Skip to main content

Virtual Environments: Issues and Opportunities for Researching Inclusive Educational Practices

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds

Part of the book series: Human-Computer Interaction Series ((HCIS))

Abstract

This chapter argues that virtual environments offer new research areas for those concerned with inclusive education. Further, it proposes that they also present opportunities for developing increasingly inclusive research processes. This chapter considers how researchers might approach researching some of these affordances. It discusses the relationship between specific features of inclusive pedagogy, derived from an international systematic literature review, and the affordances of different forms of virtual characters and environments. Examples are drawn from research in Second LifeTM (SL), virtual tutors and augmented reality. In doing this, the chapter challenges a simplistic notion of isolated physical and virtual worlds and, in the context of inclusion, between the practice of research and the research topic itself. There are a growing number of virtual worlds in which identified educational activities are taking place, or whose activities are being noted for their educational merit. These encompasses non-themed worlds such as SL and Active Worlds, game based worlds such as World of Warcraft and Runescape, and even Club Penguin, a themed virtual where younger players interact through a variety of Penguin themed environments and activities. It has been argued that these spaces, outside traditional education, are able to offer pedagogical insights (Twining 2009) i.e. that these global virtual communities have been identified as being useful as creative educational environments (Delwiche 2006; Sheehy 2009). This chapter will explore how researchers might use these spaces to investigative and create inclusive educational experiences for learners. In order to do this the chapter considers three interrelated issues: What is inclusive education?; How might inclusive education influence virtual world research? And, what might inclusive education look like in virtual worlds?

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adamao-Villiami N, Wright K (2007) SMILE:an immersive learning game for deaf, hearing children. ACM SIGGRAPH I. Conference on Computer Graphics, Interactive Techniques

    Google Scholar 

  • Babu S, Suma E, Barnes T, Hodges LF (2007) Can immersive virtual humans teach social conversational protocols? IEEE Virtual Reality Conference March 10–14, NC

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailenson J (2008) Why digital avatars make the best teachers The Chronicle of Higher Education http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Digital-Avatars-Make-the/12997?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en Accessed 29 July 2009

  • Batterson J G, Pope AT (2003) Converging technologies: A K-12 education vision. In: Roco M C, Bainbridge W S (ed) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nano-Technology Biotechnology Information Technology, Cognitive Science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands

    Google Scholar 

  • BBC (2005) Call for special schools review. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4615941.stm. Accessed 1st June 2009

  • Best S, D Kellner (2001) The Postmodern Adventure. Guilford Press, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Biever C (2007) Web removes social barriers for those with autism. New Scientist 2610:26–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks T, Camurri A, Canagarajah N, Hasselblad S (2002) Interaction with shapes, sounds as a therapy for special needs, rehabilitation. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Disability Virtual Reality, Associated Technologies Hungary 205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Capturatalk (2009) Capturatalk. http://wwwcapturatalkcom. Accessed 1May 2009

  • Carr D (2008) Learning in virtual worlds for inclusion. In: Selwyn N (Ed) Education 2.0? A commentary by the Technology Enhanced Learning phase of the Teaching and Learning Research Programme, TLRP-TEL, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Cassell J, Tartaro A (2007) Intersubjectivity in human-agent interaction. Interaction Studies 8(3):391–410

    Google Scholar 

  • Cobb S V G, Sharkey P M (2007) A decade of research, development in disability virtual reality, associated technologies: Review of ICDVRAT 1996−2006. The International Journal of Virtual Reality 6(2):51–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole M (2006) Education Equality, Human Rights: Issues of Gender ‘Race’ Sexuality Disability, Social Class. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Colwell C, Petrie H, Kornbrot D (1998) Haptic virtual reality for blind computer users. Paper presented at the Assets ‘98 Conference Los Angeles CA. http://phoenixhertsacuk/sdru/pubs/VE/colwellhtml. Accessed 1 Aug 2008

  • Cooke P, Laczny A, Brown DJ, Francik J (2002) The virtual courtroom: a view of justice. Project to prepare witnesses or victims with learning disabilities to give evidence. Disability & Rehabilitation 24(11–12):634–642

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels H, Porter J (2007) Primary Review Research Report 5/2 Learning needs, difficulties among children of primary school age: Definition, identification, provision, issues. http://www.primaryreview.org.uk/Downloads/Int_Reps/4.Children_development-learning/Primary_Review_5-2_report_Learning_needs_difficulties_071214.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2009

  • Delwiche A (2006) Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 9(3):160–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson R, Sheehy K (2010) Breaking down the barriers between learners, teachers. In: Sheehy K, Ferguson R, Clough G (Eds) Controversial Issues in Virtual Education: Perspectives on Virtual Worlds. Nova Science, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Futurelab (2008) Augmented Reality: A New Approach to Learning. http://wwwfuturelaborguk/resources/publications_reports_articles/web_articles/Web_Article496. Accessed 1 August 2008

  • Galton M, Hargreaves L, Pell T (2009) Group work, whole-class teaching with 11- to 14-year-olds compared. Journal of Education 39(1):119–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldiez BF (2004) Techniques for Assessing, Improving Performance in Navigation, Way Finding Using Mobile Augmented Reality. University of Central Florida, Orlando FL

    Google Scholar 

  • Herring P, Jones R, Sheehy K (2009) Investigating a ‘virtual tutor’ approach for improving the communication skills of children with autism. ALT-C 2009 16th International Conference of the Association for Learning Technology. University of Manchester England 8–10 September

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe C, Mercer N (2007) The Primary Review: Research Survey 2/1b Children’s Social Development Peer Interaction, Classroom Learning. Cambridge University, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaye HS (2000) Computer, Internet Use Among People with Disabilities. Disability Statistics Report. US Department of Education National Institute on Disability, Rehabilitation Research, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Kellner D (2000) Technological Transformation, Multiple Literacies and the Re-visioning of Education. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/technologicaltransformation.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2009

  • Morgan M, Gibbs S, Maxwell K, Britten N (2002) Hearing children’s voices: Methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7–11 years. Qualitative Research 2(1):5–20

    Google Scholar 

  • Open University (2005) Researching Inclusive Education: Values into Practice. The Open University, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscroft A, McAlister S (2006) Digital games, learning in cyberspace: A dialogical approach. E-Learning 3(1):38–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravenscroft A, Wegerif R, Hartley R (2007) Reclaiming thinking: Dialectic dialogic, learning in the digital age. BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 5 – Learning through Digital Technologies, 1(1):39–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Richard E, Billaudeau V, Richard P, Gaudin G (2007) Augmented reality for rehabilitation of cognitive disabled children: A preliminary study. Virtual Rehabilitation 9:102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose FD, Brooks BM, Attree EA (2002) An exploratory investigation into the usability, usefulness of virtual training of people with learning disabilities. Disability, Rehabilitation 24(11–12):627–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rudd T, Colligan F, Naik R (2006) Learner Voice. http://www.futurelaborguk/resources/publications_reports_articles/handbooks/Handbook132 Accessed 2 June 2008

  • Rudduck J (2006) The past, the papers and the project. Educational Review 58(2):131–143

    Google Scholar 

  • Schome Community (2007) The schome-NAGTY Teen Second Life Pilot Final Report: A Summary of Key Findings, Lessons Learnt. The Open University, Milton Keynes: http://knopenacuk/public/documentcfm?docid=9851 Accessed 1 August 2008

  • Schome Wiki (2008) SCHOME Proposal. http://wwwschomeacuk/wiki/Proposal Accessed 1 August 2008

  • Sheehy K (2009) RAM-Raiding: Ethics, Freedoms in Virtual Learning Environments. Learning in Virtual Worlds. March Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy K, Bucknall S (2008) Young people’s visions of future educational systems. Learning Media, Technology 33(2):101–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy K, Ferguson R (2008) Educational inclusion, new technologies. In:Scott TB, Livingston JL (Eds) Leading Edge Educational Technology. Nova Science, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy K, Ferguson R, Clough G (2008) Learning in the Panopticon: Ethical, social issues in building a virtual educational environment International Journal of Social Science Special Edition: Virtual Reality in Distance Education 2(2):89–97

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy K (2003) New technology, inclusion: The world (wide web) is not enough. In:Nind M, Sheehy K, Simmons K (Eds) Inclusive Education: Learners, Learning Contexts, David Fulton Publishers, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy K (2005) Morphing images: a potential tool for teaching word recognition to children with severe learning difficulties. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(2):293–301

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy K (2010) Virtual worlds, inclusive education The TEALEAF framework. In: Sheehy K, Ferguson R, Clough G (Eds) Controversial Issues in Virtual Education: Perspectives on Virtual Worlds. Nova Science, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy K, Kumrai R (2008) The Upstream Research Project: Evaluation Report of the Experiences of Young People Using the Connexions Service in Milton Keynes. Connexions, Milton Keynes

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheehy K, Rix JRM, Hall K, Nind M, Wearmouth J, Collins J (2009) A systematic review of whole class subject based pedagogies with reported outcomes for the academic, social inclusion of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms. In: Research Evidence in Education Library London: EPPI-Centre Social Science Research Unit Institute of Education. http://oro.open.ac.uk/10735/. Accessed 1 June 2009

  • Sheehy K, Nind M, Rix R, Simmons K (2004) Ethics, Research in Inclusive Education: Values into Practice. Falmer Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter R (2002) From rhetoric to reality: The emergence of futures into the educational mainstream. In: Gidley J, Inayatullah S (Eds), Youth Futures: Comparative Research, Transformative Visions, Praeger, Westport, CT

    Google Scholar 

  • Slee R (1998) Inclusive Education? This must signify new times for educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies 46(2):440–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas G, Glenny G (2002) Thinking about inclusion. Whose reason? What evidence? International Journal of Inclusive Education 6(4):345–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Twining P (2009) Exploring the educational potential of virtual worlds — some reflections from the Schome Park Programme. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(3):496–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO (1999) Salamanca 5 years on: A Review of UNESCO activities in the light of the salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO Special Needs Education Division of Basic Education. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED444276&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED444276. Accessed 29 July 2009

  • Walmsley J (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and learning disability. Disability and Society 16(2):187–205

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kieron Sheehy .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 The Open University All rights reserved.

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sheehy, K. (2010). Virtual Environments: Issues and Opportunities for Researching Inclusive Educational Practices. In: Peachey, A., Gillen, J., Livingstone, D., Smith-Robbins, S. (eds) Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-047-2_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-047-2_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-046-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-047-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics