Skip to main content

Constant Thresholds Can Make Target Set Selection Tractable

  • Conference paper
Design and Analysis of Algorithms (MedAlg 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 7659))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Target Set Selection, which is a prominent NP-hard problem occurring in social network analysis and distributed computing, is notoriously hard both in terms of achieving useful approximation as well as fixed-parameter algorithms. The task is to select a minimum number of vertices into a “target set” such that all other vertices will become active in course of a dynamic process (which may go through several activation rounds). A vertex, which is equipped with a threshold value t, becomes active once at least t of its neighbors are active; initially, only the target set vertices are active. We contribute further insights into islands of tractability for Target Set Selection by spotting new parameterizations characterizing some sparse graphs as well as some “cliquish” graphs and developing corresponding fixed-parameter tractability and (parameterized) hardness results. In particular, we demonstrate that upper-bounding the thresholds by a constant may significantly alleviate the search for efficiently solvable, but still meaningful special cases of Target Set Selection.

Major part of this work was done while all authors were at TU Berlin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Balogh, J., Bollobás, B., Morris, R.: Bootstrap percolation in high dimensions. Combinatorics, Probability & Computing 19(5-6), 643–692 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ben-Zwi, O., Hermelin, D., Lokshtanov, D., Newman, I.: Treewidth governs the complexity of target set selection. Discrete Optimization 8(1), 87–96 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Bodlaender, H.L.: Kernelization: New Upper and Lower Bound Techniques. In: Chen, J., Fomin, F.V. (eds.) IWPEC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5917, pp. 17–37. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Centeno, C.C., Dourado, M.C., Penso, L.D., Rautenbach, D., Szwarcfiter, J.L.: Irreversible conversion of graphs. Theoretical Computer Science 412(29), 3693–3700 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen, N.: On the approximability of influence in social networks. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 23(3), 1400–1415 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiang, C.-Y., Huang, L.-H., Li, B.-J., Wu, J., Yeh, H.-G.: Some results on the target set selection problem. Journal of Combinatorial Optimization (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Diestel, R.: Graph Theory, 4th edn. Graduate Texts in Mathematics, vol. 173. Springer (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Doucha, M., Kratochvíl, J.: Cluster Vertex Deletion: A Parameterization between Vertex Cover and Clique-Width. In: Rovan, B., Sassone, V., Widmayer, P. (eds.) MFCS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7464, pp. 348–359. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Downey, R.G., Fellows, M.R.: Parameterized Complexity. Springer (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dreyer Jr., P.A., Roberts, F.S.: Irreversible k-threshold processes: Graph-theoretical threshold models of the spread of disease and of opinion. Discrete Applied Mathematics 157, 1615–1627 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Easley, D., Kleinberg, J.: Networks, Crowds, and Markets: Reasoning about a Highly Connected World. Cambridge University Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Flum, J., Grohe, M.: Parameterized Complexity Theory. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guo, J., Niedermeier, R.: Invitation to data reduction and problem kernelization. ACM SIGACT News 38(1), 31–45 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Harant, J., Pruchnewski, A., Voigt, M.: On dominating sets and independent sets of graphs. Combinatorics, Probability and Computing 8(6), 547–553 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Hüffner, F., Komusiewicz, C., Moser, H., Niedermeier, R.: Fixed-parameter algorithms for cluster vertex deletion. Theory of Computing Systems 47(1), 196–217 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Karp, R.M.: Reducibility among combinatorial problems. In: Miller, R.E., Thatcher, J.W. (eds.) Complexity of Computer Computations, pp. 85–103. Plenum Press (1972)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kempe, D., Kleinberg, J., Tardos, É.: Maximizing the spread of influence through a social network. In: Proc. 9th ACM KDD, pp. 137–146. ACM Press (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Klasing, R., Laforest, C.: Hardness results and approximation algorithms of k-tuple domination in graphs. Information Processing Letters 89(2), 75–83 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Komusiewicz, C., Niedermeier, R.: New Races in Parameterized Algorithmics. In: Rovan, B., Sassone, V., Widmayer, P. (eds.) MFCS 2012. LNCS, vol. 7464, pp. 19–30. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Lenstra, H.W.: Integer programming with a fixed number of variables. Mathematics of Operations Research 8, 538–548 (1983)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Nichterlein, A., Niedermeier, R., Uhlmann, J., Weller, M.: On tractable cases of target set selection. Social Network Analysis and Mining (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Niedermeier, R.: Invitation to Fixed-Parameter Algorithms. Oxford University Press (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Peleg, D.: Local majorities, coalitions and monopolies in graphs: a review. Theoretical Computer Science 282, 231–257 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Raman, V., Saurabh, S., Srihari, S.: Parameterized Algorithms for Generalized Domination. In: Yang, B., Du, D.-Z., Wang, C.A. (eds.) COCOA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5165, pp. 116–126. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Reddy, T., Krishna, D., Rangan, C.: Variants of Spreading Messages. In: Rahman, M. S., Fujita, S. (eds.) WALCOM 2010. LNCS, vol. 5942, pp. 240–251. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chopin, M., Nichterlein, A., Niedermeier, R., Weller, M. (2012). Constant Thresholds Can Make Target Set Selection Tractable. In: Even, G., Rawitz, D. (eds) Design and Analysis of Algorithms. MedAlg 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7659. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34862-4_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34862-4_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34861-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34862-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics