Skip to main content

A Review of Ecosystem Services, Farmer Livelihoods, and Value Chains in Shade Coffee Agroecosystems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Integrating Agriculture, Conservation and Ecotourism: Examples from the Field

Abstract

Cultivation, processing, and consumption of coffee are dynamic processes that connect coffee farmers and agro-ecosystems with coffee drinkers spanning the globe. As a cash crop, coffee cultivation gained popularity in the Old and then the New world, and flourished under colonial regimes of the nineteenth and twentieth century. Coffee production patterns and management styles have changed ­drastically in the past two centuries and continue to shift, with the greatest recent expansions in East Asia. Traditionally, coffee is cultivated under a canopy of shade trees, a practice that ensures the longevity of the farm, supports biodiversity, and provides communities with a broad array of ecosystem services. However, many modern management schemes abandon shade practices. On the other hand, specialty coffee markets, like certified organic, certified shade (Bird Friendly), Fair Trade, and other certified coffees have gained recent popularity, though they still represent a small fraction of the global coffee economy. The global coffee economy is comprised of a wide array of coffee value chains that connect farmers with consumers, and thus impact farmer livelihoods at multiple spatial scales. Key players in the coffee value chain include local cooperatives, national government agencies, and global certification agencies. Similarly, ecosystem services provided by shade coffee occur at local, regional, and global scales, including pollination, erosion-control, and carbon sequestration, respectively. While the ecological and socio-economic costs and benefits associated with shade coffee are clear, this review reveals that there are many challenges to bridging sustainable coffee management with livelihood security. Furthermore, in this review we identify existing gaps in the literature and a number of promising research directions concerning the ecological and socio-economic impacts of coffee production.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Agyeman J, Bullard RD, Evans B (2003) Just sustainabilities: development in an unequal world. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Akiyama T, Baffes J, Larson D, Varangis P (2003) Commodity market reform in Africa: some recent experience. Econ Syst 27:83–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Alegre C (1959) Climates et cafeiers d’Arabie. Agron Trop 14:25–48

    Google Scholar 

  • AMECAFE (2010) Data prepared and provided by Jose Luis Benvidez of the Asociacion Mexicana de la Cadena Productiva del Café, A.C, 7 July 2010

    Google Scholar 

  • Amekawaa Y, Sseguyaa H, Onzerea S, Carranzaa I (2010) Delineating the multifunctional role of agroecological practices: toward sustainable livelihoods for smallholder farmers in developing countries. J Sustain Agr 34:202–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Anacafe (2008) Green book: Guatemalan coffees. Guatemalan National Coffee Association, Guatemala City

    Google Scholar 

  • Armbrecht I, Gallego MC (2007) Testing ant predation on the coffee berry borer in shaded and sun coffee plantations in Colombia. Entomol Exp Appl 124:261–267

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnould EJ, Plastina A, Ball D (2009) Does fair trade deliver on its core value proposition? Effects on income, educational attainment, and health in three countries. J Public Pol Market 28:186–201

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon C (2005a) Confronting the coffee crisis: can fair trade, organic and specialty coffees reduce small-scale farmer vulnerability in northern Nicaragua. World Dev 33:497–511

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon CM (2005b) Confronting the coffee crisis: Nicaraguan farmers use of cooperative, fair trade and agroecological networks to negotiate livelihoods and sustainability. PhD dissertation, University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon CM (2010) Who decides what is fair in fair trade? The agri-environmental governance of standards, access, and price. J Peasant Stud 37:111–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon C, Méndez VE, Brown M (2005) Participatory action-research and support for community development and conservation: examples from shade coffee landscapes of El Salvador and Nicaragua. Center for Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems (CASFS), University of California-Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon CM, Méndez VE, Flores Gomez MA, Stuart D, Díaz Flores SR (2008a) Are sustainable coffee certifications enough to secure farmer livelihoods? The millenium development goals and Nicaragua’s fair trade cooperatives. Globalizations 5:259–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon CM, Mendez VE, Gliessman S, Goodman D, Fox J (2008b) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bair J (2009) Frontiers of commodity chain research. Stanford University Press, Stanford

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakermans MH, Vitz AC, Rodewald AD, Rengifo CG (2009) Migratory songbird use of shade coffee in the Venezuelan Andes with implications for conservation of Cerulean warbler. Biol Conserv 142:2476–2483

    Google Scholar 

  • Barreda A (2004) Invasiones invisibles, subsidios perversos, guerra continua. Hojarasca, La Jornada 20–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington AJ (1999) Capitals and capabilities: a framework for analyzing peasant viability, rural livelihoods and poverty. World Dev 27:2021–2044

    Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington A (2000) Reencountering development: livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90:495–520

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer J, Muschler R, Kass D, Somarriba E (1998) Shade management in coffee and cacao plantations. Agroforest Syst 38:139–164

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennett E, Peterson G, Gordon L (2009) Understanding relationships among multiple ecosystem services. Ecol Lett 12:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Biderman J (1982) Class structure, the state and capitalist development in Nicaraguan agriculture. PhD dissertation, University of California-Berkeley, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Borkhataria R, Collazo J, Groom M (2006) Additive effects of vertebrate predators on insects in a Puerto Rican coffee plantation. Ecol Appl 16:696–703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brenner N (2001) The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Prog Hum Geog 25:591–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (1996) Present and potential roles of forest in the global climate change debate. Unasylva 47:3–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Calo M, Wise TA (2005) Revaluing peasant coffee production: organic and fair trade markets in Mexico. Global Development and Environment Institute, Medford

    Google Scholar 

  • Canadell JG, Raupach MR (2008) Managing forests for climate change mitigation. Science 320:1456–1457

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cannell M (1976) Crop physiological aspects of coffee bean yield: a review. Kenya Coffee 41:245–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Cannell M (1983) Coffee. Biologist 30:257–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Carr M (2001) The water relations and irrigation requirements of coffee. Exp Agric 37:1–36

    Google Scholar 

  • CEPAL (2002) Globalización y desarrollo. CEPAL, Santiago

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1991) In search of professionalism, bureaucracy and sustainable livelihoods for the 21st century. Ids Bull-I Dev Stud 22:5–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (1992) The self-deceiving state. Ids Bull-I Dev Stud 23:31–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Charrier A, Lashermes P, Eskes A (2009) Botany, genetics and genomics of coffee. In: Wintgens JN (ed.) Coffee: growing, processing, sustainable production. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 25–60

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarence-Smith W (2003) The coffee crisis in Asia, Africa, and the Pacific, 1870–1914. In: Clarence-Smith W, Topik S (eds.) The global coffee economy in Africa, Asia and Latin America, 1500–1989. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA, pp 100–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Cook O (1901) Shade in coffee culture. United States Department of Agriculture, Division of Botany, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, D’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Craswell ET, Sajjapongse A, Howlett DJB, Dowling AJ (1997) Agroforestry in the management of sloping lands in Asia and the Pacific. Agroforest Syst 38:121–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz-Angon A, Sillett TS, Greenberg R (2008) An experimental study of habitat selection by birds in a coffee plantation. Ecology 89:921–927

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • D’Haeze D, Deckers J, Raes D, Phong T, Loi H (2005) Environmental and socioeconomic impacts of institutional reforms on the agricultural sector of Vietnam land suitability assessment for Robusta coffee in the Dak Gan region. Agric Ecosyst Environ 105:59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Daily GC (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • DaMatta F (2004) Ecophysiological constraints on the production of shaded and unshaded coffee: a review. Field Crop Res 84:99–114

    Google Scholar 

  • DaMatta FM, Chaves ARM, Pinheiro HA, Ducatti C, Loureiro ME (2003) Drought tolerance of two field-grown clones of Coffea canephora. Plant Sci 164:111–117

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Daviron B, Ponte S (2005) The coffee paradox: global markets, commodity trade, and the elusive promise of development. Zed Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis AP, Govaerts R, Bridson DM, Stoffelen P (2006) An annotated checklist of the genus Coffea L. (Rubiaceae). Bot J Linn Soc 152:465–512

    Google Scholar 

  • De la Mora A, Livingston G, Philpott SM (2008) Arboreal ant abundance and leaf miner damage in coffee agroecosystems in Mexico. Biotropica 40:742–746

    Google Scholar 

  • De Marco P, Coelho FM (2004) Services performed by the ecosystem: forest remnants influence agricultural cultures’ pollination and production. Biodivers Conserv 13:1245–1255

    Google Scholar 

  • Decazy F, Avelino J, Guyot B, Perriot JJ, Pineda C, Cilas C (2003) Quality of different Honduran coffees in relation to several environments. J Food Sci 68:23–56

    Google Scholar 

  • Devaux A, Horton D, Velasco C, Thiele G, López G, Bernet T, Reinoso I, Ordinola M (2009) Collective action for market chain innovation in the Andes. Food Policy 34:31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick CW, Jones FA, Hardy OJ, Petit RJ (2008) Spatial scales of seed and pollen-mediated gene flow in tropical forest trees. Trop Plant Biol 1:20–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Dicum G, Luttinger N (1999) The coffee book: anatomy of an industry from crop to the last drop. The New Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Donald PF (2004) Biodiversity impacts of some agricultural commodity production systems. Conserv Biol 18:17–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Dossa EL, Fernandes ECM, Reid WS, Ezui K (2008) Above- and belowground biomass, nutrient and carbon stocks contrasting an open-grown and a shaded coffee plantation. Agroforest Syst 72:103–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Tucker C, Castellanos E (2006) Responding to the coffee crisis: a pilot study of farmers’ adaptations in Mexico, Guatemala and Honduras. Geogr J 172:156–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Elevitch CR, Wilkinson KM (2000) Agroforestry guide for the Pacific islands. Permanent Agriculture Resources, Holualoa, 240 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Engel S, Pagiola S, Wunder S (2008) Designing payments for environmental services in theory and practice: an overview of the issues. Ecol Econ 65:663–674

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalante F (1995) Coffee and agroforestry in Venezuela. Agroforest Today 7:5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Escalante F, Aguilar R, Lugo P (1987) Identifacion, evaluacion y distribucion espacial de especies utilizadas como sombra en sistemas tradicionales de cafe (Coffea arabica) en zonas del estado Trujillo, Venezuela. Venezuala Forestal 3:50–62

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2008) Food and Agriculture Organization. Resource document. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/DesktopDefault.aspx?PageID=567#ancor. Accessed Oct 2010

  • FAO (2009) FAOSTAT: crops. Resource document. http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor. Accessed Oct 2010

  • FAO (2010) FAOSTAT: crops. Resource document. http://faostat.fao.org/site/570/default.aspx#ancor. Accessed Oct 2010

  • Fox J (1994) The roots of Chiapas. Econ Polit Weekly 29:119–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Fox J (1996) How does civil society thicken? the political construction of social capital in rural Mexico. World Dev 24:1089–1103

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman A III (1993) The measurement of environmental and resource values: theory and methods. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridell G (2006) Fair trade and neoliberalism – assessing emerging perspectives. Lat Am Perspect 33:8–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallina S, Mandujano S, Gonzalez-Romero A (1996) Conservation of mammalian biodiversity in coffee plantations of Central Veracruz. Agroforest Syst 33:13–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillison AN, Liswanti N, Budidarsono S, van Noordwijk M, Tomich TP (2004) Impact of cropping methods on biodiversity in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia. Ecol Soc 9:16–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannucci D (2003) Emerging issues in the marketing and trade of organic products. In: Monograph in the proceedings of the OECD workshop on organic agriculture, OECD, Paris, Sept 2002

    Google Scholar 

  • Giovannucci D, Liu P, Byers A (2008) Adding value: certified coffee trade in North America. In: Liu P (ed.) Value-adding standards in the North American food market – trade opportunities in certified products for developing countries. FAO, Rome, pp 33–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman D (2008) The international coffee crisis: a review of the issues. In: Bacon CM, Mendez VE, Gliessman S, Goodman D, Fox J (eds.) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, Reitsma R (1997a) Bird populations in shade and sun coffee plantations in Central Guatemala. Conserv Biol 11:448–459

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R, Bichier P, Sterling J (1997b) Bird populations in rustic and planted shade coffee plantations of Eastern Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica 29:501–514

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R, Bichier P, Angon AC, MacVean C, Perez R, Cano E (2000) The impact of avian insectivory on arthropods and leaf damage in some Guatemalan coffee plantations. Ecology 81:1750–1755

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg R, Perfecto I, Philpott SM (2008) Agroforests as model systems for tropical ecology. Ecology 89:913–914

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Guadarrama-Zugasti C (2008) A grower typology approach to assessing the environmental impact of coffee farming in Veracruz, Mexico. In: Bacon CM, Méndez VE, Gliessman SR, Goodman D, Fox JA (eds.) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 127–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Guhl A (2004) Coffee and landcover changes in the Colombian coffee region landscape 1970–1997. Ensayos, Bogota

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutman P (2003) Macroeconomics for sustainable development. Program Office, World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyot BD, Gueule JC, Maniez JJ, Perriot J, VL Giron (1996) Influence de l’altitude et de l’ombrage sur la qualité des cafés Arabica. Plantations, Recherche, Développement 3:272–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson L, Terstappen V (2009) Collaboration on contentious issues: research partnerships for gender equity in Nicaragua’s fair trade coffee cooperatives. J Agromedicine 14:105–111

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison G, DiSogra C, Manalo-LeClair G, Aguayo J, Yen W (2002) Over 2.2 million low-income California adults are food insecure; 658,000 suffer hunger. UCLA Healthy Policy Research Brief

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey D (2005) A brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry M, Tittonell P, Manlay RJ, Bernoux B, Albrecht A, Vanlauwe B (2009) Biodiversity, carbon stocks and sequestration potential in aboveground biomass in smallholder farming systems of western Kenya. Agric Ecosyst Environ 129:238–252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hergoualc’h K, Skiba U, Harmand JM, Henault C (2008) Fluxes of greenhouse gases from Andosols under coffee in monoculture or shaded by Inga densiflora in Costa Rica. Biogeochemistry 89:329–345

    Google Scholar 

  • Heynen N (2007) Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt-Giménez E (2006) Campesino a campesino: voices from Latin America’s farmer to farmer movement for sustainable agriculture. Food First Books, Oakland

    Google Scholar 

  • ICAFE (1989) Instituto del Café de Costa Rica. Manual de recomendaciones para el cultivo del café. Ministerio de Agricultura y Ganadería, San Jose

    Google Scholar 

  • Illy E (2002) The complexity of coffee. Sci Am 6:86–91

    Google Scholar 

  • International Coffee Organization (ICO) (2000) Monthly statistics. http://www.ico.org/prices/m1.htm. Accessed July 2010

  • IPCC (2007) Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the IPCC. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Wembley

    Google Scholar 

  • Jack BK, Leimona B, Ferraro PJ (2009) A revealed preference approach to estimating supply curves for ecosystem services: use of auctions to set payments for soil erosion control in Indonesia. Conserv Biol 23:359–367

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffe R, Bacon C (2008) From differentiated coffee markets toward alternative trade and knowledge networks. In: Bacon CM, Mendez VE, Gliessman S, Goodman D, Fox J (eds.) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 311–336

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaffee D (2007) Brewing justice: fair trade coffee, sustainability, and survival. University of California Press, Berkeley

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaramillo L (2002) Estimación del costo de oportunidad del uso de suelo forestal en ejidos a nivel nacional. DGIPEA working paper. Instituto Nacional de Ecología, México

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha S, Dick CW (2008) Shade coffee farms promote genetic diversity of native trees. Curr Biol 18:1126–1128

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha S, Dick CW (2010) Native bees facilitate gene flow across shade coffee landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107:13760–13764

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jha S, Vandermeer J (2010) Impacts of coffee agroforestry management on tropical bee communities. Biol Conserv 143:1423–1431

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MD (2000) Effects of shade-tree species and crop structure on the winter arthropod and bird communities in a Jamaican shade coffee plantation. Biotropica 32:133–145

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson MD, Levy NJ, Kellermann JL, Robinson DE (2009) Effects of shade and bird exclusion on arthropods and leaf damage on coffee farms in Jamaica’s Blue Mountains. Agroforest Syst 76:139–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Kay M, Franks TR, Smith L (1997) Water: economics, management and demand. E & FN Spon, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellermann J, Johnson M, Stercho A, Hackett S (2008) Ecological and economic services provided by birds on Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee farms. Conserv Biol 22:1177–1185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003a) Bee pollination and fruit set of Coffea arabica and C. canephora (Rubiaceae). Am J Bot 90:153–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003b) Fruit set of highland coffee increases with the diversity of pollinating bees. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 270:955–961

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2003c) Pollination of Coffea canephora in relation to local and regional agroforestry management. J Appl Ecol 40:837–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein AM, Cunningham SA, Bos M, Steffan-Dewenter I (2008) Advances in pollination ecology from tropical plantation crops. Ecology 89:935–943

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kotecha S, Hieu P, Kuit M, Von Enden J, Swinkels R (2003) Vietnamese coffee competitiveness and policy options to improve it. Conference summary found at. www.xttmnew.agroviet.gov.vn/en/stories/Coffee_Policy_brief.pdf

  • Kremen C, Williams NM, Aizen MA, Gemmill-Herren B, LeBuhn G, Minckley R, Packer L, Potts SG, Roulston T, Steffan-Dewenter I, Vazquez DP, Winfree R, Adams L, Crone EE, Greenleaf SS, Keitt TH, Klein AM, Regetz J, Ricketts TH (2007) Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol Lett 10:299–314

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Läderach P, Oberthür T, Niederhauser N, Usma H, Collet L, Pohlan J (2006) Café especial: ­factores, dimensiones e interacciones. In: Pohlan J, Barrera J (eds.) El cafetal del futuro: realidades y visiones. Shaker, Aachen, pp 141–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Läderach P, Oberthür T, Pohlan J (2009) Management of intrinsic quality characteristics for ­specialty coffee – a framework developed and tested in coffee growing regions across Latin America. Dr. Müller Verlag, Saarbrück, Germany, 157 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Läderach P, Lundy M, Jarvis A, Ramírez J, Pérez P, Schepp E, Eitzinger KA (2010) Predicted impact of climate change on coffee supply chains. In: Leal Filho W (ed.) The economic, social and political elements of climate change. Springer, Berlin, pp 703–724

    Google Scholar 

  • Lagemann J, Heuveldop J (1983) Characterization and evaluation of agroforestry systems. CATIE, Tumalba

    Google Scholar 

  • Lara-Estrada LD (2005) Efectos de la altitud, sombra, producción y fertilización sobre la calidad del café (Coffea arabica L. var. caturra) producido en sistemas agroforestales de la zona cafetalera nor-central de Nicaragua. Agroforestry. Centro Agronómico Tropical de Investigación y Enseñanza, Turrialba

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen A, Philpott SM (2010) Twig-nesting ants: the hidden predators of the coffee berry borer in Chiapas, Mexico. Biotropica 42:342–347

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin B, Giovannucci D, Varangis P (2004) Coffee markets: new paradigms in global supply and demand. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB (2007) Agroforestry management as an adaptive strategy against potential microclimate extremes in coffee agriculture. Agric For Meteorol 144:85–94

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB (2010) The role of agroforestry in reducing water loss through soil evaporation and crop transpiration in coffee agroecosystems. Agric For Meteorol 150:510–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin BB, Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008) Synergies between agricultural intensification and climate change could create surprising vulnerabilities for crops. Bioscience 58:847–854

    Google Scholar 

  • Linton A (2005) Partnering for sustainability: business–NGO alliances in the coffee industry. Develop Prac 15:600–614

    Google Scholar 

  • Lomeli-Flores J (2007) Natural enemies and mortality factors of the coffee leaf miner Leucoptera coffeella (Guerin-Meneville) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae) in Chiapas, Mexico. PhD dissertation, Texas A&M University, College Station

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovera S (2004) Environmental markets impoverish the poor. Resource document. Ecosystem Marketplace. http://ecosystemmarketplace.com/pages/article.opinion.php?componentid=2268&componentversionid. Accessed Oct 2010

  • Lyon S (2008) We want to be equal to them: Fair-trade coffee certification and gender equity within organizations. Hum Organ 67:258–268

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyon S, Bezaury JA, Mutersbaugh T (2010) Gender equity in fair trade-organic coffee producer organizations: cases from Mesoamerica. Geoforum 41:93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Magalhaes A, Angelocci L (1976) Sudden alterations in water balance associated with flower bud opening in coffee plants. J Hortic Sci 51:419–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Manrique AJ, Thimann RE (2002) Coffee (Coffea arabica) pollination with africanized honeybees in Venezuela. Interciencia 27:414–416

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsden T, Munton R, Ward N, Wahtmore S (1996) Agricultural geography and the political economy approach: a review. Econ Geogr 72:361–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Marston S (2000) The social construction of scale. Prog Hum Geogr 24:219–242

    Google Scholar 

  • McAfee K, Shapiro EN (2010) Payments for ecosystem services in Mexico: nature, neoliberalism, social movements, and the State. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 100:579–599

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy J (2004) Privatizing conditions of production: trade agreements as neoliberal environmental governance. Geoforum 35:327–341

    Google Scholar 

  • McCauley DJ (2006) Selling out on nature. Nature 443:27–28

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • McCreery D (1995) Wage labor, free labor and vagrancy laws: the transition to capitalism in Guatemala. In: Roseberry W, Gudmundson L, Kutschbach MS (eds.) Coffee, society, and power in Latin America. Johns Hopkins University, Maryland, pp 1920–1945

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez VE, Gliessman SR, Gilbert GS (2007) Tree biodiversity in farmer cooperatives of a shade coffee landscape in western El Salvador. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:145–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez VE, Shapiro EN, Gilbert GS (2009) Cooperative management and its effects on shade tree diversity, soil properties and ecosystem services of coffee plantations in western El Salvador. Agroforest Syst 76:111–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez VE, Bacon CM, Olson M, Morris KS, Shattuck AK (2010a) Agrobiodiversity and shade coffee smallholder livelihoods: a review and synthesis of ten years of research in Central America. Prof Geogr 62:357–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Méndez VE, Bacon C, Olson M, Petchers S, Herrador D, Carranza C, Trujillo L, Guadarrama-Zugasti C, Cordón A, Mendoza A (2010b) Effects of fair trade and organic certifications on small-scale coffee farmer households in Central America and Mexico. Renewable Agric Food Syst 25:236–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Michon G, Mary F, Bompard JM (1986) Multistoried agroforestry garden system in West Sumatra, Indonesia. Agroforest Syst 4:315–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Millenium Ecosystem Assessment (MEA ) (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Moguel P, Toledo VM (1999) Biodiversity conservation in traditional coffee systems of Mexico. Conserv Biol 13:11–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Muriel SB, Kattan GH (2009) Effects of patch size and type of coffee matrix on ithomiine butterfly diversity and dispersal in cloud-forest fragments. Conserv Biol 23:948–956

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Muschler RG (1997) Shade or sun for ecologically sustainable coffee production: a summary of environmental key factors. In: Proceedings of the 3rd scientific week, CATIE, Turrialba, 3–7 Feb 1997, pp 109–112

    Google Scholar 

  • Muschler RG (2001) Shade improves coffee quality in a sub-optimal coffee zone of Costa Rica. Agroforest Syst 51:131–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutersbaugh T (2004) Serve and certify: paradoxes of service work in organic-coffee certification. Environ Plann D 22:533–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Mutersbaugh T (2005) Fighting standards with standards: harmonization, rents, and social accountability in certified agrofood networks. Environ Plann A 37:2033–2051

    Google Scholar 

  • Neelin JD, Munnich M, Su H, Meyerson JE, Holloway CE (2006) Tropical drying trends in global warming models and observations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103:6110–6115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nigh R (1997) Organic agriculture and globalization: a Maya associative corporation in Chiapas, Mexico. Hum Organ 56(4):427–435

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolasco M (1985) Cafe y sociedad en Mexico. Centro de Ecodesarrollo, Mexico City, 454 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes M, Bierhuizen J, Ploegman C (1968) Studies on the productivity of coffee, I: effect of light, temperature, and CO2 concentration on photosynthesis of Coffea arabica. Acta Bot Neerl 17:93–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutman F (1937) Studies on the physiology of Coffea arabica, I: photosynthesis of coffee leaves under natural conditions. Ann Bot 1:353–367

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien TG, Kinnaird MF (2003) Caffeine and conservation. Science 5619:587

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Rourke D (2004) Transition environments: ecological and social challenges to post-socialist industrial development. In: Peet R, Watts M (eds.) Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Oxfam (2001) Bitter coffee: how the poor are paying for the slump in coffee prices. www.globalexchange.org/campaigns/fairtrade/coffee/OxfamPriceReport.pdf

  • Oxfam (2002) Mugged: poverty in your coffee cup. www.oxfam.org.uk/resources/papers/mugged.html

  • Palm C, Van Noordwijk V, Woomer P, Alegre J, Arevalo L, Castilla C, Cordeiro D, Hariah K, Kotto-Same J, Moukam A, Parton W, Ricse A, Rodriques V, Sitompul S (2005) Carbon losses and sequestration alter land use change in the humid tropics. In: Palm CA, Vosti SA, Sanchez PA, Ericksen PJ (eds.) Slash-and-burn agriculture: the search for alternatives. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 41–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Peet R, Watts M (2004) Liberation ecologies: environment, development, social movements. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peeters LYK, Soto-Pinto L, Perales H, Montoya G, Ishiki M (2003) Coffee production, timber, and firewood in traditional and Inga-shaded plantations in Southern Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 95:481–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Peluso NL (1994) Rich forests, poor people: resource control and resistance in Java. University of California Press, Berkeley, 336 pp

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2006) The effect of an ant-hemipteran mutualism on the coffee berry borer (Hypothenemus hampei) in southern Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 117:218–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008a) Biodiversity conservation in tropical agroecosystems – a new conservation paradigm. Ann NY Acad Sci 1134:173–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J (2008b) Spatial pattern and ecological process in the coffee agroforestry system. Ecology 89:915–920

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Rice RA, Greenberg R, VanderVoort ME (1996) Shade coffee: a disappearing refuge for biodiversity. Bioscience 46:598–608

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer JH, Bautista GL, Nunez GI, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Langridge S (2004) Greater predation in shaded coffee farms: the role of resident neotropical birds. Ecology 85:2677–2681

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Mas A, Pinto LS (2005) Biodiversity, yield, and shade coffee certification. Ecol Econ 54:435–446

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Armbrecht I, Philpott SM, Soto-Pinto L, Dietsch TV (2007) Shaded coffee and the stability of rainforest margins in Latin America. In: Tscharntke T, Leuschner C, Zeller M, Guhadja E, Bidin A (eds.) The stability of tropical rainforest margins, linking ecological, ­economic and social constraints of land use and conservation. Springer Environmental Science Series, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfecto I, Vandermeer J, Wright A (2009) Nature’s matrix linking agriculture, conservation and food sovereignty. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Peyser R (2010) Hunger in the coffee lands. Specialty Coffee Association of America, Anaheim

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips S, Anderson R, Sapohire R (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecol Model 190:231–259

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott SM, Maldonado J, Vandermeer J, Perfecto I (2004) Taking trophic cascades up a level: behaviorally-modified effects of phorid flies on ants and ant prey in coffee agroecosystems. Oikos 105:141–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott SM, Bichier P, Rice R, Greenberg R (2007) Field-testing ecological and economic benefits of coffee certification programs. Conserv Biol 21:975–985

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott SM, Bichier P, Rice RA, Greenberg R (2008a) Biodiversity conservation, yield, and alternative products in coffee agroecosystems in Sumatra, Indonesia. Biodivers Conserv 17:1805–1820

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott SM, Lin BB, Jha S, Brines SJ (2008b) A multi-scale assessment of hurricane impacts on agricultural landscapes based on land use and topographic features. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:12–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Philpott SM, Arendt WJ, Armbrecht I, Bichier P, Diestch TV, Gordon C, Greenberg R, Perfecto I, Reynoso-Santos R, Soto-Pinto L, Tejeda-Cruz C, Williams-Linera G, Valenzuela J, Zolotoff JM (2008c) Biodiversity loss in Latin American coffee landscapes: review of the evidence on ants, birds, and trees. Conserv Biol 22:1093–1105

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Philpott S, Soong O, Lowenstein J, Pulido A, Tobar-Lopez D, DeClerck F (2009) Functional traits and ecosystem services: bird predation on arthropods in tropical agroecosystems. Ecol Appl 19:1858–1867

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ponte S (2002) The ‘Latte Revolution’? Regulation, markets and consumption in the global coffee chain. World Dev 30:1099–1122

    Google Scholar 

  • Ponte S (2008) Greener than thou: the political economy of fish ecolabeling and its local manifestations in South Africa. World Dev 36:159–175

    Google Scholar 

  • Prendergast M (1999) Uncommon grounds: the history of coffee and how it transformed our world. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty JN (2002) Agri-Culture: reconnecting people, land, and nature. Earthscan Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramírez L (1993) Producción de café (Coffea arabica) bajo diferentes niveles de fertilización con y sin sombra de Erythrina poeppigiana (Walpers). In: Cook OF (ed.) Erythrina in the new and old worlds. Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association, Paia, pp 121–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Raudsepp-Hearne C, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2010) Ecosystem service bundles for analyzing tradeoffs in diverse landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:5242–5247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raw A, Free JB (1977) Pollination of coffee (Coffea arabica) by honeybees. Trop Agric 54:365–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Raynolds LT, Murray D, Heller A (2007) Regulating sustainability in the coffee sector: a comparative analysis of third-party environmental and social certification initiatives. Agric Hum Values 24:147–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Renard M (2010) The Mexican coffee crisis. Lat Am Perspect 37:21–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Ribot JC, Peluso NL (2003) A theory of access. Rural Sociol 68:153–181

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice R (2000) Noble goals and challenging terrain: organic and fair trade coffee movements in the global marketplace. J Agric Environ Ethics 14:39–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice R (2003) Coffee production in a time of crisis: social and environmental connections. SAIS Rev 23:221–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice RA (2008) Agricultural intensification within agroforestry: the case of coffee and wood products. Agric Ecosyst Environ 128:212–218

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice PD, McLean J (1999) Sustainable coffee at the crossroads. Consumer’s Choice Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice R, Ward J (1996) Coffee, conservation, and commerce in the Western Hemisphere. The Smithsonian Migratory Bird Center and the Natural Resources Defense Council, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricketts TH, Daily GC, Ehrlich PR, Michener CD (2004) Economic value of tropical forest to coffee production. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:12579–12582

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Swinton SM (2005) Reconciling agricultural productivity and environmental integrity: a grand challenge for agriculture. Front Ecol Environ 3:38–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Robertson GP, Broome JC, Chornesky EA, Frankenberger JR, Johnson P, Lipson M, Miranowski JA, Owens ED, Pimentel D, Thrupp LA (2004) Rethinking the vision for environmental research in US agriculture. Bioscience 54:61–65

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero-Alvarado Y, Soto-Pinto L, Garcia-Barrios L, Barrera-Gaytan JF (2002) Coffee yields and soil nutrients under the shades of Inga sp. vs. multiple species in Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 54:215–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Roncal-Garcia S, Soto-Pinto L, Castellanos-Albores J, Ramirez-Marcial N, de Jong B (2008) Agroforestry systems and carbon stocks in indigenous communities from Chiapas, Mexico. Interciencia 33:200–206

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosa H, Kandel S, Dimas L (2004) Compensation for environmental services and rural communities: lessons from the Americas. Int Forest Rev 6:187–194

    Google Scholar 

  • Roubik DW (2002) Tropical agriculture – the value of bees to the coffee harvest. Nature 417:708–708

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Salinas-Zavala CA, Douglas AV, Diaz HF (2002) Interannual variability of NDVI in northwest Mexico. Associated climatic mechanisms and ecological implications. Remote Sens Environ 82:417–430

    Google Scholar 

  • Sayre N (2005) Ecological and geographical scale: parallels and potential for integration. Prog Hum Geogr 29:276–290

    Google Scholar 

  • Schroth G, Krauss U, Gasparotto L, Aguilar JAD, Vohland K (2000) Pests and diseases in agroforestry systems of the humid tropics. Agroforest Syst 50:199–241

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (1998) Sustainable rural livelihoods: a framework for analysis. Institute for Development Studies (IDS), Brighton

    Google Scholar 

  • Scoones I (2009) Livelihoods perspectives and rural development. J Peasant Stud 36:171–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Shiva V (2008) Soil not oil: environmental justice in a time of climate crisis. South End Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Shulman M, Garret P (1990) Cluster analysis and typology construction: the case of small-scale tobacco farmers. Sociol Spectrum 10:413–428

    Google Scholar 

  • Somarriba E, Harvey C, Samper M, Anthony F, Gonzalez J, Staver C, Rice R (2004) Biodiversity in coffee plantations. In: Schroth G, Fonseca G, Harvey C, Gascon C, Vasconcelos H, Izac AMN (eds.) Biodiversity in coffee plantations. Island Press, Washington, DC, pp 198–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Pinto L, Perfecto I, Castillo-Hernandez J, Caballero-Nieto J (2000) Shade effect on coffee production at the northern Tzeltal zone of the state of Chiapas, Mexico. Agric Ecosyst Environ 80:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Pinto L, Perfecto I, Caballero-Nieto J (2002) Shade over coffee: its effects on berry borer, leaf rust and spontaneous herbs in Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 55:37–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Soto-Pinto L, Anzueto M, Mendoza J, Ferrer GJ, de Jong B (2010) Carbon sequestration through agroforestry in indigenous communities of Chiapas, Mexico. Agroforest Syst 78:39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Staver C, Guharay F, Monterroso D, Muschler RG (2001) Designing pest-suppressive multistrata perennial crop systems: shade-grown coffee in Central America. Agroforest Syst 53:151–170

    Google Scholar 

  • Steward C (2007) From colonization to “environmental soy”: a case study of environmental and socio-economic valuation in the Amazon soy frontier. Agric Hum Values 24:107–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Sturgeon T (2000) Turnkey production networks: a new American model of industrial organization? Industrial Performance Center, Working paper, MIT, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Swinton SM, Lupi F, Robertson GP, Hamilton SK (2007) Ecosystem services and agriculture: cultivating agricultural ecosystems for diverse benefits. Ecol Econ 64:245–252

    Google Scholar 

  • Talbot JM (2004) Grounds for agreement: the political economy of the coffee commodity chain. Rowman and Littlefield Publishers, Lanham

    Google Scholar 

  • Topik S, Talbot J, Samper M (2010) Introduction globalization, neoliberalism, and the Latin American coffee societies. Lat Am Perspect 171:5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Trujillo L (2008) Coffee production strategies in a changing rural landscape: a case study in Central Veracruz, Mexico. In: Bacon CM, Mendez VE, Gliessman SR, Goodman D, Fox JA (eds.) Confronting the coffee crisis: fair trade, sustainable livelihoods and ecosystems in Mexico and Central America. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 69–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Tscharntke T, Sekercioglu C, Dietsch T, Sodhi N, Hoehn P, Tylianakis J (2008) Landscape constraints on functional diversity of birds and insects in tropical agroecosystems. Ecology 89:944–951

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ukers W (1922) All about coffee. The Tea and Coffee Trade Journal Company, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • USDL (2010) US Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Resource document. http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/dsrv. Accessed Oct 2010

  • Vaast P, Bertrand B, Perriot J-J, Guyot B, Genard M (2006) Fruit thinning and shade improve bean characteristics and beverage quality of coffee (Coffea arabica L.) under optimal conditions. J Sci Food Agric 86:197

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Valkila J, Nygren A (2010) Impacts of fair trade certification on coffee farmers, cooperatives, and laborers in Nicaragua. Agric Hum Values 27:321–333

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Bael SA, Philpott SM, Greenberg R, Bichier P, Barber NA, Mooney KA, Gruner DS (2008) Birds as predators in tropical agroforestry systems. Ecology 89:928–934

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Vossen HAM (2005) A critical analysis of the agronomic and economic sustainability of organic coffee production. Exp Agric 41:449–473

    Google Scholar 

  • Varangis P, Siegel P, Giovannucci D, Lewin B (2003) Dealing with the coffee crisis in Central America: impacts and strategies. In: World Bank Policy Research #2993. World Bank, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Vélez M, Bustillo A, Posada F (2001) Hormigas de la zona central cafetera y perspectivas de su uso en el control de Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Resúmenes XXVIII Congreso (ed. by Sociedad Colombiana de Entomología), Pereira

    Google Scholar 

  • Waltert M, Mardiastuti A, Muhlenberg M (2005) Effects of land use on bird species richness in Sulawesi, Indonesia. Conserv Biol 18:1339–1346

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson R, Herren R (eds) (2009) International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development (IAASTD): synthesis report. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts MJ (2007) What might resistance to neoliberalism consist of? In: Heynen N, McCarthy J, Prudham S (eds.) Neoliberal environments: false promises and unnatural consequences. Routledge, London, pp 273–279

    Google Scholar 

  • WDPA Consortium (2004) National IUCN protected areas, global. Downloadable Data. UNEP, IUCN, Oct 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster PJ, Holland GJ, Curry JA, Chang HR (2005) Changes in tropical cyclone number, duration, and intensity in a warming environment. Science 309:1844–1846

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams R (1994) States and social evolution: coffee and the rise of national governments in Central America. University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson K (1999) Coffee, cocoa and tea. CABI, Wallingford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2004) At risk – natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED) (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • You LWS (2005) Assessing the spatial distribution of crop production using a cross-entropy. Int J Appl Earth Obs 7:310–323

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the editors and reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions. We are especially grateful for Louise Jackson for several rounds of engaged, critical and constructive edits. We would also like to express our gratitude to the coffee farmers of Mexico, Nicaragua, El Salvador, Guatemala, Peru, Indonesia, and Costa Rica, for their support and permission to conduct research on their land. Christopher M. Bacon is grateful for support from the S.V. Ciriacy-Wantrup postdoctoral fellowship during the early phases of preparing this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shalene Jha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jha, S., Bacon, C.M., Philpott, S.M., Rice, R.A., Méndez, V.E., Läderach, P. (2011). A Review of Ecosystem Services, Farmer Livelihoods, and Value Chains in Shade Coffee Agroecosystems. In: Campbell, W., Lopez Ortiz, S. (eds) Integrating Agriculture, Conservation and Ecotourism: Examples from the Field. Issues in Agroecology – Present Status and Future Prospectus, vol 1. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1309-3_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics