Skip to main content

Clustering with Repulsive Prototypes

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence

Abstract

Although there is no exact definition for the term cluster, in the 2D case, it is fairly easy for human beings to decide which objects belong together. For machines on the other hand, it is hard to determine which objects form a cluster. Depending on the problem, the success of a clustering algorithm depends on the idea of their creators about what a cluster should be. Likewise, each clustering algorithm comprises a characteristic idea of the term cluster. For example the fuzzy c-means algorithm (Kruse et al., Advances in Fuzzy Clustering and Its Applications, Wiley, New York, 2007, pp. 3–30; Höppner et al., Fuzzy Clustering, Wiley, Chichester, 1999) tends to find spherical clusters with equal numbers of objects. Noise clustering (Rehm et al., Soft Computing – A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications 11(5):489–494) focuses on finding spherical clusters of user-defined diameter. In this paper, we present an extension to noise clustering that tries to maximize the distances between prototypes. For that purpose, the prototypes behave like repulsive magnets that have an inertia depending on their sum of membership values. Using this repulsive extension, it is possible to prevent that groups of objects are divided into more than one cluster. Due to the repulsion and inertia, we show that it is possible to determine the number and approximate position of clusters in a data set.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bezdek, J. C. (1981). Pattern recognition with fuzzy objective function algorithms. New York: Plenum.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Dave, R. N., & Krishnapuram, R. (1997). Robust clustering methods: a unified view. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems, 5, 270–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gath I., & Geva, A. B. (1989). Unsupervised optimal fuzzy clustering. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 11, 773–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafson, D. E., & Kessel, W. C. (1979). Fuzzy clustering with a fuzzy covariance matrix. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, San Diego, 761–766.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roland Winkler .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Winkler, R., Rehm, F., Kruse, R. (2009). Clustering with Repulsive Prototypes. In: Fink, A., Lausen, B., Seidel, W., Ultsch, A. (eds) Advances in Data Analysis, Data Handling and Business Intelligence. Studies in Classification, Data Analysis, and Knowledge Organization. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-01044-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics