Skip to main content

Human Before Sex? Ectogenesis as a Way to Equality

  • Chapter
Book cover Reprogen-ethics and the future of gender

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 43))

Within Gender studies in particular and in many other academic disciplines in general, the simplistic dichotomy between men and women has been long refuted. In the real world, however, boys are still brought up to be men and girls to be women with the corresponding role expectations. Even in the more enlightened circles, women’s role and place is, if not determined, definitely informed by the fact that they could be, or could become, mothers. A news item in the biggest broad sheet newspaper in Finland celebrating the International Women’s day on 8 March 2008 included interviews with teenage girls. One of the interviewees told the journalist that she liked being a girl because that allowed her to dress up and that she waited to be a mother because only that will transform her from a girl to a woman [1]. I found that very alarming. If teenagers of our time living in European capital cities think that they need to become mothers to become women, not much has changed in the last hundred years. Women do not need to blame only men for the hardships they face, as they (I refuse to write “we”) are confining themselves to specified roles.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Helsingin Sanomat. 8 March 2008. Page C12.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Firestone, Shulamith. 1970. The Dialectic Sex: A Case for Feminist Revolution. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shanner, Laura and Nisker, Jeffrey. 2001. Bioethics for clinicians: 26. Assisted reproductive technologies. Canadian Medical Association Journal 164: 1589–1594.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pence, Gregory. 2006. What is so good about natural motherhood? (In praise of unnatural gestation) In Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 77–88. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tong, Rosemary. 2006. Out of body gestation: In whose best interests? In Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 59–76. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Simonstein, Frida. 2006. Artificial reproduction technologies (RTs)– all the way to the artificial womb? Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 9: 359–365.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Aristarkhova, Irina. 2005. Ectogenesis and mother as machine. Body & Society 11: 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sander-Staudt, Maureen. 2006. Of machine born? A feminist assessment of ectogenesis and artificial wombs. In :Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 109–128. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Singer, Peter and Deanne Walls. 2006. (orig. 1985). Ectogenesis. In Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 9–25. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  10. James, David N. 1987. Ectogenesis: A reply to Singer and Wells. Bioethics 1: 80–99.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cannold, Leslie. 1995. Women, ectogenesis and ethical theory. Journal of Applied Philosophy 12: 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wells, Deane. 1987. Ectogenesis, justice and utility: A reply to James. Bioethics 1: 372–379.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gelfand, Scott. 2006. Introduction. In Ectogenesis: Artificial Womb Technology and the Future of Human Reproduction, eds. Scott Gelfand and John R. Shook, pp. 1–7. Amsterdam and New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Häyry, Matti. 2004. A rational cure for prereproductive stress syndrome. Journal of Medical Ethics 30: 377–378.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Benatar, David. 1997. Why it is better never to come into existence. American Philosophical Quarterly 34: 345–355.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Childless by Choice. http://northvalley.net/cbc/

  17. The Voluntary Human Extinction Movement. http://www.vhemt.org/

  18. Smajdor, Anna. 2007. The moral imperative for ectogenesis. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 16: 336–345.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Blackless, Melanie. et al. 2000. How sexually dimorphic are we? Review and synthesis. American Journal of Human Biology 12: 151–166.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Bennett, Rebecca. 2008. Is reproduction women’s business? How should we regulate regarding stored embryos, posthumous pregnancy, ectogenesis and male pregnancy? Studies in Ethics, Law and Technology 2(3): article 3.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Murphy, Julien, S. 1989. Is pregnancy necessary: Feminist concerns about ectogenesis. Hypatia 4: 66–84.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cannold, Leslie. 1995. Women, ectogenesis and ethical theory. Journal of Applied Philosophy 12: 55–64.

    Google Scholar 

  23. For further discussion on terminations and ectogenesis, see Iain Brassington, Chapter 15, Section “Terminations and Glass Wombs” in this book.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tuija Takala .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer Science+Business Media B.V.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Takala, T. (2009). Human Before Sex? Ectogenesis as a Way to Equality. In: Simonstein, F. (eds) Reprogen-ethics and the future of gender. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 43. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2475-6_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Dordrecht

  • Print ISBN: 978-90-481-2474-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-90-481-2475-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics