Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Climate Change, Justice and Sustainability pp 121–137Cite as

The 2°C Target Reconsidered

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

While the 2°C target has become an important reference point in the international climate-policy arena, as stated for example in the Copenhagen Accord in 2009, its scientific underpinning and its legitimacy is heavily debated in the scientific community. In this chapter, outstanding experts in the field, representing opposing viewpoints within the scientific community, present their view on the 2°C target. While Mike Hulme casts doubt on the usefulness of the very idea of a specific temperature target as guidance for mitigation policy, Claus Leggewie and Dirk Messner claim that the 2°C target has an important instrumental value in the discourse surrounding climate-related risks. We discuss both contributions and argue that climate stabilisation goals provide a useful framework for a consistent discussion of climate policy choices. We point out that the 2°C objective has two major merits: first, as a global climate stabilisation goal it provides a useful framework around which to structure the global climate policy debate. Second, we consider it an appropriate climate policy goal enabling currently available scientific knowledge to be combined with some explicit value judgements. Nevertheless, further research and public debate are required to reduce uncertainties and substantiate this conjecture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Archer, D., & Rahmstorf, S. (2010). The climate crisis: An introductory guide to climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baer, P., & Spash, C. L. (2008). Cost-benefit analysis of climate change: Stern revisited (CSIRO Working Paper Series 2008–07). Canberra: CSIRO Sustainable Ecosystems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caney, S. (2009). Justice and the distribution of greenhouse gas emissions. Journal of Global Ethics, 5(2), 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clausen, L. (2010). Wohin mit den Klimakatastrophen? In H. Welzer & I. Schulze (Eds.), KlimaKulturen (pp. 97–110). Frankfurt: Campus Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dasgupta, P. (2007). Commentary: The Stern review’s economics of climate change. National Institute Economic Review, 199, 4–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer, O., & Kowarsch, M. (2012). A pragmatist approach to the science-policy interface (Working paper).

    Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer, O., Knopf, B., Barker, T., Baumstark, L., Bellevrat, E., Chateau, B., Criqui, P., Isaac, M., Kitous, A., Kypreos, S., Leimbach, M., Lessmann, K., Magné, B., Scrieciu, S., Turton, H., & van Vuuren, D. P. (2010). The economics of low stabilization: Model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. The Energy Journal, 31, 11–48 (Special issue 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Kharecha, P., Lacis, A., Miller, R., Nazarenko, L., Lo, K., Schmidt, G. A., Russell, G., Aleinov, I., Bauer, S., Baum, E., Cairns, B., Canuto, V., Chandler, M., Cheng, Y., Cohen, A., Del Genio, A., Falufegi, G., Fleming, E., Friend, A., Hall, T., Jackman, C., Jonas, J., Kelley, M., Kinag, N. Y., Koch, D., Labow, G., Lerner, J., Menon, S., Novakov, T., Oinas, V., Perlwitz, J., Perlwitz, Ju, Rind, D., Romanou, A., Schmunk, R., Shindell, D., Stone, P., Sun, S., Streets, D., Tausnev, N., Thresher, D., Unger, N., Yao, M., & Zhang, S. (2007). Dangerous human-made interference with climate: A GISS model study. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 7, 2287–2312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heal, G. (2009). Climate change analysis: A meta-review and some suggestions for future research. Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, 3(1), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howes, S., Jotzo, F., Wyrwoll, P., Nordhaus, W. D., Stern, N., & Garnaut, R. (2011). The changing case for climate change mitigation (CCEP Working Paper 1107, July 2011). Canberra: Centre for Climate Economics & Policy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, C. C., & Jaeger, J. (2010). Three views on two degrees (ECF-Working Paper 2, 2010). Potsdam: European Climate Forum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahan, D. (2010). Fixing the communications failure. Nature, 463, 296–297. doi:10.1038/463296a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knopf, B., Luderer, G., & Edenhofer, O. (2011). Exploring the feasibility of low stabilisation targets. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews of Climate Change, 2, 617–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (1988). The pasteurization of France. Cambridge/London: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latour, B. (2001). Das Parlament der Dinge. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, T. (2011). 2 °C or not 2 °C? That is the climate question. Nature, 473, 7. doi:10.1038/473007a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenton, T. M., Held, H., Kriegler, E., Hall, J. W., Lucht, W., Rahmstorf, S., & Schellnhuber, H. J. (2008). Tipping elements in the Earth’s climate system. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105(6), 1786–1793.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meinshausen, M., Meinshausen, N., Hare, W., Raper, S. C. B., Frieler, K., Knutti, R., Frame, D. J., & Allen, M. R. (2009). Greenhouse gas emission targets for limiting global warming to 2°C. Nature, 458(7242), 1158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messner, D., & Rahmstorf, S. (2010). Kipp-Punkte im Erdsystem und ihre Auswirkungen auf Weltpolitik und –wirtschaft. In T. Debiel, D. Messner, F. Nuscheler, & C. Ulbert (Eds.), Global trends 2010. Frankfurt: Fischer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (2007). A review of the Stern review on the economics of global warming. Journal of Economic Literature, 45(3), 686–702.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (2008). A question of balance. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D. (2010). Economic aspects of global warming in a post‐Copenhagen environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(26), 11721–11726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus, W. D., & Boyer, J. (1999). Warming the world: Economic models of global warming. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, M. (2008). A physical science perspective on disaster: Through the prism of global warming. Social Research: An International Quarterly, 75(3), 659–668.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer, M., & Petsonk, A. (2005). Article 2 of the UNFCCC: Historical origins, recent interpretations. Climatic Change, 73(3), 195–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke, R. A. J. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randalls, S. (2010). History of the 2°C climate target. WIREs Climate Change, 1(4), 598–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogelj, J., Nabel, J., Chen, C., Hare, W., Markmann, K., Meinshausen, M., Schaeffer, M., Macey, K., & Hohne, N. (2010). Copenhagen accord pledges are paltry. Nature, 464, 1126–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schellnhuber, H. J. (Ed.). (2006). Avoiding dangerous climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, C. (2010). Is the dangerous limits discourse dangerously limited? Blog contribution at Earthscan: Blogging for a sustainable future. From http://www.facebook.com/note.php?note_id=433599788827. Accessed on 3 May 2012.

  • Singer, S. F., & Avery, D. T. (2007). Unstoppable global warming: Every 1,500 years (Updated and expanded ed.). Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, J. B., Schneider, S. H., Oppenheimer, M., Yohe, G. W., Hare, W., Mastrandrea, M. D., Patwardhan, A., Burton, I., Corfee-Morlot, J., Magadza, C. H. D., Füssel, H. M., Pittock, A. B., Rahman, A., Suarez, A., & Ypersele, J. P. (2009). Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106(11), 4133–4137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2007). The economics of climate change: The Stern review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, N. (2008). The economics of climate change. The American Economic Review, 98(2), 1–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tol, R. S. J. (2007). Europe’s long-term policy goal: A critical evaluation. Energy Policy, 35, 424–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNDP. (2007). Human development report 2007/2008: Fighting climate change. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNEP. (2010). The emissions gap report: Are the Copenhagen accord pledges sufficient to limit global warming to 2 °C or 1.5 °C? Nairobi: UNEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. Bonn: UNFCCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNFCCC. (2009). Decision 2/CP.15. Copenhagen Accord, December 7–19 2009. Retrieved August 21, 2011, from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2009/cop15/eng/l07.pdf

  • UNFCCC. (2010, November 29–December 10). Outcome of the work of the ad hoc working group on long-term cooperative action under the convention. Draft decision -/CP.16. Cancun. Retrieved August 21, 2011, from http://unfccc.int/files/meetings/cop_16/application/pdf/cop16_lca.pdf

  • Van der Sluijs, J., van Eijndhoven, J., Shackley, S., & Wynne, B. (1998). Anchoring devices in science for policy: The case of consensus around the climate sensitivity. Social Studies of Science, 28(2), 291–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WBGU. (1995). World in transition: Ways towards global environmental solutions. German Advisory Council on Global Change Flagship Report 1995. Berlin: Springer Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU. (1996). World in transition: The research challenge. German Advisory Council on Global Change Annual Report 1996. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU. (1997). World in transition: Ways towards sustainable management of freshwater resources. German Advisory Council on Global Change Flagship Report. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU. (2003). World in transition: New structures for global environmental policy. German Advisory Council on Global Change Flagship Report. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • WBGU. (2009). Climate change as a security risk. German Advisory Council on Global Change Flagship Report. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (2009). On modelling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 91(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman, M. L. (2010). GHG targets as insurance against catastrophic climate damages (Discussion Paper 10–42). The Harvard Project on International Climate Agreements. Cambridge: Harvard Kennedy School.

    Google Scholar 

  • WMO (World Meteorological Organization). (1988). Developing policies for responding to climatic change. A Summary of the Discussions and Recommendations of the Workshops held in Villach (28 September–2 October 1987) and Bellagio (9–13 November 1987) under the Auspices of the Beijer Institute, Stockholm, WMO/TD No. 225, Geneva.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Bank. (2010). World development report 2010 – Development and climate change. Washington, DC: World Bank.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Sustainable Solutions, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research (PIK), 60 12 03, 14412, Potsdam, Germany

    Brigitte Knopf, Christian Flachsland & Ottmar Edenhofer

  2. Institute for Social and Development Studies (IGP), Munich School of Philosophy, Munich, Germany

    Martin Kowarsch

Authors
  1. Brigitte Knopf
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Martin Kowarsch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Christian Flachsland
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ottmar Edenhofer
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brigitte Knopf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Climate Impact Research (PIK), Sustainable Solutions, Potsdam Institute for, Telegrafenberg 31A, Potsdam, 14473, Germany

    Ottmar Edenhofer

  2. Studies, Munich School of Philosophy, Institute for Social & Development, Kaulbachstraße 31a, München, 80539, Germany

    Johannes Wallacher

  3. Climate Impact Research (PIK), Climate Impacts and Vulnerabilities, Potsdam Institute for, Telegrafenberg 31A, Potsdam, 14473, Germany

    Hermann Lotze-Campen

  4. Munich School of Philosophy, Institute for Social and Development Stu, Kaulbachstraße 31a, München, 80539, Germany

    Michael Reder

  5. Climate Impact Research (PIK), Sustainable Solutions, Potsdam Institute for, Telegrafenberg 31A, Potsdam, 14473, Germany

    Brigitte Knopf

  6. Munich School of Philosophy, Institute for Social and Development Stu, Kaulbachstraße 31a, München, 80539, Germany

    Johannes Müller

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Knopf, B., Kowarsch, M., Flachsland, C., Edenhofer, O. (2012). The 2°C Target Reconsidered. In: Edenhofer, O., Wallacher, J., Lotze-Campen, H., Reder, M., Knopf, B., Müller, J. (eds) Climate Change, Justice and Sustainability. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4540-7_12

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation