Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

“Relational goods” and participation: Incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action

  • Published:
Public Choice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Theoretical explanations of why rational individuals would participate in politics remain unsatisfactory. This paper addresses the problem by developing and analyzing models which include among citizens' payoffs “relational goods,” objectives which depend upon interactions among persons. The models predict more participation than do the standard approaches. For example, under some circumstances persons will be more likely to act if they believe others will act, contrary to free-rider logic. More importantly, conditions are identified under which leaders could increase mass activity. Thus, a model is provided of “mobilization” in terms of the preferences and decisions of a rational individual.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Axelrod, R. (1986). An evolutionary approach to norms.American Political Science Review 80 (December): 1095–1111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. (1970).Sociologists, economists, and democracy. Collier-Macmillan Ltd. Reprint ed., Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.

  • Breton, A. and Breton, R. (1969). An economic theory of social movements.American Economic Review 59 (May): 198–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cloutier, E. (1976). Les conceptions américaine, canadienne-anglaise et canadienne-française de l'idée d'égalité.Canadian Journal of Political Science 9 (4): 581–604.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J.L. (1985). Strategy or identity: New theoretical paradigms and contemporary social movements.Social Research 52 (Winter): 663–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Czudnowski, M.M. (1976).Comparing political behavior. Sage Library of Social Research, Vol. 28. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M. (1980). Social dilemmas.Annual Review of Psychology 31: 169–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawes, R.M., Orbell, J.M. and van de Kragt, A.J.C. (n.d.).Cooperation in the absence of egoistic incentives. Mimeo.

  • Downs, A. (1957).An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row, Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagles, M. and Erfle, S. (1989). Community cohesion and voter turnout in English parliamentary constituencies.British Journal of Political Science 19 (January): 115–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A. and Fiorina, M.P. (1974). The paradox of not voting: A decision theoretic analysis.American Political Science Review 68 (June): 525–535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferejohn, J.A. and Fiorina, M.P. (1975). Closeness counts only in horseshoes and dancing.American Political Science Review 69 (September): 920–925.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fireman, B. and Gamson, W.A. (1979). Utilitarian logic in the resource mobilization perspective. In M.N. Zald and J.D. McCarthy (Eds.),The dynamics of social movements, 8–44. Cambridge, MA: Winthrop Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frohlich, N., Oppenheimer, J.A. and Young, O.R. (1971).Political leadership and collective goods. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gamson, W.A. (1968).Power and discontent. Homewood, IL: The Dorsey Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glazer, A. (1984, September).A new theory of voting: Why vote when millions of others do. Irvine Economics Paper No. 84-16. Mimeo.

  • Gouldner, A.W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement.American Sociological Review 25 (2): 161–178.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. and Soong, R. (1986). Threshold models of interpersonal effects in consumer demand.Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7 (1): 83–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. and Soong, R. (1983). Threshold models of diffusion and collective behavior.Journal of Mathematical Sociology 9 (3): 165–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter, M. (1978). Threshold models of collective behavior.American Journal of Sociology 83 (6): 1420–1443.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, R. (1982).Collective action. Pub. for Resources for the Future. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Homans, G.C. (1961).Social behavior: Its elementary forms. New York: Harcourt, Brace, and World.

    Google Scholar 

  • Isaac, R.M. and Walker, J.M. (1987, March).Success and failure of the voluntary contributions process: Some evidence from experimental economics. Paper presented at the Liberty Fund Seminar on the Ethics and Economics of Charity in San Diego. Mimeo.

  • Ledyard, J.O. (1981). The paradox of voting and candidate competition: A general equilibrium analysis. In G. Horwich and J.P. Quirk (Eds.),Essays in contemporary fields of economics, 54–80. Purdue Research Foundation.

  • Ledyard, J.O. (1984). The pure theory of large two candidate elections.Public Choice 44 (1): 7–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1950). Bandwagon, snob, and Veblen effects in the theory of consumers' demand.Quarterly Journal of Economics 64 (May): 183–207.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leibenstein, H. (1976).Beyond economic man: A new foundation for microeconomics. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lijphart, A. (1976).The politics of accomodation: Pluralism and democracy in the Netherlands. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luce, R.D. and Raiffa, H. (1957).Games and decisions. New York: John Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mansbridge, J.J. (1980).Beyond adversary democracy. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Margolis, H. (1982).Selfishness, altruism, and rationality: A theory of social choice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1984.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, A.H., Gurin, P., Gurin, G. and Malanchuk, O. (1981). Group consciousness and political participation.American Journal of Political Science 25 (August): 494–511.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moe, T.M. (1980).The organization of interests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberschall, A. (1973).Social conflict and social movements. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, M., Jr. (1965).The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opp, K. (1986). Soft incentives and collective action: Participation in the anti-nuclear movement.British Journal of Political Science 16 (1): 87–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palfrey, T.R. and Rosenthal, H. (1988). Private incentives in social dilemmas: The effects of incomplete information and altruism.Journal of Public Economics 35 (April): 309–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pye, L.W., with Pye, M.W. (1985).Asian power and politics: The cultural dimensions of authority. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reicher, S. and Nicholas, E. (1984). Moral orientation as a cue to political identity.Political Psychology 5 (4): 543–551.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1973).An introduction to positive political theory. Prentice-Hall Contemporary Political Theory Series. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riker, W.H. and Ordeshook, P.C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting.American Political Science Review 62 (March): 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandler, T. and Tschirhart, J.T. (1980). The economic theory of clubs: An evaluative survey.Journal of Economic Literature 18 (December): 1481–1521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugden, R. (1984). Reciprocity: The supply of public goods through voluntary contributions.Economic Journal 94 (December): 772–787.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1982). Social psychology of intergroup relations.Annual Review of Psychology 33: 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilly, C. (1978).From mobilization to revolution. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C. (1984). Social identification and psychological group formation. In H. Tajfel (Ed.),The social dimension, Vol. 2, 518–538. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J.C. (1982). Toward a cognitive redefinition of the social group. In H. Tajfel (Ed.),Social identity and intergroup relations, 15–40. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, C.J. (1978).Political participation of French Quebecois: The relationship of political cleavages to activity. Paper presented at the 1978 Annual Meeting of the Canadian Political Science Association in London, Ontario. Mimeo.

  • Uhlaner, C.J. (1986). Political participation, rational actors, and rationality.Political Psychology 7 (September): 551–573.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uhlaner, C.J. (1989). Rational turnout: The neglected role of groups.American Journal of Political Science 33 (May): 390–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Kragt, A.J.C., Dawes, R.M., Orbell, J.M., Braver, S.R. and Wilson, L.A. II. (1986). Doing well and doing good as ways of resolving social dilemmas. In H.A.M. Wilke, D.M. Messick and C.G. Rutte (Eds.),Experimental social dilemmas, 177–203. New York: Verlag Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S. and Nie, N.H. (1972).Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verba, S., Nie, N.H. and Kim, J. (1978).Participation and political equality: A seven-nation comparison. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilke, H.A.M., Rutte, C.G., Wit, A.P., Messick, D.M. and Samuelson, C.D. (1986). Leadership in social dilemmas: Efficiency and equality. In H.A.M. Wilke, D.M. Messick and C.G. Rutte (Eds.),Experimental social dilemmas, 55–76. New York: Verlag Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Social Sciences, University of California, Irvine, 92717, Irvine, CA

    Carole Jean Uhlaner

Authors
  1. Carole Jean Uhlaner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

The author thanks the Russell Sage Foundation for support as a Visiting Fellow during 1986–87. The paper has benefited from the comments of Patricia Gurin, Steve Brams, Jane Mansbridge, Linda Cohen, Tyler Cowen, Ami Glazer, and seminar participants at the University of Rochester.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Uhlaner, C.J. “Relational goods” and participation: Incorporating sociability into a theory of rational action. Public Choice 62, 253–285 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02337745

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02337745

Keywords

Search

Navigation