Skip to main content

Automatically Generating Discussion Questions

  • Conference paper
Artificial Intelligence in Education (AIED 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7926))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Automatic question generation can support instruction and learning. However, work to date has produced mostly “shallow” questions that fall short of supporting deep learning and discussion. We propose an extension to a state-of-the-art question generation system that allows it to produce deep, subjective questions suitable for group discussion. We evaluate the questions generated by this system against a panel of experienced judges, and find that our approach fares significantly better than the baseline system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Palincsar, A.: Collaborative approaches to comprehension instruction. In: Rethinking Reading Comprehension, pp. 99–114 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Graesser, A., Person, N.: Question asking during tutoring. American Educational Research Journal 31(1), 104–137 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Craig, S., Sullins, J., Witherspoon, A., Gholson, B.: The deep-level-reasoning-question effect: The role of dialogue and deep-level-reasoning questions during vicarious learning. Cognition and Instruction 24(4), 565–591 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Roscoe, R., Chi, M.: Understanding tutor learning: Knowledge-building and knowledge-telling in peer tutors explanations and questions. Review of Educational Research 77(4), 534–574 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bloom, B., Engelhart, M., Furst, E., Hill, W., Krathwohl, D.: Taxonomy of educational objectives: Handbook i: Cognitive domain, vol. 19, p. 56. David McKay, New York (1956)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Graesser, A., Rus, V., Cai, Z.: Question classification schemes. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Question Generation (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brown, J., Frishkoff, G., Eskenazi, M.: Automatic question generation for vocabulary assessment. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Language Technology and Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 819–826. Association for Computational Linguistics (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang, W.-M., Hao, T., Liu, W.: Automatic question generation for learning evaluation in medicine. In: Leung, H., Li, F., Lau, R., Li, Q. (eds.) ICWL 2007. LNCS, vol. 4823, pp. 242–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Agarwal, M., Mannem, P.: Automatic gap-fill question generation from text books. In: Proceedings of the 6th Workshop on Innovative Use of NLP for Building Educational Applications, pp. 56–64. Association for Computational Linguistics (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Heilman, M., Smith, N.: Question generation via overgenerating transformations and ranking. Technical report, DTIC Document (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Beck, I., et al.: Questioning the Author: An Approach for Enhancing Student Engagement with Text. ERIC (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Palinscar, A., Brown, A.: Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction 1(2), 117–175 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chinn, C., Anderson, R., Waggoner, M.: Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. Reading Research Quarterly 36(4), 378–411 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Michaels, S., O’Connor, C., Resnick, L.: Deliberative discourse idealized and realized: Accountable talk in the classroom and in civic life. Studies in Philosophy and Education 27(4), 283–297 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Resnick, L., Michaels, S., O’Connor, C.: How (well structured) talk builds the mind. In: Innovations in Educational Psychology: Perspectives on Learning, Teaching and Human Development, pp. 163–194 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Adey, P., Shayer, M.: An exploration of long-term far-transfer effects following an extended intervention program in the high school science curriculum. Cognition and Instruction 11(1), 1–29 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Langer, J.: Envisioning Literature: Literary Understanding and Literature Instruction. Language and Literacy Series. ERIC (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Applebee, A., Langer, J., Nystrand, M., Gamoran, A.: Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. American Educational Research Journal 40(3), 685–730 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cazden, C.B.: Classroom Discourse: The Language of Teaching and Learning. Heinemann, Portsmouth (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Wiebe, J., Mihalcea, R.: Word sense and subjectivity. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 1065–1072. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Baccianella, S., Esuli, A., Sebastiani, F.: Sentiwordnet 3.0: An enhanced lexical resource for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. In: Proceedings of the Seventh Conference on International Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), Valletta, Malta. European Language Resources Association, ELRA (May 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Liu, M., Calvo, R.A., Rus, V.: Automatic question generation for literature review writing support. In: Aleven, V., Kay, J., Mostow, J. (eds.) ITS 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6094, pp. 45–54. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Dumais, S.T.: Latent semantic analysis. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology 38(1), 188–230 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Huang, A.: Similarity measures for text document clustering. In: Proceedings of the Sixth New Zealand Computer Science Research Student Conference (NZCSRSC 2008), Christchurch, New Zealand, pp. 49–56 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Wu, H.C., Luk, R.W.P., Wong, K.F., Kwok, K.L.: Interpreting tf-idf term weights as making relevance decisions. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. 26(3), 13:1–13:37 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang, D., Zhu, S., Li, T., Gong, Y.: Multi-document summarization using sentence-based topic models. In: Proceedings of the ACL-IJCNLP 2009 Conference Short Papers, pp. 297–300. Association for Computational Linguistics (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Dredze, M., Wallach, H., Puller, D., Pereira, F.: Generating summary keywords for emails using topics. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, pp. 199–206. ACM (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hu, M., Sun, A., Lim, E.: Comments-oriented blog summarization by sentence extraction. In: Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 901–904. ACM (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. SparkNotes: SparkNote on Animal Farm (2007), http://www.sparknotes.com/lit/animalfarm/ (accessed January 3, 2013)

  30. Orwell, G.: Animal Farm (1945), http://gutenberg.net.au/ebooks01/0100011.txt (accessed January 3, 2013)

  31. Dyke, G., Adamson, D., Howley, I., Rosé, C.: Enhancing scientific reasoning and explanation skills with conversational agents. Submitted to the IEEE Journal on Transactions on Learning Technologies Special Issue on Learning Systems for Science and Technology Education

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Adamson, D., Bhartiya, D., Gujral, B., Kedia, R., Singh, A., Rosé, C.P. (2013). Automatically Generating Discussion Questions. In: Lane, H.C., Yacef, K., Mostow, J., Pavlik, P. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Education. AIED 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7926. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39112-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-39111-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-39112-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics