Skip to main content

Evolution, Cooperation, and Repeated Games

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Games, Groups, and the Global Good

Part of the book series: Springer Series in Game Theory ((SSGT))

Abstract

I discuss recent work that characterizes what outcomes correspond to evolutionarily stable strategies in two-player symmetric repeated games when players have a positive probability of making a mistake.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This chapter is based on work with D. Fudenberg.

  2. 2.

    Roughly speaking, a strategy s is ES if no mutant strategy s performs better than s in expectation against a population consisting mostly of s but with a small proportion of s .

  3. 3.

    In fact, the situation is even worse than ALT would suggest. Consider the strategy that repeatedly follows the pattern C followed by twoDs until the pattern is broken, at which point it thereafter plays D. For the same reason as ALT, this more elaborate strategy is ES, yet it attains an average payoff of only \(\frac{2} {3}\). In fact, by continuing to add more Ds to the repeated pattern, we can obtain an ES strategy that is arbitrarily close in average payoff to the fully uncooperative strategy AD.

  4. 4.

    A two-player game is symmetric if the two players have the same set of actions and if interchanging actions between the players causes the corresponding payoffs to be interchanged.

References

  • Axelrod R (1984) The evolution of cooperation. Basic Books

    Google Scholar 

  • Axelrod R, Hamilton W (1981) The evolution of cooperation. Science 211:1390–1396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Maskin E (1986) The folk theorem in repeated games with discounting or with incomplete information. Econometrica 54(3):533–554 (Reprinted in A. Rubinstein (ed) Game theory in economics, London, Edward Elgar, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Maskin E (1990) Evolution and cooperation in noisy repeated games. Am Econ Rev 80:274–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Fudenberg D, Maskin E (2007) Evolution and repeated games. Mimeo

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Maskin, E. (2009). Evolution, Cooperation, and Repeated Games. In: Levin, S. (eds) Games, Groups, and the Global Good. Springer Series in Game Theory. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85436-4_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-85436-4_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-85435-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-85436-4

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics