Skip to main content

Abbot v Weekly (1665) 83 ER 357; 1 Lev 176

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2213 Accesses

Part of the book series: ASSER International Sports Law Series ((ASSER))

Abstract

Trespass for breaking his close; the defendant prescribes, that all the inhabitants of the village, time out of memory…had used to dance there at all times of the year at their free will, for their recreation, and so justifies to dance there: issue was on the prescription, and a verdict for the defendant, and to save his costs the plaintiff moved in arrest of judgment, that this prescription to dance in the freehold of another, and spoil his grass, was void, especially as it is laid…at all times of the year, and not at seasonable times; and that ’twas also ill laid in the inhabitants, who although they may prescribe in easements…yet they ought to be easements of necessity, as ways to a church…and not for pleasure only, as this case is. Second, if it be good, it ought to have been laid by way of custom in the town, and not by prescription in the persons…..but by the Court, this is a good custom, and it is necessary for inhabitants to have their recreation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In plain language, an easement is right to cross (a right of way) or otherwise use someone else’s land for a specified purpose.

  2. 2.

    In this instance, prescription meant the acquisition of an easement by uninterrupted and unhidden use over a long period. Technically, the period entailed continuous and open use of the easement from “time immemorial”, which was fixed in the legal memory of English common law at 1189 i.e., before the reign of Richard I.

  3. 3.

    For a sports historian’s view of the law’s influence on the regulation of sport at the material time see Vamplew 2007b, 2009. The author would also like to thank Professor Vamplew for his insightful comments on an earlier draft of this chapter.

  4. 4.

    This chapter is informed by a similar, but much more erudite, account of the law’s role contribution to the birth of modern sport by McArdle 2000, Chap. 1.

  5. 5.

    See, for example, R (Beresford) v Sunderland City Council [2003] UKHL 60; [2004] 1 AC 889.

  6. 6.

    For a recent account of “ancient” sport, from Homer to Byzantium, see generally Potter 2011.

  7. 7.

    See Sawer 2010 in an article that draws from sports finance data available at www.sportingintelligence.com.

  8. 8.

    The research on the history and development of sport in Britain at the material time is voluminous. Nonetheless, three monographs that continue to reward on re-reading include Birley 1993; Holt 1990 and Vamplew 1988.

  9. 9.

    For a witty review of how the British “invented” these sports see generally Norridge 2008.

  10. 10.

    Cited by Holt 1990, 268.

  11. 11.

    See generally Hargreaves 1986. In the sport of rugby this, essentially, class-based distinction led in the 1890s to the schism between rugby union and rugby league. See generally Collins 2006.

  12. 12.

    See further Mangan 2011.

  13. 13.

    Quoted by Haley 1978, 119.

  14. 14.

    Elias 1978 and Elias and Dunning 1986.

  15. 15.

    On this “reform of popular culture” see further Burke 2009.

  16. 16.

    It must be noted that the Elias and Dunning’s approach has been criticised for placing too much emphasis on a “violence reduction” rationale in the formalisation of sport at this time. Compare, for instance, Vamplew 2007, 161–171.

  17. 17.

    See, for example, Agozino 1996, 163–188; Malcolm 2002, 37–57 and Sheard 1997, 31–57.

  18. 18.

    See generally Bailey 1978.

  19. 19.

    Anderson 2006, 265–287.

  20. 20.

    See Radford 2001, 33–98.

  21. 21.

    The provision made it a criminal offence for any person to obstruct the highway by playing at “Football or any other Game on any Part of said Highways, to the Annoyance of Any Passenger or Passengers.”

  22. 22.

    The provision made it an offence to “play at any game to the annoyance of the inhabitants or passengers” and it authorised a constable to take any person committing such an offence into custody without warrant.

  23. 23.

    See further Vorspan 2000, 905–908.

  24. 24.

    Walvin 1975, 50–56.

  25. 25.

    Walvin 1975, 55.

  26. 26.

    Huggins 2004, 15–16.

  27. 27.

    Hunt 1995, 5–29.

  28. 28.

    12 Ric 2 c6, Unlawful Games (1388).

  29. 29.

    17 Edw 4 c3, Unlawful Games (1477).

  30. 30.

    11 Hen 7 c17, Unlawful Games (1495).

  31. 31.

    19 Hen 7 c12, Unlawful Games (1503).

  32. 32.

    3 Hen 8 c3, Unlawful Games (1511).

  33. 33.

    6 Hen 8 c2, Unlawful Games (1514).

  34. 34.

    33 Hen 8 c9, Unlawful Games (1541).

  35. 35.

    Hunt 1995, 19–21.

  36. 36.

    39 Edw 3 c23, Unlawful Games (1365).

  37. 37.

    For the specific example of the attempts to proscribe football during the period see Bushaway 1982, 250–252 and Dunning and Sheard 1979, Chap. 1.

  38. 38.

    Hignall 2002, 63.

  39. 39.

    Hignall, 64.

  40. 40.

    Lowerson 1995, 143–153.

  41. 41.

    Lowerson 1995, 148.

  42. 42.

    Commons Preservation Society 18931896, 47.

  43. 43.

    Under a strict settlement the immediate “owner” of the estate had very limited means of generating revenue from the land by way of, for example, leasing or mortgaging it or part thereof. This meant that not only did strict settlements concentrate landholding within an ever declining landed elite but it also meant that many estates became financially unviable for lack of investment. The overall economic undesirability of this system resulted in legislative changes such as the Settled Estate Acts of 1856 and 1877, as supplemented by the Settled Land Acts 1882, 1890 and 1925.

  44. 44.

    Baker 2002, 295.

  45. 45.

    See Walvin 1975, 61–62 on the “cricketing” history of founding members of the football league (Derby County FC and Preston North End FC) and both Sheffield clubs.

  46. 46.

    Bath and North East Somerset Council v HM Attorney General and Anor [2002] EWHC 1623 (Ch), para 9.

  47. 47.

    Clareborough and Kirkham 1999, 12–13.

  48. 48.

    See generally Inglis 2005. Leitch designed stands for Arsenal, Manchester United, Chelsea, Everton, Liverpool, Tottenham, Aston Villa, Hearts and Glasgow Rangers.

  49. 49.

    Collins and Vamplew 2002.

  50. 50.

    25 Geo 2 c36, Disorderly Houses (1751).

  51. 51.

    Collins and Vamplew 2002, 5.

  52. 52.

    Vorspan 2000, 935.

  53. 53.

    For an account of the related case law see Vorspan 2000, 935–948.

  54. 54.

    Miers 2004, 239–241 and at Chap. 9.

  55. 55.

    Collins and Vamplew 2002, 10ff.

  56. 56.

    See generally Chalk and Holley 1987.

  57. 57.

    Walvin 1975, 56.

  58. 58.

    In terms of primary research on this point, it is well to note that from its establishment in 1889, the Board of Agriculture undertook annual reports of transactions, proceedings and other statistical data relevant to the Glebe Lands Act 1888 and on other related provisions, which also, indirectly, would have made land available for sporting and recreational purposes. See, for instance, the first of these reports in Board of Agriculture 1890, (5947) xxv 315.

  59. 59.

    Walvin 1975, 59. See also Rose 1991, 140–141.

  60. 60.

    See Mangan and Hickey 2009 on the “missing men” and their role as school teachers in the spread in popularity of association football at the material time.

  61. 61.

    Walvin 1975, 59.

  62. 62.

    See the Elementary Education Acts 1888, (5485) xxxv 1, 216, recommendation 110.

  63. 63.

    Plans for newly built or fitted elementary schools were obliged, for instance, to provide for a playground. See Education Department’s Code of Regulations, 1891 (6272) lxi 141, schedule IV, building rule 15.

  64. 64.

    Rose 1991, 142–143.

  65. 65.

    See the three volume Report of the Inter-Departmental Committee on Physical Deterioration. 1904 (2175) xxxii 1; (2210) xxxii 145; and (2186) xxxii 655.

  66. 66.

    Walvin 1975, 60.

  67. 67.

    For a review of the working men’s club movement within the context of rational or participative recreationalism see Bailey 1978, Chap. 5.

  68. 68.

    Wigglesworth 1996, 65.

  69. 69.

    See generally Nicholls 1996, 20–65.

  70. 70.

    Lowerson 1995, 125.

  71. 71.

    Henry Shapland Colt (1869–1951), who read law at Cambridge in the later 1880s, was a leading golf architect in the first quarter of the twentieth century. The Oxford Dictionary of National Biography notes that as a designer Colt was aware of the social tensions arising in England from the great expansion of golf as a middle-class game at the time. Although Colt promoted the development of working class clubs, the Oxford DNB notes that “this arrangement did nothing to challenge the social distinctions that were already entrenched in the game”. See http://www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/41096.

  72. 72.

    Colt 1912, 15–16.

  73. 73.

    See Tranter 1998, Chap. 5.

  74. 74.

    Cunningham 1980, 76.

  75. 75.

    Cunningham 1980, 76.

  76. 76.

    What follows has benefitted from Chap. 1 in Kain et al. 2004.

  77. 77.

    Private Enclosure Acts driven by the concerns of local, landed elites became a feature of the legal landscape from the 1750s and become so frequent that, for the sake of parliamentary efficacy, public general Enclosure Acts were thought necessary. The first of these appeared in 1801, another in 1836 with a consolidating provision, later amended, in 1845.

  78. 78.

    For further sources and maps see www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/records/research-guides/enclosure.htm.

  79. 79.

    Kain 2004, 4.

  80. 80.

    Fitch v Rawling and others (1795) 126 ER 614; 2 Hy BL 393.

  81. 81.

    For references to similar case law and principle see Vorspan 2000, 928–929.

  82. 82.

    Dyce v Hay (1852) 1 Macq 305.

  83. 83.

    Dyce v Hay (1852) 1 Macq 305, 309.

  84. 84.

    See, for example, Tyson v Smith (1838) 112 ER 1265; 9 Al & Ed 406, 421.

  85. 85.

    Blundell v Catterall (1821) 106 ER 286; 5 B & Ad 553. In that case, the Court of King’s Bench held that, in the absence of custom or usage or prescriptive right and taking account that the shore in question was vested in an individual, the public had no common law right to bathe in the sea and to pass over the seashore, between the ordinary high and low water marks, for that purpose on foot or with horses or vehicles even where it could be done without creating any nuisance.

  86. 86.

    Lowerson 1995, 148.

  87. 87.

    First Report from the Select Committee on Open Spaces (Metropolis). 1865 (178) viii, 259.

  88. 88.

    Cunningham 1980, 76.

  89. 89.

    Report from the Select Committee on Open Spaces. 1833 (448) xv, 337.

  90. 90.

    Report from the Select Committee on Open Spaces 1833, 18.

  91. 91.

    Report from the Select Committee on Open Spaces 1833, 18.

  92. 92.

    Report from the Select Committee on Open Spaces 1833, 18.

  93. 93.

    Report from the Select Committee on Open Spaces 1833, 66.

  94. 94.

    Report from the Select Committee on Open Spaces 1833, 8.

  95. 95.

    Vorspan 2000, 915.

  96. 96.

    Cunningham 1980, 151.

  97. 97.

    Now called the Open Spaces Society. See further www.oss.org.uk/history.

  98. 98.

    See Malcolmson 1973, 110.

  99. 99.

    Inclosure Act 1845, s30.

  100. 100.

    Note the extensive case law cited by Vorspan 2000, 917–921.

  101. 101.

    Attorney-General v Mayor, Aldermen and Burgesses of the Corporation of Southampton (1858) 65 ER 957, 1 Giff 363.

  102. 102.

    Note the case law collated by Vorspan 2000, 929–935.

  103. 103.

    Warrick v Queen’s College, Oxford (1870) LR 10 Eq 105.

  104. 104.

    Disturbances and even riots about the use of Plumstead Common continued well into the next decade, and especially in 1876. See further Allen 1997, 61–77 and George 2011, 195–210.

  105. 105.

    R v Oxfordshire County Council (Ex p Sunningwell Parish Council) [1999] UKHL 28; [2000] 1 AC 335.

  106. 106.

    Oxfordshire CC v Oxford City Council [2006] UKHL 25; [2006] 2 AC 674.

References

  • Allen R (1997) The battle for the common: politics and populism in mid-Victorian Kentish London. Soc Hist 22:61–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agozino B (1996) Football and the civilizing process: penal discourse and the ethic of collective responsibility in sports law. Int J Sociol Sport 24:163–188

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderson J (2006) The legal response to prize fighting in England and America. North Irel Leg Q 57:265–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailey P (1978) Leisure and class in Victorian England: rational recreation and the contest for control. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Baker JH (2002) An introduction to English legal history, 4th edn. Butterworths LexisNexis, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Birley D (1993) Sport and the making of Britain. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Board of Agriculture (1890) Report of proceedings under the inclosure acts, the metropolitan commons acts, the drainage and improvement of land acts, the copyhold acts, the universities and college estate acts, tithe rentcharge acts and glebe lands act 1888, 1889. (5947) xxv 315

    Google Scholar 

  • Burke P (2009) Popular culture in early modern Europe, 3rd edn. Ashgate, Farnham

    Google Scholar 

  • Bushaway B (1982) By rite: custom, ceremony and community in England, 1700–1800. Junction, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalk G, Holley D (1987) Saints! a complete record of Southampton Football Club, 1885–1987. Breedon Books, Derby

    Google Scholar 

  • Clareborough D, Kirkham A (1999) Sheffield United Football Club, 1889–1999: a complete record. Sheffield United FC, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins T (2006) Rugby’s great split: class culture and the origins of Rugby League Football. Routledge, Abingdon

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins T, Vamplew W (2002) Mud, sweat and beers: a cultural history of sport and alcohol. Berg, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Colt H (1912) The construction of new courses. In: Sutton M (ed) The book of the links: a symposium on golf. WH Smith, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Commons Preservation Society (1893–1896) Commons preservation society: report of the executive committee of proceedings during the years 1893–1896. Eyre and Spottiswoode, 1897

    Google Scholar 

  • Cunningham H (1980) Leisure in the industrial revolution, c1780–c1880. Croom Helm, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning E, Sheard K (1979) Barbarians, gentlemen, and players: a sociological study of the development of Rugby football. Robertson, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Elementary Education Acts (1888 ) Final report of the commissioners appointed to inquire into the Elementary Education Acts in England and Wales. 1888 (5485) xxxv 1, 216

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias N (1978) The civilising process. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias N, Dunning E (1986) Quest for excitement: sport and leisure in the civilizing process. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • George D (2011) The Plumstead Common Riots of 1876: a study in Mid-Victorian protest. Lond J 36:195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haley B (1978) The healthy body and Victorian culture. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hargreaves J (1986) Sport, power and culture: a social and historical analysis of popular sports in britain. Polity Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Hignall A (2002) Rain stops play: cricketing climates. Frank Cass, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Holt R (1990) Sport and the British: a modern history. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Huggins M (2004) The Victorians and sport. Continuum, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt A (1995) The Role of law in the civilizing process and the reform of popular culture. Can J Law Soc 10:5–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Kain P et al (2004) The enclosure maps of England and Wales, 1595–1918. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Inglis S (2005) Engineering archie. English Heritage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowerson J (1995) Sport and the English middle classes, 1870–1914. Manchester University Press, Manchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Malcolm D (2002) Cricket and the civilizing process. Int Rev Sociol Sport 37:37–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malcolmson RW (1973) Popular recreations in English s 1700–1850. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan J, Hickey C (2009) Soccer’s missing men: school teachers and the spread of association football. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mangan J (2011) ‘Manufactured’ masculinity: making imperial manliness morality and militarism. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • McArdle D (2000) From boot money to Bosman: football society and the law. Cavendish, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Miers D (2004) Regulating commercial gambling. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls R (1996) Trafford Park: the first hundred years. Phillamore, Andover

    Google Scholar 

  • Norridge J (2008) Can we have our balls back, please? How the British invented sport. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter D (2011) The victor’s crown. Quercus, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Radford M (2001) Animal welfare law in Britain: regulation and responsibility. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose L (1991) The erosion of childhood: child oppression in Britain, 1860–1918. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawer P (2010) Top of the big money leagues. The Sunday Telegraph, London, 28 Mar, Sport, 15

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheard K (1997) Aspects of boxing in the western civilizing process. Int Rev Sociolo Sport 32:31–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tranter N (1998) Sport, economy and society in Britain, 1750–1914. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vamplew W (1988) Pay up and play the game: professional sport in Britain, 1875–1914. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vamplew W (2007a) Empiricist versus sociological history: some comments on the civilizing process. Sport Hist 27:161–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamplew W (2007b) Playing with the rules: influences on the development of regulation in sport. Int J Hist Sport 24:843–871

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vamplew W (2009) Sports without rules: hunting, shooting and fishing in Edwardian Britain. Eur Stud Sport Hist 2:34–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorspan R (2000) Rational recreation and the law: the transformation of popular urban leisure in Victorian England. McGill Law J 45:891–973

    Google Scholar 

  • Walvin J (1975) The people’s game: a social history. Allen Lane, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigglesworth N (1996) The evolution of English sport. Frank Cass, London

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jack Anderson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 T.M.C. ASSER PRESS, The Hague, The Netherlands, and the author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Anderson, J. (2013). Abbot v Weekly (1665) 83 ER 357; 1 Lev 176. In: Anderson, J. (eds) Leading Cases in Sports Law. ASSER International Sports Law Series. T.M.C. Asser Press, The Hague, The Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-909-2_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Societies and partnerships