Abstract
In the developed world there are growing concerns about water security due to the increase in exploration and production of coal seam and shale gas in peri-urban areas using both the hydraulic fracturing (fracking) technique of gas production and the method of extraction of naturally occurring groundwater by pumping it from coal formations to release coal seam gas (CSG). In Australia there is a competing prerequisite to maintain and increase the natural resource base as well as the need to protect and sustain the supply of potable and agricultural groundwater in peri-urban areas. One identified issue for this chapter is whether the increasing popularity of fracking in peri-urban and semi-rural areas in New South Wales (NSW) and Queensland poses a risk to the quality of groundwater supply as well as its contamination. The other main issue is whether the extraction of groundwater from coal seams where fracking is not needed has a major impact on groundwater depletion; and, if so, investigating the appropriate risk assessment and risk management approaches.
One problem at hand is that fracking is a technique designed to produce gas from coal seams and shale strata. The process involves pumping water, sand and chemicals under high pressure into layers of coal or shale to create fissures or cracks that force gas to the surface where it is collected and processed. The technique impacts on water supplies in two main ways: It requires large quantities of water at the pumping stage and it is alleged to produce vast amounts of contaminated groundwater containing chemicals known collectively as BTEX, methane gas and excessive amounts of salt. Attractors to this method of gas exploration and production are twofold. The drilling technique invented and developed by George Mitchell in 1980s and 1990s made drilling previously inaccessible strata reachable and cheap. The other attraction is that in the United States of America (USA), since 2008 the domestic price of ‘Henry Hub’ gas has fallen from $12 per million BTUs in 2008 to $4 per million BTUs in 2012. The impact of this 66 % fall in price has relieved the USA’s reliance on imported carbon based fuels momentously, but has had a deleterious impact on groundwater supplies.
The evidence based on the development of drilling sites using fracking in NSW and Queensland peri-urban areas so far, suggests that environmental concerns may not be given as much consideration as they ought, in particular because compliance with environmental risk assessments is not specific enough. In this chapter, we explore the above issues and report on a methodology to assess the potential risk to groundwater supplies in NSW and Queensland using an environmental risk model for CSG extraction in combination with the ‘triple-bottom line’ (TBL) process for community consultation informed by the Global Reporting Initiative (GRIG4) guidelines.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Azapagic A (2004) Developing a framework for sustainable development indicators for the mining and minerals industry. J Clean Prod 12:639–662
Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics (2013) Gas market report. Bureau of Resources and Energy Economics, Canberra, Australia
Environment Agency, UK (2014) Report – an environmental risk assessment for coal bed, coal mine and abandoned mine methane operations in England. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK
NSW Government (2012a) Code of practice for coal seam gas fracture stimulation activities. NSW Government, Sydney, Australia
NSW Government (2012b) Code of practice for coal seam gas well integrity. NSW Government, Sydney, Australia
NSW Parliament (2012) Legislative council, vol 5, General purpose standing committee report. New South Wales Parliamentary Library, Sydney, Australia
O’Kane M (2013) Initial report on the independent review of coal seam gas activities in NSW. NSW Government, Sydney, Australia
O’Kane M (2014) Final report of the independent review of coal seam gas activities in NSW. NSW Government, Sydney, Australia
Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines (2014) Queensland’s petroleum and coal seam gas 2013–14. Queensland Department of Natural Resources and Mines, Brisbane, Australia
Queensland Water Commission (2012) Underground water impact report for the Surat Cumulative Management Area, Brisbane, Australia
Ross C, Darby P (2013) Research paper unconventional gas: coal seam gas, shale gas and tight gas. Research Service, Victorian Parliamentary Library, Department of Parliamentary Service, Melbourne, Australia
Articles
BCA (2013) Sustainability: a guide to triple bottom line accounting. Common Ground Publishing, Sydney, Australia
Singha RK, Murtyb HR, Guptac SK, Dikshit AK (2012) An overview of sustainability assessment methodologies. Ecol Indic 15:281–299
Sydney Morning Herald (2012) 11 May Fairfax Press, Sydney
Sydney Morning Herald (2014) 18–19 Oct. Fairfax Press, Sydney
Sydney Morning Herald (2015) 14 Mar. Fairfax Press, Sydney
Internet Sources
Alderman P (2014) NSW coal seam gas industry – major new developments proposed – Nov 2014, viewed 26 July 2015. http://www.piperalderman.com.au/publications/resources-update/article/6769
Australian Government (2014) National Assessment of Chemicals Associated with coal seam gas extraction in Australia, viewed 12 Dec 2014. http://www.nicnas.gov.au/communications/issues/fracking-hydraulic-fracturing-coal-seam-gas-extraction/information-sheet
Cook P, Beck V, Brereton D, Clark R, Fisher B, Kentish S, Toomey J, Williams J (2013) Engineering energy: unconventional gas production report for the Australian Council of Learned Academies, ACOLA. Viewed 1 May 2014. http://acola.org.au/PDF/SAF06FINAL/FinalReportEngineeringEnergyJune2013.pdf. Independent Inspections, 2013
Geoscience Australia (2013) Atlas of Australian mineral resources, mines and processing centres, viewed 4 Dec 2014. http://www.australianminesatlas.gov.au/aimr/commodity/blackcoal.html
GRI – Global Reporting Initiative (2002a) The global reporting initiative–an overview. Global Reporting Initiative, Boston, USA. Viewed 15 May 2015. www.globalreporting.org 2004
NSW Government (2011) Atlas of New South Wales, viewed 4 Dec 2014. http://atlas.nsw.gov.au/public/nsw/home/topic/article/coal.html
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002). An update of the OECD composite leading indicators. Short-term Economic Statistics Division, Statistics Directorate/OECD. Viewed 15 May 2015. http://www.oecd.org 2004
Queensland Government Business and Industry Portal (2014) CSG-LNG legislation. Viewed 8 May 2014. http://www.business.qld.gov.au/industry/csg-lng-industry/regulatory-framework-csg-lng/csg-lng-legislation
NSW Office of Water (2014) Viewed 4 May 2014. http://www.water.nsw.gov.au/Water-management/Groundwater/Water-and-coal-seam-gas/Water-and-coal-seam-gas
Paton J (2014) Shale’s ‘Next Big Play’ draws U.S. gas producer to Australia. Viewed 5 May 2014. http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2014-01-16/shale-s-next-big-play-draws-magnum-to-australia-s-cooper-basin.html
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Open Access This chapter is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial 2.5 License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.5/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the work’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in the credit line; if such material is not included in the work’s Creative Commons license and the respective action is not permitted by statutory regulation, users will need to obtain permission from the license holder to duplicate, adapt or reproduce the material.
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Dingsdag, D.P. (2016). Risks of Coal Seam and Shale Gas Extraction on Groundwater and Aquifers in Eastern Australia. In: Maheshwari, B., Thoradeniya, B., Singh, V.P. (eds) Balanced Urban Development: Options and Strategies for Liveable Cities. Water Science and Technology Library, vol 72. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28112-4_16
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-28110-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-28112-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)