Abstract
Germany’s prosecution offices as well as its court system are organized on the state or Länder level and are subsumed within the state-level Ministries of Justice. While the Minister of Justice at the state level is a political appointee, appointed by the state’s Minister-President, prosecutors are career civil servants, who are protected from arbitrary dismissal after they complete a period of probationary service. An exception to that rule exists in four states, where the position of General Public Prosecutor (Generalstaatsanwalt) is a political appointee who serves at the pleasure of the Minister of Justice. Regardless of that fact, all prosecutors at the state level are members of a hierarchically ordered bureaucracy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
There is also a smaller federal prosecution office known as the Bundesanwaltschaft. However, their jurisdiction is limited to prosecuting serious offenses against the state such as high profile terrorism cases. Their primary mandate is to represent the State before the Federal Court of Appeals (Sect. 142 subs. 1 COA). The Länder prosecution services represent the state at the Amtsgericht (local court), Landgericht (district courts), and Oberlandesgericht (Higher Regional Court) Levels.
- 2.
Prosecutor Interview [9BU], 4 May 2005.
- 3.
The organization of prosecution offices parallels the organization of the courts. There is a Generalstaatsanwalt located at each of the 25 regional courts of appeal (Oberlandesgerichte). Some of the Länder possess more than one regional court of appeal. There are 116 district courts (Landgerichte) in Germany. Beneath the district courts are the Amtsgerichte.
- 4.
§64 Par. 2 NBG (Niedersächsisches Beamtengesetz), §145 GVG (Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz).
- 5.
Prosecutor Interview [7SE], 5 April 2006.
- 6.
Prosecutor Interview [4KD], 23 February 2006.
- 7.
Prosecutor Interview [4AJ], 2 February 2006.
- 8.
Many judges work in courts with a single professional judge, other courts include one professional judge and two lay judges. Although judges at the Landgericht level may work on a five judge panel, those panels are comprised of a presiding judge, two additional professional judges with differing levels of seniority, and two lay judges.
- 9.
Prosecutor Interview [13AS], 10 June 2004.
- 10.
Prosecutor Interview [13OI], 10 June 2004.
- 11.
Prosecutor Interview [13AS], 10 June 2004.
- 12.
Prosecutor Interview [9EG], 8 May 2006.
- 13.
Prosecutor Interview [13PR], 6 December 2005.
- 14.
Prosecutor Interview [4GG], 30 January 2006.
- 15.
Prosecutor Interview [2BN], 16 July 2004.
- 16.
Prosecutor Interview [4AJ], 2 February 2006.
- 17.
Prosecutor Interview [13WT], 18 November 2005.
- 18.
Prosecutor Interview [2QM], 6 October 2005.
- 19.
Prosecutor Interview [19BS], 14 May 2008.
- 20.
Prosecutor Interview [6SB], 23 February 2006.
- 21.
Deutsches Richtergesetz [DRiG], Sept. 8, 1961; BGBl.I at 1665, §5 paragraph 1 (F.R.G.). Available at “Gesetz in internet.” http://bundesrecht.juris.de.
- 22.
The judicial service encompasses positions in the prosecution function, the judiciary, and the Ministry of Justice.
- 23.
Prosecutor Interview [8HL], 25 May 2006.
- 24.
Prosecutor Interview [2BN], 16 July 2004.
- 25.
Prosecutor Interview [7GC], 6 April 2006.
- 26.
Prosecutor Interview [7GC], 6 April 2006. See also Prosecutor Interview [9BU], 4 May 2005.
- 27.
Prosecutor Interview [9BU], 4 May 2005.
- 28.
Other states have a top 25 % score cutoff. Ministry Interview [13JM], 10 June 2004.
- 29.
Prosecutor Interview [2BN], 16 July 2004.
- 30.
Prosecutor Interview [11OT], 15 July 2004.
- 31.
Prosecutor Interview [11OT], 15 July 2004.
- 32.
One prosecutor told me that his hiring committee was impressed by the fact that he already had three children. Prosecutor Interview [4AJ], 2 February 2006.
- 33.
Prosecutor Interview [5XW], 19 January 2006.
- 34.
Prosecutor Interview [5BC], 16 January 2006.
- 35.
Prosecutor Interview [12FG], 24 April 2006.
- 36.
Prosecutor Interview [13BR], 18 November 2005.
- 37.
Prosecutor Interview [12CJ], 29 November 2005.
- 38.
Prosecutor interview [2BN], 16 July 2004.
- 39.
Prosecutor Interview [16AG], 9 June 2008.
- 40.
Prosecutor Interview [7AG], 7 April 2006.
- 41.
Prosecutor Interview [5XW], 19 January 2006.
- 42.
Appellate Judge Interview [13MU], 10 April 2004.
- 43.
Prosecutor Interview [7GC], 6 April 2006.
- 44.
Prosecutor Interview [2QM], 6 October 2005.
- 45.
Prosecutor Interview [2QM], 6 October 2005.
- 46.
Prosecutor Interview [19BS], 14 May 2008.
- 47.
Prosecutor Interview [19IC], 14 May 2008.
- 48.
Prosecutor Interview [16PP], 30 April 2008.
- 49.
Appellate Judge Interview [13MU], 10 April 2004.
- 50.
Prosecutor Interview [13BC], 8 December 2005.
- 51.
Prosecutor Interview [1DR], 15 March 2006.
- 52.
Prosecutor Interview [4EW], 2 February 2006.
- 53.
§203 StGB.
- 54.
§202 StGB.
- 55.
§204 StGB.
- 56.
Prosecutor Interview [12LH], 29 November 2005.
- 57.
See Prosecutor Interviews [13OI], 10 June 1984 and [13AS], 10 June 1984.
- 58.
Prosecutor Interview [5BC], 16 January 2006.
- 59.
Prosecutor Interview [1ZU], 15 March 2006.
- 60.
Prosecutor Interview [1ZU], 15 March 2006.
- 61.
According to the German, Code of Criminal Procedure defense lawyers possess a right to inspect the same files which are made are available to the court (§147 StPO). This requirement exists in European law as well. According to Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights, defense counsel must have the opportunity to access the observations and evidence compiled by the prosecution.
- 62.
§160(2) StPO.
- 63.
Prosecutor Interview [5UD], 19 January 2006.
- 64.
Prosecutor Interview [12CJ], 29 November 2005.
- 65.
Prosecutor Interview [2QM], 6 October 2005.
- 66.
Prosecutor Interview [7GC], 6 April 2006.
- 67.
Prosecutor Interview [7GC], 6 April 2006.
- 68.
Prosecutor Interview [1CK], 13 March 2006.
- 69.
Prosecutor Interview [16AG], 9 June 2008.
- 70.
Prosecutor Interview [5BC], 16 January 2006.
- 71.
See, e.g., Prosecutor Interview [16AG], 9 June 2008.
- 72.
Justice Ministry Interview [12CR], 2 December 2006.
- 73.
Prosecutor Interview [6SB], 23 February 2006.
- 74.
Prosecutor Interview [6SB], 23 February 2006
- 75.
Prosecutor Interview [13WT], 18 November 2005.
- 76.
Prosecutor Interview [4AJ], 2 February 2006.
References
Books, Articles and Online Publications
Blankenburg, E., & Treiber, H. (1985). The establishment of the public prosecutor’s office in Germany. International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 12, 375–391.
Hohmann, B., & Neubeck, G. (1996). Zur Tätigkeit des Staatsanwalts. Dresden: Sächsischen Staatsministerium der Justiz.
Justizzahlen in Berlin. (2007). Berlin: Senatsverwaltung Für Justiz [pdf]. Available at http://www.berlin.de/imperia/md/content/senatsverwaltungen/justiz/aktuell/justizzahlen_2005_2007.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2008.
Koetz, A. G., & Feltes, T. (1996). Organisation Der Staatsanwaltschaften. Köln: Bundesanzeiger Verlag GmbH.
Korioth, S. (2006). Legal education in Germany Today. Wisconsin International Law Journal, 24, 85–108.
Kroger, J. (2008). Convictions: A prosecutor’s battles against MAFIA killers, drug kingpins, and Enron thieves. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Künnecke, M. (2006). The accountability and independence of judges: German perspectives. In G. Canivet, M. Andenas, & D. Fairgrieve (Eds.), Independence, accountability, and the judiciary (pp. 217–231). London: British Institute of International and Comparative Law.
Lipsky, M. (1980). Street level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of individuals in public services. New York: Russell Sage.
Merryman, J. (1985). The civil law tradition. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Rice, L. I. (2010). A case for reform: Paul Butler ’86 used to put people away – Now he wants to set them free. Harvard Law Bulletin (Summer). Available at http://law.harvard.edu/news/bulletin/2010/summer/cn_03.php. Accessed Aug 2013.
Sessar, K. (1979). Prosecutorial discretion in Germany. In W. McDonald (Ed.), The prosecutor (pp. 255–276). Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Staatsanwaltschaft Berlin Website, Senatsverwaltung für Justiz. Available at http://www.berlin.de/sen/justiz/strafverfolgung/sta/index.html. Last Accessed 23 July 2007.
Suthers, J. W. (2008). No higher calling, no greater responsibility: A prosecutor makes his case. Golden, CO: Fulcrum Publishing.
Von Münch, I. (2002). Legal education and the legal profession in Germany. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlag.
Winerip, M. (1985). High profile prosecutor, New York Times Magazine, June 9, 1985. Available at http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=9903E3DAA35755C0A963948260. Accessed 19 July 2013.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Appendices
Legislation
3.1.1 Code of Criminal Procedure (StPO)
§147, 160(2)
3.1.2 Code of Criminal Law (StGB)
§202, 203, 204
3.1.3 Other Laws
Sect. 142 subs. 1 Constitution of Courts Act (Gerichtsverfassungsgesetz, GVG).
Sect. 145
Section 64 Nr. 2 Niedersachsen Civil Service Law (Niedersächsisches Beamtengesetz, NBG)
German Law on Judges (Deutsches Richtergesetz, DRiG) Sept. 8, 1961, BGBl. I at 1665, § 5 para. 1 (F.R.G)
3.1.4 International Conventions
Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights
Interviews
Prosecutor Interview [9BU], 4 May 2005
Prosecutor Interview [7SE], 5 April 2006
Prosecutor Interview [4KD], 2 February 2006
Prosecutor Interview [4AJ], 2 February 2006
Prosecutor Interview [130I], 10 June 2004
Prosecutor Interview [13AS], 10 June 2004
Prosecutor Interview [2BN], 16 July 2004
Prosecutor Interview [13WT], 18 November 2005
Prosecutor Interview [2QM], 6 October 2005
Prosecutor Interview [19BS], 14 May 2008
Prosecutor Interview [6SB], 23 February 2006
Prosecutor Interview [4GG], 30 January 2006
Prosecutor Interview [8HL], 25 May 2006
Prosecutor Interview [2BN], 16 July 2004
Prosecutor Interview [7GC], 6 April 2006
Prosecutor Interview [11OT], 15 July 2004
Prosecutor Interview [5XW], 19 January 2006
Prosecutor Interview [5BC], 16 January 2006
Prosecutor Interview [12FG], 24 April 2006
Prosecutor Interview [13BR], 18 November 2005
Prosecutor Interview [12CJ], 29 November 2005
Prosecutor Interview [16AG], 9 June 2008
Prosecutor Interview [7AG], 7 April 2006
Prosecutor Interview [19IC], 14 May 2008
Prosecutor Interview [16PP], 30 April 2008
Prosecutor Interview [13BC], 8 December 2005
Prosecutor Interview [1DR], 15 March 2006
Prosecutor Interview [4EW], 2 February 2006
Prosecutor Interview [12LH], 29 November 2005
Prosecutor Interview [1ZU], 15 March 2006
Prosecutor Interview [5UD], 19 January 2006
Prosecutor Interview [1CK], 13 March 2006
Appellate Judge Interview [13MU], 10 April 2004
Justice Ministry Interview [12CR], 2 December 2006
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boyne, S.M. (2014). The Organization of Prosecution. In: The German Prosecution Service. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40928-8_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40928-8_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40927-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40928-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)