Skip to main content

The Mind-Body Problem

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science ((BSPS,volume 287))

Abstract

The most popular view about the nature of the mind is that it is immaterial, hence separable from the body. Moreover, it is still widely believed that we are alive (“animated”) as long as we have souls (animae), and that we die when these leave us. Saul Kripke (1971) revived this prehistoric myth by claiming that mental processes cannot be neural because the brain-mind association is contingent rather than logically necessary – hence people in alternative worlds might not need brains to think. This is all that modal (or possible worlds) metaphysics manages to tell us about mind. Psychologists tell us much more, of course, but many of them are still not interested in the brain, which cognitive neuroscientists regard as the organ of mind: whether or not they are dualists, those psychologists behave as if they were. Indeed, they act as dualists whenever they write about the neural “substrate” or “correlate” of this or that mental function, which is like saying that the legs constitute the substrate or correlate of walking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Reference

  • Cacioppo, John T., Penny S. Visser, and Cynthia I. Pickett, eds. 2006. Social neuroscience: People thinking about thinking people. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • DiLorenzo, Daniel J., and Joseph D. Bronzino, eds. 2008. Neuroengineering. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iversen, Leslie L., Susan D. Iversen, Floyd D. Bloom, and Robert H. Roth. 2008. Introduction to neuropsychopharmacology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levitis, Daniel A. William Z. Lickider, and Glenn Freund. 2009. Biologists do not agree on what constitutes behaviour. Animal Behaviour 78: 103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purves, Dale, Elizabeth M. Brannon, Roberto Cabeza, Scott A. Huettel, Kevin S. LaBar, Michael L. Platt, and Marty G. Woldorff. 2008. Principles of cognitive neuroscience. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi, Hidehiko, Motoichiro Kato, Masato Matsuura, Dean Mobbs, Tetsuya Suhara, and Yoshiro Okubo. 2009. When your gain is my pain and your pain is my gain: Neural correlates of envy and Schadenfreude. Science 323: 937–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kripke, Saul. 1971. “Identity and Necessity”. In Identity and individuation, ed. Milton K. Munitz, 135–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Renan, Ernest. 1949 [1852]. Averroès et l’averroisme. Oeuvres complètes, vol. III. Paris: Calmann-Lévy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stich, Stephen P. 1999. Deconstructing the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • –––––. 1980. Essay on mind. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingenieros, José. 1946 [1919]. Principios de psicología, 6th ed. Buenos Aires: Losada.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––––––. 2006. Philosophy of mind, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Westview.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––––––. 1955. The revolt against dualism: An inquiry concerning the existence of ideas. La Salle, IL.: Open Court Pub. Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, Paul M. 1984. Matter and consciousness: A contemporary introduction to the philosophy of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedetti, Fabrizio. 2009. Placebo effects: Understanding the mechanisms in health and disease. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemeny, Margaret E. 2009. Psychobiological responses to social threat: Evolution of a psychological model in psychneuroimmunology. Brain, Behavior, and Immunity 23: 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, James J., ed. 2007. Handbook of emotion regulation. New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ––––––. 1970. [1936]. The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology: An introduction to phenomenological philosophy. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melzack, Ronald. 1989. Phantom limbs, the self and the brain. Canadian Journal of Psychology 30: 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, Colin. 1993. Problems in philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mario Bunge .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bunge, M. (2010). The Mind-Body Problem. In: Matter and Mind. Boston Studies in the Philosophy of Science, vol 287. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-9225-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics