Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Environmental Science and Management in a Changing World

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Perspectives on Environmental Management and Technology in Asian River Basins

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Geography ((BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY))

Abstract

Recognition of the pervasive impact of human activities on the natural world has prompted a reframing of approaches to environmental repair. Disentangling threads in the evolution of theoretical environmental science and management practice over the last 50 years enables practitioners to position contemporary programmes within a coherent conceptual framework. Over the last 50 years, environmental management strategies have moved beyond concern solely for utilitarian values to recognizing the importance of biodiversity management and associated ecosystem services. Initially, these programmes focussed on management of single issues, emphasizing concerns for endangered species and conservation in designated reserves that retained notionally pristine areas. The transition to an ecosystem approach to environmental management marked the recognition that there are too many species to attempt to save them one at a time and that conservation efforts must focus upon whole ecosystems. However, the ecosystem approach retained a vision of nature in equilibrium and management initiatives were framed in terms of environmental reference conditions and adjustments around a mean condition. Emerging theories in both ecology and earth sciences view nature as a complex adaptive system, often involving non-linear relationships and stochastic events which lead to outcomes that are unpredictable in time and space. Explicit recognition of inherent uncertainties in the character and behaviour of environmental systems has prompted a shift towards application of adaptive and participatory management principles. Recognizing directly the imperative to integrate scientific thinking with social-ecological considerations, post-normal scientific practice embraces a more inclusive approach to the management of complex adaptive systems, striving to maximise the resilience of any given system. Prospective opportunities for geographers in meeting the needs of this emerging framework are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ascher W (2001) Coping with complexity and organizational interests in natural resource management. Ecosystems 4:742–757

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social—ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, Galat D, Gloss S, Goodwin P, Hart D, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Katz S, Kondolf GM, Lake PS, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’Donnell TK, Pagano L, Powell B, Sudduth E (2005) Synthesizing US river restoration efforts. Science 308:636–637

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Block WM, Brennan LA, Gutierrez RJ (1987) Evaluation of guild-indicator species for use in resource management. Environ Manag 11:265–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Botkin DB (1989) Discordant harmonies: a new ecology for the twenty-first century. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bracken LJ, Wainwright J (2006) Geomorphological equilibrium: myth and metaphor? Trans Inst Br Geogr NS31:167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brierley GJ, Fryirs KA (2005) Geomorphology and river management: applications of the river styles framework. Blackwell, Malden

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Walker B, Anderies JM, Abel N (2001) From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems 4:765–781

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Claridge MF, Dawah HA, Wilson MRE (1997) Species: the units of biodiversity. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cosgrove D, Petts GE (eds) (1990) Water, engineering and landscape. Belhaven Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietz T, Ostrom E, Stern PC (2003) The struggle to govern the commons. Science 302:1907–1912

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Downes BJ, Barmuta LA, Fairweather PG, Faith DP, Keough MJ, Lake PS, Mapstone BD, Quinn GP (2002) Monitoring ecological impacts: concepts and practice in flowing waters. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Du Toit JT, Rogers KH, Biggs HC (eds) (2003) The Kruger experience: ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Everard M, Powell A (2002) Rivers as living systems. Aquat Conserv-Mar Freshw Ecosyst 12:329–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C (2003) Freshwater and resilience: a shift in perspective. Philos Trans Royal Soc London Ser B 358:2027–2036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter SR, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS, Walker B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 31:437–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Carpenter S, Walker B, Scheffer M, Elmqvist T, Gunderson L, Holling CS (2004) Regime shifts, resilience, and biodiversity in ecosystem management. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:557–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ann Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forman RT (1995) Land mosaics.The ecology of landscapes and regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Franklin JF (1993) Preserving biodiversity: species, ecosystems, or landscapes. Ecol Appl 3:202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz SO, Ravetz JR (1993) Science for the post-normal age. Futures 25:739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaston KJ (1996) What is biodiversity? In: Gaston KJ (ed) Biodiversity: a biology of numbers and difference. Blackwell, Oxford, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Graf WL (2001) Damage control: restoring the physical integrity of America’s rivers. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 91(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH (2000) Ecological resilience: in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris G (2007) Seeking sustainability in an age of complexity. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Heino J, Paavola R, Virtanen R, Muotka T (2005) Searching for biodiversity indicators in running waters: do bryophytes, macroinvertebrates, and fish show congruent diversity patterns? Biodivers Conserv 14:415–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs E (2003) Nature by design: people natural process and ecological restoration. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilderbrand RH, Watts AC, Randle AM (2005) The myths of restoration ecology. Ecol Soc 10(1):19 [online]

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillman M, Brierley GJ (2002) Information needs for environmental flow allocation: a case study from the Lachlan River, New South Wales, Australia. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 92:617–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman M, Brierley GJ (2005) A critical review of catchment-scale stream rehabilitation programmes. Prog Phys Geogr 29:50–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (1973) Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 4:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10:328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooper DU, Chapin FS, Ewel JJ, Hector A, Inchausti P, Lavorel S, Lawton JH, Lodge DM, Loreau M, Naeem S, Schmid B, Setala H, Symstad AJ, Vandermeer J, Wardle DA (2005) Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol Monogr 75:3–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jakobsen CH, Hels T, McLaughlin WJ (2004) Barriers and facilitators to integration among scientists in transdisciplinary landscape analyses: a cross-country comparison. For Policy Econ 6:15–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones CG, Lawton JH, Shachak M (1994) Organisms as ecosystem engineers. Oikos 69:373–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay JJ, Regier HA, Boyle M, Francis G (1999) An ecosystem approach for sustainability: addressing the challenge of complexity. Futures 31:721–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koelmans AA, van der Heijde A, Knijff LM, Aalderink RH (2001) Integrated modelling of eutrophication and organic contaminant fate and effects in aquatic ecosystems. A review. Water Res 35:3517–3536

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn TS (1962) The structure of scientific revolutions. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Lake PS (2001) On the maturing of restoration: linking ecological research and restoration. Ecol Manag Restor 2:110–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambeck RJ (1997) Focal species: a multi-species umbrella for nature conservation. Conserv Biol 11:849–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Launer AE, Murphy DD (1994) Umbrella species and the conservation of habitat fragments: a case study of a threatened butterfly and a vanishing grassland ecosystem. Biol Conserv 69:145–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lepori F, Palm D, Brannas E, Malmqvist B (2005) Does restoration of structural heterogeneity in streams enhance fish and macroinvertebrate diversity? Ecol Appl 15:2060–2071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losos E (1993) The future of the US endangered species act. Trends Ecol Evol 8:332–336

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Montgomery D (2001) Geomorphology, river ecology, and ecosystem management. In: Dorava JM, Montgomery DR, Palcsak BB, Fitzpatrick FA (eds) Geomorphic processes and riverine habitat. American Geophysical Union, Washington DC, pp 247–253

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Niemi GJ, McDonald ME (2004) Application of ecological indicators. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 35:89–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noss RF (1990) Indicators for monitoring biodiversity: a hierarchical approach. Conserv Biol 4:355–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OECD (2003) Environmental indicators: development, measurement and use. www.oecd.org/dataoecd/20/40/37551205.pdf. Accessed Jan 2011

  • O’Neill RV (2001) Is it time to bury the ecosystem concept? (With full military honors of course!). Ecology 82:3275–3284

    Google Scholar 

  • Paine RT (1995) A conversation on refining the concept of keystone species. Conserv Biol 9:962–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer MA, Bernhardt ES, Allan JD, Lake PS, Alexander G, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm CN, Shah JF, Galat DL, Loss SG, Goodwin P, Hart DD, Hassett B, Jenkinson R, Kondolf GM, Lave R, Meyer JL, O’Donnell TK, Pagano L, Sudduth E (2005) Standards for ecologically successful river restoration. J Appl Ecol 42:208–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson DL (1994) Selecting indicator taxa for the quantitative assessment of biodiversity. Philos Trans Royal Soc London Ser B-Biolog Sci 345:75–79

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Perry GLW (2002) Landscapes, space and equilibrium: shifting viewpoints. Prog Phys Geogr 26:339–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD, Allen CR, Holling CS (1998) Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems 1:6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petts GE, Amoros C (eds) (1996) Fluvial hydrosystems. Chapman & Hall, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD (1992) Nonlinear dynamical systems in geomorphology: revolution or evolution? Geomorphology 5:219–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips JD (2003) Sources of nonlinearity and complexity in geomorphic systems. Prog Phys Geogr 27:1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pickett STA, Cadenasso ML, Grove JM (2005) Biocomplexity in coupled natural-human systems: a multidimensional framework. Ecosystems 8:225–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poole GC (2002) Fluvial landscape ecology: addressing uniqueness within the river discontinuum. Freshw Biol 47:641–660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper KR (1959) The logic of scientific discovery. Hutchinson, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Postel S, Richter B (2003) Rivers for life Managing water for people and nature. Island Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast JR (1997) Species richness covariance in higher taxa: Empirical tests of the biodiversity indicator concept. Ecography 20:210–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravetz JR (1999) What is post-normal science? Futures 31:647–653

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhoads BL, Wilson D, Urban M, Herricks EE (1999) Interaction between scientists and nonscientists in community-based watershed management: Emergence of the concept of stream naturalization. Environ Manag 24:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richter B, Postel S (2004) Saving earth’s rivers. Issues Sci Technol 20:31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricotta C (2005) Through the jungle of biological diversity. Acta Biotheor 53:29–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers KH (2003) Adopting a heterogeneity paradigm: Implications for management of protected savannas. In: Du Toit JT, Rogers K, Biggs HC (eds) The Kruger experience Ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 41–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers KH, O’Keefe J (2003) River heterogeneity: ecosystem structure, function and management. In: Du Toit JT, Rogers K, Biggs HC (eds) The Kruger experience Ecology and management of savanna heterogeneity. Island Press, Washington DC, pp 189–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter S, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413:591–596

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Severinghaus WD (1981) Guild theory development as a mechanism for assessing environmental-impact. Environ Manage 5:187–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simberloff D (1998) Flagships, umbrellas, and keystones: Is single-species management passe in the landscape era? Biol Conserv 83:247–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprugel DG (1991) Disturbance, equilibrium, and environmental variability: what is natural vegetation in a changing environment? Biol Conserv 58:1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tress G, Tress B, Fry G (2005) Clarifying integrative research concepts in landscape ecology. Landsc Ecol 20:479–493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG, Romme WH, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV, Kratz TK (1993) A revised concept of landscape equilibrium: disturbance and stability on scaled landscapes. Landsc Ecol 8:213–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner M, Gardner RH, O’Neill RV (2001) Landscape ecology in theory and practice: pattern and process. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environmental Program (1992) Convention on Biological Diversity. http://www.cbd.int/. Accessed Jan 2011

  • Uys M (ed) (1994) Classification of rivers and environmental health indicators. In: Proceedings of a Joint South African/Australian workshop, February 7–14 1994, Cape Town, South Africa. Water Research Commission Report No. TT 63/94

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig AS (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5 [online]

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallington TJ, Hobbs RJ, Moore SA (2005) Implications of current ecological thinking for biodiversity conservation: a review of the salient issues. Ecol Soc 10(1):15 [online]

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters CJ, Holling CS (1990) Large-scale management experiments and learning by doing. Ecology 71:2060–2068

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltner-Toews D, Kay J (2005) The evolution of an ecosystem approach: the diamond schematic and an adaptive methodology for ecosystem sustainability and health. Ecol Soc 10(1):38 [online]

    Google Scholar 

  • Wegner A, Moore SA, Bailey J (2005) Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practitioner perceptions. Environ Impact Assess Rev 25:143–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams PB (2001) River engineering versus river restoration, ASCE Wetlands Engineering and River Restoration Conference, Reno, NV

    Google Scholar 

  • Wohl E, Angermeier PL, Bledsoe B, Kondolf GM, Macdonnell L, Merritt DM, Palmer MA, Poff NL, Tarboton D (2005) River restoration. Water Resour Res 41(10):W10301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu JG, Loucks OL (1995) From balance of nature to hierarchical patch dynamics: a paradigm shift in ecology. Q Rev Biol 70:439–466

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Susan Owen, Brad Coombes and Mick Hillman for helpful comments in the development of this manuscript, and David Higgitt for his co-ordination of support to present an earlier version of this work at the National University of Singapore Centenary Symposium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Environment, University of Auckland, Private Bag 92019, Auckland, New Zealand

    Gary Brierley

  2. Centre for Water in the Environment, University of Witswatersrand, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Carola Cullum

Authors
  1. Gary Brierley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Carola Cullum
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gary Brierley .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Geography, National University of Singapore, Singapore, 129792, Singapore

    David Higgitt

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brierley, G., Cullum, C. (2012). Environmental Science and Management in a Changing World. In: Higgitt, D. (eds) Perspectives on Environmental Management and Technology in Asian River Basins. SpringerBriefs in Geography. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2330-6_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation