Skip to main content

Trading Zone and the Complexity of Planning

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Urban Planning as a Trading Zone

Part of the book series: Urban and Landscape Perspectives ((URBANLAND,volume 13))

Abstract

In this chapter, we explore the applicability of the trading zone approach by addressing the complexities that frame and penetrate all contested planning issues. Planning issues are thoroughly political, and the ‘political’ is thoroughly complex. The complexities in planning include not only issues of ontological and epistemological differences about what should be done and what is a ‘good city’ but also questions such as what kind of processes of decision making, information gathering and valuation should be incorporated in planning. By addressing the political, communicative and technical ‘dimensions’ of planning through two illustrative planning cases, we discuss how trading zone as a concept resonates with these complexities and whether it can bring theoretical and practical insights into planning. We find the nature of planning to be often more complex than the illustrations of trading zone formation thus far have portrayed. Hence, complexities may restrain the applicability of the trading zone concept as a planning tool. Overcoming the seemingly irreconcilable differences between actors in any planning case calls for creative, dialogical, locally sensitive and flexible planning. These issues are at the heart of the trading zone approach. Therefore, the trading zone approach can be suitable in a range of descriptive and normative uses within planning, when applied with due attention to different aspects of complexity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agger A, Löfgren K (2008) Democratic assessment of collaborative planning processes. Plann Theor 7:145–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alexander ER (2008) The role of knowledge in planning. Plann Theor 7(2):207–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bäcklund P (2005) Paikallisyhteisö liikkeellä! In: Bäcklund P, Schulman H (eds) Suunnittelun kumppanuudet – tapaus Vuosaari. Helsingin kaupungin tietokeskuksen erityisjulkaisuja, Helsinki, pp 67–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäcklund P (2007) Tietämisen politiikka. Kokemuksellinen tieto kunnan hallinnassa (Politics of Knowing. Experiential knowledge in City Governance. City of Helsinki Urban Facts special publications). PhD dissertation, in Finnish]

    Google Scholar 

  • Bäcklund P, Mäntysalo R (2010) Agonism and institutional ambiguity: ideas on democracy and the role of participation in the development of planning theory and practice – the case of Finland. Plann Theor 9(4):333–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes M, Newman J, Knops A, Sullivan H (2003) Constituting “the public” in public participation. Public Adm 81(2):379–399 s

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry J, Porter L (2011) Indigenous recognition in state-based planning systems: Understanding textual mediation in the contact zone. Plann Theor, OnlineFirst. 21 Nov 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Christensen KS (1985) Coping with uncertainty in planning. J Am Plann Assoc 51(1):63–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins H, Evans R, Gorman M (2007) Trading zones and interactional expertise. Stud Hist Philos Sci 38:657–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg B (1998) Rationality and power. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester J (1989) Planning in the face of power. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Forester J (1993) Critical theory, public policy, and planning practice. State University of New York Press, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J (1987) Planning in the public domain. From knowledge to action. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann J (2008) The uses of planning theory: a bibliographic essay. J Plann Educ Res 28:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fuller B (2006) Trading zones: cooperating for water resource and ecosystem management when stakeholders have apparently irreconcilable differences. PhD dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller B (2008) Cooperating and still disagreeing on what really matters. LKY School of Public Policy, Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller B (2010) Surprising cooperation despite apparently irreconcilable differences: Agricultural water use efficiency and CALFED. Environ Sci Policy 12:663–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galison P (1997) Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Galison P (2010) Trading with the enemy. In: Gorman ME (ed) Trading zones and interactional expertise: creating new kinds of collaboration. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Gorman M, Werhane P, Swami N (2009) Moral imagination, trading zones, and the role of the ethicist in nanotechnology. Nanoethics 3:185–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson C (2009) The Halland model. A trading zone for building conservation in concert with labour market policy and the construction industry, aiming at regional sustainable development. Chalmers university of technology, Göteborg

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1984) The theory of communicative action, vol 1. Reason and the rationalization of society. Beacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas J (1987) The theory of communicative action, vol 2. Lifeworld and system: a critique of functionalist reason. Polity Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hajer M (2004) Three dimensions of deliberative policy analysis. The case of rebuilding ground zero. Paper for presentation at the 2004 convention of the American Political Science Association, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1992) Planning through debate. Town Plann Rev 63(2):143–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Healey P (1997) Collaborative planning: shaping places in fragmented societies. Macmillan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hiironniemi S (2005) Suomen hallinto verkostona – 2000-luvun haasteiden hallintaa. Sisäasiainministeriön julkaisuja 14/2005. 133 s. Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier J (2000) Going round the back? Environ Plann A 32:33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier J (2002) Shadows of power. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier J (2003) Agonizing over consensus: why habermasian ideals cannot be ‘real’. Plann Theor 2(1):37–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hull A (2008) Policy integration: what will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transp Policy 15:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JE (1995) Planning theory’s emerging paradigm: communicative action and interactive practice. J Plann Educ Res 14(3):183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JE, Booher DE (1999) Consensus building as role playing and Bricolage: toward a theory of collaborative planning. J Am Plann Assoc 65(1):9–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Innes JE, Booher DE, Di Vittorio S (2011) Strategies for megaregion governance. J Am Plann Assoc 77(1):55–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jalonen H (2007) Kompleksisuusteoreettinen tulkinta hallinnollisen tehokkuuden ja luovuuden yhteensovittamisesta kunnallisen päätöksenteon valmistelutyössä. Tampereen teknillinen yliopisto. Tampere (PhD dissertation)

    Google Scholar 

  • Janssen I (2009) Power positions in out-of-town retail development decisions. Paper presented at 16th ERES conference, 24–27 June, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins L (2010) The evolution of a trading zone: a case study of the turtle excluder device. Stud Hist Philos Sci 41:75–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen V (2010) Kauppakeskusten kestävän suunnittelun kysymyksiä Iso-Britanniassa ja Alankomaissa. In: Kanninen V, Rantanen A (eds) Kauppakeskukset osana kestävää kulutusta ja kaupunkirakennetta. 50–53. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskuksen julkaisu C 82, Espoo, pp 50–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen V, Kontio P, Mäntysalo R, Ristimäki M (eds) (2010) Autoriippuvainen yhdyskunta ja sen vaihtoehdot. Yhdyskuntasuunnittelun tutkimus- ja koulutuskeskuksen julkaisu B 101, Espoo

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellogg K, Orlikowski J, Yates J (2006) Life in the trading zone: structuring coordination across boundaries in postbureaucratic organizations. Organ Sci 17(1):22–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luhtakallio E (2010) Local politicizations. A comparison of Finns and French practicing democracy. Helsinki University Press, Helsinki

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäntysalo R (2000) Land-use planning as inter-organizational learning. 385 s. Acta Universitatis Ouluensis Technica, C 155, Oulu

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäntysalo R (2002) Dilemmas in critical planning theory. Town Plann Rev 73(4):417–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäntysalo R, Balducci A, Kangasoja J (2011a) Planning as agonistic communication in a trading zone: re-examining Lindblom’s partisan mutual adjustment. Plann Theor 10:257–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mäntysalo R, Saglie I-L, Cars G (2011b) Between input legitimacy and output efficiency: defensive routines and agonistic reflectivity in Nordic land-use planning. Eur Plann Stud 19(12):2109–2126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mazza L (2002) Technical knowledge and planning actions. Plann Theor 1(1):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messeri LR (2010) The problem with pluto: conflicting cosmologies and the classification of planets. Soc Stud Sci 40:187–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mills D, Huber MT (2005) Anthropology and the educational ‘trading zone’: disciplinarity, pedagogy and professionalism. Arts Humanit High Educ 4:9–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe C (2000) The democratic paradox. Verso, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters G, Pierre J (2004) Multi-level governance and democracy: a Faustian Bargain? In: Bache I, Flanders M (eds) Multi-level governance. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 75–92

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pløger J (2006) Urban planning and urban life: problems and challenges. Plann Pract Res 21(2):201–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt ML (1991) Arts of the contact zone. Profession 91:33–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon P (2008) Vastademokratia. Politiikka epäluulon aikakaudella. Vastapaino, Tampere (Suomentanut Tapani Kilpeläinen)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sager T (1994) Communicative planning theory. Avebury, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver H, Scott A, Kazepov Y (2010) Participation in Urban Contention and Deliberation. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(3):453–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19:387–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tewdwr-Jones M, Allmendinger P (1998) Deconstructing communicative rationality: a critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environ Plann A 30:1975–1989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eeden M (2010) The regional retail derby. A comparative research about the competiveness of three Dutch inner-city centres versus large-scale peripheral shopping centres. Delft University of Technology, Faculty of Architecture, Department Real Estate and Housing, Working paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Vartola J (2004) Näkökulmia Byrokratiaan. Tampereen Yliopistopaino oy, Tampere

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson G, Herndl CG (2007) Boundary objects as rhetorical exigency: knowledge mapping and interdisciplinary cooperation at the Los Alamos National Laboratory. J Bus Tech Commun 21(2):129–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The work on this chapter has been partly funded by the Academy of Finland, research grant 253845.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vesa Kanninen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kanninen, V., Bäcklund, P., Mäntysalo, R. (2013). Trading Zone and the Complexity of Planning. In: Balducci, A., Mäntysalo, R. (eds) Urban Planning as a Trading Zone. Urban and Landscape Perspectives, vol 13. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5854-4_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-5854-4_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-94-007-5853-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-94-007-5854-4

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics