Abstract
The potential benefits of introducing road user charging, in terms of limiting the negative effects of driving such as congestion and harmful emissions, outstrip those that could be achieved with fuel tax alone. In this chapter, we explore the theory and evidence underpinning road user charging, with a particular focus on the role of the policy in addressing climate change damage costs. In practice, countries have been hesitant to adopt national road user charging for cars. With the exception of the city state of Singapore, none has yet done so. Instead, road-related taxes, mainly on fuel and car ownership, are commonplace and a major source of tax revenue. It emerges that there is a diverse patchwork of approaches to charging for road use throughout the world, and varying calls for reform. Greenhouse gas reduction is not always at the centre of the road user charging debate. However, national road user charging appears to offer a holistic solution: it is therefore interesting to explore what role within it climate change costs should take, and what impact on climate change such a solution might have.
If road pricing was implemented nationwide, we would all face different prices for the trips we make. When we travelled on uncongested roads we would generally pay less, but on congested roads we would generally pay more. Paying the family road bill would probably be like paying the phone bill (DfT 2004a:2).
The benefits of road pricing come not so much from the overall cost, but from the differentiation in cost that it makes possible. Major benefits could be obtained without road users overall paying more than they otherwise would in fuel duty. But additional revenue could fund more transport infrastructure or services, as well as providing higher environmental benefits (DfT 2004a:3).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
New Member states’ are countries that became EU members in 2004, mostly from Central and Eastern Europe.
References
ACEA (2010) Overview of CO2 based motor vehicle taxes in the EU, 20.04.2010. ACEA, Brussels
Balmer U (2003) Practice and experience with implementing transport pricing reform in heavy goods transport in Switzerland, paper presented at the 4th IMPRINT-EUROPE seminar. Brussels
Baumol WJ, Oates WE (1988) The theory of environmental policy, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Beevers SD, Carslaw DC (2004) The impact of congestion charging on vehicle emissions in London. Atmos Environ 39(1):1–5
Bickel P, Hunt A, Laird J, Lieb C, Lindberg G, Odgaard T, Jong de G, Mackie P, Navrud S, Shires J, Tavasszy L (2006) Proposal for harmonised guidelines. HEATCO (Developing harmonised European approaches for transport costing and project assessment) Deliverable 5. Institut für Energiewirtschaft und Rationelle Energieanwendung, Universität Stuttgart, Stuttgart
CE Delft (2008) Handbook on estimation of external costs in the transport sector, deliverable 1 of the impact project prepared for the European commission (DG TREN) in association with INFRAS, Fraunhofer Gesellschaft, ISI and University of Gdansk, Delft
Chester MV, Horvath A (2009) Environmental assessment of passenger transportation should include infrastructure and supply chains, Environ Res Lett 4(2). doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/2/024008
Chin KK (2009) The Singapore Experience: the evolution of technologies, costs and benefits, and lessons learnt, discussion paper prepared for the ITF/OECD roundtable of 4–5 February 2010 on Implementing Congestion Charging. Paris.
Committee on Climate Change (CCC) (2009) Meeting the carbon budgets—the need for a step change. Retrieved 15 Mar 2010 from http://hmccc.s3.amazonaws.com/21667%20CCC%20Report%20AW%20WEB.pdf
Department for Transport (DfT) (2007) Towards a Sustainable Transport System. DfT, London.
European Commission (1995) Toward fair and efficient pricing in transport. Brussels
European Commission (1998) Fair payment for infrastructure use: a phased approach to a common transport infrastructure charging framework in the EU. Brussels
European Commission (2001) White paper: European transport policy for 2010: time to decide. Brussels.
European Commission (2006) IP/06/383: Sustainable transport – Towards fair and efficient infrastructure charging. Brussels.
European Commission (2007) Communication from the commission to the council and the European parliament 6 results of the review of the community strategy to reduce CO2 emissions from passenger cars and light-commercial vehicles, {SEC(2007) 60} {SEC(2007) 61}, COM/2007/0019 final
European Commission (2008) Directive 2008/101/EC of the European parliament and of the council amending directive 2003/87/EC so as to include aviation activities in the scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the community (19 November 2008)
European Commission (2009) Directive 2009/29/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 23 April 2009 amending directive 2003/87/EC so as to improve and extend the greenhouse gas emission allowance trading scheme of the Community
European Commission (2010) Report from the commission to the European parliament, the council, and the European economic and social committee progress report on implementation of the community’s integrated approach to reduce CO2 emissions from light-duty vehicles, COM/2010/0656 final.DECC (2010), Toolkit for guidance on valuation of energy use and greenhouse gas emissions, Tables 1–29, supporting the toolkit and guidance. http://www.decc.gov.uk/en/content/cms/statistics/analysts_group/analysts_group.aspx. Last accessed Mar 2011
Defra/DECC (2010) 2010 Guidelines to Defra/DECC’s GHG conversion factors for company reporting: methodology paper for emission factors, October 2010. Defra, London
Department for Transport (DfT) (2004a) Feasibility study of road pricing in the UK – Full report. DfT, London
Department for Transport (DfT) (2004b) Feasibility study of road pricing in the UK, Annex C ‘Charging technologies and existing schemes’. DfT, London
Department for Transport (DfT) (2004c) Feasibility study of road pricing in the UK, Annex A ‘The economic case for road pricing’. DfT, London
Department for Transport (DfT) (2004d) Feasibility study of road pricing in the UK, Annex B Modelling results and analysis. DfT, London
Department for Transport (DfT) (2010a) Transport statistics Great Britain 2010, Updated 25 November 2010. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/statistics/datatablespublications/tsgb/. Last accessed Mar 2011
Department for Transport (DfT) (2010b) TAG unit 3.3.5 ‘The greenhouse gases sub-objective’. http://www.deft.gov.uk/webtag/documents/expert/pdf/unit3.3.5d.pdf. Last accessed Mar 2011
Department for Transport (DfT) (2010c) TAG unit 3.5.6 ‘Values of time and operating costs’. http://www.deft.gov.uk/webtag/documents/expert/pdf/unit3.5.6d.pdf. Last accessed Mar 2011
DVLA (2010) Rates of vehicle tax. DVLA, Swansea
Eddington, Sir R. (2006) The Eddington transport study: the case for action. HM Treasury and Department for Transport, London. http://www.dft.gov.uk/about/strategy/transportstrategy/eddingtonstudy. Last accessed Mar 2011
Eliasson J (2009) A cost–benefit analysis of the Stockholm congestion charging system. Transp. Res Part A 43:468–480
European Parliament (2004) Directive 2004/52/EC of the European parliament and of the council of 29 April 2004 on the interoperability of electronic road toll systems in the community
European Parliament (2006) Directive 2006/38/EC of the European parliament of the council of 17 May 2006 amending directive 1999/62/EC on the charging of heavy goods vehicles for the use of certain infrastructures. Brussels
Hahn W (2002) Implementing transport pricing reform in Germany, paper presented at the 3rd IMPRINT-EUROPE seminar. Brussels.
Henry Tax Review (2009) Australia’s future tax system, Report to the Treasurer, December 2009
House of Commons Select Committee on Transport (2009) Taxes and charges on road users. HC103, TSO, paragraph 38 and written evidence by several witnesses, London
Knight FH (1924) Some fallacies in interpretation of social costs. Q J Econ 38(August):582–606
Mackie PJ, Wardman MR, Fowkes AS, Whelan GA, Nellthorp J, Bates JJ (2003) Value of travel time savings in the UK, a report to the Department for Transport. Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds
McKinnon A, McClelland D (2005) An Alternative Method of Road-User Charging for Lorries. Logistics Research Centre, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh
Ministry of Transport (1964) Road Pricing: The economic and technical possibilities (the Smeed Committee Report). HMSO, London.
Mohring HD, Harwitz I (1962) Highway benefits: an analytical framework. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL
Nash CA (2007) Developments in transport policy – road pricing in Britain. J Transport Econ Policy 41:135–147
Nash CA, Matthews B (2005) Transport pricing policy and the research agenda. In: Nash CA, Matthews B (eds) Measuring the marginal social cost of transport. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Nash C, Matthews B, Link H, Bonsall P, Lindberg G, van der Voorde E, Ricci A, Enei R, Proost S (2008a) Policy conclusions. Deliverable 10 of GRACE (Generalization of Research on Accounts and Cost Estimation), Funded by the European Commission Sixth Framework Programme, University of Leeds, Leeds
Nash CA, Menaz B, Matthews B (2008b) Inter-urban road goods vehicle pricing in Europe. In: Richardson H, Christine Bae C-H (eds) Road congestion and pricing in Europe. Implications for the United States. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 233–251
Newbery DMG (1989) Cost recovery from optimally designed roads. Economica 56(222):165–185
Pigou AC (1920) Wealth and welfare. Macmillan, London
Rothengatter W (2003) How good is first best? Marginal cost and other pricing principles for user charging transport. Transport Policy 10:121–130
Sansom T, Nash CA, Mackie PJ, Shires JD, Watkiss P (2001) Surface transport costs and charges Great Britain 1998. Institute for Transport Studies, Leeds
Santos G, Fraser G (2006) Road pricing: lessons from London. Econ Policy 21(46):264–310
Steen M (2009) Dutch propose full-scale road pricing system. Retrieved 25 Mar 2010 from http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/9a17120a-d090-11de-af9c-00144feabdc0.html
Stern N (2006) The economics of climate change: the stern review. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Swiss Federal Statistical Office (2004) Monitoring Sustainable Development. MONET, Neuchâtel
TML (2006) ASSESS – Assessment of the contribution of the TEN and other transport policy measures to the mid-term implementation of the White Paper on the European transport policy for 2010 (in association with TNO, WSP, TRT, CA Kiel, UG, ITS-Leeds, SWOV, DLR, IUAS Bad Honnef and ITU), Final Report for the European Commission, Brussels
TRL (2009) Road vehicle emission factors 2009. http://www.dft.gov.uk/pgr/roads/environment/emissions/regulated.xls. Last accessed Mar 2011
Vickrey WS (1969) Congestion theory and transport investment. Am Econ Rev 59(2):251–260
Walters AA (1961) The theory and measurement of private and social cost of highway congestion. Econometrica 29:676–699
Walters AA (1968) The economics of road user charges. World Bank Staff Occasional Paper Number Five. IBRD, Washington
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Matthews, B., Nellthorp, J. (2012). National Road User Charging: Theory and Implementation. In: Zachariadis, T. (eds) Cars and Carbon. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2123-4_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2123-4_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-94-007-2122-7
Online ISBN: 978-94-007-2123-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)