Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Student Equity in Australian Higher Education pp 257–274Cite as

From Equity to Excellence: Reforming Australia’s National Framework to Create New Forms of Success

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This chapter asserts the need to renovate and improve the equity framework advanced in A Fair Chance for All in order to support and shape the future of Australian higher education. Failing to renovate this national framework after 25 years renders it exposed to being further swamped and sidelined by other institutional and national initiatives, with many such initiatives residing outside the Framework in an undefined fashion. In this chapter we affirm the continued need for a national equity framework, but suggest that it must be expanded to fit contemporary contexts and do more to ameliorate educational disadvantage in Australia. We advance the need to create a more sophisticated perspective on student success that shifts focus from access to outcomes. A shift in policy emphasis should also move beyond preoccupation with the prospects of a small number of tightly defined groups. We discuss rationales and options for moving un-anxiously from a focus on groups to a focus on individuals. The success of any such change rests on the availability of robust and accessible evidence. The concluding section of this chapter looks at current prospects and opportunities for development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abes, E. S. (2009). Theoretical borderlands: Using multiple theoretical perspectives to challenge inequitable power structures in student development theory. Journal of College Student Development, 50(2), 141-156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1985). Achieving educational excellence: A critical assessment of priorities and practices in higher education. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Astin, A. W. (1993). An empirical typology of college students. Journal of College Student Development, 34, 36–46.

    Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS). (2015). Ausstats. Accessed from: www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/ViewContent?readform&view=productsbyCatalogue&Action=Expand&Num=7.1

  • Australian Council of Social Services (ACOSS). (2014). Poverty in Australia. Canberra: ACOSS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baik, C., Naylor, R., & Arkoudis, S. (2015). The first year experience in Australian universities: Finding from two decades, 1994–2014. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boyer, E. L. (1987). College: The undergraduate experience in America. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braxton, J. M. (2009). Understanding the development of the whole person. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 573–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cave, M. (1997). The use of performance indicators in higher education: The challenge of the quality movement. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, B. (1997). Conceptual issues and the Australian experience with income-contingent charges for higher education. The Economic Journal, 107(442), 738–751.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R., & Trow, M. (1966). The organizational context. In A. W. Astin (Ed.), College peer groups: Problems and prospects for research. Chicago: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. (2010). Defining and monitoring academic standards in Australian higher education. Higher Education Management and Policy, 22(1), 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. (2014a). Students’ early departure intention and the mitigating role of support. Australian Universities Review, 56(2), 20–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H. (2014b). Higher education learning outcomes assessment. Frankfurt: Peter Lang Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., & Edwards, D. (2010). The graduate pathways survey: New insights on education and employment outcomes five years after completion of a bachelor degree at an Australian university. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(3), 74–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., & Goedegebuure, L. (2012). Recasting the academic workforce: Why the attractiveness of the academic profession needs to be increased and eight possible strategies for how to go about this from an Australian perspective. Higher Education, 64, 875–889.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., & Kelly, P. (2015). Study success in Australia. Brussells: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., & Krause, K. (2005). Investigating ten years of equity policy in Australian higher education. Higher Education Policy and Management, 27(1), 35–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coates, H., & Mahat, M. (2014). Threshold quality parameters in hybrid higher education. Higher Education, 68(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuenin, S. (1998). Performance indicators in higher education: A study of their development and use in 15 OECD countries. Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Augelli, A. R. (1994). Identity development and sexual orientation: Toward a model of lesbian, gay, and bisexual development. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts, & D. Birman (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 312–333). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education. (2014). Higher education statistics. Retrieved September 30, 2014, from http://education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics

  • Department of Education. (2015). Selected higher education statistics. Retrieved April 8, 2015, from http://education.gov.au/higher-education-statistics

  • Department of Education and Training (DET). (2015). Higher education statistics. Accessed from: https://education.gov.au/selected-higher-education-statistics-2013-student-data

  • Department of Employment, Education and Training (DEET). (1990). A fair chance for all: National and institutional planning for equity in higher education. Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Employment, Education and Training (DEET). (1993). National report on Australia’s higher education sector. Canberra: DEET.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dill, B. T., & Zambrana, R. E. (2009). Critical thinking about inequality: An emerging lens. In Emerging intersections: Race, class, and gender in theory, policy, and practice (pp. 1–21). New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferdman, B. M., & Gallegos, P. I. (2001). Racial identity development and Latinos in the United States. In New perspectives on racial identity development: A theoretical and practical anthology (pp. 32–66). New York: New York University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T. (2012). Towards a southern theory of higher education. Paper presented at the preparing for tomorrow today: The first year experience as foundation: First Year in Higher Education Conference 2009, Conference proceedings, Townsville, 29 June–1 July 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gale, T., & Tranter, D. (2011). Social justice in Australian higher education policy: An historical and conceptual account of student participation. Critical Studies in Education, 52(1), 29–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • James, R. (2002). Socioeconomic background and higher education participation: An analysis of school students’ aspirations and expectations. Canberra: Department of Education, Science and Training.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, R. (2007). Social equity in a mass, globalised higher education environment: The unresolved issue of widening access to university. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnes, J., & Taylor, J. (1991). Performance indicators in higher education: UK universities. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kells, H. (Ed.). (1993). The development of performance indicators in higher education: A compendium of twelve countries. Paris: Centre for Educational Research and Innovation and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, D., & Norton, A. (2014). Review of the demand driven funding system. Canberra: Department of Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, M. M. (2002). Historically Black vs. White institutions: Academic development among Black students. The Review of Higher Education, 25(4), 385–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linder, C., & Rodriguez, K. L. (2012). Learning from the experiences of self-identified women of color activists. Journal of College Student Development, 53(3), 383–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linke, R. D. (1991). Report of the research group on performance indicators in higher education. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm, Z. T., & Mendoza, P. (2014). Afro-Caribbean international students’ ethnic identity development: Fluidity, intersectionality, agency, and performativity. Journal of College Student Development, 55(6), 595–614.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrill, B. (1999). Gender, change and identity: Mature women students in universities. Brookfield: Ashgate Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Commission on Excellence in Education (NCEE). (1983). A nation at risk: The imperative for educational reform. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naylor, R., Baik, C., & James, R. (2013). Developing a critical interventions framework for advancing equity in Australian higher education. Melbourne: The University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, A. (2014). Language background should be dropped as a higher ed equity category. Retrieved July 29, 2014, from http://andrewnorton.net.au/2014/07/28/language-background-should-be-dropped-as-a-higher-ed-equity-group/

  • Oliver, B. (2011). Assuring graduate outcomes. Strawberry Hills: Australian Learning and Teaching Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, N., Bexley, E., & James, R. (2011). Selection and participation in higher education. University selection in support of student success and diversity of participation. Melbourne: Centre for the Study of Higher Education/University of Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, A., Coates, H., James, R., & Krause, K. (2012). Development of the University Experience Survey (UES). Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rockenbach, A. N., Mayhew, M. J., & Bowman, N. A. (2015). Perceptions of the campus climate for nonreligious students. Journal of College Student Development, 56(2), 181–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sax, L. J. (2008). The gender gap in college: Maximizing the developmental potential of women and men. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency (TEQSA). (2015). National register of higher education providers. Accessed from: www.teqsa.gov.au/national-register

  • Torres, V., Jones, S. R., & Renn, K. A. (2009). Identity development theories in student affairs: Origins, current status, and new approaches. Journal of College Student Development, 50(6), 577–596.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yorke, M., & Longden, B. (2004). Retention and student success in higher education. New York: McGraw-Hill International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zepke, N., & Leach, L. (2010). Beyond hard outcomes: ‘Soft’ outcomes and engagement as student success. Teaching in Higher Education, 15(6), 661–673.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education (MCSHE), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia

    Ryan Naylor, Hamish Coates & Paula Kelly

Authors
  1. Ryan Naylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hamish Coates
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Paula Kelly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ryan Naylor .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Andrew Harvey

  2. Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Catherine Burnheim

  3. La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia

    Matthew Brett

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer Science+Business Media Singapore

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Naylor, R., Coates, H., Kelly, P. (2016). From Equity to Excellence: Reforming Australia’s National Framework to Create New Forms of Success. In: Harvey, A., Burnheim, C., Brett, M. (eds) Student Equity in Australian Higher Education. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0315-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0315-8_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore

  • Print ISBN: 978-981-10-0313-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-981-10-0315-8

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation