Skip to main content

A Wake Up Call

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1821 Accesses

Part of the book series: Studies in Brain and Mind ((SIBM,volume 6))

Abstract

Although I am going to argue that we need not accept the conclusion expressed in Philip Goff’s title, I am grateful for the opportunity to comment on his paper. For I believe he has raised an important challenge that property dualism, and some other views, must face up to.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Here, and elsewhere in these comments, I rely on some views about consciousness that I have explained and defended in Robinson (2004a). These views, of course, may not be accepted by all property dualists. However, what is needed to dispute Goff’s conclusion is only one coherent form of property dualism. It need not be shown that views that include property dualism, but are laden with certain further assumptions, cannot lead to panpsychism.

  2. 2.

    Readers will rightly take this sentence as showing that I am not offering a HOT theory of consciousness. However, HOT theorists can accept the distinction I am making in this section. For them, consciousness tout court will be sensory episodes accompanied by unconscious thoughts that one is having them, while self-consciousness will involve sensory episodes accompanied by conscious thoughts that one is having them. For explanation of my views on higher order theories, see Robinson (2004a, b).

  3. 3.

    One might suggest here that a self cannot gradually disappear. The text, however, shows how some aspects of a self appear in several guises, and can gradually be lost. My view is that other aspects of self go the same way. For more on the notion of a self, see Robinson (2010).

References

  • Mangan, B. 2001. Sensation’s ghost: The non-sensory “fringe” of consciousness. Psyche 7(18). Available at http://www.theassc.org/files/assc/2509.pdf

  • Robinson, W.S. 2004a. Understanding phenomenal consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W.S. 2004b. A few thoughts too many? In Higher-order theories of consciousness, ed. R.J. Gennaro, 295–313. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, W.S. 2010. Your brain and you: What neuroscience means for us. New York: Goshawk Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to William S. Robinson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Robinson, W.S. (2014). A Wake Up Call. In: Brown, R. (eds) Consciousness Inside and Out: Phenomenology, Neuroscience, and the Nature of Experience. Studies in Brain and Mind, vol 6. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-6001-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics