Abstract
Neuroimaging research continues to engage the imaginations of scientists, members of the media, and the general public. As an area of human subject research, it also raises a number of research ethics issues that, while not necessarily unique to neuroimaging, offer particular challenges in this growing domain. Here, we consider a number of the key research ethics issues that are emerging as being of central importance to the continued development of this field. We will situate our discussion within the Canadian framework, but many of the issues raised will have broad jurisdictional relevance. While providing a comprehensive examination of all of the research ethics issues implicated by neuroimaging research is beyond the scope of this review, it is hoped that this paper will serve as a useful overview and guide to researchers, research ethics boards, and others interested in neuroimaging research.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Ciara Toole, BHSc, LLB, Faculty of Law, University of Alberta.
Amy Zarzeczny, LLM, Assistant Professor, Johnson-Shoyama Graduate School of Public Policy, University of Regina. Timothy Caulfield, LLM, FRSC, Canada Research Chair in Health Law and Policy, Professor, Faculty of Law and School of Public Health, Senior Health Scholar with the Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research and Research Director, Health Law Institute, University of Alberta.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Poldrack has estimated an average of 30–40 papers on fMRI neuroimaging are published every week (2008, p. 223).
References
(2008) The ethical neuroscientist, Editorial Comment. Nat Neurosci 11(3):239
Alpert S (2007) Brain privacy: how can we protect it? Am J Bioeth 7(9):70–73
Bandettini P (2009) What’s new in neuroimaging methods? Ann N Y Acad Sci 1156:260–293
Bartels A, Zeki S (2000) The neural basis of romantic love. Neuroreport 11(17):3829–3834
Bubela T, Nisbet MC, Borchelt R, Brunger F, Critchley C, Einsiedel E, Geller G, Gupta A, Hampel J, Hyde-Lay R, Jandciu EW, Jones SA, Kolopack P, Lane S, Lougheed T, Nerlich B, Ogbogu U, O’Riordan K, Ouellette C, Spear M, Strauss S, Thavaratnam T, Willemse S, Caulfield T (2009) Science communication reconsidered. Nat Biotechnol 27(6):514–518
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, Constitution Act, 1982, (U.K.) 1982, c. 11, Schedule B
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (2006) CIHR Procedure for Addressing Allegations of Non-Compliance with Research Policies. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/25178.html. Accessed 12 June 2009
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR), Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (2010) Tri-Council Policy Statement: Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans, 2nd Ed. http://www.pre.ethics.gc.ca/pdf/eng/tcps2/TCPS_2_FINAL_Web.pdf. Accessed 15 December 2010
Canadian Medical Association (2004) CMA code of ethics. http://policybase.cma.ca/PolicyPDF/PD04-06.pdf. Accessed 17 December 2010
Canli T, Amin Z (2002) Neuroimaging of emotion and personality: scientific evidence and ethical considerations. Brain Cogn 50(3):414–431
Canli T, Zhao Z, Brewer J, Grabrieli J, Cahill L (2000) Event-related activation in the human amygdala associated with later memory for individual emotional experience. J Neurosci 20(19): RC99, 1–5
Caulfield T, Ogbogu U (2008) Biomedical research and the commercialization agenda: a review of main considerations for neuroscience. Account Res 15(4):303–320
Caulfield T, Rachul C, Zarzeczny A (2010) Neurohype and the name game: who’s to blame? AJOB Neurosci 1(2):13–15
Cho MK (2002) Conflicts of interest in magnetic resonance imaging: issues in clinical practice and research. Top Magn Reson Imaging 13(2):73–38
Congdon E, Canli T (2008) A neurogenetic approach to impulsivity. J Personal 76(6):1447–1484
Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) in collaboration with the World Health Organization (WHO) (1993) International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Geneva
Davatzikos C, Rapurel K, Fan Y, Shen DG, Acharyya M, Loughead JW, Gur RC, Langleben DD (2005) Classifying spatial patterns of brain activity with machine learning methods: application to lie detection. Neuroimage 28(3):663–668
de Champlain J, Patenaude J (2006) Review of a mock research protocol in functional neuroimaging by Canadian research ethics boards. J Med Ethics 32(9):530–534
Declaration of Helsinki (1964) Declaration of Helsinki with amendments in 1975, 1983, 1989, 1996, 2000 and 2008. World Medical Association, Helsinki, Finland. http://www.wma.net/e/policy/b3.htm. Accessed 26 May 2009
Desmond JE, Chen SH (2002) Ethical issues in the clinical application of fMRI: factors affecting the validity and interpretation of activations. Brain Cogn 50(3):482–497
Downie J, McDonald F (2004) Revisioning the oversight of research involving humans in Canada. Health Law J 12:159–181
Downie J, Murphy R (2007) Inadmissible, eh? Am J Bioeth 7(9):67–69
Farah M, Smith ME, Gawuga C, Lindsell D, Foster D (2009) Brain imaging and brain privacy: a realistic concern? J Cogn Neurosci 21(1):119–127
Feigenson N (2006) Brain imaging and courtroom evidence: on the admissibility and persuasiveness of fMRI. Int J Law Context:2:233–255
Green RM (2006) From genome to brainome: charting the lessons learned. In: Illes J (ed) Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 105–121
Hadskis M (2007) The regulation of human biomedical research in Canada. In: Downie J, Caulfield T, Flood C (eds) Canadian health law and policy, 3rd edn. Markham, LexisNexis Canada Inc., pp 257–310
Hakun JG, Ruparel K, Seelig D, Busch E, Loughead JW, Gur R, Langleben DD (2009) Towards clinical trials of lie detection with fMRI. Social Neurosci 4(6): 518–527
Halushka v. University of Saskatchewan (1965), 53 D.L.R. (2d) 437 (Sask. C.A.)
Hart A, Whalen P, Shin L, McInerney S, Fischer H, Rauch S (2000) Differential response in the human amygdale to racial outgroup vs. ingroup face stimuli. Neuroreport 11(11):2351–2355
Haynes J, Rees G (2006) Decoding mental states from brain activity in humans. Nat Rev Neurosci 7(7):523–534
Illes J (ed) (2006) Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford University Press, New York
Illes J, Bird S (2006) Neuroethics: a modern context for ethics in neuroscience. Trends Neurosci 29(9):511–517
Illes J, Chin V (2008) Bridging philosophical and practical implications of incidental findings in brain research. J Law Med Ethics 36(2):298–304
Illes J, Kirschen M, Edwards E, Stanford L, Bandettini P, Cho M, Ford P, Glover G, Kulynych J, Macklin R, Michael D, Wolf S (2006a) Incidental findings in brain imaging research. Science 311(5762):783–784
Illes J, Racine E, Kirschen M (2006b) A picture is worth a 1000 words, but which 1000? In: Illes J (ed) Neuroethics: defining the issues in theory, practice, and policy. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 149–168
Illes J, Kirschen M, Edwards E, Bandettini P, Cho MK, Ford P, Glover GH, Kulynych J, Macklin R, Michael DB, Wolf SM, Grabowski T, Seto B (2008) Practical approaches to incidental findings in brain imaging research. Neurology 70(5):384–390
Illes J, Moser MA, McCormick JB, Racine E, Blakeslee S, Caplan A, Check Hayden E, Ingram J, Lohwater T, McKnight P, Nicholson C, Phillips A, Sauve KD, Snell E, Weiss S (2010) Neurotalk: improving the communication of neuroscience research. Nat Rev Neurosci 11:61–69
Jackson G (2006) A curious consensus: brain scans prove disease? Ethical Hum Psychol Psychiatry 8(1):55–60
Kass NE, Myers R, Fuchs EJ, Carson KA, Flexner C (2007) Balancing justice and autonomy in clinical research with healthy volunteers. Nature Clin Pharmacol Ther 82(2):219–227
Kaufman M (ed) (2001) Brain imaging in substance abuse: research, clinical, and forensic applications. Humana Press Inc, Totowa
Kerr I, Caulfield T (2007) Emerging health technologies. In: Downie J, Caulfield T, Flood C (eds) Canadian health law and policy, 3rd edn. Markham, LexisNexis Canada Inc., pp 509–538
Kiehl K, Smith A, Hare R, Mendrek A, Forster B, Bring J, Liddle P (2001) Limbic abnormalities in affective processing by criminal psychopaths as revealed by functional magnetic imaging. Biol Psychiatry 50(9):677–684
Kirschen M, Jaworska A, Illes J (2006) Subjects’ expectations in neuroimaging research. J Magen Reson Imaging 23(2):205–209
Kulynych J, (2002) Legal and ethical issues in neuroimaging research: human subjects protection, medical privacy, and the public communication of research results. Brain and Cognition 50:345–357
Langleben DD, Schroeder L, Maldjian JA, Gur RC, McDonald S, Ragland JD, O’Brien CP, Childress AR (2002) Brain activity during simulated deception: an event-related functional magnetic resonance study. Neuroimage 15(3):727–732
Lee T, Chan A, Raine A (2009) Hypersensitivity to threat stimuli in domestic violence offenders: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. J Clin Psychiatry 70(1):36–45
Lieberman M, Hariri A, Jarcho J, Eisenberger N, Bookheimer S (2005) An fMRI investigation of race-related amygdala activity in African-American and Caucasian-American individuals. Nat Neurosci 8(6):720–722
Logothetis N (2008) What we can do and what we cannot do with fMRI. Nature 453(7197):869–878
Madrigal A (16 March 2009) MRI lie detection to get first day in court, Wired Science.http://blog.wired.com/wiredscience/2009/03/noliemri.html. Accessed 16 December 2010
Marshall J, Martin T, Downie J, Malisza K (2007) A comprehensive analysis of MRI research risks: in support of full disclosure. Can J Neurol Sci 34(1):11–17
McClure S, Li J, Tomlin D, Cypert K, Montague L, Montague PR (2004) Neural correlates of behavioral preference for culturally familiar drinks. Neuron 44:379–387
McDonald M (2000) The governance of health research involving human subjects. Ottawa, Law Commission of Canada. http://www.cdha.nshealth.ca/default.aspx?page=DocumentRender&doc.Id=320. Accessed 17 December 2010
McMonagle E (2007) Functional neuroimaging and the law: a Canadian perspective. Am J Bioeth 7(9):69–70
Mobbs D, Yu R, Meyer M, Passamonti L, Seymour B, Calder A, Schweizer A, Frith C, Dalgleish T (2009) A key role for similarity in vicarious reward. Science 324(5929):900
O’Connor MF, Wellisch DK, Stanton AL, Eisenberger NI, Irwin MR, Lieberman MD (2008) Craving love? Enduring grief activates brain’s reward centre. Neuroimage 42(2):969–972
Poldrack R (2006) Can cognitive processes be inferred from neuroimaging data? Trends in Cog Sci 10(2):59–63
Poldrack RA (2008) The role of fMRI in cognitive neuroscience: where do we stand? Curr Opin Neurobiol 18:223–227
R. v. Beland [1987] 2 S.C.R. 398
Racine E, Illes J (2007) Emerging ethical challenges in advanced neuroimaging research: review, recommendations and research agenda. J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics 2(2):1–10
Racine E, Bar-Ilan O, Illes J (2006) Brain imaging: a decade of coverage in the print media. Sci Commun 28(1):122–142
Racine E, Van der Loos HZA, Illes J (2007) Internet marketing of neuroproducts: new practices and healthcare policy challenges. C Q Healthcare Ethics 16(2):181–194
Raine A, Meloy JR, Bihrle S, Stoddard J, LaCasse L, Buchsbaum MS (1998) Reduced prefrontal and increased subcortical brain functioning assessed using positron emission tomography in predatory and affective murderers. Behav Sci Law 16(3):319–332
Reibl v. Hughes [1980] 2 S.C.R. 880
Rogers B (1990) Ethics and research. AAOHN J 38(12):581–585
Rosen A, Gur R (2002) Ethical considerations for neuropsychologists as functional magnetic imagers. Brain Cogn 50(3):469–481
Royal J, Peterson B (2008) The risks and benefits of searching for incidental findings in MRI research scans. J Law Med Ethics 36(2):305–314
Sutton L, Erlen J, Glad J, Siminoff L (2003) Recruiting vulnerable populations for research: revisiting the ethical issues. J Prof Nurs 19(2):106–112
Thomason M (2009) Children in non-clinical functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies give the scan experience a “thumbs up”. Am J Bioeth 9(1):25–27
Thompson S (2007) A brave new world of interrogation jurisprudence? Am J Law Med 33(2–3):341–357
Vul E, Harris C, Winkielman P, Pashler H (2009) Puzzlingly high correlations in fMRI studies of emotion, personality, and social cognition. Perspect Psychol Sci 4(3):274–290
Weisberg D, Keil F, Goodstein J, Rawson E, Gray J (2008) The seductive allure of neuroscience explanations. J Cogn Neurosci 20(3):470–477
Weiss v. Solomon, [1989] 48 C.C.L.T. 280 (Qc.C.S.)
Wolf S, Lawrenz F, Nelson C, Kahn J, Cho M, Clayton E, Fletcher J, Georgieff M, Hammerschmidt D, Hudson K, Illes J, Kapur V, Keane M, Koenig B, LeRoy B, McFarland E, Paradise J, Parker L, Terry S, Van Ness B, Wilfond B (2008) Managing incidental findings in human subjects research: analysis and recommendations. J Law Med Ethics 36(2):219–248
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the Canadian Institutes of Health Research for funding, our NeuroSCAN project collaborators and the University of Alberta’s Health Law Institute for research and administrative support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Toole, C., Zarzeczny, A., Caulfield, T. (2012). Research Ethics Challenges in Neuroimaging Research: A Canadian Perspective. In: Spranger, T. (eds) International Neurolaw. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21541-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-21541-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-21540-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-21541-4
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawLaw and Criminology (R0)