Skip to main content

The Other-Race Effect Revisited: No Effect for Faces Varying in Race Only

  • Chapter
Recent Progress in Brain and Cognitive Engineering

Part of the book series: Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance ((TAHP,volume 5))

  • 1563 Accesses

Abstract

The other-race effect refers to the observation that we perform better in tasks involving faces of our own race compared to faces of a race we are not familiar with. This is especially interesting as from a biological perspective, the category “race” does in fact not exist (Cosmides L, Tooby J, Krurzban R, Trends Cogn Sci 7(4):173–179, 2003); visually, however, we do group the people around us into such categories. Usually, the other-race effect is investigated in memory tasks where observers have to learn and subsequently recognize faces of individuals of different races (Meissner CA, Brigham JC, Psychol Public Policy Law 7(1):3–35, 2001) but it has also been demonstrated in perceptual tasks where observers compare one face to another on a screen (Walker PM, Tanaka J, Perception 32(9):1117–1125, 2003). In all tasks (and primarily for technical reasons) the test faces differ in race and identity. To broaden our general understanding of the effect that the race of a face has on the observer, in the present study, we investigated whether an other-race effect is also observed when participants are confronted with faces that differ only in ethnicity but not in identity. To that end, using Asian and Caucasian faces and a morph algorithm (Blanz V, Vetter T, A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques – SIGGRAPH’99, pp 187–194, 1999), we manipulated each original Asian or Caucasian face to generate face “race morphs” that shared the same identity but whose race appearance was manipulated stepwise toward the other ethnicity. We presented each Asian or Caucasian face pair (original face and a race morph) to Asian (South Korea) and Caucasian (Germany) participants who had to judge which face in each pair looked “more Asian” or “more Caucasian”. In both groups, participants did not perform better for same-race pairs than for other-race pairs. These results point to the importance of identity information for the occurrence of an other-race effect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Moses Y, Adini Y, Ullman S (1994) Face recognition: the problem of compensating for changes in illumination direction. Lect Notes Comput Sci 800:286–296

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosmides L, Tooby J, Krurzban R (2003) Perceptions of race. Trends Cogn Sci 7(4):173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Jenkins R, White D, Van Montfort X, Burton AM (2011) Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition 121(3):313–323

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou X, Laurence S, Mondloch C (2014) They all look different to me: within-person variability affects identity perception for other-race faces more than own-race faces. J Vis 10(13): 1263, Meeting abstract presented at VSS 2014

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hugenberg K, Young SG, Bernstein MJ, Sacco DF (2010) The categorization-individuation model: an integrative account of the other-race recognition deficit. Psychol Rev 117(4):1168–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Anastasi JS, Rhodes MG (2005) An own-age bias in face recognition for children and older adults. Psychon Bull Rev 12(6):1043–1047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kuefner D, Cassia VM, Picozzi M, Bricolo E (2008) Do all kids look alike ? Evidence for an other-age effect in adults. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 34(4):811–817

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Armony JL, Sergerie K (2007) Own-sex effects in emotional memory for faces. Neurosci Lett 426(1):1–5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kret ME, De Gelder B (2012) A review on sex differences in processing emotional signals. Neuropsychologia 50(7):1211–1221

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Megreya AM, Bindemann M, Havard C (2011) Sex differences in unfamiliar face identification: evidence from matching tasks. Acta Psychol 137(1):83–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Zhao M, Hayward WG, Bülthoff I (2014) Face format at encoding affects the other-race effect in face memory. J Vis 14:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ekman P, Friesen WV (1976) Pictures of facial affect. Consulting Psychologists Press, Palo Alto

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bülthoff I, Newell FN (2004) Categorical perception of sex occurs in familiar but not unfamiliar faces. Vis Cogn 11(7):823–855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Armann R, Bülthoff I (2012) Male and female faces are only perceived categorically when linked to familiar identities–and when in doubt, he is a male. Vis Res 63:69–80

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Levin DT (1996) Classifying faces by race: the structure of face categories. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 22(6):1364–1382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Rhodes G, Ewing L, Hayward WG, Maurer D, Mondloch CJ, Tanaka J (2009) Contact and other-race effects in configural and component processing of faces. Br J Psychol 100(Pt 4):717–728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Goldstone RL (1994) Influences of categorization on perceptual discrimination. J Exp Psychol Gen 123(2):178–200

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Blanz V, Vetter T (1999) A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on computer graphics and interactive techniques, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., Los Angeles, pp 187–194

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beale JM, Keil FC (1995) Categorical effects in the perception of faces. Cognition 57(3):217–239

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin DT (2000) Race as a visual feature: using visual search and perceptual discrimination tasks to understand face categories and the cross-race recognition deficit. J Exp Psychol Gen 129(4):559–574

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Armann R, Bülthoff I (2009) Gaze behavior in face comparison: the roles of sex, task, and symmetry. Atten Percept Psychophys 71(5):1107–1126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Toole AJ, Deffenbacher KA, Valentin D, Abdi H (1994) Structural aspects of face recognition and the other-race effect. Mem Cogn 22(2):208–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee RK, Bülthoff I, Armann R, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2011) The other-race effect is not ubiquitous. J Vis 11(11):626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lee RK, Bülthoff I, Armann R, Wallraven C, Bülthoff HH (2011) Investigating the other-race effect in different face recognition tasks. Iperception 2(4):355–355

    Google Scholar 

  25. Hayward WG, Rhodes G, Schwaninger A (2008) An own-race advantage for components as well as configurations in face recognition. Cognition 106(2):1017–1027

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Meissner CA, Brigham JC (2001) Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: a meta-analytic review. Psychol Public Policy Law 7(1):3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Walker PM, Tanaka J (2003) An encoding advantage for own-race versus other-race faces. Perception 32(9):1117–1125

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Megreya AM, White D, Burton AM (2011) The other-race effect does not rely on memory: evidence from a matching task. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 64(8):1473–1483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruce V, Young AW (1986) Understanding face recognition. Br J Psychol 77(3):305–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schweinberger SR, Soukup GR (1998) Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 24(6):1748–1765

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Baudouin J-Y, Tiberghien G (2002) Gender is a dimension of face recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 28(2):362–365

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Ganel T, Goshen-Gottstein Y (2002) Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 28(4):854–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bruyer R, Leclere S, Quinet P (2004) Ethnic categorisation of faces is not independent of face identity. Perception 33(2):169–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Karin Bierig for her help in running this experiment. This study was supported by the Max Planck Society, by the WCU (World Class University) program and by the Brain Korea 21 PLUS Program both funded by the Ministry of Education through the National Research Foundation of Korea. Please address correspondence to I. Bülthoff (isabelle.buelthoff@tuebingen.mpg.de).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isabelle Bülthoff .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bülthoff, I., Armann, R.G.M., Lee, R.K., Bülthoff, H.H. (2015). The Other-Race Effect Revisited: No Effect for Faces Varying in Race Only. In: Lee, SW., Bülthoff, H., Müller, KR. (eds) Recent Progress in Brain and Cognitive Engineering. Trends in Augmentation of Human Performance, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-7239-6_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics