Abstract
Poor usability and hence a stressful work situation is still a severe problem in computer-supported work, despite efforts to increase the focus on these issues. Consequently, Sweden has a high level of sick rates, particularly in the civil service sector, and some problems relating to inadequate IT systems with poor usability. In this chapter, we aim at understanding attitudes about and practices for integrating usability and users’ health issues in systems development. Quality in value—i.e. users’ well-being, productivity, and user satisfaction—is shaped by attitudes and perspectives underpinning discourse in systems development. These attitudes and perspectives are embedded in the methods, models, and representations used in systems development, as well as in discourse and action. In our qualitative study, data was collected through semistructured interviews with 127 informants, and in a case study of an ongoing project in one organization. During analysis of data, we identified problems with attitudes and perspectives about users and their work, such as the strong focus on automation, efficiency, and surveillance of work, which shaped the development of new technology and ultimately shapes the work situation of the user. Furthermore, we identified that the work of civil servants was frequently discussed in terms of simple steps and procedures that can be predefined and automated in accordance with clearly defined rules and regulations. Finally, we suggest user-centered design and field studies to address the problems and to improve the understanding of the users’ needs and work practices in development projects.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Aarås, A., Horgen, G., & Ro, O. (2000). Work with the visual display unit: Health consequences. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 12, 107–134.
åborg, C., & Billing, A. (2003). Health effects of ‘the Paperless Office’ – evaluations of the introduction of electronic document handling systems. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 389–396.
åborg, C., 2001, Electronic document handling – a longitudinal study on the effects on work environment and health. In Sandsjö, L., & Kadefors, R. (Eds.), Prevention of muscle disorders in computer users: scientific basis and recommendations (pp. 245–250). The 2nd Procid Symposium.
åborg, C., Sandblad, B., Gulliksen, J., & Lif, M. (2003). Integrating work environment consideration into usability evaluation methods – the ADA approach. Interacting with Computers, 15, 453–471.
Aronsson, G., Dallner, M., & åborg, C. (1994). Winners and losers from computerisation. A study of the psychosocial work conditions and health of Swedish state employees. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 17–37.
Beath, C.M. & Orlikowski, W.J. (1994). The contradictory structure of systems development methodologies: deconstructing the IS-user relationship in information engineering. Information Systems Research, 5, 350–377.
Bergkvist, U. (1993). Health problems during work with visual display terminals. Arbete och Hälsa 1993:28. Stockholm, Sweden: Arbetslivsinstitutet.
Beyer, H. & Holtzblatt, K. (1998). Contextual design – Defining customer-centered systems. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
Boivie, I. (2003). Usability and usability and users’ health issues in systems development. Licentiate Theses. Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala University.
Boivie, I. (2005). A fine balance – Addressing usability and users’ needs in the development of IT systems for the workplace. Ph.D. dissertation. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis.
Boivie, I., Åborg, C., Persson, J. & Löfberg, M., (2003). Why usability gets lost or usability in in-house software development. Interacting with Computers, 15, 623–639.
Boivie, I., Blomkvist, S., Persson, J., & Åborg, C., (2003). Addressing users’ health issues in software development – an exploratory study. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 411–420.
Boivie, I., Gulliksen, J., & Göransson, B. (2006). The lonesome cowboy – A study of the usability designer role in systems development. Interacting with Computers 18, 601–634.
Clegg, C., Axtell, C., Damodaran, L., Farbey, B., Hull, R., Lloyd-Jones, R., Nicholls, J., Sell, R., & Tomlinson, C. (1997). Information technology: a study of performance and the role of human and organizational factors. Ergonomics, 40, 851–871.
Eason, K., (1997). Understanding the organizational ramifications of implementing information technology systems. In Helander, M. Landauer, T.K. Prabhu, P. (Eds.), Handbook of Human-Computer Interaction (pp. 1475–1494). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
Göransson, B. (2004) User-centred systems design. Designing usable interactive systems in practice. Ph.D. dissertation. Uppsala, Sweden: Acta Universitatis Uppsaliensis.
Göransson, B., Gulliksen, J., & Boivie, I. (2003). The usability design process – Integrating User-centered systems design in the software development process. Software Process Improvement and Practice, 8, 111–131.
Greenbaum, J. & Kyng, M. (1991). Design at work: Cooperative design of computer systems. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Greenbaum, J. (1990). The head and the heart: Using gender analysis to study the social construction of computer systems. Computers & Society, 20. 9–16.
Gulliksen, J., Göransson, B., Bovie, I., Blomkvist, S., Persson, J. & Cajander, å. (2003). Key principles for user-centered systems design. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 397–409.
Hagberg, M., Wigaeus Tornqvist, E., & Toomingas, A. (2002). Self-reported reduced productivity due to musculoskeletal symptoms: Associations with workplace and individual factors among white-collar computer users. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 12, 151–162.
Harris, J., & Henderson, A. (1999). Better mythology for system design. In Proceedings of ACM CHI 99. Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Vol 1. (pp 88–95).
ISO 13407. (1999). ISO 13407: Human-centred design processes for interactive systems. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO 9241-10. (1996). ISO 9241-10: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
ISO 9241-11. (1998). ISO 9241-11: Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization.
Kammersgaard, J. (1990). Four different perspectives on human computer-interaction. In J. Preece, & L. Keller, Human-Computer Interaction. Hemel Hempstead, UK: Prentice Hall.
Karasek, R. & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic books.
Klein, H., & M. Myers (1999). A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Quarterly 23, 67–94.
Landauer, T.K. (1995). The trouble with computers – Usefulness, usability and productivity. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
Norman, D.A. (1986) Cognitive engineering. In D.A. Norman & S.W. Draper (Eds.), User centered systems design (pp. 31–61). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Nurminen, M. I. (1987). Different perspectives: What are they and how can they be used? In Docherty, P. Fuchs-Kittowski, K., Kolm, P, & Mathiassen, L. (Eds.). System design for human development and productivity: Participation and beyond. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Nygaard, K. (1986). Program development as a social activity. Information Processing 86. In Kugler, H-J. (Ed.), Proceedings from the IFIP 10th World Computer Congress, Dublin, Ireland, September 1–5, 1986, (pp. 189–198). North Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers.
Punnett, L., & Bergkvist, U. (1997). Visual display unit work and upper extremity musculoskeletal disorders: A review of epidemiological findings. Arbete och Hälsa (Work and Health). 1997:16. Solna, Sweden: National Institute of Working life.
Sachs, P. (1995). Transforming work: Collaboration, learning and design. ACM, 38, 36–44.
Sandblad, B., Gulliksen, J., Åborg, C., Boivie, I., Persson, J., Göransson, B., Kavathatzopoulos, I., Blomkvist, S., & Cajander, å. (2003). Work environment and computer systems development. Behaviour & Information Technology, 22, 375–387.
Standish Group (1995), CHAOS report, from http://www.standishgroup.com/
Standish Group (1998), CHAOS report, from http://www.standishgroup.com/
Statistics Sweden. (2001). Statistiska meddelanden, rapport 2001:2. (Statistical messages, report 2001:2).(in Swedish, summary in English).
Statistics Sweden. (2005). Statistiska meddelanden, Arbetorsakade besvär AM43 SM 0501. (Statistical messages, Work-Related Disorders). (in Swedish, summary in English).
Suchman, L.A. (1987). Plans and situated actions: The problem of human machine communication. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Vicente, K.J. (1999). Cognitive work analyses. Toward safe, productive and healthy computer-based work. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Wigaeus Tornqvist, E., Eriksson, N., & Bergqvist, U. (2000). Dator-och kontorsarbetsplatsens fysiska och psykosociala arbetsmiljörisker, (The physical and psychosocial work environment risks at computer- and office workplaces). Arbetsliv och Hälsa 2000 (Working Life and Health 2000). Marklund, S. (pp. 235–260). Solna, Sweden:Arbetslivsinstitutet.
Winograd. T. & Flores, F. (1984). Understanding computer and cognition. Menlo Park, CA: Addison-Wesley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2008 Springer-Verlag London Limited
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Cajander, Å., Boivie, I., Gulliksen, J. (2008). Usability and Users’ Health Issues in Systems Development — Attitudes and Perspectives. In: Law, E.LC., Hvannberg, E.T., Cockton, G. (eds) Maturing Usability. Human-Computer Interaction Series. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-941-5_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-84628-941-5_11
Publisher Name: Springer, London
Print ISBN: 978-1-84628-940-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-84628-941-5
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)