Skip to main content

Common Knowledge Logic in a Higher Order Proof Assistant

  • Chapter
Programming Logics

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7797))

Abstract

This paper presents experiments on common knowledge logic, conducted with the help of the proof assistant Coq. The main feature of common knowledge logic is the eponymous modality that says that a group of agents shares a knowledge about a certain proposition in a inductive way. This modality is specified by using a fixpoint approach. Furthermore, from these experiments, we discuss and compare the structure of theorems that can be proved in specific theories that use common knowledge logic. Those structures manifest the interplay between the theory (as implemented in the proof assistant Coq) and the metatheory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Aumann, R.J.: Backward induction and common knowledge of rationality. Games and Economic Behavior 8, 6–19 (1995)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baltag, A.: A logic of epistemic actions. In: van der Hoek, W., Meyer, J.-J., Witteveen, C. (eds.) Proceedings of the ESSLLI 1999 workshop on Foundations and Applications of Collective Agent-Based Systems. Utrecht University (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baltag, A., Moss, L., Solecki, S.: The logic of public announcements, common knowledge and private suspicion. In: Proc. of TARK, pp. 43–56. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bertot, Y., Castéran, P.: Interactive Theorem Proving and Program Development Coq’Art: The Calculus of Inductive Constructions. Springer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about Knowledge. The MIT Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gamow, G., Stern, M.: Forthy unfaithful wives. In: Puzzle Math., pp. 20–23. The Viking Press, New York (1958)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gardner, M.: Puzzles from other worlds. Vintage (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Geanakoplos, J.: Common knowledge. In: Aumann, R., Hart, S. (eds.) Handbook of Game Theory, vol. 2, pp. 1437–1496. Elsevier, Amsterdam (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gentzen, G.: Untersuchungen über das logische Schließen. Mathematische Zeitschrift 210, 405–431 (1935)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Girard, J.-Y.: Linear logic. Theoretical Computer Science 50, 1–102 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Harel, D., Kozen, D., Tiuryn, J.: Dynamic Logic. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Lafont, Y.: From proof nets to interaction nets. In: Girard, J.-Y., Lafont, Y., Regnier, L. (eds.) Advances in Linear Logic, pp. 225–247. Cambridge University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lehmann, D.: Knowledge, common knowledge and related puzzles (extended summary). In: PODC 1984: Proceedings of the Third Annual ACM Symposium on Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 62–67. ACM Press, New York (1984)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Lescanne, P.: Mechanizing epistemic logic with Coq. Annals of Mathematics and Artificial Intelligence 48, 15–43 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lescanne, P., Puisségur, J.: Dynamic logic of common knowledge in a proof assistant, http://hal-ens-lyon.archives-ouvertes.fr/ensl-00198782

  16. Lewis, D.: Convention: A philosophical study. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Littlewood, J.E.: Littlewood’s miscellany. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  18. McCarthy, J., Sato, M., Hayashi, T., Igarashi, S.: On the model theory of knowledge. Technical Report AIM-312, Stanford University (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Meyer, J.-J.C., van der Hoek, W.: Epistemic Logic for Artificial Intelligence and Computer Science. Cambridge Tracts in Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 41. Cambridge University Press (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Moses, Y.O., Dolev, D., Halpern, J.Y.: Cheating husbands and other stories: a case study in knowledge, action, and communication. Distributed Computing 1(3), 167–176 (1986)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Prémaillon, B.: Logique épistémique, modélisation dans un assistant de preuve. Master’s thesis, Master Ingénierie Mathématique, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Puisségur, J.: Eléments de construction d’une logique épistémique et dynamique. Rapport de stage de licence de l’École normale supérieure de Lyon (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Samet, D.: Hypothetical knowledge and games with perfect information. Games and Economic Behavior 17, 230–251 (1996)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Vestergaard, R., Lescanne, P., Ono, H.: The inductive and modal proof theory of Aumann’s theorem on rationality. Technical Report IS-RR-2006-009, JAIST (2006), http://www.jaist.ac.jp/~vester/Writings/vestergaard-IS-RR-2006-009.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Lescanne, P. (2013). Common Knowledge Logic in a Higher Order Proof Assistant. In: Voronkov, A., Weidenbach, C. (eds) Programming Logics. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7797. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37651-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37651-1_11

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-37650-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-37651-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics