Skip to main content

Optimistic Selection Rule Better Than Majority Voting System

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 6515))

Abstract

A recently proposed ensemble approach to game-tree search has attracted a great deal of attention. The ensemble system consists of M computer players, where each player uses a different series of pseudo-random numbers. A combination of multiple players under the majority voting system would improve the performance of a Shogi-playing computer. We present a new strategy of move selection based on the search values of a number of players. The move decision is made by selecting one player from all M players. Each move is selected by referring to the evaluation value of the tree search of each player. The performance and mechanism of the strategy are examined. We show that the optimistic selection rule, which selects the player that yields the highest evaluation value, outperforms the majority voting system. By grouping 16 or more computer players straightforwardly, the winning rates of the strongest Shogi programs increase from 50 to 60% or even higher.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Knuth, D.E., Moore, R.W.: An Analysis of Alpha-Beta Pruning. Artificial Inteligence 6, 293–326 (1975)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Slate, D.J., Atkin, L.R.: Chess 4.5 – the northwestern university chess program. In: Frey, P.W. (ed.) Chess Skill in Man and Machine, pp. 82–118. Springer, Heidelberg (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Moore, G.E.: Cramming More Components onto Integrated Circuits. Electronics 38, 114–117 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hyatt, R.: The DTS High-performance Parallel Tree Search Algorithm, http://www.cis.uab.edu/info/faculty/hyatt/search.html

  5. Hsu, F.-H.: IBS’s Deep Blue Chess Grandmaster Chips. IEEE Micro 19, 70–80 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Donninger, C., Lorenz, U.: The Chess Monster Hydra. In: Becker, J., Platzner, M., Vernalde, S. (eds.) FPL 2004. LNCS, vol. 3203, pp. 927–932. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Newborn, M.M.: Unsynchronized Iteratively Deepening Parallel Alpha-Beta Search. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence PAMI-10, 687–694 (1988)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Vučković, V.V.: The Method of the Chess Search Algorithms Parallelization using Two-processor Distributed System. In: Facta Universitatis. Series Mathematics an Informatics, vol. 22, pp. 175–188 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brockington, M.G., Schaeffer, J.: The APHID Parallel alpha-beta Search Algorithm. In: IEEE Symposium of Parallel and Distributed Processing (SPDP 1996), New Orleans, October 23–26 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Himstedt, K., Lorenz, U., Möller, D.P.F.: A twofold distributed game-tree search approach using interconnected clusters. In: Luque, E., Margalef, T., Benítez, D. (eds.) Euro-Par 2008. LNCS, vol. 5168, pp. 587–598. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Polikar, R.: Ensemble Based Systems in Decision Making. IEEE Circuits and systems magazine 6, 21–45 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanawa, M., Ito, T.: The Council System in Brain Game. In: Cognitive Science and Entertainment Symposium, The University of Electro-Communications, Tokyo, Japan, pp. 72–75 (2009) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Obata, T., Hanawa, M., Ito, T.: Consultation Algorithm in Brain Game: Performance of the Simple Majority System. In: Proceedings of the GI22 Conference of IPSJ, pp. 1–5 (2009) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ito, T.: Consultation Player “Monju” – A Majority Rule to Increasing the Winning Rate. IPSJ Journal 50, 887–894 (2009) (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Grimbergen, R.: The 19th CSA World Computer-Shogi Championship. ICGA Journal 32, 121–125 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Bonanza 4.1.2 is a computer Shogi program. Source codes are available from, http://www.geocities.jp/bonanza_shogi/ (in Japanese)

  17. GPS Shogi is the first-prize winner of the 19th CSA World Computer-Shogi Championship, Source codes are available from, http://gps.tanaka.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/gpsshogi/ (in Japanese)

  18. Iida, H., Sakuta, M., Rollason, J.: Computer Shogi. Artificial Intelligence 134, 121–144 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2011 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sugiyama, T., Obata, T., Hoki, K., Ito, T. (2011). Optimistic Selection Rule Better Than Majority Voting System. In: van den Herik, H.J., Iida, H., Plaat, A. (eds) Computers and Games. CG 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6515. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17928-0_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-17928-0_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-17927-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-17928-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics