Abstract
This chapter argues that virtual environments offer new research areas for those concerned with inclusive education. Further, it proposes that they also present opportunities for developing increasingly inclusive research processes. This chapter considers how researchers might approach researching some of these affordances. It discusses the relationship between specific features of inclusive pedagogy, derived from an international systematic literature review, and the affordances of different forms of virtual characters and environments. Examples are drawn from research in Second LifeTM (SL), virtual tutors and augmented reality. In doing this, the chapter challenges a simplistic notion of isolated physical and virtual worlds and, in the context of inclusion, between the practice of research and the research topic itself. There are a growing number of virtual worlds in which identified educational activities are taking place, or whose activities are being noted for their educational merit. These encompasses non-themed worlds such as SL and Active Worlds, game based worlds such as World of Warcraft and Runescape, and even Club Penguin, a themed virtual where younger players interact through a variety of Penguin themed environments and activities. It has been argued that these spaces, outside traditional education, are able to offer pedagogical insights (Twining 2009) i.e. that these global virtual communities have been identified as being useful as creative educational environments (Delwiche 2006; Sheehy 2009). This chapter will explore how researchers might use these spaces to investigative and create inclusive educational experiences for learners. In order to do this the chapter considers three interrelated issues: What is inclusive education?; How might inclusive education influence virtual world research? And, what might inclusive education look like in virtual worlds?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adamao-Villiami N, Wright K (2007) SMILE:an immersive learning game for deaf, hearing children. ACM SIGGRAPH I. Conference on Computer Graphics, Interactive Techniques
Babu S, Suma E, Barnes T, Hodges LF (2007) Can immersive virtual humans teach social conversational protocols? IEEE Virtual Reality Conference March 10–14, NC
Bailenson J (2008) Why digital avatars make the best teachers The Chronicle of Higher Education http://chronicle.com/article/Why-Digital-Avatars-Make-the/12997?utm_source=at&utm_medium=en Accessed 29 July 2009
Batterson J G, Pope AT (2003) Converging technologies: A K-12 education vision. In: Roco M C, Bainbridge W S (ed) Converging Technologies for Improving Human Performance: Nano-Technology Biotechnology Information Technology, Cognitive Science. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands
BBC (2005) Call for special schools review. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/4615941.stm. Accessed 1st June 2009
Best S, D Kellner (2001) The Postmodern Adventure. Guilford Press, NY
Biever C (2007) Web removes social barriers for those with autism. New Scientist 2610:26–27
Brooks T, Camurri A, Canagarajah N, Hasselblad S (2002) Interaction with shapes, sounds as a therapy for special needs, rehabilitation. Proceedings of 4th International Conference on Disability Virtual Reality, Associated Technologies Hungary 205–212
Capturatalk (2009) Capturatalk. http://wwwcapturatalkcom. Accessed 1May 2009
Carr D (2008) Learning in virtual worlds for inclusion. In: Selwyn N (Ed) Education 2.0? A commentary by the Technology Enhanced Learning phase of the Teaching and Learning Research Programme, TLRP-TEL, London
Cassell J, Tartaro A (2007) Intersubjectivity in human-agent interaction. Interaction Studies 8(3):391–410
Cobb S V G, Sharkey P M (2007) A decade of research, development in disability virtual reality, associated technologies: Review of ICDVRAT 1996−2006. The International Journal of Virtual Reality 6(2):51–68
Cole M (2006) Education Equality, Human Rights: Issues of Gender ‘Race’ Sexuality Disability, Social Class. Routledge, London
Colwell C, Petrie H, Kornbrot D (1998) Haptic virtual reality for blind computer users. Paper presented at the Assets ‘98 Conference Los Angeles CA. http://phoenixhertsacuk/sdru/pubs/VE/colwellhtml. Accessed 1 Aug 2008
Cooke P, Laczny A, Brown DJ, Francik J (2002) The virtual courtroom: a view of justice. Project to prepare witnesses or victims with learning disabilities to give evidence. Disability & Rehabilitation 24(11–12):634–642
Daniels H, Porter J (2007) Primary Review Research Report 5/2 Learning needs, difficulties among children of primary school age: Definition, identification, provision, issues. http://www.primaryreview.org.uk/Downloads/Int_Reps/4.Children_development-learning/Primary_Review_5-2_report_Learning_needs_difficulties_071214.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2009
Delwiche A (2006) Massively multiplayer online games (MMOs) in the new media classroom. Journal of Educational Technology and Society 9(3):160–172
Ferguson R, Sheehy K (2010) Breaking down the barriers between learners, teachers. In: Sheehy K, Ferguson R, Clough G (Eds) Controversial Issues in Virtual Education: Perspectives on Virtual Worlds. Nova Science, NY
Futurelab (2008) Augmented Reality: A New Approach to Learning. http://wwwfuturelaborguk/resources/publications_reports_articles/web_articles/Web_Article496. Accessed 1 August 2008
Galton M, Hargreaves L, Pell T (2009) Group work, whole-class teaching with 11- to 14-year-olds compared. Journal of Education 39(1):119–140
Goldiez BF (2004) Techniques for Assessing, Improving Performance in Navigation, Way Finding Using Mobile Augmented Reality. University of Central Florida, Orlando FL
Herring P, Jones R, Sheehy K (2009) Investigating a ‘virtual tutor’ approach for improving the communication skills of children with autism. ALT-C 2009 16th International Conference of the Association for Learning Technology. University of Manchester England 8–10 September
Howe C, Mercer N (2007) The Primary Review: Research Survey 2/1b Children’s Social Development Peer Interaction, Classroom Learning. Cambridge University, Cambridge
Kaye HS (2000) Computer, Internet Use Among People with Disabilities. Disability Statistics Report. US Department of Education National Institute on Disability, Rehabilitation Research, Washington DC
Kellner D (2000) Technological Transformation, Multiple Literacies and the Re-visioning of Education. http://www.gseis.ucla.edu/faculty/kellner/essays/technologicaltransformation.pdf. Accessed 29 July 2009
Morgan M, Gibbs S, Maxwell K, Britten N (2002) Hearing children’s voices: Methodological issues in conducting focus groups with children aged 7–11 years. Qualitative Research 2(1):5–20
Open University (2005) Researching Inclusive Education: Values into Practice. The Open University, Milton Keynes
Ravenscroft A, McAlister S (2006) Digital games, learning in cyberspace: A dialogical approach. E-Learning 3(1):38–51
Ravenscroft A, Wegerif R, Hartley R (2007) Reclaiming thinking: Dialectic dialogic, learning in the digital age. BJEP Monograph Series II, Number 5 – Learning through Digital Technologies, 1(1):39–57
Richard E, Billaudeau V, Richard P, Gaudin G (2007) Augmented reality for rehabilitation of cognitive disabled children: A preliminary study. Virtual Rehabilitation 9:102–108
Rose FD, Brooks BM, Attree EA (2002) An exploratory investigation into the usability, usefulness of virtual training of people with learning disabilities. Disability, Rehabilitation 24(11–12):627–633
Rudd T, Colligan F, Naik R (2006) Learner Voice. http://www.futurelaborguk/resources/publications_reports_articles/handbooks/Handbook132 Accessed 2 June 2008
Rudduck J (2006) The past, the papers and the project. Educational Review 58(2):131–143
Schome Community (2007) The schome-NAGTY Teen Second Life Pilot Final Report: A Summary of Key Findings, Lessons Learnt. The Open University, Milton Keynes: http://knopenacuk/public/documentcfm?docid=9851 Accessed 1 August 2008
Schome Wiki (2008) SCHOME Proposal. http://wwwschomeacuk/wiki/Proposal Accessed 1 August 2008
Sheehy K (2009) RAM-Raiding: Ethics, Freedoms in Virtual Learning Environments. Learning in Virtual Worlds. March Cambridge
Sheehy K, Bucknall S (2008) Young people’s visions of future educational systems. Learning Media, Technology 33(2):101–114
Sheehy K, Ferguson R (2008) Educational inclusion, new technologies. In:Scott TB, Livingston JL (Eds) Leading Edge Educational Technology. Nova Science, NY
Sheehy K, Ferguson R, Clough G (2008) Learning in the Panopticon: Ethical, social issues in building a virtual educational environment International Journal of Social Science Special Edition: Virtual Reality in Distance Education 2(2):89–97
Sheehy K (2003) New technology, inclusion: The world (wide web) is not enough. In:Nind M, Sheehy K, Simmons K (Eds) Inclusive Education: Learners, Learning Contexts, David Fulton Publishers, London
Sheehy K (2005) Morphing images: a potential tool for teaching word recognition to children with severe learning difficulties. British Journal of Educational Technology 36(2):293–301
Sheehy K (2010) Virtual worlds, inclusive education The TEALEAF framework. In: Sheehy K, Ferguson R, Clough G (Eds) Controversial Issues in Virtual Education: Perspectives on Virtual Worlds. Nova Science, NY
Sheehy K, Kumrai R (2008) The Upstream Research Project: Evaluation Report of the Experiences of Young People Using the Connexions Service in Milton Keynes. Connexions, Milton Keynes
Sheehy K, Rix JRM, Hall K, Nind M, Wearmouth J, Collins J (2009) A systematic review of whole class subject based pedagogies with reported outcomes for the academic, social inclusion of pupils with special educational needs in mainstream classrooms. In: Research Evidence in Education Library London: EPPI-Centre Social Science Research Unit Institute of Education. http://oro.open.ac.uk/10735/. Accessed 1 June 2009
Sheehy K, Nind M, Rix R, Simmons K (2004) Ethics, Research in Inclusive Education: Values into Practice. Falmer Routledge, London
Slaughter R (2002) From rhetoric to reality: The emergence of futures into the educational mainstream. In: Gidley J, Inayatullah S (Eds), Youth Futures: Comparative Research, Transformative Visions, Praeger, Westport, CT
Slee R (1998) Inclusive Education? This must signify new times for educational research. British Journal of Educational Studies 46(2):440–454
Thomas G, Glenny G (2002) Thinking about inclusion. Whose reason? What evidence? International Journal of Inclusive Education 6(4):345–369
Twining P (2009) Exploring the educational potential of virtual worlds — some reflections from the Schome Park Programme. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(3):496–514
UNESCO (1999) Salamanca 5 years on: A Review of UNESCO activities in the light of the salamanca statement and framework for action on special needs education. UNESCO Special Needs Education Division of Basic Education. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/custom/portlets/recordDetails/detailmini.jsp?_nfpb=true&_&ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=ED444276&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_0=no&accno=ED444276. Accessed 29 July 2009
Walmsley J (2001) Normalisation, emancipatory research and learning disability. Disability and Society 16(2):187–205
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2010 The Open University All rights reserved.
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sheehy, K. (2010). Virtual Environments: Issues and Opportunities for Researching Inclusive Educational Practices. In: Peachey, A., Gillen, J., Livingstone, D., Smith-Robbins, S. (eds) Researching Learning in Virtual Worlds. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-047-2_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84996-047-2_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84996-046-5
Online ISBN: 978-1-84996-047-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)