Skip to main content

Building Transformative Capacity for Ecosystem Stewardship in Social–Ecological Systems

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Springer Series on Environmental Management ((SSEM))

Abstract

We use a “resilience lens” to identify gaps in the understanding of capacity to transform social-ecological systems’ (SES) trajectories toward ecosystem stewardship and highlight some challenges that need to be addressed. We draw on the organizational evolution literature in combination with the latest insights on SES transformations to give a more detailed understanding of what constitute transformative capacity. Two case studies illustrate the possibilities and challenges. SES transformations require knowledge and skills that can link ecosystem and social system dynamics, and develop strategies to overcome barriers and enable institutional changes that foster transformations. We identify some criteria that seem important for developing a framework for analyzing transformations and assessing transformative capacity in social-ecological systems. These criteria include experimentation and innovation, agency and social networks, opportunity context, diversity, boundaries, and collaboration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aldrich H (1999) Organizations evolving. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Allison HE, Hobbs RJ (2004) Resilience, adaptive capacity, and the “lock-in trap” of the Western Australian agricultural region. Ecol Soc 9(1):3, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss1/art3/

    Google Scholar 

  • Armitage D, Marschke M, Plummer R (2008) Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Glob Environ Change 18(1):86–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babcock EA, Pikitch EK (2004) Can we reach agreement on a standardized approach to ecosystem-based fishery management? Bull Mar Sci 74:685–692

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumgartner FR, Jones BD (1991) Agenda dynamics and policy subsystems. J Polit 53(4):1044–1074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Folke C (eds) (1998) Linking social and ecological systems: management practices and social mechanisms for building resilience. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) (2003) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Hughes TP, Steneck RS, Wilson JA, Bellwood DR, Crona B, Folke C, Gunderson LH, Leslie HM, Norberg J, Nyström M, Olsson P, Österblom H, Scheffer M, Worm B (2006) Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science 311:1557–1558

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Burt R (1992) Structural holes: the social structure of competition. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson L, Sandström A (2008) Network governance of the commons. Int J Commons 2:33–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Folke C (2006) Ecology for transformation. Trends Ecol Evol 21:309–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR, Gunderson LH (2001) Coping with collapse: ecological and social dynamics in ecosystem management. Bioscience 51(6):451–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash DW, Adger W, Berkes F, Garden P, Lebel L, Olsson P, Pritchard L, Young O (2006) Scale and cross-scale dynamics: governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecol Soc 11(2):8, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapin FS III, Carpenter SR, Kofinas GP, Folke C, Abel N, Clark WC, Olsson P, Stafford Smith DM, Walker B, Young OR, Berkes F, Biggs R, Grove JM, Naylor RL, Pinkerton E, Steffen W, Swanson FJ (2010) Ecosystem Stewardship: Sustainability Strategies for a Rapidly Changing Planet. Trends Ecol Evol 25:241–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R et al (1998) Principles for sustainable governance of the oceans. Science 281:198–199

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder LB et al (2006) Resolving mismatches in U.S. ocean governance. Science 313:617–618

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS, Cumming DHM, Redman CL (2006) ‘Scale mismatches in social–ecological systems: causes, consequences, and solutions’. Ecol Soc 11(1):14, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art14/

    Google Scholar 

  • Cumming GS, Olsson P, Chapin FS III, Holling CS (in preparation) Coping with climate change: the urgent need for a learning agenda

    Google Scholar 

  • Danter KJ, Griest DL, Mullins GW, Norland E (2000) Organizational change as a component of ecosystem management. Soc Nat Resour 13:537–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Enfors EI, Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, Bossio D (2008) Making investments in dryland development work: participatory scenario planning in the Makanya catchment, Tanzania. Ecol Soc 13(2):42, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art42/

    Google Scholar 

  • Ernstson H, Sörlin S, Elmqvist T. Social movements and ecosystem services – the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecol Soc 13(2):39, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss2/art39/)

  • Fischer-Kowalski, Rotmans (2009) Conceptualizing, observing and influencing social ecological transitions. Ecol Soc 14(2):3, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss2/art3/

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Colding J, Berkes F (2003) Synthesis: building resilience and adaptive capacity in social–ecological systems. In: Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (eds) Navigating social–ecological systems: building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 352–387

    Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Hahn T, Olsson P, Norberg J (2005) Adaptive governance of social–ecological knowledge. Annu Rev Environ Resour 30:441–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folke C, Pritchard L, Berkes F, Colding J, Svedin U (2007) ‘The problem of fit between ecosystems and institutions: ten years later’. Ecol Soc 12(1):30, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art30/

    Google Scholar 

  • Galaz V, Olsson P, Hahn T, Folke C, Svedin U (2008) The problem of fit among biophysical systems, environmental and resource regimes, and broader governance systems: insights and emerging challenges. In: Young OR, King LA, Schröder H (eds) Institutions and environmental change – principal findings, applications, and research frontiers. The MIT, Cambridge, pp 147–182

    Google Scholar 

  • Garner WB, Bird B, Starr J (1992) Act as if: differentiating entrepreneurial from organizational behavior. Entrepren Theor Pract 16(3):13–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW (2005) The dynamics of transitions in socio-technical systems: a multi-level analysis of the transition pathway from horse-drawn carriages to automobiles (1860–1930). Tech Anal Strat Manag 17(4):445–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geels FW, Schot J (2007) Typology of socio-technical transition pathways. Res Policy 36(3):399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gelcich S, Olsson P, Castilla J, Hughes T, Folke C (in preparation) Governance transformation for the sustainable management of marine coastal social–ecological systems

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon LJ, Peterson GD, Bennett EM (2008) Agricultural modifications of hydrological flows create ecological surprises. Trends Ecol Evol 23(4):211–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1973) The strength of weak ties. Am J Soc 76:1360–1380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH (1999) Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management: antidotes for spurious certitude? Conserv Ecol 3(1):7, (online) URL: http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss1/art7

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in social–ecological systems. Island, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light SS (eds) (1995) Barriers and bridges to renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunderson L, Allen C, Holling CS (2009) Fundamentals of ecological resilience. Island, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Hahn T, Olsson P, Folke C, Johansson K (2006) Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: the role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecol 34:573–592

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall PA, Taylor RCR (2006) Political science and the three new institutionalisms. Polit Stud 44:936–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hegmon M, Peeples MA, Kinzig A, Kulow S, Meegan CM, Nelson MC (2008) Social transformation and its human costs in the Prehispanic U.S. Southwest. Am Anthropol 110:313–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS, Meffe GK (1996) Command and control and the pathology of natural resource management. Conserv Biol 10(2):328–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holtz G, Brugnach M, Pahl-Wostl C (2008) Specifying “regime” – a framework for defining and describing regimes in transition research. Technol Forecasting Soc Change 75:623–643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huitric M (2005) Lobster and conch fisheries of Belize: a history of sequential exploitation. Ecol Soc 10(1):21, http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol10/iss1/art21/

    Google Scholar 

  • Imperial MT (1999) Institutional analysis and ecosystem-based management: the institutional analysis and development framework. Environ Manag 24:449–465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kay A (2003) Path dependency and the CAP. J Eur Public Pol 10:405–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loorbach DA (2007) Transition management: new mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books, Utrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1999a) Sustaining marine fisheries. National Academy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • National Research Council (1999b) Our common journey. National Academy, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Norberg J, Cumming G (eds) (2008) Complexity theory for a sustainable future. Columbia University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Berkes F (2004a) Adaptive co-management for building social–ecological resilience. Environ Manag 34(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Hahn T (2004b) ‘Social–ecological transformation for ecosystem management: the development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden’. Ecol Soc 9(4):2, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss4/art2

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Gunderson LH, Carpenter SR, Ryan P, Lebel L, Folke C, Holling CS (2006) ‘Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social–ecological systems’. Ecol Soc 11(1):18, (online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art18/

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Galaz V, Hahn T, Schultz L (2007) Enhancing the fit through adaptive comanagement: creating and maintaining bridging functions for matching scales in the Kristianstads Vattenrike Biosphere Reserve Sweden. Ecol Soc 12(1):28, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol12/iss1/art28/

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsson P, Folke C, Hughes TP (2008) Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 105:9489–9494

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom E (1990) Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2009) A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Glob Environ Change 19:354–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Mostert E, Tàbara D (2008) ‘The growing importance of social learning in water resources management and sustainability science’. Ecol Soc 13(1):24, online) URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol13/iss1/art24/(last visit November 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson GD (2007) Using scenario planning to enable an adaptive co-management process in the northern highlands lake district of Wisconsin. In: Berkes F, Armitage D, Doubleday N (eds) Adaptive co-management: collaboration, learning, and multi-level governance. UBC, Vancouver, pp 289–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Raskin P, Banuri T, Gallopín G, Gutman P, Hammond A, Kates R, Swart R (2002) Great transition – the promise and lure of the times ahead. Stockholm Environment Institute, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Repetto R (ed) (2006) Punctuated equilibrium and the dynamics of U.S. environmental policy. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Resilience Alliance and Santa Fe Institute (2004) Thresholds and alternate states in ecological and social–ecological systems, Resilience Alliance (online) URL: http://www.resalliance.org/index.php?id=183

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson A, Chapin FS 3rd, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461, 472–475

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheffer M, Carpenter SR, Foley JA, Folke C, Walker B (2001) Catastrophic shifts in ecosystems. Nature 413(6856):591–696

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz L, Folke C, Olsson P (2007) Enhancing ecosystem management through social–ecological inventories: lessons from Kristianstads Vattenrike, Sweden. Environ Conserv 34(2):140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • True JL, Baumgartner FR, Bryan DJ (1999) Explaining stability and change in American policymaking: the punctuated equilibrium model. In: Sabatier P (ed) Theories of the policy process. Westview, Boulder, pp 97–115

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations Environment Programme (2007) Global environment outlook: environment for development, vol 4. Progress Press Ltd, Valletta

    Google Scholar 

  • van den Brink M, Meijerink S (2005) Implementing policy innovations: resource dependence, struggle for discursive hegemony and institutional inertia in the Dutch river policy domain. Paper prepared for the ERSA Congress, Amsterdam 23–27, August 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker B, Barrett S, Polasky S, Galaz V, Folke C, Engström G, Ackerman F, Arrow K, Carpenter SR, Chopra K, Daily G, Ehrlich P, Hughes T, Kautsky N, Levin S, Mäler K-G, Shogren J, Vincent J, Xepapadeas T, de Zeeuw A (2009) Looming global-scale failures and missing institutions. Science 325:1345–1346

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Holling CS, Carpenter SR, Kinzig A (2004) Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social–ecological systems. Ecol Soc 9(2):5, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol9/iss2/art5/

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker BH, Abel N, Anderies JM, Ryan P (2009b) Resilience, adaptability, and transformability in the Goulburn-broken catchment, Australia. Ecol Soc 14(1):12, [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art12/

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley F (1995) Governing design: the management of social systems and ecosystems management. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS, Light S (eds) Barriers and bridges to the renewal of ecosystems and institutions. Columbia University Press, New York, pp 391–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Westley F (2002) The devil in the dynamics: adaptive management on the front lines. In: Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island, Washington, pp 333–360

    Google Scholar 

  • White L (2000) Changing the “whole system” in the public sector. J Org Change Manag 13:162–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young OR (2002) Institutional interplay: the environmental consequences of cross-scale interactions. In: Ostrom E, Dietz T, Dolsak N, Stern P, Stonich S, Weber EU (eds) The drama of the commons. National Academy, Washington, pp 265–291

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Per Olsson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Olsson, P., Bodin, Ö., Folke, C. (2010). Building Transformative Capacity for Ecosystem Stewardship in Social–Ecological Systems. In: Armitage, D., Plummer, R. (eds) Adaptive Capacity and Environmental Governance. Springer Series on Environmental Management. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-12194-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics