Abstract
Western structuralism has produced important elements which have resulted in essential shifts in the modes of thinking in the humanities and in the cultural and social sciences. Despite these shifts, Western discourses have still not produced any general, integral, and coherent structural model of ontology and/or epistemology. This chapter intends to show that such a model can be found in Chinese neo-Confucian philosophy (960–1644). It follows the presumption that the crucial theoretical underpinnings of such models were developed much earlier in the history of Chinese thought, given that the bases of a structural approach to being had already been established in ancient Chinese philosophy. This paradigmatic foundation was further developed and elaborated by various Chinese philosophers in later centuries as a crucial feature of the classical Chinese logic of binary analogies. The article points out that the central binary concept of the neo-Confucian tradition (i.e., the concept of structure and creativenessity) (li and qi) has generally been interpreted as a dualism of idea and matter by Euro-American sinologists. However, such interpretations have overlooked an important feature of traditional, structurally determined Chinese onto-epistemology.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptions7. References
Bauer W (2000) Geschichte der Chinesichen Philosophie. CH Beck, München
Cheng Hao 程顥, Cheng Yi 程頤 (1981) 二程集 (Collection of the Cheng brothers), 4 vol. Zhonghua Shuju, Beijing
Cui Qingtian (2005) Processes and methods in researching the history of Chinese logic. In: Rošker J (ed) Chinese logic and Chinese culture – researches in traditional Chinese logic. Asian and African Studies, IX/2. University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, pp 15–25
Forke A (1934a) Geschichte der alten Chinesischen Philosophie. R. Oldenbourg, Hamburg
Forke A (1934b) Geschichte der mittelalterlichen Chinesischen Philosophie. R. Oldenbourg, Hamburg
Graham AC (1989) Disputers of the Tao – philosophical argument in ancient China. Open Court Publishing, Chicago
Graham AC (1992) Unreason within reason – essays on the outskirt of rationality. Open Court Publishing, Lasalle
McArthur D (2006) Debates over structural realism. J Gen Philos Sci 37(2):209–224
Rošker JS (1995) 老子與海德格的對話 – 試探一些有關中西傳統存有論比較的問題 (A dialogue between Laozi and Heiddegger – a comparison of traditional Chinese and western ontology). Xinzhu shifan xueyuan xuebao (2):189–213
Rošker JS (2010) The concept of structure as a basic epistemological paradigm of traditional Chinese thought. Asian Philos 20(1):79–96
Zhang Zai 張載 (1989) 正蒙 (Correction of ignorance), Xingli da quan, vol 4. Shandong youyi shu sShe, Jinan, Jinan
Zhou Dunyi 周敦頤 (2000) 周子通書(Master Zhou’s Almanac), Shanghai guji chuban she, Shanghai
Zhu Xi 朱熹 (1996) 朱熹集 (Zhu Xi’s collection), Sichuan jiaoyu chuban she, Chengdu
Zhu Xi 朱熹 (2000) 朱子今思錄 (Master Zhu’s records for contemporary reflection), Shanghai guji chuban she, Shanghai
Zhuangzi 莊子 (2000) 南花真經 (The genuine classic of Nan Hua), Guangzhou chuban she, Guangzhou
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rošker, J.S. (2012). Structure and Creativeness: A Reinterpretation of the Neo-Confucian Binary Category Li 理 and Qi 氣. In: Swan, L., Gordon, R., Seckbach, J. (eds) Origin(s) of Design in Nature. Cellular Origin, Life in Extreme Habitats and Astrobiology, vol 23. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4156-0_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4156-0_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-4155-3
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-4156-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)