Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Learning Network from High-Dimensional Array Data

  • Chapter
Frontiers in Computational and Systems Biology

Part of the book series: Computational Biology ((COBO,volume 15))

  • 1512 Accesses

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. A. Bergamaschi, Y.H. Kim, P. Wang, T. Sorlie, T. Hernandez-Boussard, P.E. Lonning, R. Tibshirani, A.L. Borresen-Dale, and J.R. Pollack. Distinct patterns of DNA copy number alteration are associated with different clinicopathological features and gene-expression subtypes of breast cancer. Genes Chromosomes Cancer, 45:1033–1040, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. A. Bergamaschi, Y.H. Kim, K.A. Kwei, Y.L. Choi, M. Bocanegra, A. Langerod, W. Han, D.Y. Noh, D.G. Huntsman, S.S. Jeffrey, A.L. Borresen-Dale, and J.R. Pollack. CAMK1D amplification implicated in epithelial-mesenchymal transition in basal-like breast cancer. Mol Oncol, 2008, in press.

    Google Scholar 

  3. A.J. Butte, P. Tamayo, D. Slonim, T.R. Golub, and I.S. Kohane. Discovering functional relationships between RNA expression and chemotherapeutic susceptibility using relevance networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 97(22):12182–12186, 2000.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. H.Y. Chang, J.B. Sneddon, A.A. Alizadeh, R. Sood, R.B. West, et al. Gene expression signature of fibroblast serum response predicts human cancer progression: Similarities between tumors and wounds. PLoS Biol, 2(2):e7, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. A.P. Dawid and S.L. Lauritzen. Hyper-Markov laws in the statistical analysis of decomposable graphical models. Ann Stat, 21(3):1272–1317, 1993.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. A. Dempster. Covariance selection. Biometrics, 28(1):157–175, 1972.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. Drton and M.D. Perlman. Model selection for Gaussian concentration graphs. Biometrika, 91(3):591–602, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. D. Edward. Introduction to Graphical Modelling, 2nd edition. Springer, New York, 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. B. Efron, T. Hastie, I. Johnstone, and R. Tibshirani. Least angle regression. Ann Stat, 32:407–499, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Pathwise coordinate optimization. Ann Appl Stat, 1(2):302–332, 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Sparse inverse covariance estimation with the graphical lasso. Biostatistics, 2007. doi:10.1093/biostatistics/kxm045.

    Google Scholar 

  12. J. Friedman, T. Hastie, and R. Tibshirani. Regularized paths for generalized linear models via coordinate descent. Technical Report, Department of Statistics, Stanford University, 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  13. W. Fu. Penalized regressions: the bridge vs the lasso. J Comput Graph Stat, 7(3):417–433, 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  14. A. Genkin, D.D. Lewis, and D. Madigan. Large-scale Bayesian logistic regression for text categorization. Technometrics, 49:291–304, 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. H. Joe and Y. Liu. A model for a multivariate binary response with covariates based on compatible conditionally specified logistic regression. Stat Probab Lett, 31:113–120, 1996.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. A.V. Kapp, S.S. Jeffrey, A. Langerod, A.L. Borresen-Dale, W. Han, D.Y. Noh, I.R. Bukholm, M. Nicolau, P.O. Brown, and R. Tibshirani. Discovery and validation of breast cancer subtypes. BMC Genomics, 7:231, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Y. Kim, L. Girard, C. Giacomini, P. Wang, T. Hernandez-Boussard, R. Tibshirani, J. Minna, and J. Pollack. Combined microarray analysis of small cell lung cancer reveals altered apoptotic balance and distinct expression signatures of MYC family gene amplification. Oncogene, 25(1):130–138, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. A. Langerod, H. Zhao, O. Borgan, J.M. Nesland, I.R. Bukholm, T. Ikdahl, R. Karesen, A.L. Borresen-Dale, and S.S. Jeffrey. TP53 mutation status and gene expression profiles are powerful prognostic markers of breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res, 9:R30, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. H. Li and J. Gui. Gradient directed regularization for sparse Gaussian concentration graphs, with applications to inference of genetic networks. Biostatistics, 7(2):302–317, 2006.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Lutz and P. Bühlmann. Boosting for high-multivariate responses in high-dimensional linear regression. Stat Sin, 16:471–494, 2006.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. D. Madigan and J. York. Bayesian graphical models for discrete data. Int Stat Rev, 63:215–232, 1995.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. N. Meinshausen and P. Buhlmann. High dimensional graphs and variable selection with the lasso. Ann Stat, 34:1436–1462, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. M. Newman. The structure and function of complex networks. Soc Ind Appl Math, 45(2):167–256, 2003.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. M.A. Newton, M.N. Gould, C.A. Reznikoff, and J.D. Haag. On the statistical analysis of allelic-loss data. Stat Med, 17:1425–1445, 1998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Nie, G. Wu, and W. Zhang. Correlation between mRNA and protein abundance in Desulfovibrio vulgaris: a multiple regression to identify sources of variations. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 339(2):603–610, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. S. Paik, S. Shak, G. Tang, C. Kim, J. Baker, et al. A multigene assay to predict recurrence of tamoxifen-treated, node-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 351(27):2817–2826, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. J. Peng, P. Wang, N. Zhou, and J. Zhu. Partial correlation estimation by joint sparse regression models. J Am Stat Assoc, 104(486):735–746, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. J. Peng, J. Zhu, A. Bergamaschi, W. Han, D.Y. Noh, J.R. Pollack, and P. Wang. Regularized multivariate regression for identifying master predictors with application to integrative genomics study of breast cancer. Ann Appl Stat, 4(1):53–77, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. J. Pollack, T. Srlie, C. Perou, C. Rees, S. Jeffrey, P. Lonning, R. Tibshirani, D. Botstein, A. Brresen-Dale, and P. Brown. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci, 99(20):12963–12968, 2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. P. Ravikumar, M. Wainwright, and J. Lafferty. High-dimensional Ising model selection using l 1-regularized logistic regression. Ann Stat, 38:1287–1319, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. A.J. Rothman, P.J. Bickel, E. Levina, and J. Zhu. Sparse permutation invariant covariance estimation. Electron J Stat, 2:494–515, 2008.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. L.H. Saal, P. Johansson, K. Holm, S.K. Gruvberger-Saal , Q.B. She, et al. Poor prognosis in carcinoma is associated with a gene expression signature of aberrant PTEN tumor suppressor pathway activity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 104(18):7564–7569, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. J. Schafer and K. Strimmer. An empirical Bayes approach to inferring large-scale gene association networks. Bioinformatics, 21(6):754–764, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Sorlie, C.M. Perou, R. Tibshirani, T. Aas, S. Geisler, H. Johnsen, T. Hastie, M.B. Eisen, M. van de Rijn, S.S. Jeffrey, T. Thorsen, H. Quist, J.C. Matese, P.O. Brown, D. Botstein, P. Eystein Lonning, and A.L. Borresen-Dale. Gene expression patterns of breast carcinomas distinguish tumor subclasses with clinical implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 98:10869–10874, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. T. Sorlie, R. Tibshirani, J. Parker, T. Hastie, J.S. Marron, A. Nobel, S. Deng, H. Johnsen, R. Pesich, S. Geisler, J. Demeter, C.M. Perou, P.E. Lnning, P.O. Brown, A.L. Brresen-Dale, and D. Botstein. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 100:8418–8423, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. C. Sotiriou, P. Wirapati, S. Loi, A. Harris, S. Fox, et al. Gene expression profiling in breast cancer: Understanding the molecular basis of histologic grade to improve prognosis. J Natl Cancer Inst, 98(4):262–272, 2006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. R. Tibshirani. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc B, 58:267–288, 1996.

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. R. Tibshirani and P. Wang. Spatial smoothing and hot spot detection for CGH data using the fused lasso. Biostatistics, 9(1):18–29, 2008.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  39. B. Turlach, W. Venables, and S. Wright. Simultaneous variable selection. Technometrics, 47:349–363, 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  40. M.J. van de Vijver, Y.D. He, L.J. van’t Veer, H. Dai, A.A. Hart, D.W. Voskuil, G.J. Schreiber, J.L. Peterse, C. Roberts, M.J. Marton, M. Parrish, D. Atsma, A. Witteveen, A. Glas, L. Delahaye, T. van der Velde, H. Bartelink, S. Rodenhuis, E.T. Rutgers, S.H. Friend, and R. Bernards. A gene-expression signature as a predictor of survival in breast cancer. N Engl J Med, 347(25):1999–2009, 2002.

    Google Scholar 

  41. S. Varambally, J. Yu, B. Laxman, D. Rhodes, R. Mehra, S. Tomlins, R. Shah, U. Chandran, F. Monzon, M. Becich, J. Wei, K. Pienta, D. Ghosh, M. Rubin, and A. Chinnaiyan. Integrative genomic and proteomic analysis of prostate cancer reveals signatures of metastatic progression. Cancer Cell, 8(5):393–406, 2005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. P. Wang. Statistical methods for CGH array analysis. Ph.D. Thesis, Stanford University, 2004.

    Google Scholar 

  43. P. Wang, D.L. Chao, and L. Hsu. Learning networks from high dimensional binary data: An application to genomic instability data. Biometrics, 2010, to appear. arXiv:0908.3882v1 [stat.ME].

  44. Y. Wang, J.G. Klijn, Y. Zhang, A.M. Sieuwerts, M.P. Look, et al. Gene-expression profiles to predict distant metastasis of lymph-node-negative primary breast cancer. Lancet, 365(9460):671–679, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  45. J. Whittaker. Graphical Models in Applied Mathematical Multivariate Statistics. Wiley, New York, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  46. M. Yuan and Y. Lin. Model selection and estimation in regression with grouped variables. J R Stat Soc, Ser B, 68(1):49–67, 2006.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  47. M. Yuan and Y. Lin. Model selection and estimation in the Gaussian graphical model. Biometrika, 94(1):19–35, 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  48. M. Yuan, A. Ekici, Z. Lu, and R. Monterio. Dimension reduction and coefficient estimation in multivariate linear regression. J R Stat Soc B, 69(3):329–346, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. T. Zhang and F. Oles. Text categorization based on regularized linear classifiers. Inf Retr, 4:5–31, 2001.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  50. H. Zhao, A. Langerod, Y. Ji, K.W. Nowels, J.M. Nesland, R. Tibshirani, I.K. Bukholm, R. Karesen, D. Botstein, A.L. Borresen-Dale, and S.S. Jeffrey. Different gene expression patterns in invasive lobular and ductal carcinomas of the breast. Mol Biol Cell, 15:2523–2536, 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. H. Zou and T. Trevor. Regularization and variable selection via the elastic net. J R Stat Soc, Ser B, 67(2):301–320, 2005.

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA, USA

    Li Hsu & Pei Wang

  2. Department of Statistics, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

    Jie Peng

Authors
  1. Li Hsu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jie Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Pei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Li Hsu , Jie Peng or Pei Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Scientific Computing, Dept. Computer Science & Mathematics, Warwick University, Coventry, CV4 7AL, United Kingdom

    Jianfeng Feng

  2. Dept. Epidemiology, Michigan State University, East Lansing, 48824, Michigan, USA

    Wenjiang Fu

  3. Dept. Biological Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, 90089, California, USA

    Fengzhu Sun

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag London Limited

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hsu, L., Peng, J., Wang, P. (2010). Learning Network from High-Dimensional Array Data. In: Feng, J., Fu, W., Sun, F. (eds) Frontiers in Computational and Systems Biology. Computational Biology, vol 15. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-196-7_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-196-7_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-195-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-196-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation