Skip to main content

Current procedures

  • Conference paper
  • 59 Accesses

Part of the book series: Environment & Policy ((ENPO,volume 5))

Abstract

A procedure in backcasting scenarios is presented. Two case studies differing in scale are used to illustrate the differences in ecological contribution to plandesign and to plan evaluation. Scenarios for naturedevelopment are presented for both case studies, based on ecological objectives and spatial strategies in planning. In order to evaluate the ecological impact of the scenarios a computermodel, LEDESS, using a geographical information system, wasdeveloped. The model is an expert system describing the development of vegetation and animal habitats in relation to abiotic conditions and management. It is more a tool for policy making in planning than an accurate predictive model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

References

  • De Jong, T.M., 1992. Kleine methodologie voor ontwerpend onderzoek. Boom. Meppel, Amsterdam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, W.B. (red.), 1987. Ecologische infrastructuur en natuurontwikkeling in de Randstad. Rapport De Dorschkamp nr. Rijksinstituut voor onderzoek in de Bos- en Landschapsbouw De Dorschkamp, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, W.B. and J.P. Knaapen, 1988. Landscape planning and ecological infrastructure: The Randstad study. In: K.F. Schreiber (ed.). Connectivity in landscape ecology. Münsterische Geographische Arbeiten 29. Münster, FRG,pp. 163–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, W.B., J.P. Knaapen & J. Roos-Klein Lankhorst (red.). 1991. Natuurontwikkeling in de Centrale Open Ruimte. SC-DLO Rapport 138. DLO-Staring Centrum, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, W.B., J.P. Knaapen & J.G.M. Rademakers. Landscape planning for nature restoration; comparing regional scenarios. In: Vos, C & P. Opdam (eds.) Landscape ecology and management of a landscape under stress. IALE-studies 1. Chapman & Hall, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harms, W.B. en J. Roos-Klein Lankhorst (red.). 1994. Toekomst voor de natuur in de Gelderse Poort; planvorming en evaluatie. SC-DLO Rapport 298.1. DLO-Staring Centrum, Wageningen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmer, W., W. Overmars & G. Litjens. 1990. RivierenparkGelderse Poort. Stroming, bureau voor natuur- en landschapsontwikkeling b.v., Laag-Keppel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min. LNV. 1990. Ministerie van Landbouw, Natuurbeheer en Visserij, Natuurbeleidsplan; regeringsbeslissing. SDU. The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

References

  • Emmelin, L. (1995). ‘Landscape Impact Analysis: a method for strategic environmental impact analysis’. This volume.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmelin, L., & Brusewitz, G. (1982) Painting the future. Visual impact analysis of changes in the Swedish landscape. Forskningsrådsnämnden, Delegationen för långsiktsmotiverad forskning, Stockholm. 92pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmelin, L., & Brusewitz, G. (1985) Det föränderliga landskapet — utvecklingoch framtidsbilder. LTs förlag, Stockholm. 128pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Emmelin, L., Jones, M., & Ree, H. (1990) Landskap på Jæren og Romerike. Utvikling og framtidsbilder. Landbrukspolitikk og miljø del II, Kulturlandskap. Landbruksforlaget/Senter for forskningsoppdrag, Oslo. 32pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1992) Landscape impacts of alternative agricultural policies: a visual impact analysis in Jæren and Romerike, Norway. L’avenir des paysages ruraux européens entre gestion des héritages et dynamique du changement. Conférence européenne permanente pour l’étude du paysage rural. Standing European Conference for the Study of Rural Landscape. Colloque de Lyon, 9–13 juin 1992, pp. 255–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, M. (1993) Economy versus ecology — challenges for agriculture in Norway in the light of some West European experiences. Bebyggelseshistorisk Tidskrift 26, 43–65.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 1995 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this paper

Cite this paper

Harms, W.B., Jones, M., Emmelin, L. (1995). Current procedures. In: Schoute, J.F.T., Finke, P.A., Veeneklaas, F.R., Wolfert, H.P. (eds) Scenario Studies for the Rural Environment. Environment & Policy, vol 5. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0441-8_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0441-8_14

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-4197-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-011-0441-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics