Skip to main content

Obstacles to the Dissemination of Mathematics Education Research

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer International Handbooks of Education ((SIHE,volume 10))

Abstract

Mathematics education research has often been undertaken with an expectation that the results would have some influence on teachers’ practice and on educational policies including curriculum, but numerous obstacles seem to limit that influence. This investigation of the topic begins by exploring the meanings of the words obstacles, dissemination, mathematics, education, and research. In section 2, the development process and the relationship between research, policy, and practice are examined. Next, some variables that influence change are considered. In the fourth section, some of the obstacles are discussed under the headings ‘research and researchers’, ‘teachers and schools’, and ‘systems’. Finally, three strategies for the future are suggested; these relate to communication and complexity, changing the development model, and extending the boundaries of research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   429.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   549.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Abram, D. (1996). The spell of the sensuous: Perception and language in a more than human world. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmed, A. (1987). Better mathematics: A curriculum development study based on The Low Attainers in Mathematics Project. London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aichele, D., & Coxford, A. (Eds.). (1994). Professional development for teachers of mathematics (1994 Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics). Reston, VA: NCTM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Assessment Performance Unit. (1985). A review of monitoring in mathematics 1978 to 1982 (Parts 1 & 2). London: Department of Education and Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, T., & Claxton, G. (2000). The intuitive practitioner: On the value of not always knowing what one is doing. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batchelor, S. (1998). Buddhism without beliefs: A contemporary guide to awakening. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1979). Mind and nature: A necessary unity. New York: E. P. Dutton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (1991). A sacred unity: Further steps to an ecology of mind (R. E. Donaldson, Ed.). New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bateson, G. (2000). Steps to an ecology of mind (New, N. ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1972 by Ballentine Books, New York)

    Google Scholar 

  • Begg, A. (1994). Professional development of high school mathematics teachers. Unpublished D.Phil. thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beishuisen, M., Gravemeijer, K., & van Lieshout, E. (Eds.). (1997). The role of contexts and models in the development of mathematical strategies and procedures. Utrecht: Freudenthal Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bertalanffy, L. von. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. New York: Braziller.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1977). On loosening the constructs. Plenary presentation at the annual conference of the Mathematical Association of Victoria, Melbourne.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1988). Mathematical enculturation: A cultural perspective on mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1992). International perspectives on research in mathematics education. In D. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 710–723). New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, A. (1996). Introduction. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1–4). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, P., & Atkin, J. (Eds.). (1996). Changing the subject: Innovations in science, mathematics andtechnology education. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bramald, R., Miller, J., & Higgins, S. (2000). ICT, mathematics and effective teaching. MathematicsEducation Review, 12, 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvin, W. (1996). How brains think: Evolving intelligence, then and now. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cambridge Institute of Education. (1985). New perspectives on the mathematics curriculum: An independent appraisal of the outcomes of APU mathematics testing 1978–82 (Report for the Department of Education and Science). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capra, F. (1996). The web of life: A new scientific understanding of living systems. New York: Anchor. (Also published as The web of life: A new synthesis of mind and matter, London, Harper Collins)

    Google Scholar 

  • Casti, J. (1994). Complexification: Explaining a paradoxical world through the science of surprise. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claxton, G. (1999). Wise up: The challenge of lifelong learning. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb, P. (1994). Where is the mind? Constructivist and sociocultural perspectives on mathematics development. Educational Researcher, 23(1), 13–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). The teacher research movement; A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(1), 15–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, J., & Stewart, I. (1994). The collapse of chaos: Discovering simplicity in a complex world. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalin, P. (1986). From leadership training to educational development: IMTEC as an international experience. In E. Hoyle & A. McMahon (Eds.), The management of schools (World Yearbook of Education, pp. 297–309). London: Kogan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: G P Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2000). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York: Harcourt & Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (1995). Thinking otherwise and hearing differently: Enactivism and school mathematics. Journal of Curriculum Theorizing, 11(4), 31–58. (Reprinted in Pinar W. (Ed.). (1999). Contemporary curriculum discourses: Twenty years of JCT (pp. 325–345). New York: Peter Lang Publishing)

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Towards a sound alternative. New York: Garland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (1997). Cognition, complexity, and teacher education. Harvard Educational Review, 67(1), 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, B., Sumara, D., & Luce-Kapler, R. (2000). Engaging minds: Learning and teaching in a complex world. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, P., & Hersh, R. (1981). The mathematical experience. Boston: Birkhausen

    Google Scholar 

  • Dawson, S. (1999). The enactivist perspective on teacher development: ‘A path laid while walking’. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood, & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 148–162). London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Mello, A. (1990). Awareness. London: Fount.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Education and Science and the Welsh Office. (1982). Mathematics counts (Report of the Committee of Inquiry into the Teaching of Mathematics in Schools under the Chairmanship of Cockcroft, W.). London: Her Majesty’s Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Education and Employment. (1998). The implementation of the national numeracy strategy: The final report of the numeracy task force. London: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, B. (1991). ‘Teachers as experts’: A case study of school-based staff development. In L. Bell & C. Day (Eds.), Managing the professional development of teachers (pp. 88–109). Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. (1987). Neural Darwinism: The theory of neuronal group selection. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernest, P. (1991). The philosophy of mathematics education. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1982). Research into educational innovation. In H. Gray (Ed.), The management of educational institutions (pp. 245–261). Lewes: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M. (1989). Planning, doing, and coping with change. In B. Moon, P. Murphy & J. Raynor (Eds.), Policies for the curriculum (pp. 183–211). London: Hodder and Stoughton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fullan, M., with Stiegelbauer, S. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gadamer, H.-G. (1990). Truth and method. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (1992). Hermeneutics and education. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giorgi, A. (1970). Psychology as a human science: A phenomenologically based approach. New York: Harper and Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass, G., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverley Hills: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goleman, D. (1996). Emotional intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ. London: Bloomsbury.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravemeijer, K. (2000). Didatical phenomenological analysis as a design heuristic: Early statistics as anexample. Paper presented in Working Group 8 ‘Research, Theory and Practice’ at the Ninth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Makuhari, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grouws, D. (Ed.). (1992). Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K., Johnson, D., Brown, M., Dickson, L., & Clarkson, R. (1989). Children’s mathematical frameworks 8–13: A study of classroom teaching. Windsor: NFER/Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart, K., Kerslake, D., Brown, M., Ruddock, G., Küchemann, D., & McCartney, M. (1981). Children’sunderstanding of mathematics: 11–16. London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatch, G, & Shiu, C. (1998). Practitioner research and the construction of knowledge in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 297–315). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiebert, J. (Ed.). (1986). Conceptual and procedural knowledge: The case for mathematics. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howson, G., Keitel, C, & Kilpatrick, J. (1981). Curriculum development in mathematics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. (1987). The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination and reasoning. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, A., & Lesh, R. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kieren, T. (1995). Teaching in the middle: Enactivist view on teaching and learning mathematics. Invited plenary at Queens/Gage Canadian National Mathematics Leadership Conference: Queens University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, J. (1996). Introduction to Section 1. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick, & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 7–9). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurti, J. (1956). Education and the significance of life. London: Victor Gollancz.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lakoff, G, & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh: The embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lampert, M. (2000). Knowing teaching: The intersection of research on teaching and qualitative research. Harvard Educational Review, 70(1), 86–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lortie, D. (1975). Schoolteacher: A sociological study. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malone, J. (2000). Bridging the gap: A challenge for the dual community. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000 (Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, pp. 27-36). Fremantle: MERGA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mason, J. (1998). Researching from the inside in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain: A search for identity (pp. 357–377). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1987). The tree of knowledge: The biological roots of human understanding. Boston: Shambhala Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (Eds.). (1980). Autopoiesis and cognition: The realization of the living. Dordrecht: Reidel.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mingers, J. (1995). Self-producing systems: Implications and applications of autopoiesis. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, D., Higgins, S., Bramald, R., Hardman, F., Miller, J., Mroz, M., Tse, H., Newton, D., Thompson, I., Williamson, J., Halligan, J., & Bramald, S. (1999). Ways forward with ICT: Effective pedagogy using information and communications technology for literacy and numeracy in primary schools (Report for the Teacher Training Agency, London). Newcastle: University of Newcastle upon Tyne.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nhãt Hanh, T. (1987). The miracle of mindfulness: A manual on meditation (Rev. ed.). Boston: Beacon Press. (Original work published 1975 as Phép la cua su tinh thuc, translated by Mobi Ho).

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1992). The challenge to care in schools. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nørretranders, T. (1998). The user illusion: Cutting consciousness down to size (J. Sydenham, Trans.). New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotkin, H. (1998). Evolution in mind: An introduction to evolutionary psychology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Posner, G., Strike, K., Hewson, P., & Gertzog, W. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, M. (1992). Towards a professional development ethos. Paper presented at the 15th Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia, University of Western Sydney, Nepean.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, I. (1989). The empowerment paradigm for the professional development of teachers of mathematics. In N. Ellerton & M. Clements. (Eds.), School mathematics: The challenge to change (pp. 269-283). Geelong: Deakin University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, O. (1995). A new vision of the mind. In J. Cornwell (Ed.), Nature’s imagination: The frontiers of scientific vision (pp. 101–121). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Secondary Mathematics Individualised Learning Experiment (SMILE). (1986). GCSE aims and objectives. London: SMILE/Inner London Education Authority.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sowder, J. (2000). Editorial. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 31(1), 2–4.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffe, L., & Gale, J. (Eds.). (1993). Constructivism in education. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sumara, D., & Davis, B. (1997). Enactivist theory and community learning: Towards a complexified understanding of action research. Educational Action Research, 5(3), 403–422.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, A. (1984). The relationship of teachers’ conceptions of mathematics and mathematics teaching to instructional practice. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 105–127.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanier, J. (1998). Becoming human (CBC Massey Lecture Series). Toronto: Anansi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. (1999). Ethical know-how: Action, wisdom and cognition. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Glasersfeld, E. (1995). Radical constructivism: A way of knowing and learning. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walkerdine, V. (1987). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiliam, D., & Lee, C. (2001, September). Teachers developing assessment for learning: Impact onstudent achievement. Paper presented at the 27th annual conference of the British Education Research Association, University of Leeds, Leeds.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, D., Wilson, K., Richardson, A., Tuson, J., & Coles, L. (1998). Teachers’ ICT skills andknowledge needs: Final report to SOEID. Retrieved September 26, 2002 from http://www.gov.uk/library/ict/append-title.htm

  • Wittmann, E. (2000). Developing mathematics education in a systemic process. Plenary lecture pre-sented at the Ninth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Makuhari, Japan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zack, V., Mousley, J., & Breen, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developing practice: Teachers’ inquiry and educational change, Geelong: Deakin University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Begg, A., Davis, B., Bramald, R. (2003). Obstacles to the Dissemination of Mathematics Education Research. In: Bishop, A.J., Clements, M.A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F.K.S. (eds) Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3951-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0273-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive

Publish with us

Policies and ethics