Abstract
Imaging is a key component in the evaluation of patients with urolithiasis, as it is essential for the diagnosis and for determining the appropriate treatment of renal and ureteral stone disease. The ideal imaging study would be rapidly performed, have high sensitivity and specificity, and expose the patient to minimal or no radiation. Non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT) remains the first-line imaging modality for the evaluation of patients with suspected urolithiasis. It allows for rapid and accurate diagnosis. The major limitation of NCCT is radiation exposure, though low-dose NCCT protocols help to minimize this risk. Ultrasound is also useful for the evaluation of patients with suspected urolithiasis and should be considered the imaging study of choice in pediatric patients and pregnant women with suspected stones. Ultrasound has the advantage of no radiation exposure, but at the cost of decreased sensitivity and specificity compared to NCCT. Plain film radiography of the abdomen/pelvis (KUB) is useful as an adjunct to ultrasound. The role of intravenous pyelography (IVP) has been largely supplanted by NCCT; however, IVP is still useful in evaluation for obstruction and anatomic abnormalities that may impact in treatment decisions. The main utility of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with urolithiasis is in detecting secondary signs of obstruction, especially in those patients who must avoid radiation exposure.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Andreoiu M, MacMahon R (2009) Renal colic in pregnancy: lithiasis or physiological hydronephrosis? Urology 74:757–761
Berrington de Gonzalez A, Mahesh M, Kim KP et al (2009) Projected cancer risks from computed tomographic scans performed in the United States in 2007. Arch Intern Med 169:2071–2077
Brenner DJ, Hall EJ (2007) Computed tomography – an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 357:2277–2284
Dalrymple NC, Verga M, Anderson KR et al (1998) The value of unenhanced helical computerized tomography in the management of acute flank pain. J Urol 159:735–740
Dobbins JT 3rd, McAdams HP (2009) Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update. Eur J Radiol 72:244–251
Ege G, Akman H, Kuzucu K et al (2003) Acute ureterolithiasis: incidence of secondary signs on unenhanced helical CT and influence on patient management. Clin Radiol 58:990–994
Federle MP, McAninch JW, Kaiser JA et al (1981) Computed tomography of urinary calculi. AJR Am J Roentgenol 136:255–258
Ferrandino MN, Bagrodia A, Pierre SA (2009) Radiation exposure in the acute and short-term management of urolithiasis at 2 academic centers. J Urol 181:668–672, discussion 673
Ferrandino MN, Pierre SA, Simmons WN et al (2010) Dual-energy computed tomography with advanced postimage acquisition data processing: improved determination of urinary stone composition. J Endourol 24:347–354
Fowler KA, Locken JA, Duchesne JH et al (2002) US for detecting renal calculi with nonenhanced CT as a reference standard. Radiology 222:109–113
Gandolpho L, Sevillano M, Barbieri A (2001) Scintigraphy and Doppler ultrasonography for the evaluation of obstructive urinary calculi. Braz J Med Biol Res 34:745–751
Goldwasser B, Cohan RH, Dunnick NR et al (1989) Role of linear tomography in evaluation of patients with nephrolithiasis. Urology 33:253–256
Hakim CM, Chough DM, Ganott MA et al (2010) Digital breast tomosynthesis in the diagnostic environment: a subjective side-by-side review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:W172–W176
Hamm M, Wawroschek F, Weckermann D et al (2001) Unenhanced helical computed tomography in the evaluation of acute flank pain. Eur Urol 39:460–465
Hoppe H, Studer R, Kessler TM (2006) Alternate or additional findings to stone disease on unenhanced computerized tomography for acute flank pain can impact management. J Urol 175:1725–1730, discussion 1730
Hopper KD, Yakes WF (1990) The posterior intercostal approach for percutaneous renal procedures: risk of puncturing the lung, spleen, and liver as determined by CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 154:115–117
Hyams ES, Korley FK, Pham JC et al (2011) Trends in imaging use during the emergency department evaluation of flank pain. J Urol 186:2270–2274
Jackman SV, Potter SR, Regan F et al (2000) Plain abdominal x-ray versus computerized tomography screening: sensitivity for stone localization after nonenhanced spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 164:308–310
Jellison FC, Smith JC, Heldt JP et al (2009) Effect of low dose radiation computerized tomography protocols on distal ureteral calculus detection. J Urol 182:2762–2767
Jin DH, Lamberton GR, Broome DR et al (2010) Effect of reduced radiation CT protocols on the detection of renal calculi. Radiology 255:100–107
Johnston R, Lin A, Du J et al (2009) Comparison of kidney-ureter-bladder abdominal radiography and computed tomography scout films for identifying renal calculi. BJU Int 104:670–673
Joseph P, Mandal AK, Singh SK et al (2002) Computerized tomography attenuation value of renal calculus: can it predict successful fragmentation of the calculus by shock wave lithotripsy? A preliminary study. J Urol 167:1968–1971
Kalb B, Sharma P, Salman K et al (2010) Acute abdominal pain: is there a potential role for MRI in the setting of the emergency department in a patient with renal calculi? J Magn Reson Imaging 32:1012–1023
Katz DS, Scheer M, Lumerman JH et al (2000) Alternative or additional diagnoses on unenhanced helical computed tomography for suspected renal colic: experience with 1000 consecutive examinations. Urology 56:53–57
Kavakli HS, Koktener A, Yilmaz A (2011) Diagnostic value of renal resistive index for the assessment of renal colic. Singapore Med J 52:271–273
Kim BS, Hwang IK, Choi YW et al (2005) Low-dose and standard-dose unenhanced helical computed tomography for the assessment of acute renal colic: prospective comparative study. Acta Radiol 46:756–763
Kluner C, Hein PA, Gralla O et al (2006) Does ultra-low-dose CT with a radiation dose equivalent to that of KUB suffice to detect renal and ureteral calculi? J Comput Assist Tomogr 30:44–50
Lamb AD, Wines MD, Mousa S et al (2008) Plain radiography still is required in the planning of treatment for urolithiasis. J Endourol 22:2201–2205
Levine JA, Neitlich J, Verga M et al (1997) Ureteral calculi in patients with flank pain: correlation of plain radiography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 204:27–31
Manglaviti G, Tresoldi S, Guerrer CS et al (2011) In vivo evaluation of the chemical composition of urinary stones using dual-energy CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 197:W76–W83
Mermuys K, De Geeter F, Bacher K et al (2010) Digital tomosynthesis in the detection of urolithiasis: diagnostic performance and dosimetry compared with digital radiography with MDCT as the reference standard. AJR Am J Roentgenol 195:161–167
Mettler FA Jr, Huda W, Yoshizumi TT et al (2008) Effective doses in radiology and diagnostic nuclear medicine: a catalog. Radiology 248:254–263
Mitterberger M, Pinggera GM, Pallwein L et al (2007) Plain abdominal radiography with transabdominal native tissue harmonic imaging ultrasonography vs unenhanced computed tomography in renal colic. BJU Int 100:887–890
Mitterberger M, Aigner F, Pallwein L et al (2009) Sonographic detection of renal and ureteral stones. Value of the twinkling sign. Int Braz J Urol 35:532–539, discussion 540–531
Moesbergen TC, de Ryke RJ, Dunbar S et al (2011) Distal ureteral calculi: US follow-up. Radiology 260:575–580
Mostafavi MR, Ernst RD, Saltzman B (1998) Accurate determination of chemical composition of urinary calculi by spiral computerized tomography. J Urol 159:673–675
Mutgi A, Williams JW, Nettleman M (1991) Renal colic. Utility of the plain abdominal roentgenogram. Arch Intern Med 151:1589–1592
Ng CS, Herts BR, Streem SB (2005) Percutaneous access to upper pole renal stones: role of prone 3-dimensional computerized tomography in inspiratory and expiratory phases. J Urol 173:124–126
Niemann T, Kollmann T, Bongartz G (2008) Diagnostic performance of low-dose CT for the detection of urolithiasis: a meta-analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 191:396–401
Pareek G, Hedican SP, Lee FT Jr et al (2005) Shock wave lithotripsy success determined by skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography. Urology 66:941–944
Patel T, Kozakowski K, Hruby G et al (2009) Skin to stone distance is an independent predictor of stone-free status following shockwave lithotripsy. J Endourol 23:1383–1385
Patlas M, Farkas A, Fisher D et al (2001) Ultrasound vs CT for the detection of ureteric stones in patients with renal colic. Br J Radiol 74:901–904
Pepe P, Motta L, Pennisi M et al (2005) Functional evaluation of the urinary tract by color-Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) in 100 patients with renal colic. Eur J Radiol 53:131–135
Perks AE, Schuler TD, Lee J et al (2008) Stone attenuation and skin-to-stone distance on computed tomography predicts for stone fragmentation by shock wave lithotripsy. Urology 72:765–769
Pfister SA, Deckart A, Laschke S et al (2003) Unenhanced helical computed tomography vs intravenous urography in patients with acute flank pain: accuracy and economic impact in a randomized prospective trial. Eur Radiol 13:2513–2520
Pichler R, Skradski V, Aigner F (2011) In young adults with a low body mass index ultrasonography is sufficient as a diagnostic tool for ureteric stones. BJU Int 109:770–774
Poletti PA, Platon A, Rutschmann OT et al (2007) Low-dose versus standard-dose CT protocol in patients with clinically suspected renal colic. AJR Am J Roentgenol 188:927–933
Ray AA, Ghiculete D, Pace KT et al (2010) Limitations to ultrasound in the detection and measurement of urinary tract calculi. Urology 76:295–300
Regan F, Kuszyk B, Bohlman ME et al (2005) Acute ureteric calculus obstruction: unenhanced spiral CT versus HASTE MR urography and abdominal radiograph. Br J Radiol 78:506–511
Ripolles T, Agramunt M, Errando J et al (2004) Suspected ureteral colic: plain film and sonography vs unenhanced helical CT. A prospective study in 66 patients. Eur Radiol 14:129–136
Sandhu C, Anson KM, Patel U (2003) Urinary tract stones – Part I: role of radiological imaging in diagnosis and treatment planning. Clin Radiol 58:415–421
Segal AJ, Spataro RF, Linke CA et al (1978) Diagnosis of nonopaque calculi by computed tomography. Radiology 129:447–450
Shah K, Kurien A, Mishra S et al (2010) Predicting effectiveness of extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy by stone attenuation value. J Endourol 24:1169–1173
Sheafor DH, Hertzberg BS, Freed KS et al (2000) Nonenhanced helical CT and US in the emergency evaluation of patients with renal colic: prospective comparison. Radiology 217:792–797
Shokeir AA, Abdulmaaboud M (1999) Resistive index in renal colic: a prospective study. BJU Int 83:378–382
Shokeir AA, Abdulmaaboud M (2001) Prospective comparison of nonenhanced helical computerized tomography and Doppler ultrasonography for the diagnosis of renal colic. J Urol 165:1082–1084
Smith RC, Rosenfield AT, Choe KA et al (1995) Acute flank pain: comparison of non-contrast-enhanced CT and intravenous urography. Radiology 194:789–794
Smith RC, Verga M, McCarthy S et al (1996) Diagnosis of acute flank pain: value of unenhanced helical CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol 166:97–101
Sudah M, Vanninen R, Partanen K et al (2001) MR urography in evaluation of acute flank pain: T2-weighted sequences and gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional FLASH compared with urography. Fast low-angle shot. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176:105–112
Sudah M, Vanninen RL, Partanen K et al (2002) Patients with acute flank pain: comparison of MR urography with unenhanced helical CT. Radiology 223:98–105
Sundaram CP, Saltzman B (1999) Urolithiasis associated with protease inhibitors. J Endourol 13:309–312
Tessler AN, Ghazi MR (1979) Case profile: computerized tomographic assistance in diagnosis of radiolucent calculi. Urology 13:672–673
Ulusan S, Koc Z, Tokmak N (2007) Accuracy of sonography for detecting renal stone: comparison with CT. J Clin Ultrasound 35:256–261
Unal D, Yeni E, Karaoglanoglu M et al (2003) Can conventional examinations contribute to the diagnostic power of unenhanced helical computed tomography in urolithiasis? Urol Int 70:31–35
Vieweg J, Teh C, Freed K et al (1998) Unenhanced helical computerized tomography for the evaluation of patients with acute flank pain. J Urol 160:679–684
Viprakasit DP, Sawyer MD, Herrell SD et al (2012) Limitations of ultrasonography in the evaluation of urolithiasis: a correlation with computed tomography J Endourol. Mar;26(3):209–13. Epub 2011 Oct 19
Wang AJ, Nguyen G, Toncheva G et al (2011) Radiation exposure from non-contrast CT, digital tomosynthesis, and standard KUB and tomograms. J Endourol 25:A304–A305
Wells IT, Raju VM, Rowberry BK et al (2011) Digital tomosynthesis – a new lease of life for the intravenous urogram? Br J Radiol 84:464–468
Westphalen AC, Hsia RY, Maselli JH et al (2011) Radiological imaging of patients with suspected urinary tract stones: national trends, diagnoses, and predictors. Acad Emerg Med 18:699–707
White WM, Zite NB, Gash J et al (2007) Low-dose computed tomography for the evaluation of flank pain in the pregnant population. J Endourol 21:1255–1260
Wiesenthal JD, Ghiculete D, RJ DAH (2010) Evaluating the importance of mean stone density and skin-to-stone distance in predicting successful shock wave lithotripsy of renal and ureteric calculi. Urol Res 38:307–313
Yilmaz S, Sindel T, Arslan G et al (1998) Renal colic: comparison of spiral CT, US and IVU in the detection of ureteral calculi. Eur Radiol 8:212–217
Zilberman DE, Ferrandino MN, Preminger GM et al (2010) In vivo determination of urinary stone composition using dual energy computerized tomography with advanced post-acquisition processing. J Urol 184:2354–2359
Zilberman DE, Tsivian M, Lipkin ME et al (2011) Low dose computerized tomography for detection of urolithiasis – its effectiveness in the setting of the urology clinic. J Urol 185:910–914
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lipkin, M.E., Preminger, G.M. (2013). Imaging. In: Knoll, T., Pearle, M. (eds) Clinical Management of Urolithiasis. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28732-9_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-28732-9_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-28731-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-28732-9
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)