Skip to main content

Risks of Coal Seam and Shale Gas Extraction on Groundwater and Aquifers in Eastern Australia

  • Chapter

Part of the book series: Water Science and Technology Library ((WSTL,volume 72))

Abstract

In the developed world there are growing concerns about water security due to the increase in exploration and production of coal seam and shale gas in peri-urban areas using both the hydraulic fracturing (fracking) technique of gas production and the method of extraction of naturally occurring groundwater by pumping it from coal formations to release coal seam gas (CSG). In Australia there is a competing prerequisite to maintain and increase the natural resource base as well as the need to protect and sustain the supply of potable and agricultural groundwater in peri-urban areas. One identified issue for this chapter is whether the increasing popularity of fracking in peri-urban and semi-rural areas in New South Wales (NSW) and Queensland poses a risk to the quality of groundwater supply as well as its contamination. The other main issue is whether the extraction of groundwater from coal seams where fracking is not needed has a major impact on groundwater depletion; and, if so, investigating the appropriate risk assessment and risk management approaches.

One problem at hand is that fracking is a technique designed to produce gas from coal seams and shale strata. The process involves pumping water, sand and chemicals under high pressure into layers of coal or shale to create fissures or cracks that force gas to the surface where it is collected and processed. The technique impacts on water supplies in two main ways: It requires large quantities of water at the pumping stage and it is alleged to produce vast amounts of contaminated groundwater containing chemicals known collectively as BTEX, methane gas and excessive amounts of salt. Attractors to this method of gas exploration and production are twofold. The drilling technique invented and developed by George Mitchell in 1980s and 1990s made drilling previously inaccessible strata reachable and cheap. The other attraction is that in the United States of America (USA), since 2008 the domestic price of ‘Henry Hub’ gas has fallen from $12 per million BTUs in 2008 to $4 per million BTUs in 2012. The impact of this 66 % fall in price has relieved the USA’s reliance on imported carbon based fuels momentously, but has had a deleterious impact on groundwater supplies.

The evidence based on the development of drilling sites using fracking in NSW and Queensland peri-urban areas so far, suggests that environmental concerns may not be given as much consideration as they ought, in particular because compliance with environmental risk assessments is not specific enough. In this chapter, we explore the above issues and report on a methodology to assess the potential risk to groundwater supplies in NSW and Queensland using an environmental risk model for CSG extraction in combination with the ‘triple-bottom line’ (TBL) process for community consultation informed by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRIG4) guidelines.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Azapagic A (2004) Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. J Clean Prod 12:639–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics (2013) Gas market report. Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics, Canberra, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Environment Agency, UK (2014) Report – an environmental risk assessment for coal bed, coal mine and abandoned mine methane operations in England. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Government (2012a) Code of practice for coal seam gas fracture stimulation activities. NSW Government, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Government (2012b) Code of practice for coal seam gas well integrity. NSW Government, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • NSW Parliament (2012) Legislative council, vol 5, General purpose standing committee report. New South Wales Parliamentary Library, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kane M (2013) Initial report on the independent review of coal seam gas activities in NSW. NSW Government, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Kane M (2014) Final report of the independent review of coal seam gas activities in NSW. NSW Government, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines (2014) Queensland’s petroleum and coal seam gas 2013–14. Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Queensland Water Commission (2012) Underground water impact report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross C, Darby P (2013) Research paper unconventional gas: coal seam gas, shale gas and tight gas. Research Service, Victorian Parliamentary Library, Department of Parliamentary Service, Melbourne, Australia

    Google Scholar 

Articles

  • BCA (2013) Sustainability: a guide to triple bottom line accounting. Common Ground Publishing, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Singha RK, Murtyb HR, Guptac SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 15:281–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Morning Herald (2012) 11 May Fairfax Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Morning Herald (2014) 18–19 Oct. Fairfax Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  • Sydney Morning Herald (2015) 14 Mar. Fairfax Press, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

Internet Sources

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Donald P. Dingsdag .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.5 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in the work’s Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or reproduce the material.

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dingsdag, D.P. (2016). Risks of Coal Seam and Shale Gas Extraction on Groundwater and Aquifers in Eastern Australia. In: Maheshwari, B., Thoradeniya, B., Singh, V.P. (eds) Balanced Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 72. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics