Skip to main content

A GIS-Based Performance Metrics for Designing a Low Energy Urban Agriculture System

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development

Abstract

This chapter explores a GIS-based performance metric for designing a low energy agriculture system in the City of Atlanta. A framework of a planning support system (PSS) is proposed, which contains dimensions of representation, performance and scenario planning. The specific PSS demonstrated how a performance-oriented urban design decision model reorganizes fragmented information and turns them into useful representational layers, analyses of performance measures, and scenario planning for making design decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ArkFab (2011) The ArkFab open source living machine series. http://arkfab.org/?tag=wheat-street-farm. Last date accessed 11.2012

  • Avin U (2007) Using scenarios to make urban plans. In: Hopkins L, Zapata M (eds) Engaging the future: forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, pp 103–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2007) Planning support systems: progress, predictions, and speculations on the shape of things to come. In: Brail R (ed) (2008): planning support systems for cities and regions. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Batty M (2012) Cities as flow systems: urban metabolism and complexity. In: Reports presented at the WasteMet Asia 2012 conference. Sands Expo and Convention Center Marina Bay Sands, Singapore, 1–4 July 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop I (1998) Planning support: hardware and software in search of a system. Comput Environ Urban Syst 22(3):189–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bomford M (2009) How much greenhouse gas comes from food? http://energyfarms.wordpress.com/2009/04/16/how-much-energy-goes-into-our-food-system/. Last date accessed 08.2012

  • Box G, Draper N (1987) Empirical model-building and response surfaces. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brail R, Klosterman R (2001) Introduction. In: Brail R, Klosterman R (eds) Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models and visualization tools. ESRI, Redlands, pp ix–xxi

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson H, van der Leeuw S, Redman C, Meffert D, Davis G, Alfsen C et al (2010) Urban transitions: on urban resilience and human-dominated ecosystems. Ambio 39(8):531–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2012) ArcGIS 10.1. http://www.esri.com/news/arcnews/spring12articles/introducing-arcgis-101.html. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Gandy M (2004) Rethinking urban metabolism: water, space and the modern city. City 8(3):371–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geertman S, Stillwell J (2004) Planning support systems: an inventory of current practice. Comput Environ Urban Syst 28(4):291–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greater Philadelphia Innovation Cluster for Energy Efficient Buildings (2012) GPIC goals. http://gpichub.org/about/gpic-goals. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Greensgrow (2012) Greensgrow Philadelphia project. http://www.greensgrow.org/about-us/greensgrow-philadelphia-project/. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Growing Power (2012) About US. http://www.growingpower.org/about_us.htm. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Harris B (1989) Beyond geographic information-systems—computers and the planning professional. J Am Plan Assoc 55(1):85–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris B (1999) Computing in planning: professional and institutional requirements. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 26(3):321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harwood S (2007) Using scenarios to building planning capacity. In: Hopkins L, Zapata M (eds) Engaging the future: forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects. Lincohn Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, pp 135–153

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermanowicz S, Asano T (1999) Abel Wolman’s “The Metabolism of Cities” revisited: a case for water recycling and reuse. Water Sci Technol 40(4–5):29–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins L (1999) Structure of a planning support system for urban development. Environ Plan B: Plan Des 26(3):333–343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ifu Hamburg GmbH (2012) E!Sankey. 3.1. http://www.e-sankey.com/en/. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Integrated Environmental Solutions Limited (2012) VE-Ware. http://www.iesve.com/software/ve-ware. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Kaufman J, Bailkey M (2000) Farming inside cities: entrepreneurial urban agriculture in the United States, working paper. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy C, Pincetl S, Bunje P (2011) The study of urban metabolism and its applications to urban planning and design. Environ Pollut 159(8–9):1965–1973

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman R (2001) Planning support systems: a new perspective on computer-aided planning. In: Brail R, Klosterman R (eds) Planning support systems: integrating geographic information systems, models and visualization tools. ESRI Press, Redlands, pp 1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Klosterman R (2008) A new tool for a new planning: the What if? TM planning support system. In: Brail R (ed) Planning support systems for cities and regions. Puritan Press Incorporated, Hampshire, pp 85–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Lundie S, Peters G (2005) Life cycle assessment of food waste management options. J Cleaner Prod 13(3):275–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pimentel D, Hepperly P, Hanson J, Seidel R, Douds D (2005) Organic and conventional farming systems: environmental and economic issues. Department of Entomology & Section of Ecology and Systematics, New York State College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca. http://ecommons.library.cornell.edu/bitstream/1813/2101/1/pimentel_report_05-1.pdf. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Richardson M (2011) Identifying opportunities for urban agriculture in Atlanta. Technical Report, Georgia Tech Program in Science, Technology and Innovation Policy, Enterprise Innovation Institute, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Rickwood P (2011) Modelling in urban and regional planning: past, present, and yet to come. In: Chan F, Marinova D, Anderssen R (eds) Sustaining our future: understanding and living with uncertainty, proceedings of MODSIM2011, the 19th international congress on modelling and simulation. Modelling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand, Western Australia, pp 1652–1658, 12–16 Dec 2011. www.mssanz.org.au/modsim2011/D10/wongsosaputro.pdf. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Selincourt K (2008) A comparison of greenhouse gas flux from composting compared to landfill and fertilizer production. Growing Heap 43:11–13

    Google Scholar 

  • SketchUp Team and Technology (2012) SketchUp Pro 8. http://www.sketchup.com/intl/en/product/gsupro.html. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • Steinitz C (1990) Toward a sustainable landscape with high visual preference and high ecological integrity: the loop road in Acadia National Park, USA. Landscape Urban Plan 19(3):213–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz C (2002) On teaching ecological principles to designers. In: Johnson B, Hill K (eds) Ecology and design frameworks for learning. Island Press, Washington, pp 231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz C, Rogers P (1970) A systems analysis model of urbanization and change: an experiment in interdisciplinary education. The MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinitz C, Arias H, Bassett S, Flaxman M, Goode T, Maddock T et al (2002) Alternative futures for changing landscapes: the Upper San Pedro River Basin in Arizona and Sonora. In: Ralph C, Rich T (eds) (2005): bird conservation implementation and integration in the Americas, proceedings of the third international partners in flight conference, Asilomar, 20–24 Mar 2002, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Research Station, Albany, pp 93–100

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEP) (2008) Municipal solid waste generation, recycling and disposal in the United States: facts and figures for 2008. http://www.epa.gov/osw/nonhaz/municipal/pubs/msw2008rpt.pdf. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • US Department of Agriculture (2013) Food desert locator. http://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/food-desert-locator.aspx#.UUsyzR1-lQA. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • US Department of Energy (2012) Building America: program goals. http://www1.eere.energy.gov/buildings/building_america/program_goals.html. Last date accessed 07.2012

  • U.S. Census Bureau (2011) Current Population Survey, 2011 Annual Social and Economic Supplement

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Agriculture (2011) Food Availability (Per Capita) DataSystem

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (2005) Residential energy consumption survey (RECS). http://www.eia.gov/consumption/residential/data/2005/#undefined. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • U.S. Energy Information Administration (2008) Commercial buildings energy consumption survey (CBECS): 2003 detailed tables. http://www.eia.gov/emeu/cbecs/cbecs2003/detailed_tables_2003/detailed_tables_2003.html#consumexpen03. Last date accessed 03.2013

  • van Leeuwen J, Timmermans M (2006) Introduction. In: van Leeuwen J, Timmermans M (eds) Innovations in design and decision support systems in architecture and urban planning. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 13–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonk G, Geertman S (2008) Improving the adoption and use of planning support systems in practice. Appl Spat Anal 1(3):153–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webber C, Matthews H (2008) Food-miles and the relative climate impacts of food choices in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 42(10):3508–3513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolman A (1965) The metabolism of cities. Sci Am 213(3):178–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang P, Quan S, Minter D, Nguyen D, Hampton T, Brooks T, Brame C et al (2012) Agrarian urbanism studio report. Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeiler M (1999) Modeling our world: the Esri guide to Geodatabase design. ESRI Press, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Perry Pei-Ju Yang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Quan, S.J., Minter, J.D., Yang, P.PJ. (2013). A GIS-Based Performance Metrics for Designing a Low Energy Urban Agriculture System. In: Geertman, S., Toppen, F., Stillwell, J. (eds) Planning Support Systems for Sustainable Urban Development. Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography, vol 195. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-37533-0_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics