Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Sexual Size Dimorphism in Australopithecus: Current Understanding and New Directions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Paleobiology of Australopithecus

Part of the book series: Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology ((VERT))

Abstract

Sexual size dimorphism in extant and extinct species has often been viewed as a proxy for sexual selection, and by extension, mating system. As a result, various measures of relative size variation have been calculated for australopiths (particularly Australopithecus afarensis) as a means to infer mating system and social structure in these extinct hominins. Such analyses are confounded by several factors, including (1) different levels of sexual dimorphism may be present within one species when comparing different systems such as canine size, postcranial size, and body mass; (2) evidence suggests that sexual size dimorphism responds not only to sexual selection acting on both male and female size, but also to natural selection acting differentially on the sexes; and (3) measures of relative size variation within skeletal and/or dental samples of unknown sex are not direct measures of size dimorphism, but rather estimates which are subject to both known and unknown sources of error. This chapter addresses concerns and possibilities for future analyses that relate to these confounding effects, and goes on to present the current understanding of size dimorphism within Australopithecus. Specific methodologies for measuring relative size variation within fossil taxa are discussed, particularly newer techniques which incorporate information from across multiple skeletal elements. Finally, the biological and phylogenetic significance of different possible levels of dimorphism within Ardipithecus ramidus and various species of Australopithecus is discussed in the context of extracting information on selection pressures beyond simple reconstruction of mating systems and social structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alberts, S. C., Buchan, J. C., & Altmann, J. (2006). Sexual selection in wild baboons: From mating opportunities to paternity success. Animal Behaviour, 72, 1177–1196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altmann, J., & Alberts, S. (1987). Body mass and growth rate in a wild primate population. Oecologia, 72, 15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, M. J., & Dixson, A. F. (2002). Sperm competition: Motility and the midpiece in primates. Nature, 416, 496.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, R. A. (2000). Socioecology of baboons: The interaction of male and female strategies. In P. M. Kappeler (Ed.), Primate males: Causes and consequences of variation in group composition (pp. 97–107). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beehner, J. C., Onderdonk, D. A., Alberts, S. C., & Altmann, J. (2006). The ecology of conception and pregnancy failure in wild baboons. Behavioral Ecology, 17, 741–750.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, L. R., de Ruiter, D. J., Churchill, S. E., Schmid, P., Carlson, K. J., Dirks, P. H. G. M., & Kibii, J. M. (2010). Australopithecus sediba: A new species of Homo-like australopith from South Africa. Science, 328, 195–204.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boinski, S., Sughrue, K., Selvaggi, L., Quatrone, R., Henry, M., & Cropp, S. (2002). An expanded test of the ecological model of primate social evolution: Competitive regimes and female bonding in three species of squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedii, S. boliviensis, and S. sciureus). Behaviour, 139, 227–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonnefille, R., Potts, R., Chalié, F., Jolly, D., & Peyron, O. (2004). High-resolution vegetation and climate change associated with Pliocene Australopithecus afarensis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 101, 12125–12129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brockelman, W. Y., Reichard, U., Treesucon, U., & Raemaekers, J. (1998). Dispersal, pair formation and social structure in gibbons (Hylobates lar). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 42, 329–339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheverud, J. M., Dow, M. M., & Leutenegger, W. (1985). The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: Sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution, 39, 1335–1351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1977). Some aspects of intraspecific variation in feeding and ranging behaviour in primates. In T. H. Clutton-Brock (Ed.), Primate ecology: Studies of feeding and ranging behaviour in lemurs, monkeys and apes (pp. 539–556). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H. (1985). Size, sexual dimorphism, and polygyny in primates. In W. L. Jungers (Ed.), Size and scaling in primate biology (pp. 51–60). New York: Plenum Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., & Harvey, P. H. (1977). Primate ecology and social organization. Journal of Zoology, London, 183, 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock, T. H., Harvey, P. H., & Rudder, B. (1977). Sexual dimorphism, socionomic sex ratio and body weight in primates. Nature, 269, 797–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham, D. L. (2005). Postcranial proportional variation in Australopithecus. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Missouri-Columbia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London: J. Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demment, M. W. (1983). Feeding ecology and the evolution of body size of baboons. African Journal of Ecology, 21, 219–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Ruiter, D. J., Churchill, S. E., & Berger, L. R. (2013). Australopithecus sediba from Malapa, South Africa. In K. E. Reed, J. G., Fleagle, & R. E. Leakey (Eds.), The paleobiology of Australopithecus (pp. 147–160). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doran, D. M. (1997). Ontogeny of locomotion in mountain gorillas and chimpanzees. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 323–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Downhower, J. F. (1976). Darwin’s finches and evolution of sexual dimorphism in body size. Nature, 263, 558–563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ely, J., & Kurland, J. A. (1989). Spatial autocorrelation, phylogenetic constraints, and the causes of sexual dimorphism in primates. International Journal of Primatology, 10, 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emlen, S. T., & Oring, L. W. (1977). Ecology, sexual selection, and the evolution of mating systems. Science, 197, 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flinn, M. V., & Low, B. S. (1986). Resource distribution, social competition, and mating patterns in human societies. In D. I. Rubenstein & R. W. Wrangham (Eds.), Ecological aspects of social evolution: Birds and mammals (pp. 217–243). Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ford, S. M. (1994). Evolution of sexual dimorphism in body weight in platyrrhines. American Journal of Primatology, 34, 221–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, A. (2000). Hylobatid communities: Changing views on pair bonding and social organization in hominoids. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 48, 86–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galdikas, B. M. F., & Teleki, G. (1981). Variations in subsistence activities of female and male pongids: New perspectives on the origins of hominid labor division. Current Anthropology, 22, 241–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaulin, S. J. C., & Sailer, L. D. (1984). Sexual dimorphism in weight among the primates: The relative impact of allometry and sexual selection. International Journal of Primatology, 5, 515–535.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D. (2004). Evolution of body size and sexual size dimorphism in the order primates: Rensch’s rule, quantitative genetics, and phylogenetic effects. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D. (2006a). Scaling of size and dimorphism in primates I: Microevolution. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 27–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D. (2006b). Scaling of size and dimorphism in primates II: Macroevolution. International Journal of Primatology, 27, 63–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon, A. D., Green, D. J., & Richmond, B. G. (2008). Strong postcranial size dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis: Results from two new resampling methods for multivariate data sets with missing data. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 135, 311–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green, D. J., Gordon, A. D., & Richmond, B. G. (2007). Limb-size proportions in Australopithecus afarensis and Australopithecus africanus. Journal of Human Evolution, 52, 187–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenfield, L. O. (1992). Relative canine size, behavior, and diet in male ceboids. Journal of Human Evolution, 23, 469–480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haile-Selassie, Y., Latimer, B. M., Alene, M., Deino, A. L., Gibert, L., Melillo, S.M., Saylor, B. Z., Scott, G. R., Lovejoy, C. O. (2010). An early Australopithecus afarensis postcranium from Woranso-Mille, Ethiopia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107, 12121–12126.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, A. H. (1997). Sperm competition in primates. The American Naturalist, 149, 189–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, E. H. (2006). Size and shape variation in Australopithecus afarensis proximal femora. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 217–227.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmon, E. (2009). Size and shape variation in the proximal femur of Australopithecus africanus. Journal of Human Evolution, 56, 551–559.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hartwig-Scherer, S. (1993). Body weight prediction in early fossil hominids: Towards a taxon-‘‘independent’’ approach. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 92, 17–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, R. A., & Lee, P. C. (1998). Predation risk as an influence on group size in cercopithecoid primates: Implications for social structure. Journal of Zoology, 245, 447–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, L. A. (1991). Contest and scramble competition: Patterns of female aggression and ranging behavior among primates. Behavioral Ecology, 2, 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isbell, L. A., & Pruetz, J. D. (1998). Differences between vervets (Cercopithecus aethiops) and patas monkeys (Erythrocebus patas) in agonistic interactions between adult females. International Journal of Primatology, 19, 837–855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, X., Wang, Y., & Wang, Q. (1999). Coexistence of monogamy and polygyny in black-crested gibbon (Hylobates concolor). Primates, 40, 607–611.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, S. E., Gordon, A. D., Stumpf, R. M., Overdorff, D. J., & Wright, P. (2005). Morphological variation in populations of Eulemur albocollaris and E. fulvus rufus. International Journal of Primatology, 26, 1399–1416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, S. C., Juell, K. E., & Rogers, A. R. (1996). Estimating sexual dimorphism by method-of-moments. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 100, 191–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, W. L. (1988a). New estimates of body size in australopithecines. In F. E. Grine (Ed.), Evolutionary history of the ‘‘Robust’’ australopithecines (pp. 115–125). New York: Aldine de Gruyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, W. L. (1988b). Relative joint size and hominoid locomotor adaptations with implications for the evolution of hominid bipedalism. Journal of Human Evolution, 17, 247–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, W. L. (1990a). Problems and methods in reconstructing body size in fossil primates. In J. Damuth & B. MacFadden (Eds.), Body size in mammalian paleobiology: Estimation and biological implications (pp. 103–118). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jungers, W. L. (1990b). Scaling of postcranial joint size in hominoid primates. In F. K. Jouffroy, S. M. H & C. Niemitz (Eds.), Gravity, posture and locomotion in primates (pp. 87–95). Firenze: Il Sedicesimo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. (1990). The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in prosimian primates. American Journal of Primatology, 21, 201–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kappeler, P. M. (1991). Patterns of sexual dimorphism in body weight among prosimian primates. Folia Primatologica, 57, 132–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay, R. F., Plavcan, J. M., Glander, K. E., & Wright, P. C. (1988). Sexual selection and canine dimorphism in New World monkeys. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 77, 385–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W. H., & White, T. D. (1988). Variation, sexual dimorphism and the taxonomy of Australopithecus. In F. E. Grine (Ed.), Evolutionary history of the “robust” australopithecines (pp. 175–191). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kimbel, W. H., Lockwood, C. A., Ward, C. V., Leakey, M. G., Rak, Y., & Johanson, D. C. (2006). Was Australopithecus anamensis ancestral to A. afarensis? A case of anagenesis in the hominin fossil record. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 134–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kościński, K., & Pietraszewski, S. (2004). Methods to estimate sexual dimorphism from unsexed samples: A test with computer-generated samples. Przegląd Antropologiczny-Anthropological. Review, 67, 33–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lague, M. R. (2002). Another look at shape variation in the distal femur of Australopithecus afarensis: Implications for taxonomic and functional diversity at Hadar. Journal of Human Evolution, 42, 609–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lague, M. R., & Jungers, W. L. (1996). Morphometric variation in Plio-Pleistocene hominid distal humeri. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 101, 401–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lappan, S. (2007). Social relationships among males in multimale siamang groups. International Journal of Primatology, 28, 369–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S.-H. (2001). Assigned resampling method: a new method to estimate size sexual dimorphism in samples of unknown sex. Przegląd Antropologiczny-Anthropological. Review, 64, 21–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lehman, S. M., Mayor, M., & Wright, P. C. (2005). Ecogeographic size variations in sifakas: A test of the resource seasonality and resource quality hypotheses. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 126, 318–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, J., Korstjens, A. H., & Dunbar, R. I. M. (2007). Group size, grooming and social cohesion in primates. Animal Behaviour, 74, 1617–1629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R. (1992). Patterns of variation in the ontogeny of primate body size dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution, 23, 27–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R. (1995). Socioecology and the ontogeny of sexual size dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 97, 339–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R., & Shea, B. T. (1995). Ontogeny and the evolution of adult body size dimorphism in apes. American Journal of Primatology, 36, 37–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leigh, S. R., & Shea, B. T. (1996). Ontogeny of body size variation in African apes. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 99, 43–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., & Kelly, J. T. (1977). Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates. Primates, 18, 117–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leutenegger, W., & Shell, B. (1987). Variability and sexual dimorphism in canine size of Australopithecus and extant hominoids. Journal of Human Evolution, 16, 359–367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, R. J., & Kappeler, P. M. (2005). Seasonality, body condition, and the timing of reproduction in Propithecus verreauxi verreauxi in the Kirindy Forest. American Journal of Primatology, 67, 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindenfors, P., & Tullberg, B. S. (1998). Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: the consequences of sexual selection. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 64, 413–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, C. A. (1999). Sexual dimorphism in the face of Australopithecus africanus. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 108, 97–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, C. A., Richmond, B. G., Jungers, W. L., & Kimbel, W. H. (1996). Randomization procedures and sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis. Journal of Human Evolution, 31, 537–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, C. A., Kimbel, W. H., & Johanson, D. C. (2000). Temproal trends and metric variation in the mandibles and dentition of Australopithecus afarensis. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 23–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lockwood, C. A., Menter, C. G., Moggi-Cecchi, J., & Keyser, A. W. (2007). Extended male growth in a fossil hominin species. Science, 318, 1443–1446.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O. (1981). The origin of man. Science, 211, 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O. (2009). Reexamining human origins in light of Ardipithecus ramidus. Science, 326, 741–748.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O., Latimer, B., Suwa, G., Asfaw, B., & White, T. D. (2009a). Combining prehension and propulsion: The foot of Ardipithecus ramidus. Science, 326, 721–728.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O., Simpson, S. W., White, T. D., Asfaw, B., & Suwa, G. (2009b). Careful climbing in the Miocene: the forelimbs of Ardipithecus ramidus and humans are primitive. Science, 326, 701–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, C. O., Suwa, G., Spurlock, L., Asfaw, B., & White, T. D. (2009c). The pelvis and femur of Ardipithecus ramidus: The emergence of upright walking. Science, 326, 711–716.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maestripieri, D., & Roney, J. R. (2005). Primate copulation calls and postcopulatory female choice. Behavioral Ecology, 16, 106–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marlowe, F. W. (2003). The mating system of foragers in the standard cross-cultural sample. Cross-Cultural Research, 37, 282–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. D., Willner, L. A., & Dettling, A. (1994). The evolution of sexual size dimorphism in primates. In R. V. Short & E. Balaban (Eds.), The differences between the sexes (pp. 159–200). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. (1988). New estimates of body weight in early hominids and their significance to encephalization and megadotia in “robust” australopithecines. In F. E. Grine (Ed.), Evolutionary history of the ‘‘Robust’’ australopithecines (pp. 133–148). New York: Aldine de Gruyer.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. (1991). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis. Journal of Human Evolution, 20, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. (1992). Body size and proportions in early hominids. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 87, 407–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. (1994). Behavioral ecological implications of early hominid body size. Journal of Human Evolution, 27, 77–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M. (1996). Sexual dimorphism in fossil hominids and its socioecological implications. In J. Steele & S. Shennan (Eds.), The archeology of human ancestry: Power, sex and tradition (pp. 91–109). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHenry, H. M., & Berger, L. R. (1998). Body proportions in Australopithecus afarensis and A. africanus and the origin of the genus Homo. Journal of Human Evolution, 35, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitani, J. C., Gros-Louis, J., & Richards, A. F. (1996). Sexual dimorphism, the operational sex ratio, and the intensity of male competition in polygynous primates. American Naturalist, 147, 966–980.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, C. L., Boinski, S., & van Schaik, C. P. (1991). Competitive regimes and female bonding in two species of squirrel monkey (Saimiri oerstedi and S. sciureus). Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 28, 55–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A. (2002). Sexual selection and mate choice. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 877–903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R. (1976). Natural selection of optimal reproductive tactics. American Zoologist, 16, 775–784.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pianka, E. R., & Parker, W. S. (1975). Age specific reproductive tactics. American Naturalist, 109, 453–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. (1994). Comparison of 4 simple methods for estimating sexual dimorphism in fossils. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 94, 465–476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. (1999). Mating systems, intrasexual competition and sexual dimorphism in primates. In P. C. Lee (Ed.), Comparative primate socioecology (pp. 241–269). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. (2000). Inferring social behavior from sexual dimorphism in the fossil record. Journal of Human Evolution, 39, 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. (2001). Sexual dimorphism in primate evolution. Yearbook of Physical Anthropology, 44, 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. (2003). Scaling relationships between craniofacial sexual dimorphism and body mass dimorphism in primates: Implications for the fossil record. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 120, 38–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M. (2004). Sexual selection, measures of sexual selection, and sexual dimorphism in primates. In P. M. Kappeler & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Sexual selection in primates: New and comparative perspectives (pp. 230–252). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., & Gordon, A. D. (2007). Craniodental versus postcranial variables as estimators of size dimorphism in extinct taxa. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 44, 190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1992). Intrasexual competition and canine dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 87, 461–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997a). Interpreting hominid behavior on the basis of sexual dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution, 32, 346–374.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1997b). Intrasexual competition and body weight dimorphism in anthropoid primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 103, 37–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., van Schaik, C. P., & Kappeler, P. M. (1995). Competition, coalitions and canine size in primates. Journal of Human Evolution, 28, 245–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., Lockwood, C. A., Kimbel, W. H., Lague, M. R., & Harmon, E. H. (2005a). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis revisited: How strong is the case for a human-like pattern of dimorphism? Journal of Human Evolution, 48, 313–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., van Schaik, C. P., & McGraw, W. S. (2005b). Seasonality, social organization, and sexual dimorphism in primates. In D. K. Brockman & C. P. van Schaik (Eds.), Seasonality in Primates: Studies of Living and Extinct Human and Non-Human Primates (pp. 401–463). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Plavcan, J. M., Ward, C. V., & Paulus, F. L. (2009). Estimating canine tooth crown height in early Australopithecus. Journal of Human Evolution, 57, 2–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, A. M. W. (1995). The body weight of AL 288–1 (Lucy): A new approach using estimates of skeletal length and the body mass index. International Journal of Osteoarchaeology, 5, 203–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, E., & Stenseth, N. C. (1999). Climatic variability, plant phenology, and northern ungulates. Ecology, 80, 1322–1339.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Post, E., Langvatn, R., Forchhamer, M. C., & Stenseth, N. (1999). Environmental variation shapes sexual dimorphism in red deer. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 96, 4467–4471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ralls, K. (1976). Mammals in which females are larger than males. Quarterly Review of Biology, 51, 245–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravosa, M. J., Meyers, D. M., & Glander, K. E. (1993). Relative growth of the limbs and trunk in sifakas: Heterochronic, ecological, and functional considerations. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 92, 499–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rehg, J. A., & Leigh, S. R. (1999). Estimating sexual dimorphism and size differences in the fossil record: A test of methods. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 110, 95–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichard, U. (1995). Extra-pair copulations in a monogamous gibbon. Ethology, 100, 99–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Remis, M. (1995). Effects of body size and social context on the arboreal activities of lowland gorillas in the Central African Republic. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 97, 413–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reno, P. L., Meindl, R. S., McCollum, M. A., & Lovejoy, C. O. (2003). Sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis was similar to that of modern humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100, 9404–9409.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reno, P. L., Meindl, R. S., McCollum, M. A., & Lovejoy, C. O. (2005). The case is unchanged and remains robust: Australopithecus afarensis exhibits only moderate skeletal dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution, 49, 279–288.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reno, P. L., McCollum, M. A., Meindl, R. S., & Lovejoy, C. O. (2010). An enlarged postcranial sample confirms Australopithecus afarensis dimorphism was similar to modern humans. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 3355–3363.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richmond, B. G., & Jungers, W. L. (1995). Size variation and sexual dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis and living hominoids. Journal of Human Evolution, 29, 229–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rodman, P. S., & Mitani, J. C. (1987). Orangutans: Sexual dimorphism in a solitary species. In B. B. Smuts, D. L. Cheney, R. M. Seyfarth, R. W. Wrangham, & T. T. Struhsaker (Eds.), Primate societies (pp. 146–154). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, M. E., Abernethy, K., Bermejo, M., Cipolletta, C., Doran, D., McFarland, K., et al. (2004). Western gorilla diet: a synthesis from six sites. American Journal of Primatology, 64, 173–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarmiento, E. E. (2010). Comment on the paleobiology and classification of Ardipithecus ramidus. Science, 328, 1105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. E., & Stroik, L. K. (2006). Bootstrap tests of significance and the case for humanlike skeletal-size dimorphism in Australopithecus afarensis. Journal of Human Evolution, 51, 422–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simons, E. L., Plavcan, J. M., & Fleagle, J. G. (1999). Canine sexual dimorphism in Egyptian Eocene anthropoid primates: Catopithecus and Proteopithecus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 96, 2559–2562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. (1996). Biology and body size in human evolution. Current Anthropology, 37, 451–481.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J. (1999). Statistics of sexual size dimorphism. Journal of Human Evolution, 36, 423–459.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. J., & Cheverud, J. M. (2002). Scaling of sexual dimorphism in body mass: A phylogenetic analysis of Rensch’s rule in Primates. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 1095–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sommer, V., & Reichard, U. (2000). Rethinking monogamy: The gibbon case. In P. M. Kappeler (Ed.), Primate males: Causes and consequences of variation in group composition (pp. 159–168). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanford, C. B. (2002). Avoiding predators: Expectations and evidence in primate antipredator behavior. International Journal of Primatology, 23, 741–757.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugardjito, J., & van Hooff, J. A. (1986). Age-sex class differences in the positional behaviour of the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Indonesia. Folia Primatologica, 47, 14–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sugiyama, Y., & Koman, J. (1987). A preliminary list of chimpanzees’ alimentation at Bossou, Guinea. Primates, 28, 133–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, G., Asfaw, B., Kono, R. T., Kubo, D., Lovejoy, C. O., & White, T. D. (2009a). The Ardipithecus ramidus skull and its implications for hominid origins. Science, 326, 681–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suwa, G., Kono, R. T., Simpson, S. W., Asfaw, B., Lovejoy, C. O., & White, T. D. (2009b). Paleobiological implications of the Ardipithecus ramidus dentition. Science, 326, 94–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tecot, S. R. (2008). Seasonality and predictability: The hormonal and behavioral responses of the red-bellied lemur, Eulemur rubriventer, in southeastern Madagascar. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of Texas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tecot, S. (2013). Variable energetic strategies in disturbed and undisturbed rain forest habitats: fecal cortisol levels in southeastern Madagascar. In J. Masters, M. Gamba, & F. Génin (Eds.). Leaping Ahead: Advances in Prosimian Biology (pp. 185–196). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorén, S., Lindenfors, P., & Kappeler, P. M. (2006). Phylogenetic analyses of dimorphism in primates: Evidence for stronger selection on canine size than on body size. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 130, 50–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tutin, C. E. G., Ham, R. M., White, L. J. T., & Harrison, M. J. S. (1997). The primate community of the Lope Reserve, Gabon: Diets, responses to fruit scarcity, and effects on biomass. American Journal of Primatology, 42, 1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Utami, S. S., Goosens, B., Bruford, M. W., de Ruiter, J. R., & van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. (2002). Male bimaturism and reproductive success in Sumatran orang-utans. Behavioral Ecology, 13, 643–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M., & van Schaik, C. P. (1992). Cooperation in competition: The ecology of primate bonds. In A. H. Harcourt & F. M. B. de Waal (Eds.), Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals (pp. 357–389). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Schaik, C. P. (1989). The ecology of social relationships amongst female primates. In V. Standen & F. A. Foley (Eds.), Comparative socioecology: The behavioral ecology of humans and other mammals (pp. 195–218). Oxford: Blackwell Scientific Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward, C. V., Leakey, M. G., & Walker, A. (2001). Morphology of Australopithecus anamensis from Kanapoi and Allia Bay, Kenya. Journal of Human Evolution, 41, 255–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ward C. V., Plavcan, J. M., & Manthi, F. K. (2010). Anterior dental evolution in the Australopithecus anamensis-afarensis lineage. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 365, 3333–3344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, S. L. (1971). The study of human evolution. In P. Dolhinow & V. Sarich (Eds.), Background for man (pp. 82–117). Boston: Little, Brown.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, T. D., WoldeGabriel, G., Asfaw, B., Ambrose, S., Beyene, Y., Bernor, R. L., Boisserie, J -R., Currie, B., Gilbert, H., Haile-Selassie, Y., Hart, W. K., Hlusko, L. J., Howell, F. C., Kono, R. T., Lehmann, T., Louchart, A., Lovejoy, C. O., Renne, P. R., Saegusa, H., Vrba, E. S., Wesselman, H., & Suwa, G. (2006). Asa Issie, Aramis and the origin of Australopithecus. Nature, 440, 883–889.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood B., & Harrison T. (2011). The evolutionary context of the first hominins. Nature, 470, 347–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1977). Feeding behaviour of chimpanzees in Gombe National Park, Tanzania. In T. H. Clutton-Brock (Ed.), Primate ecology: Studies of feeding and ranging behaviour in lemurs, monkeys, and apes (pp. 503–538). London: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. W. (1980). An ecological model of female-bonded primate groups. Behaviour, 75, 262–300.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagiwa, J., & Basabose, A. K. (2006). Effects of fruit scarcity on foraging strategies of sympatric gorillas and chimpanzees. In G. Hohmann, M. M. Robbins, & C. Boesch (Eds.), Feeding ecology in apes and other primates ecological, physical and behavioral aspects (pp. 73–96). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anthropology, University at Albany—SUNY, 1400 Washington Avenue, Albany, NY, 12222, USA

    Adam D. Gordon

Authors
  1. Adam D. Gordon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adam D. Gordon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Human Origins, Arizona State University, Tempe, Arizona, USA

    Kaye E. Reed

  2. Department of Anatomical Sciences, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York, USA

    John G. Fleagle

  3. Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, New York, USA

    Richard E. Leakey

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Gordon, A.D. (2013). Sexual Size Dimorphism in Australopithecus: Current Understanding and New Directions. In: Reed, K., Fleagle, J., Leakey, R. (eds) The Paleobiology of Australopithecus. Vertebrate Paleobiology and Paleoanthropology. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5919-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation