Skip to main content

Structuring E-Participation in Policy Making through Argumentation

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8055))

Abstract

An important feature of democracies is that citizens can engage their Governments in dialogues about policies. They tend to do so in one of three ways: they may seek a justification of some policy or action; they may object to all or some aspects of a policy; or they may make policy proposals of their own.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.J.M.: Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems. Artif. Intell. 171(10-15), 855–874 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenwood, K., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., McBurney, P.: Structuring dialogue between the people and their representatives. In: Traunmüller, R. (ed.) EGOV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2739, pp. 55–62. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Walton, D.: Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wooldridge, M., van der Hoek, W.: On obligations and normative ability: Towards a logical analysis of the social contract. J. Applied Logic 3(3-4), 396–420 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Wyner, A., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Towards a structured online consultation tool. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., de Bruijn, H. (eds.) ePart 2011. LNCS, vol. 6847, pp. 286–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Wyner, A.Z., Atkinson, K., Bench-Capon, T.: Model based critique of policy proposals. In: Tambouris, E., Macintosh, A., Sæbø, Ø. (eds.) ePart 2012. LNCS, vol. 7444, pp. 120–131. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Wyner, A.Z., Bench-Capon, T.J.M., Atkinson, K.: Towards formalising argumentation about legal cases. In: Ashley, K.D., van Engers, T.M. (eds.) ICAIL, pp. 1–10. ACM (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bench-Capon, T. (2013). Structuring E-Participation in Policy Making through Argumentation. In: Decker, H., Lhotská, L., Link, S., Basl, J., Tjoa, A.M. (eds) Database and Expert Systems Applications. DEXA 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8055. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40285-2_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-40285-2_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-40284-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-40285-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics