Skip to main content

The Artificial Bowel Sphincter in the Treatment of Severe Fecal Incontinence in Adults

  • Chapter
Book cover Fecal Incontinence

Abstract

Fecal incontinence is a severe disability that deeply affects the quality of life of the afflicted patient. The estimated prevalence in the general population ranges from 1% to 17%. In France, it is estimated that 350,000 persons over the age of 45 years have a severe form of fecal incontinence. In the event of ineffective medical treatment and the inability or failure of conventional surgery, the only choice for these patients until recently was to accept their condition or opt for end colostomy. However, technological progress has opened up the prospect of effective therapy for severe fecal incontinence both in terms of performance and long-term reliability. Replacement of sphincter function by an artificial bowel sphincter is one available option that has shown promising results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Christiansen J, Lorentzen M (1987) Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 1:244–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lehur PA, Michot F, Denis P et al (1996) Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Report of 14 consecutive implantations. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1352–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong WD, Congilosi S, Spencer M et al (2002) The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1139–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ortiz H, Armendariz P, DeMiguel M et al (2002) Complications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation. Br J Surg 89:877–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Altomare DF, Dodi G, La Torre F et al (2001) Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 88:1481–1486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker SC, Spencer MP, Madoff RD (2003) Artificial bowel sphincter: long-term experience at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 46:722–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Michot F, Costaglioli B, Leroi AM, Denis P (2003) Artificial anal sphincter in severe fecal incontinence: outcome of prospective experience with 37 patients in one institution. Ann Surg 237:52–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehur PA, Zerbib F, Glemain P et al (2002) Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation. Dis Colon Rectum 45:508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Skinner S et al (2004) A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial of placement of the artificial bowel sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter) for the control of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1852–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Savoye G, Leroi AM, Denis P, Michot F (2000) Manometric assessment of an artificial bowel sphincter. Br J Surg 87:586–589

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Romano G, La Torre F, Cutini G et al (2003) Total anorectal reconstruction with the artificial bowel sphincter: report of eight cases. Dis Colon Rectum 46:730–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Marchai F, Doucet C, Lechaux D et al (2005) Secondary implantation of an artificial sphincter after abdominoperineal resection and pseudocontinent perineal colostomy for rectal cancer. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 29:425–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mundy L, Merlin TL, Maddern GJ, Hiller JE (2004) Systematic review of safety and effectiveness of an artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:665–672

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vaizey CJ (2004) Letter to the editor. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Matzel KE, Kamm MA, Stösser M et al and the MDT 301 Study Group (2004) Sacral Spinal Nerve Stimulation for Faecal Incontinence Multicentre Study. Lancet 363:1270–1276

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rasmussen OO, Butzen S, Sørensen M et al (2004) Sacral nerve stimulation in fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47:1158–1163

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

References

  1. Ehrenpreis ED, Chang D, Eichenwald E (2007) Pharmacotherapy for fecal incontinence: a review. Dis Colon Rectum [Epub ahead of print]

    Google Scholar 

  2. Schiller LR (2003) Treatment of fecal incontinence. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 6(4):319–327

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Coggrave M, Wiesel PH, Norton C (2006) Management of faecal incontinence and constipation in adults with central neurological diseases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev2):CD002115. Update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2001) (4):CD002115

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bachoo P, Brazzelli M, Grant A (2000) Surgery for faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (2):CD001757

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bharucha AE (2004) Outcome measures for fecal incontinence: anorectal structure and function. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl l):S90–S98

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Norton C, Cody JD, Hosker G (2006) Biofeedback and/or sphincter exercises for the treatment of faecal incontinence in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002111. Update of: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2000)(2):CD002111

    Google Scholar 

  7. Christiansen J, Lorentzen M (1987) Implantation of artificial sphincter for anal incontinence. Lancet 1:244–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lehur PA, Michot F, Denis P et al (1996) Results of artificial sphincter in severe anal incontinence. Report of 14 consecutive implantations. Dis Colon Rectum 39:1352–1355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehur PA, Zerbib F, Glemain P et al (2002) Comparison of quality of life and anorectal function after artificial sphincter implantation. Dis Colon Rectum 45:508–513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Parker SC, Spencer MP, Madoff RD (2003) Artificial bowel sphincter: long-term experience at a single institution. Dis Colon Rectum 46:722–729

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. O’Brien PE, Dixon JB, Skinner S et al (2004) A prospective randomized controlled clinical trial of placement of the artificial bowel sphincter (Acticon Neosphincter) for the control of fecal incontinence. Dis Colon Rectum 47(11):1852–1860

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Romano G, La Torre F, Cutini G et al (2003) Total anorectal reconstruction with the artificial bowel sphincter: report of eight cases. Dis Colon Rectum 46:730–734

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Wong WD, Congilosi S, Spencer M et al (2002) The safety and efficacy of the artificial bowel sphincter for faecal incontinence: results from a multicenter cohort study. Dis Colon Rectum 45:1139–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ortiz H, Armendariz P, DeMiguel M et al (2002) Complications and functional outcome following artificial anal sphincter implantation. Br J Surg 89:877–881

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Altomare DF, Dodi G, La Torre F et al (2001) Multicentre retrospective analysis of the outcome of artificial anal sphincter implantation for severe faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 88:1481–1486

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Klutke JJ (2000) Current status of urethral occlusive devices in management of urinary incontinence. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 12(5):415–419

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Madoff RD (2004) Surgical treatment options for fecal incontinence. Gastroenterology 126(1 Suppl 1):S48–S54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Altomare DF, Binda GA, Dodi G et al (2004) Disappointing long-term results of the artificial anal sphincter for faecal incontinence. Br J Surg 91:1352–1353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. La Torre F, Masoni L, Montori J et al (2004) The surgical treatment of faecal incontinence with artificial anal sphincter implant. Hepatogastroenterology 51:1358–1361

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2007 Springer-Verlag Italia

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lehur, PA., Meurette, G., La Torre, F. (2007). The Artificial Bowel Sphincter in the Treatment of Severe Fecal Incontinence in Adults. In: Ratto, C., Doglietto, G.B., Lowry, A.C., Påhlman, L., Romano, G. (eds) Fecal Incontinence. Springer, Milano. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-88-470-0638-6_19

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Milano

  • Print ISBN: 978-88-470-0637-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-88-470-0638-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics