Skip to main content

Lexical Variation in Learners’ Responses to Cue Words: The Effect of Gender

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Lexical Availability in English and Spanish as a Second Language

Part of the book series: Educational Linguistics ((EDUL,volume 17))

Abstract

This chapter looks at the effect of gender on words retrieved by the same sample of English as Foreign Language Learners at two points of time: sixth grade and ninth grade. The prompts were: ‘Body’, ‘Food’, ‘School’, ‘Town’, ‘Countryside’, ‘Transport’, ‘Animals’, ‘Sports’, and ‘Professions’. The study provides evidence of a significant increase of word responses in 9th grade for all cue words and for both groups. This result is relevant for lexical availability as well as for vocabulary research as it proves that learners continue learning words within each of the semantic categories represented by the cue words. The study is also relevant for sociolinguistic research on gender and language education as it reveals significant differences in favour of females in six prompts out of nine at the two collection times.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Wilcoxon-signed rank test for non-parametric comparison of two related samples was conducted. Significance values for all pairs are p = .000.

  2. 2.

    The Mann–Whitney test for non-parametric comparison of two independent samples was conducted. The p values are as follows: ‘Transport’: .117, ‘Town’: .110, ‘School’: .05, ‘Professions’: .046, ‘Countryside’: .019, ‘Hobbies’: .014, ‘Parts of the body’: 002, ‘Animals’: .005, ‘Food and drink’: .000. Significant level is set at p = .05.

  3. 3.

    The Wilcoxon-signed rank test for non-parametric comparison of two related samples was conducted. Significance values for all pairs are p = .000.

References

  • Agustín Llach, M.P. 2009. Gender differences in vocabulary acquisition in the foreign language in primary education: Evidence from lexical errors, Biblioteca de Investigación 54. Logroño: La Rioja University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agustín Llach, M.P. 2010. Exploring the role of gender in lexical creations. In Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign languages, ed. R.M. Jiménez Catalán, 74–92. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agustín Llach, M.P., and M. Terrazas Gallego. 2013. Vocabulary knowledge development and gender differences in a second language. ELIA 22: 45–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ohtman, N.M.A. 2004. The relationship between gender and learning styles in Internet-based teaching – A study from Kuwait. The Reading Matrix 41: 38–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreou, G., F. Vlachos, and E. Andreou. 2005. Affecting factors in second language learning. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research 345: 429–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, S. 1992. The relationship between gender, comprehension, processing strategies, and cognitive and affective response in foreign language listening. The Modern Language Journal 76: 160–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyle, J.P. 1987. Sex differences in listening vocabulary. Language Learning 372: 273–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brantmeier, C. 2003. Does gender make a difference? Passage content and comprehension in second language reading. Reading in a Foreign Language 151: 1–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brantmeier, C. 2004. Gender, violence-oriented passage content and second language reading comprehension. The Reading Matrix 42: 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcedo González, A. 1998. Sobre las pruebas de disponibilidad léxica para estudiantes de español LE. RILCE 142: 205–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carcedo González, A. 2000. Disponibilidad léxica en español como lengua extranjera: el caso finlandés estudio de nivel preuniversitario, y cotejo con tres fases de adquisición. Turku: Turun Yliopisto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Casey, M.B. 1996. Gender, sex, and cognition: Considering the interrelationship between biological and environmental factors. Learning and Individual Differences 81: 39–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, M. 2000. Gender in the language classroom. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernández Fontecha, A. 2010. Gender and motivation in EFL vocabulary production. In Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign languages, ed. R.M. Jiménez Catalán, 93–116. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • García Marcos, F., and M.V. Mateo García. 1997. Disponibilidad Léxica y Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras. Docencia e Investigación. Cuenca: Universidad de Castilla La Mancha.

    Google Scholar 

  • Germany, P., and N. Cartes. 2000. Léxico disponible en inglés como segunda lengua en instrucción formalizada. Revista Estudios Pedagógicos 26: 39–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grace, C. 2000. Gender differences: Vocabulary retention and access to translations for beginning language learners in CALL. The Modern Language Journal 84(2): 214–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hellekant, J. 1994. Are multiple-choice tests unfair to girls? System 22(3): 349–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Cabrera, C.E., and M. Samper Hernández. 2006. Léxico disponible, norma culta y norma popular. In memoriam Manuel Alvar, II. Rosa M.ª Castañar y José M.ª Enguita, 1341–1358. Zaragoza: Institución “Fernando el Católico”.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hernández Muñoz, N. 2010. Social aspects of oral and written lexical production in Spanish. SKY Journal of Linguistics 23: 101–123.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyde, J.S., and M.C. Linn. 1988. Gender differences in verbal abilities. A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin 1041: 53–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, R.M. 2003. Sex differences in L2 vocabulary learning strategies. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 131: 54–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, R.M. 2010. Gender tendencies in EFL across vocabulary tests. In Gender perspectives on vocabulary in foreign languages, ed. R.M. Jiménez Catalán, 117–139. Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, R.M., and J. Ojeda. 2008. The English vocabulary of boys and girls: Similarities or differences? Evidence from a quantitative study. In Theoretical and methodological approaches to gender and language study, ed. L. Litosseliti, H. Sauton, K. Segall, and J. Sunderland, 103–118. Houndmills/Basingstoke/Hampshire/New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, R.M., and J. Ojeda. 2009. Girls’ and Boys’ lexical availability in English as a foreign language. ITL International Journal of Applied Linguistics 158: 57–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiménez, R.M., and M. Terrazas. 2005–2008. The receptive vocabulary of English foreign language young learners. Journal of English Studies 5–6: 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kiss, C., and M. Nikolov. 2005. Preparing, piloting and validating an instrument to measure young learners’ aptitude. Language Learning 551: 99–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kissau, S. 2006. Gender differences in motivation to learn French. Canadian Modern Language Review 623: 401–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, J., and F. Wu. 2003. Differential performance by gender in foreign language testing. Poster for the 2003 annual meeting of NCME Chicago, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Linn, M.C., and A.C. Petersen. 1985. Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis. Child Development 56: 1479–1498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, S., and P. Gobel. 2006. Motivation and gender in the Japanese EFL classroom. System: An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics 34(2): 194–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ojeda Alba, J., and R.M. Jiménez Catalán. 2007. The worlds children’s words build. Didáctica (Lengua y Literatura) 19: 155–172.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reyes Diaz, M.J. 1999. Acerca de la relación entre la variable sexo y el aprendizaje léxico. In Contribuciones al estudio de la Lingüística Aplicada. Logroño: Asociación Española de Lingüística Aplicada, ed. J. de las Cuevas, D. Fasla, 387–391. ISBN: 84-605-8800-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samper Hernández, M. 2002. Disponibilidad léxica en alumnos de español como lengua extranjera, Colección Monografías, núm. 4. Málaga: ASELE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Samper Padilla, J.A., and C.E. Hernández Cabrera. 1997. Estudio de la disponibilidad léxica en Gran Canaria. Datos iniciales y variación sociolingüística. Contribuciones al estudio de la lingüística hispánica Homenaje a Ramón Trujillo Carreño, Vol. II, 229–239. La Laguna: Universidad de la Laguna.

    Google Scholar 

  • San Mateo Valdehita, A. 2003–2004. Aprendizaje de léxico en español como segunda lengua. Investigación sobre tres métodos. Unpublished M.Phil. thesis, UNED. Available online at http://www.mec.es/redele/biblioteca2005/san_mateo.shtml

  • Scarcella, R., and C. Zimmerman. 1998. Academic words and gender. ESL student performance on a test of academic lexicon. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20: 27–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaer, U., and U. Bader. 2003. Evaluation Englisch an der Primarschule Projekt 012. http://www.ai.ch/dl.php/de/20031110083112/Evaluationsbericht+07.11.2003.pdf. Accessed 16 Feb 2010.

  • Spellerberg, S.M. 2011. L3 English acquisition in Denmark and Greenland: Gender-related tendencies. International Journal of Multilingualism 8(3): 155–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, H. 1995. Gender differences in performance on tests of cognitive abilities: Experimental design issues and empirical results. Learning and Individual Differences 7: 275–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takala, S. 2000. Test fairness: A DIF analysis of an L2 vocabulary test. Language Testing 173: 323–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wen, Q., and R.K. Johnson. 1997. L2 learner variables and English achievement: A study of tertiary-level English majors in China. Applied Linguistics 181: 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. 2001. Sex and language proficiency level in color-naming performance. An ESL/EFL perspective. International Journal of Applied Linguistics 112: 238–256.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, D.J., and R. Oxford. 1997. A gender-related analysis of strategies used to process written input in the native language and a foreign language. Applied Language Learning 81: 43–73.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to acknowledge the financial support of FEDER and Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación through grant nº FFI2010-19334.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to María del Pilar Agustín Llach .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

del Pilar Agustín Llach, M., Fontecha, A.F. (2014). Lexical Variation in Learners’ Responses to Cue Words: The Effect of Gender. In: Jiménez Catalán, R. (eds) Lexical Availability in English and Spanish as a Second Language. Educational Linguistics, vol 17. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7158-1_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics