Skip to main content

Surveillance in Germany: Strategies and Counterstrategies

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Data Protection in a Profiled World

Abstract

It is generally recognised that state surveillance of private conduct poses simultaneously technical, legal and political questions. In 2008, all three dimensions culminated in Germany, when three new technical surveillance measures became subject of respective rulings of the German Federal Constitutional Court, who seized the opportunity to significantly develop the German fundamental rights system in regard to new technological developments. While the Court built upon independent expert opinion, it appears that German politicians do not understand information and communication technology well and rely too much on the opinion of actors such as the Federal Police, while ignoring that those actors have considerable self-interests, as well. On the political plane, the data retention directive and its transposition into national law has provoked the largest privacy movement ever in Germany. Besides the considerable public awareness induced by this campaign, the movement provides an interesting insight into the possibilities and restrictions of web 2.0 instruments as regards the formation of Internet communities and their political activities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abel, W. 2009. Agents, trojans and tags: The next generation of investigators. International Review of Law, Computers & Technology 23:99–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abel, W., and B. Schafer. 2009. The German Constitutional Court on the right in confidentiality and integrity of information technology systems: A case report on BVerfG. NJW 2008, 822. SCRIPTed 6 (1): 106. http://www.law.ed.ac.uk/ahrc/script-ed/vol6-1/abel.asp .

  • Adler, D. 2007. Stasi 2.0. dataloo.de, 14 April. http://www.dataloo.de/stasi-20-525.html.

  • Bendrath, R. 2001. Wie weiter mit dem Datenschutz? Telepolis, 24 October. http://www.heise.de/tp/r4/artikel/9/9903/1.html.

  • Benkler, Y. 2006. The wealth of networks. How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale Univ. Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Böckenförde, T. 2008. Auf dem Weg zur elektronischen Privatsphäre. Juristenzeitung 63:925–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buermeyer, U. 2007. Die Online-Durchsuchung. HRR-Strafrecht 4:154–166. http://www.hrr-strafrecht.de/hrr/archiv/07-04/index.php?sz=8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht. 1983. Decision of 15 December 1983 (1BvR 209, 269, 362, 420, 440, 484/83), decisions. vol. 65, 1–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht. 2004. Decision of 3 March 2004 (1 BvR 2378/99 and 1 BvR 1084/99), decisions, vol. 109, 279–391. Also available online at http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20040303_1bvr237898.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht. 2008a. Decision of 27 Feburary 2008 (1 BvR 370/07 and 1 BvR 595/07), decisions, vol. 120, 274–350. Also available online in English at http://www.bverfg.de/en/decisions/rs20080227_1bvr037007en.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht. 2008b. Decision of 11 March 2008 (1 BvR 2074/05 and 1 BvR 1254/07), decisions, vol. 120, 378–433. Also available online at http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20080311_1bvr207405.html.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bundesverfassungsgericht. 2008c. Decision of 11 March 2008 (1 BvR 256/08). Europäische Grundrechte Zeitschrift, 257–265. Also available online at http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/rs20080311_1bvr025608.html.

  • De Hert, P., K. de Vries, and S. Gutwirth. 2009. La limitation des ‘perquisitions en ligne’ par un renouvellement des droit fondamentaux”, Note d’observations sur Cour constitutionnelle fédérale allemande, 27 février 2008 (Online Dursuchung). Revue du droit des Technologies de l’Information, Jurisprudence 34:89–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • EU. 2006. Directive 2006/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 March 2006 on the retention of data generated or processed in connection with the provision of publicly available electronic communications services or of public communications networks and amending Directive 2002/58/EC. Official Journal L105 (13/04/2006):54–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann-Riem, W. 2008. Der grundrechtliche Schutz der Vertraulichkeit und Integrität eigengenutzter informationstechnischer Systeme. Juristenzeitung 21:1009–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hömig, D. 2009. “Neues” Grundrecht, neue Fragen? Zum Urteil des BVerfG zur Online-Durchsuchung, JURA. 207–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, G. 2007. Ermächtigungsgrundlage für die ‘Online-Durchsuchung’? Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 31:575–580. Also available online athttp://www.uni-kassel.de/fb7/oeff_recht/publikationen/pubOrdner/publikation_2007_hornung_online_durchsuchung.pdf.

  • Hornung, G. 2008. Ein neues Grundrecht. Der verfassungsrechtliche Schutz der “Vertraulichkeit und Integrität informationstechnischer Systeme”. Computer und Recht 5:299–306.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, G., and C. Schnabel. 2009a. Data protection in Germany I: The population census decision and the right to informational self-determination. Computer Law & Security Review 25 (1): 84–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornung, G., and C. Schnabel. 2009b. Data protection in Germany II: Recent decisions on online-searching of computers, automatic number plate recognition and data retention. Computer Law & Security Review 25 (2): 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NBX. 2001. Stasi 2.0. Comment in Telepolis, 7 July. http://www.heise.de/tp/foren/S-Stasi-2-0/forum-18164/msg-815528/read/.

  • Roggan, F., ed. 2008. Online-Durchsuchungen. Rechtliche und tatsächliche Konsequenzen des BVerfG-Urteils vom 27. Februar 2008. Berlin: BWV.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roßnagel, A., and C. Schnabel. 2008. Das Grundrecht auf Gewährleistung der Vertraulichkeit und Integrität informationstechnischer Systeme und sein Einfluss auf das Privatrecht. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 49:3534–3538.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouvroy, A., and Y. Poullet. 2009. The right to informational self-determination and the value of self-development. Reassessing the importance of privacy for democracy. In Reinventing data protection, eds. S. Gutwirth, Y. Poullet, P. De Hert, de C. Terwangne, S. Nouwt. New York: Springer: 45-76.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shirky, C. 2008. Here comes everybody: The power of organizing without organizations. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gerrit Hornung .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hornung, G., Bendrath, R., Pfitzmann, A. (2010). Surveillance in Germany: Strategies and Counterstrategies. In: Gutwirth, S., Poullet, Y., De Hert, P. (eds) Data Protection in a Profiled World. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8865-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics