Abstract
Sapient agents have been characterized as a subclass of intelligent agents capable of “insight” and “sound judgment.” Although several engineering issues have been established to characterize sapient agents, biological referents also seem necessary to understand the cognitive functionality of such systems. Small-world and scale-free networks, the so-called complex networks, provide a new mathematical approach to anatomical and functional connectivity related to cognitive processes. We argue that complex cognitive functions require such complex connectivity, which results from epigenetic development through experiences. Particularly we claim that agents will show complex functionality only if a complex arrangement of their knowledge is achieved. In this chapter, we propose a model in which situated agents evolve knowledge networks holding both small-world and scale-free properties. Experimental results using pragmatic games support explanations about the conditions required to obtain such networks relating degree distribution and sensing; clustering coefficient and biological motivations; goals; acquired knowledge; and attentional focus. This constitutes a relevant advance in the understanding of how low-level connectivity emerges in artificial agents.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Albert, R., Jeong, H., and Barabási, A-L. (1999). The diameter of the World Wide Web, Nature, 401, 130–131.
Albert, R., and Barabási, A-L. (2002). Statistical mechanics of complex networks, Reviews of Modern Physics, 74, 47.
Barabási, A-L., and Albert, R. (1999). Emergence of scaling in random networks, Science, 286, 509–512.
Barabási, A-L. (2002). Linked: The New Science of Networks, Perseus.
Barabási, A.-L., Jeong, H., Ravasz, R., Néda, Z., Vicsek, T., and Schubert, A. (2002). On the topology of the scientific collaboration networks, Physica A, 311, 590–614.
Barabási, A-L., and Bonabeau, E. (2003). Scale-Free Networks, Scientific American, 288, 60–69.
Batali, J., and Grundy, W.N. (1996) Modeling the evolution of motivation, Evolutionary Computation 4(3), 235–270.
Brooks, R.A. (1990). Elephants don’t play chess, Robotics and Autonomous Systems 6(28), 3–15.
Brooks, R.A., Breazeal, C., Marjanovic, M., Scassellati, B., and Williamson, M. (1998). The cog project: Building a humanoid robot, Computation for Metaphors, Analogy and Agents, C. Nehaniv (ed.), Berlin, LNAI 1562, 52–87
Chialvo, D.R. (2004). Critical brain networks, Physica A, 340(4), 756–765, September.
Cohen, P. (2004). Small world networks key to memory, New Scientist, 182, p. 12.
Collier, J. (2000). Autonomy and process closure as the basis for functionality, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, J.L.R. Chandler and G. Van der Vijver (eds.), 901, 280–290, New York.
Drescher, D.L. (1991). Made-Up Minds: A Constructivist Approach to Artificial Intelligence, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Eguiluz V.M., et al. (2005). Scale-free brain functional networks, Physical Review. Letters, 92, p. 018102.
Erdös, P., and Rényi, A. (1960). On the evolution of random graphs, Mathematics Institute Publication Hungarian Academy of Science, 5, 17–60.
Ferrer-i-Cancho R., and Sole, R.V., (2001) The small world of human language, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, Biological Sciences, 268(1482), 2261–2265.
Foner, L. and Maes, P. (1994). Paying attention to what’s important: Using Focus of attention to improve unsupervised learning, The Third International Conference on the Simulation of Adaptive Behavior (SAB94), pp. 256–265.
Franklin, S., and Graesser, A. (1997). Is it an agent, or just a program?, Intelligent Agents III, LNAI 1193, 21–36, Springer-Verlag.
Gazzaniga, M.S., et al.(2002). Cognitive Neuroscience: The Biology of the Mind, W.W. Norton, New York London.
Jeong H., et al. (2000). The large-scale organization of metabolic networks, Nature, 407, 651–654.
Lederberg, J. (2001). The meaning of epigenetics, The Scientist 15(18), 6.
Levenson, J.M., and Sweatt, D. (2005). Epigenetic mechanisms in memory formation, Nature 6, 109–119.
McIntyre, A., Kaplan, F. and Steels, L. (2002). Crucial factors in the origins of word-meaning. In: A. Wray, (ed.). The Transition to Language, Oxford, UK, Oxford University Press. pp. 252–271.
Milo, R., et al. (2002). Network motifs: Simple building blocks of complex networks, Science 298, 824–827.
Milo, R., et al. (2004). Superfamilies of evolved and designed networks, Science 303, 1538–1542.
Montague, P.R., and Dayan, P. (1998). Neurobiological modeling: Squeezing top down to meet bottom up, A Companion to Cognitive Science. W. Bechtel and G. Graham (eds.), Basil Blackwell, Oxford, UK pp. 526–542.
Mora-Basáñez, C.R. de la Gersherson, C., and García-Vega, V.A. (2004). Representation development and behavior modifiers, Advances in Artificial Intelligence: Iberamia 2004, Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence, 3315, 504–513, Berlin.
Newman, M.E.J. (2003). The structure and function of complex networks, SIAM Review, 45(2), 167–256.
Prince, C.G. (2002). Introduction: The Second International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics, Lund University Cognitive Studies 94, Lund, Sweden.
Russell, S.J. , and Norvig, P. (1995). Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, Prentice Hall, Enstlwood Clifts, NJ.
Russell, S.J., and Subramanian, D. (1995). Provably bounded-optimal agents, Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 2, 575–609, May.
Scheutz, M., (2001) The evolution of simple affective states in multi-agent environments, Proceedings of AAAI Fall Symposium 01, AAAI Press, USA.
Sheutz, M., and Sloman, A. (2001). Affect and agent control: Experiments with simple affective states, Proceedings of IAT-01, pages 200–209, World Scientific.
Skolicki, Z., and Arciszewski, T. (2003). Sapient agents—Seven approaches, Proceedings of International Conference Integration of Knowledge Intensive Multi-Agent Systems: KIMAS’03: Modeling, Exploration, and Engineering, Boston.
Smithers, T. (1992). Taking eliminative materialism seriously: A methodology for autonomous systems research, toward a practice of autonomous systems: Proceedings of the First European Conference on Artificial Life, F.J. Varela and P. Bourgine (eds.), MIT Press / Bradford Book, pp. 31–40.
Sole, R.V., et al. (2006). Language networks: Their structure, function and evolution, Santa Fe Institute Working Paper 05-12-042, Santa Fe, CA.
Sporns, O., and Chialvo, D.R. (2004). Organization, development and function of complex rain networks, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 418–425.
Steels, L., and Brooks, R. A. (1995). The Artificial Life route to Artificial Intelligence: Building Situated embodied agents, Lawrence Erlbaum Ass.
Steels, L. (1996a) Emergent behavior lexicons, From Animals To Animats 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior, SAB’96. Complex Adaptive Systems, pp. 562–567, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
Steels, L. (1996b). Self-organizing vocabularies, Proceedings of Alife V, C. Langton and T. Shimohara (eds), pages 179–184, Nara Japan.
Steels, L. (1997). Synthesising the origins of language and meaning using co-evolution, self-organisation and level formation, Approaches to the Evolution of Language: Social and Cognitive Bases, J. Hurford, C. Knight, and M. Studdert-Kennedy (eds.), Edinburgh University Press, UK.
Stojanov, G. (2001). Petitagé: A case study in developmental robotics, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, Lund University Cognitive Studies 85, Lund, Sweden.
Watts, D., and Strogatz, S. (1998). Collective dynamics of “small-world” networks, Nature, 393, 440–442.
Watts, D. (1999). Small-worlds. The Dynamics of Networks between Order and Randomness, Princeton Studies in Complexity, Princeton University Press.
Wooldridge, M., and Jennings, N.R. (1995). Intelligent agents: Theory and practice, The Knowledge Engineering Review, 10(2), 115–152.
Ziemke, T. (2001). Are robots embodied?, Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, Lund University Cognitive Studies 85 Lund, Sweden.
Zlatev, J., and Balkenius, C. (2001). Introduction: Why ’epigenetic robotics?,’ Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling Cognitive Development in Robotic Systems, Lund University Cognitive Studies, 85 pp 1–4 Lund, Sweden.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Mora-Basáñez, C.R.d., Guerra-Hernández, A., García-Vega, V.A., Steels, L. (2008). On Plasticity, Complexity, and Sapient Systems. In: Mayorga, R.V., Perlovsky, L.I. (eds) Toward Artificial Sapience. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-999-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-999-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-998-9
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-999-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)