Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Use of dissection-related courseware by low-ability high school students: A qualitative inquiry

  • Development
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article reports on a naturalistic study conducted with 24 low-achieving high school Biology students. Observations and interviews were used to determine how the teacher and students used two different computer-based instructional programs on frog anatomy and dissection, and how students conducted a subsequent dissection. Student and teacher opinions were solicited about the different computer-based programs and the dissection laboratory. Findings suggest that dissection can be a valuable learning experience for low-achieving Biology students when they are engaged in group cooperation and interaction and receive adequate instructional preparation. Results also point to the motivation these students exhibit toward computer use, to the importance of balancing learner and program control, and to the value of considering the teacher as a possible source of both interaction and structure during courseware use. Recommendations based on these and other findings are offered for educators and instructional developers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science. (1989).Science for all Americans: A Project 2061 report on literacy goals in science, mathematics, and technology. Washington, DC: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ascher, C. (1985). Increasing science achievement in disadvantaged students.The Urban Review, 17(4), 279–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, W. (1984). Dissection dissected.The Science Teacher, 51(6), 42–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erickson, F. (1986). Qualitative methods in research on teaching. In M. Wittrock (Ed.),Handbook of research on teaching (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foss, J. (1990). A hypermedia program of the frog: A laboratory dissection of Rana pipiens. In R. V. Hairston (Ed.),The responsible use of animals in Biology classrooms (pp. 63–67). Reston, VA: The National Association of Biology Teachers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, S. (1991, December 17). Severing students from a tradition.The Washington Post, D1, D4.

  • Hooper, K. (1988). Multimedia in education. In S. Ambron & K. Hooper (Eds.),Interactive multimedia: Visions of multimedia for developers, educators, and information providers. Redmond, WA: Microsoft Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinzie, M. B., Strauss, R., and Foss, M. J. (in press). The effects of an interactive dissection simulation on the performance and achievement of high school Biology students.Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

  • Maehr, M. L. (1976). Continuing motivation: An analysis of a seldom considered educational outcome.Review of Educational Research, 46, 443–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, D. (1989). Naturalistic inquiry and computer-based instruction: Rationale, procedures, and potential.Educational Technology Research and Development, 37(3), 39–51.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, D. (1991). Learning disabled students' interactions with commercial courseware: A naturalistic study.Educational Technology Research and Development, 39(1), 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, R., & Kinzie, M. (1991). Hi-tech alternatives to dissection.American Biology Teacher, 53, 154–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Technology and the at-risk student: Outcomes from the first annual Technology Leadership Conference. (1988).Electronic Learning, 8(3), 36–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yelverton, B. J. (1991, September). Reverse dissection.The Science Teacher, 58(9), 72–74.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. the University of Virginia, USA

    Mable B. Kinzie & Susan M. Powers

  2. Albemarle County Public Schools, USA

    M. Jean Foss

Authors
  1. Mable B. Kinzie
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Jean Foss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Susan M. Powers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

As participating teacher in this research, Mrs. Foss' integral and enthusiastic involvement is recognized with co-authorship of this article. She has asked to be identified by name rather than by a pseudonym.

The paper on which this article was based was presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association (AERA) in April 1993. The authors thank Mary Catherine Ellwein and an anonymous reviewer for their valuable comments on an earlier draft. Correspondence may be directed to Mable Kinzie at the Department of Educational Studies, Curry School of Education, University of Virginia, 405 Emmet Street, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2495.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kinzie, M.B., Jean Foss, M. & Powers, S.M. Use of dissection-related courseware by low-ability high school students: A qualitative inquiry. ETR&D 41, 87–101 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297359

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02297359

Keywords

Search

Navigation