Abstract
In this chapter, contrasting views on the contributions that teachers as researchers are making to the field of mathematics education are used as a springboard to examine developments over the past decade. On the one hand, there is a growing movement for more teachers to become involved in a critical exploration of their practice through such methods as critical reflection, action research, and lesson studies. The contrasting position makes the claim that these activities have done little to add to the body of knowledge on mathematics education. The chapter starts by scanning the literature in mathematics education and then takes a step back and explores the broad roots and issues of the teacher-researcher movement. A particular example of teachers studying for a higher degree in teaching provides an opportunity to explore the interface between the two contrasting positions. The chapter closes with an appeal to academics in mathematics education to seek ways to listen to and engage with the informed voices of teachers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Boulter, C. (2000, January). Research by primary school science teachers: Reflections on the relationship of research to professional development at times of curriculum change. In J. Kuiper (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 1–12). Port Elizabeth: University of Port Elizabeth Press.
Breen, C. (2000). Re-searching teaching: Changing paradigms to improve practice. In M. A. Clements, H. H. Tairab & W. K. Yoong (Eds.), Science, mathematics and technical education in the 20th and 21st centuries (pp. 94–103). Gadong: Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Department of Science and Mathematics Education.
Breen, C. (2002). Researching teaching: Moving from gut feeling to disciplined conversation. South African Journal of Higher Education, 16(2), 25–31.
Breen, C, Lebethe, A., & Agherdien, G. (in press). A case for collaborative staff development: A path layered while walking. In A. Peter, A. Begg, C. Breen & V. Santos-Wagner (Eds.), Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Cochran-Smith, M. (1991). Learning to teach against the grain. Harvard Educational Review, 51(3), 279–310.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1992). Communities for teacher research: Fringe or forefront? American Journal of Education, 100, 298–324.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1999). The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher, 28(7), 15–25.
Colyn, W. (Ed.). (1992). Reflections: Mathematics teachers’ voices. Cape Town: University of Cape Town, Mathematics Education Project.
Crawford, K., & Adler, J. (1996). Teachers as researchers in mathematics education. In A. Bishop, K. Clements, C. Keitel, J. Kilpatrick & C. Laborde (Eds.), International handbook of mathematics education (pp. 1187–1205). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Davis, B. (1996). Teaching mathematics: Toward a sound alternative. New York: Garland Publishing.
Ensor, P. (2000, July). Recognising and realizing ‘best practice’ in initial teacher education and classroom teaching. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 235–242). Fremantle, Western Australia: Executive Press.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1994). The knower and the known: The nature of knowledge in research on teaching. Review of Research in Education, 20, 3–56.
Fuchs, S. (1995). The new wars of truth: Conflicts over science studies as differentiated modes of observation. Social Science Information, 35(2), 307–326.
Gadamer, H.-G. (1975). Truth and method (2nd rev. ed). New York: Crossroad Publishing.
Hatch, G., & Shiu, C. (1998). Practitioner research and the construction of knowledge in mathematics education. In A. Sierpinska & J. Kilpatrick (Eds.), Mathematics education as a research domain (Book 2, pp. 297–315). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Hewitt, D. (1995, May). Response to Paul’s comments on the principle of economy in the learning and teaching of maths. Philosophy of Mathematics Education Newsletter, 8.
Hiebert, J., & Stigler, J. W. (2000). A proposal for improving classroom teaching: Lessons from the TIMSS video study. Elementary School Journal, 101, 3–20.
Hollingsworth, S. (Ed.) (1997). International action research: A casebook for educational reform. Washington, DC: Falmer.
Huberman, M. (1996). Moving mainstream: Taking a closer look at teacher research. Language Arts, 73(2), 124–140.
Irwin, K., & Britt, M. (1999). Teachers’ knowledge of mathematics and reflective professional development. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 91–101). London: Falmer.
Jaworski, B., Wood, T., & Dawson, S. (Eds.). (1999). Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives. London: Falmer.
Jipson, J., & Paley, N. (Eds.). (1997). Daredevil research: Re-creating analytic practice. New York: Peter Lang.
Kilpatrick, J. (2000). Research in mathematics education across two centuries. In M. A. Clements, H. H. Tairab & W. K. Yoong (Eds.), Science, mathematics and technical education in the 20th and 21st centuries (pp. 79–93). Gadong: Universiti Brunei Darussalam, Department of Science and Mathematics Education.
Kincheloe, J. (1991). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: Falmer.
Krainer, K. (1999). PFL-Mathematics: Improving professional practice in mathematics teaching. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 102–112). London: Falmer.
Krainer, K. (2000, August). Teacher education as research: A trend in European mathematics teachereducation. Paper presented to Working Group for Action 7 at the Ninth International Congress on Mathematical Education, Tokyo.
Levin, D. (1989). The listening self: Personal growth, social change and the closure of metaphysics. London: Routledge.
Lewis, C. (2000, April). Lesson study: The core of Japanese professional development. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans.
Lytle, S. (1993, Winter). Risky business. Quarterly of the National Writing Project and the Center for the Study of Writing and Literacy, 15(1), 20–23.
Malone, J. (2000, July). Bridging the gap: A challenge for the dual community. In J. Bana & A. Chapman (Eds.), Mathematics education beyond 2000: Proceedings of the 23rd Annual Conference of the Mathematics Education Research Group of Australasia (pp. 27–36). Fremantle, Western Australia: Executive Press.
Mason, J. (1994, July). Researching from the inside: Locating an I-you relationship. In J. Ponte & J. Matos (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Meeting of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 176–190). Lisbon: Faculdade Ciencias Universidade de Lisboa.
Mason, J. (2001). Researching your own practice: The discipline of noticing. London: Routledge Falmer.
Maturana, H., & Varela, F. (1986). The tree of knowledge. New York: Shambhala.
Mbeki, N. (1992). Problems facing our pupils. In W. Colyn (Ed.), Reflections: Mathematics teachers’ voices (pp. 26–34). Cape Town: University of Cape Town, Mathematics Education Project.
McDonald, J. (1982). Teaching: Making sense of an uncertain craft. New York: Teachers College Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1962). Phenomenology of perception. London: Routledge.
Mousley, J. (1997). An introduction: Teachers’ inquiry. In V. Zack, J. Mousley & C. Breen (Eds.), Developing practice: Teachers’ inquiry and educational change (pp. 1–10). Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Muller, J. P. (1999). Reason, reality and public trust: The case of educational research for policy. In N. Taylor & P. Vinjevold (Eds.), Getting learning right (pp. 37–64). Johannesburg: Joint Education Trust.
Noffke, S. (1997). Professional, personal and political dimensions of action research. Review of Research in Education, 22, 305–343.
Olson, M. (1997). Collaboration: An epistemological shift. In H. Christiansen, L. Goulet, C. Krentz & M. Maeers (Eds.), Recreating relationships: Collaboration and educational reform (pp. 13–25). Albany: State University of New York Press.
Peter, A., Begg, A., Breen, C, & Santos-Wagner, V. (Eds.), (in press). Collaboration in teacher education: Examples from the context of mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Setati, M. (2000, January). Classroom based research: From with or on teachers to with and on teachers. In S. Mahlomaholo (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Science, Mathematics and Technology Education (pp. 511–520). Port Elizabeth: University of Port Elizabeth Press.
Taole, K. (2000, January). Calling for a shift in the existing research culture. In S. Mahlomaholo (Ed.), Proceedings of the 8th annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics, Science and Technology Education (pp. 37–41). Port Elizabeth: University of Port Elizabeth Press.
Tripp, D. (1987). Teacher autobiography and classroom practice. Perth: Murdoch University.
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Vithal, R. (1998, January). Disruptions and data: The politics of doing mathematics education research in South Africa. In N. A. Ogude & C. Bohlmann (Eds.), Proceedings of the 6th annual conference of the Southern African Association for Research in Mathematics and Science Education (pp. 475–480). Pretoria: University of South Africa.
Wheatley, M. (1992). Leadership and the new science. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.
Whitehead, J. (1989). Creating a living educational theory from questions of the kind, ‘How do I improve my practice?’ Cambridge Journal of Education, 19(1), 41–52.
Wood, T. (1999). Approaching teacher development: Practice into theory. In B. Jaworski, T. Wood & S. Dawson (Eds.), Mathematics teacher education: Critical international perspectives (pp. 163–179). London: Falmer.
Zack, V., Mousley, J., & Breen, C. (Eds.). (1997). Developing practice: Teachers’ inquiry and educational change. Geelong: Deakin University Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2003 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Breen, C. (2003). Mathematics Teachers as Researchers: Living on the Edge?. In: Bishop, A.J., Clements, M.A., Keitel, C., Kilpatrick, J., Leung, F.K.S. (eds) Second International Handbook of Mathematics Education. Springer International Handbooks of Education, vol 10. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0273-8_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-010-3951-2
Online ISBN: 978-94-010-0273-8
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive