Abstract
The discipline of toxicology is concerned with the health risks of human exposure to chemicals. According to the Paracelsus’ paradigm toxicology is charged with describing the adverse effects of chemicals in a qualitative sense, and with evaluating them quantitatively by determining how much of a chemical is required to produce a substance specific. Taken together the intrinsic properties of an agent are described (hazard identification) and the amount of the chemical required to produce these (risk characterization) is determined. Since humans or organisms in the environment can be exposed via inhalation, skin contact or oral intake, the concentrations in the different environmental compartments, which result in human or environmental exposure, must be evaluated. Obviously risk characterization comprises the following elements:
-
Hazard identification, i.e. a description of the agent’s toxic potential. Dose–response, including information on the concentration above which the agent induces toxic effects to identify the no observable effect level (NOEL).
-
Exposure assessment, in which the concentration of the agent in the relevant medium and time of exposure are evaluated.
Based in this information difference between the NOEL and human exposure or the risk at a given exposure is determined. Humans may be exposed to chemicals in the air, water, food, or on the skin. From the concentrations of a chemical in these different compartments the external daily exposure is estimated. The response to the chemical depends upon duration and route of exposure, the toxicokinetics of the chemical, the dose–response relationship and the susceptibility of the individual. Thus, the precise definition of the terms hazard, exposure, and risk is essential to understand toxicological evaluations (details on data requirements and procedures for risk assessment are given subsequently).
Hazard: this qualitative term represents the intrinsic toxic properties of a compound. The expression of hazard depends upon conditions of use and exposure.
Dose: is determined by the concentration of the chemical and the time of exposure.
Risk: is the likelihood of an adverse effect resulting from a given exposure.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
ACGIH (2008) Threshold Limit Values and Biological Exposure Indices. Signature Publications
Angerer, J., Ewers, U., Wilhelm, M. (2007) Human biomonitoring: state of the art. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 210: 201–228.
Bolt, H.M., Huici-Montagud, A. (2008) Strategy of the scientific committee of occupational exposure limits (SCOEL) in the derivation of occupational exposure limits for carcinogens and mutagens. Archives of Toxicology 82(1): 61–64.
Boogaard, P.J. (2007) Human biomonitoring activities – programmes by industry. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 210: 259–261.
Dorne, J.L.C.M., Renwick, A.G. (2005) The refinement of uncertainty/safety factors in risk assessment by the incorporation of data on toxicokinetic variability in humans. Toxicological Sciences 86: 20–26.
Dunn, W.B., Bailey, N.J., Johnson H.E. (2005) Measuring the Metabolome: Current Analytical Technologies. Analyst, Cambridge.
EFSA (2005) Opinion of the scientific committee on a request from EFSA related to a harmonised approach for risk assessment of substances which are both genotoxic and carcinogenic. The EFSA Journal 282: 1–31. http://www.efsa.eu.int/science/sc_commitee/sc_opinions/1201/sc_op_ej282_gentox_summary_en1.pdf
EPA (US Environmental Protection Agency; 2005) Guidelines for carcinogen risk assessment EPA/630/P-03/001F. USEPA, Washington, DC.
European Communities, Directive 67/548/EEC Annex V Part B. http://ecb.jrc.it/testing-methods/
Greim, H., Reuter, U. (2001) Classification of carcinogenic chemicals in the work area by the German MAK Commission: current examples for the new categories. Toxicology 166: 11–23.
Greim, H., Snyder, R. (eds.) (2008) Toxicology and Risk Assessment – A Comprehensive Introduction. Wiley.
Greim, H., Ziegler-Skylakakis, K. (2007) Risk assessment for biopersistent granular particles. Inhalation Toxicology 19: 1–6.
IARC (International Agency for Research on Cancer). IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. WHO, Lyon.
Kroes, R.A.G., Renwick, Feron V., Galli, C.L., Gibney, M., Greim, H., Guy, R. H., Lhuguenot, J.C., van de Sandt, J.J.M. (2007) Application of the threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) to the safety evaluation of cosmetic ingredients. Food Chemicals Toxicology 45: 2533–2562.
Luhe, A., Suter, L., Ruepp, S., Singer, T., Weiser, T., Albertini, S. (2005) Toxicogenomics in the pharmaceutical industry: hollow promises or real benefit? Mutation Research 575: 102–115.
Munro, I.C., Renwick, A.G., Danielewska-Nikiel, B. (2008) The threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) in risk assessment. Toxicology Letters 180: 151–156.
Needham, L.L., Calafat, A.M., Barr, D.B. (2007) Uses and issues of biomonitoring. International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health 210: 229–238.
OECD, Guidelines for the Testing of Chemicals, Section 4: Health Effects. http://lysander.sourceoecd. org/vL¼3769318/cL¼31/nw¼1/rpsv/cw/vhosts/oecdjournals/1607310x/v1n3/contp1-1.htm
Renwick, A.G. (1993) Data-derived safety factors for the evaluation of food additives and environmental contaminants. Food Additives and Contamination 10: 275–305.
Renwick, A.G., Lazarus, N.R. (1998) Human variability and noncancer risk assessment – an analysis of the default uncertainty factor. Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology 27: 3–20.
SCHER, SCCP, SCENIHR (2008) Risk Assessment Methodologies and Approaches for Mutagenic and Carcinogenic Substances. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General, The EU Commission.
Swenberg, J.A., Fryar-Tita, E., Jeong, Y.C., Boysen, G., Starr, T. (2008) Biomarkers in toxicology and risk assessment: informing critical dose-response relationships. Chemical Research in Toxicology 21: 253–225.
TGD: Technical Guidance Document in support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for new notified substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for existing substances and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council concerning the placing of biocidal products on the market. ecb.jrc.ec.europa.eu/tgd
UNECE (United Nations Economic Commission for Europe). Globally harmonized system of classification and labelling of chemicals (GHS) http://www.unece.org/trans/danger/publi/ghs/ghs_rev02/02files_e.html
Wetmore, B.A., Merrick, B.A. (2004) Toxicoproteomics: proteomics applied to toxicology and pathology. Toxicologic Pathology 32: 619–642.
WHO (1987) Principles for the Safety Assessment of Food Additives and Contaminants in Food. Environmenal Health Criteria 70. International Programme on Chemical Safety, World Health Organisation, Geneva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Greim, H. (2010). Chemical Risk Assessment in Toxicological Perspective. In: Eriksson, J., Gilek, M., Rudén, C. (eds) Regulating Chemical Risks. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9428-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9428-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht
Print ISBN: 978-90-481-9427-8
Online ISBN: 978-90-481-9428-5
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)