Abstract
One of the most significant episodes in the early-twentieth-century reception of Leibniz was the reading of his works on natural philosophy as an anticipation of Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. In a way, such an interpretation might have been meant to uplift the fame of Leibniz as a scientist, which had been, it was said not without a touch of chauvinism, overshadowed for too long a time by the evershining Newtonian star; as well as to give evidence of the extraordinary forerunning talent of the philosopher, which had, as it was just then being discovered and believed, most clearly manifested itself not only in the edition of his logical work but also in many other fields of science; and even, perhaps, to burnish Einstein’s new-born theory through the authority of a highly reputed metaphysician of the past that could inaugurate it.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
R.T.W. Arthur, Leibniz’s Theory of Time, in [Okruhlik Brown 1985], pp. 263–313.
R.T.W. Arthur, Space and Relativity in Newton and Leibniz, “British Journal for Philosophy of Science”, 45, 1994, pp. 219–40.
J. Barbour, Absolute or Relative Motion?, Cambridge 1989.
J. Barbour, The End of Time. The next Revolution in Physics, London 1999.
Mach’s Principle: From Newton’s Bucket to Quantum Gravity, eds. J. Barbour and H. Pfister, Boston 1995.
I. Bernard Cohen, Revolution in Science, Cambridge 1985.
H.R. Bernstein, Leibniz and Huygens on the ‘Relativity’ ofMotion, “Studia Leibnitiana Sonderheft”, 13, 1982, pp. 85–102.
D. Bertoloni Meli, Leibniz on the Censorship of the Copernican System, “Studia Leibnitiana”, 20, 1988, pp. 19–42.
D. Bertoloni Meli, Public Claims, Private Worries: Newton’s Principia and Leibniz’s Theory of Planetary Motion, “Studies in History and Philosophy of Science”, 22, 1991, pp. 415–49.
H.R. Brown, Physical Relativity: Space-time Structure from a Dynamical Perspective, Oxford 2005.
R. Carnap, Über die Abhängigkeit der Eigenschaften des Raumes von denen der Zeit, “Kant-Studien”, 30, 1925, pp. 331–54.
E. Cassirer, Leibniz’ System in seinen wissenschaftlichen Grundlagen, Marburg 1902.
E. Cassirer, Zur Einstein’schen Relativitätstheorie, Berlin 1920.
E. Cassirer, Newton and Leibniz, “Philosophical Review”, 52, 1943, pp. 366–91.
A. Coffa, The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. To the Vienna Station, Cambridge 1991.
J.A. Cover, Non-Basic Time and Reductive Strategies: Leibniz’s Theory of Time, “Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science”, 28, 1997, pp. 289–318.
Phänomenologie und Leibniz, eds. R. Cristin and K. Sakai, Freiburg 2000.
V. De Risi, Leibniz around 1700: Three Texts on Metaphysics, “The Leibniz Review”, 16, 2006, pp. 55–69.
V. De Risi, Geometry and Monadology. Leibniz’s Analysis Situs and Philosophy of Space, Basel 2007.
J. Earman, Notes on the Causal Theory of Time, in [Suppes 1973], pp. 72–84.
J. Earman, World Enough and Space-Time. Absolute versus Relational Theories of Space and Time, Cambridge 1989.
Foundations of Space-Time Theories, eds. J. Earman, C.N. Glymour and J.J. Stachel, Minneapolis 1977.
F. Enriques, Per la storia della logica. I principi e l’ordine della scienza nel concetto dei pensatori matematici, Bologna 1922.
M. Ferrari, Il neocriticismo tedesco e la teoria della relatività, “Rivista di filosofia”, 86, 1995, pp. 239–81.
M. Friedman, Simultaneity in Newtonian Mechanics and Special Relativity, in [Earman Glymour Stachel 1977], pp. 403–32.
M. Friedman, Foundations of Space-Time Theories. Relativistic Physics and Philosophy of Science, Princeton 1983.
M. Friedman, Kant and the Exact Sciences, Cambridge 1992.
M. Friedman, Geometry, Convention and the Relativized A Priori, in [Salmon Wolters 1994]; now also in [Friedman 1999], pp. 59–70.
M. Friedman, Reconsidering Logical Positivism, Cambridge 1999.
M.J. Futch, Leibniz’s Metaphysics of Time and Space, Boston 2008.
D. Garber, Leibniz: Physics and Philosophy, in [Jolley 1995], pp. 270–352.
D. Garber, Leibniz: Body, Substance, Monad, Oxford 2009.
W. Gent, Leibnizens Philosophie der Zeit und des Raumes, “Kant-Studien”, 31, 1926, pp. 61–88.
A. Grünbaum, Philosophical Problems of Space and Time, 2nd ed., eds. R.S. Cohen and M.W. Wartofsky, Dordrecht 1973.
J.L. Heilbron, The Sun and the Church: Cathedrals as Solar Observatories, Cambridge 1999.
K. Hentschel, Interpretationen und Fehlinterpretationen der speziellen und allgemeinen Relativitätstheorie durch Zeitgenossen Albert Einsteins, Basel 1990.
E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Teil. Prolegomena zur reinen Logik, Halle 1900; 2nd ed. 1913.
E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Teil. Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, Halle 1901; 2nd ed. 1922.
E. Husserl, Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenlogie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie, “Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung”, 1, 1913.
E. Husserl, Briefwechsel, ed. K. Schuhmann, vol. 3, Dordrecht 1994.
A. Jauernig, Leibniz on Motion and the Equivalence of Hypothesis, “Leibniz Review”, 17, 2008, pp. 1–40.
The Cambridge Companion to Leibniz, ed. N. Jolley, Cambridge 1995.
B. Lariviere, Leibnizian Relationism and the Problem of Inertia, “Canadian Journal of Philosophy”, 17, 1987, pp. 437–48.
G. Lechalas, Étude sur l’espace et le temps, Paris 1895.
G.W. Leibniz, Specimen Dynamicum, eds. H.G. Dosch, G.W.Most and E. Rudolph, Hamburg 1982.
K. Lewin, Die zeitliche Geneseordnung, “Zeitschrift für Physik”, 13, 1923, pp. 62–81.
D. Lynden-Bell, A Relative Newtonian Mechanics, in [Barbour Pfister 1995], pp. 173–78.
E. Mach, Die Mechanik in ihrer Entwicklung historisch-kritisch dargestellt, Leipzig 1883.
D. Mahnke, Leibniz als Gegner der Gelehrteneinseitigkeit, Stade 1912.
D. Mahnke, Leibniz auf der Suche nach der allgemeinen Primzahlgleichung, “Bibliotheca mathematica”, 13, 1912, pp. 29–61.
D. Mahnke, Die Indexbezeichnung bei Leibniz als Beispiel seiner kombinatorischen Charakteristik, “Bibliotheca Mathematica”, dritte Folge, 13, 1913, pp. 250–260.
D. Mahnke, Eine neue Monadologie, “Kant-Studien Ergänzunghefte”, 39, 1917.
D. Mahnke, Die Neubelebung der Leibnizschen Weltanschauung, “Logos”, 9, 1920–21, pp. 363–79.
D. Mahnke, Leibniz und Goethe, Erfurt 1924.
D. Mahnke, Leibnizens Synthese von Universalmathematik und Individualmetaphysik, “Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung”, 7, 1925, pp. 305–612.
D. Mahnke, Leibniz als Begründer der symbolischen Mathematik, “Isis”, 1927, pp. 279–93.
P. Mancosu, “Das Abenteuer der Vernunft”: O. Becker and D. Mahnke on the phenomenological foundations of the exact sciences, in [Peckhaus 2005], pp. 229–43.
H. Mehlberg, Essai sur la théorie causale du temps, “Studia Philosophica”, 1, 1935, pp. 119–260; “Studia Philosophica”, 2, 1937, pp. 111–231.
M. Mugnai, Leibniz’s Theory of Relations, “Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa”, 28, 1992.
J. Norton, Mach’s Principle before Einstein, in [Barbour Pfister 1995], pp. 9–57.
The Natural Philosophy of Leibniz, eds. K. Okruhlik and J.R. Brown, Dordrecht 1985.
Logical Empiricism. Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, eds. P. Parrini,W.C. Salmon and M.H. Salmon, Pittsburgh 2003.
Oskar Becker und die Philosophie der Mathematik, ed. V. Peckhaus, München 2005.
H. Poser, Monadologien des 20. Jahrhunderts, “Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa”, 26, 1986, pp. 338–45.
H. Putnam, Reichenbach’s metaphysical Picture, “Erkenntnis”, 35, 1991, pp. 61–75.
W.V.O. Quine, On the Reasons for Indeterminacy of Translation, “Journal of Philosophy”, 67, 1970, pp. 178–83.
H. Reichenbach, Die Einsteinsche Raumlehre, “Die Umschau”, 24, 1920, pp. 402–405.
H. Reichenbach, Relativitätstheorie und Erkenntnis Apriori, Berlin 1920.
H. Reichenbach, Die Einsteinsche Bewegungslehre, “Die Umschau”, 25, 1921, pp. 501–505.
H. Reichenbach, La signification philosophique de la théorie de la relativité, “Revue philosophique de la France et de l’Étranger”, 94, 1922, pp. 5–61.
H. Reichenbach, Relativitätstheorie und absolute Transportzeit, “Zeitschrift für Physik”, 9, 1922, pp. 111–117.
H. Reichenbach, Der gegenwärtige Stand der Relativitätsdiskussion, “Logos”, 10, 1922, pp. 316–78.
H. Reichenbach, Die Bewegungslehre bei Newton, Leibniz und Huyghens, “Kant-Studien”, 29, 1924, pp. 416–38.
H. Reichenbach, Die relativistische Zeitlehre, “Scientia”, 1924, pp. 361–74.
H. Reichenbach, Axiomatik der relativistischen Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Braunschweig 1924.
H. Reichenbach, Die Kausalstruktur der Welt und der Unterschied von Vergangenheit und Zukunft, “Sitzungsberichte der Bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften”, 1925, pp. 133–175.
H. Reichenbach, Philosophie der Raum-Zeit-Lehre, Berlin 1928.
H. Reichenbach, The Direction of Time, ed. M. Reichenbach, Berkeley 1956.
A.A. Robb, A Theory of Time and Space, Cambridge 1914.
J.T. Roberts, Leibniz on Force and Absolute Motion, “Philosophy of Science”, 70, 2003, pp. 553–73.
B. Russell, Our Knowledge of the External World, Chicago 1914.
T.A. Ryckman, Two Roads from Kant: Cassirer, Reichenbach and General Relativity, in [Parrini Salmon Salmon 2003], pp. 159–93.
Logic, Language, and the Structure of Scientific Theories, eds.W. Salmon and G. Wolters, Pittsburgh 1994.
M. Schlick, DasWesen derWahrheit nach der modernen Logik, “Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftlichen Philosophie und Soziologie”, 34, 1910, pp. 387–477.
M. Schlick, Gibt es intuitive Erkenntnis?, “Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie und Soziologie”, 37, 1913, pp. 472–88.
M. Schlick, Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre, Berlin 1918; 2nd ed. 1925.
M. Schlick, Kritizistische oder empiristische Deutung der neuen Physik?, “Kant- Studien”, 26, 1921, pp. 96–111.
I. Schneider, Das Raum-Zeit-Problem bei Kant und Einstein, Berlin 1921.
L. Sklar, Space, Time, and Space-Time, Berkeley 1976.
H. Stein, Some philosophical Prehistory of General Relativity, in [Earman Glymour Stachel 1977], pp. 3–49.
Space, Time and Geometry, ed. P. Suppes, Dordrecht 1973.
H.L. van Breda, Leibniz’ Einfluß auf das Denken Husserls, “Studia Leibnitiana Supplementa”, 5, 1966, pp. 124–45.
B. van Fraassen, An Introduction to the Philosophy of Space and Time, New York 1970.
B. van Fraassen, Earman on the Causal Theory of Time, in [Suppes 1973], pp. 85–93.
H. Weyl, Das Kontinuum. Kritische Untersuchungen über die Grundlagen der Analysis, Zürich 1917.
H. Weyl, Philosophie der Mathematik und Naturwissenschaft, München 1927.
J.A. Winnie, The Causal Theory of Space-Time, in [Earman Glymour Stachel 1977], pp. 134–205.
H. Woltmann, Dietrich Mahnke 1884–1939, in Niedersächsische Lebensbilder, ed. O.H. May, Hildesheim 1957.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Basel AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
De Risi, V. (2012). Leibniz on Relativity. The Debate between Hans Reichenbach and Dietrich Mahnke on Leibniz’s Theory of Motion and Time. In: Krömer, R., Chin-Drian, Y. (eds) New Essays on Leibniz Reception. Publications des Archives Henri Poincaré Publications of the Henri Poincaré Archives(). Springer, Basel. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0504-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0346-0504-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Basel
Print ISBN: 978-3-0346-0503-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-0346-0504-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)