Abstract
Surgical techniques such as minimally invasive thyroid surgery and minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) have become part of daily endocrine surgical practice.
The three most commonly utilised approaches for thyroid surgery have become minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy (MIVAT), minimal invasive thyroid surgery through a direct lateral mini-incision approach (MITS) or a central mini-incision approach. The major application of this surgical approach is the diagnostic excision of solitary thyroid nodules with atypical follicular cytology or excision of toxic thyroid nodules. In relation to the diagnostic excision of atypical solitary nodules, MITS should be seen as an investigative procedure positioned between fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) and conventional standard thyroidectomy achieved through a 5–6-cm incision. MITS follows the same principles as a conventional thyroid surgical procedure but is performed with less trauma of access. It uses a capsular dissection and requires identification of the laryngeal nerves and parathyroid glands. The simple MITS operative setup combined with its low costs has made it an attractive alternative treatment option to conventional thyroidectomy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsRecommended Reading
Agarwal G, et al. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy using the ‘focused’ lateral approach. Surgical technique. ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:147–51.
Alvarado R, et al. Minimally invasive thyroid surgery for single nodules: an evidence based review of the lateral mini-incision technique. World J Surg. 2008;32:1341–8. Review.
Bellantone R, et al. Video assisted vs. conventional thyroid lobectomy. Arch Surg. 2002;137:301–4.
Chao TC, et al. Video-assisted open thyroid lobectomy through a small incision. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:15–9.
Del Rio P, et al. Pain after minimally invasive video-assisted and after minimally invasive open thyroidectomy: results of a prospective outcome study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393:271–3.
Delbridge LW. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy: the Australian experience. Asian J Surg. 2003;26:76–81.
Gagner M. Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Br J Surg. 1996;83:875.
Gagner M, Inabnet WB. Endoscopic thyroidectomy for solitary thyroid nodules. Thyroid. 2001;11:161–3.
Gauger PG, et al. Endoscopically assisted, minimally invasive parathyroidectomy. Br J Surg. 1999;86:1563–6.
Gossnell JE, et al. Minimal access thyroid surgery: technique and report of the first 25 cases. ANZ J Surg. 2004;74:330–4.
Hegazy MA, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for small follicular thyroid nodules. World J Surg. 2007;31:1743–50.
Henry JF. Minimally invasive surgery of the thyroid and parathyroid glands. Br J Surg. 2006;93:1–2.
Ikeda Y, et al. Are there significant benefits of minimally invasive endoscopic thyroidectomy? World J Surg. 2004;28:1075–8.
Inabnet WB, et al. Safety of same day discharge in patients undergoing suture less thyroidectomy: a comparison of local and general anaesthesia. Thyroid. 2007;18:57–61.
Lombardi CP, et al. Safety of video-assisted thyroidectomy versus conventional surgery. Head Neck. 2005;27:58–64.
Lundgren CI, et al. Minimally invasive thyroid surgery for diagnostic excision of solitary thyroid nodules. Asian J Surg. 2007;30:250–4.
Miccoli P, et al. Comparison between minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy and conventional thyroidectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surgery. 2001;130:1039–43.
Miccoli P, et al. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for papillary carcinoma: a prospective study of its completeness. Surgery. 2002;132:1070–3.
Palazzo FF, Delbridge LW. Minimal-access/minimally invasive parathyroidectomy for primary hyperparathyroidism. Surg Clin North Am. 2004;84:717–34.
Palazzo FF, et al. Safety and feasibility of thyroid lobectomy via a lateral 2.5-cm incision with a cohort comparison of the first 50 cases: evolution of a surgical approach. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2005;390:230–5.
Patel D, Kebebew E. Pros and cons of robotic transaxillary thyroidectomy. Thyroid. 2012;22:984–5.
Perigli G, et al. Clinical benefits of minimally invasive techniques in thyroid surgery. World J Surg. 2008;32:45–50.
Ruggieri M, et al. The minimally invasive surgical approach in thyroid diseases. Minerva Chir. 2007;62:309–14.
Sackett WR, et al. Minimal access thyroid surgery: is it feasible, is it appropriate? ANZ J Surg. 2002;72:777–8.
Stalberg P, et al. Minimally invasive parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy – current concepts. Surgeon. 2007;5:301–8.
Sywak MS, et al. A randomized controlled trial of minimal invasive thyroidectomy using the lateral approach versus conventional hemithyroidectomy. Surgery. 2008;144:1016–21; discussion 1021–2.
Terris D, et al. Minimally invasive thyroidectomy: basic and advanced techniques. Laryngoscope. 2006;116:350–6.
Yeh MW, et al. Completion of thyroidectomy for malignancy after minimal access thyroid surgery. ANZ J Surg. 2006;76:332–4.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kruijff, S., Delbridge, L. (2014). Non-endoscopic Minimally Invasive Thyroid Surgery. In: Terris, D., Singer, M. (eds) Minimally Invasive and Robotic Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9011-1_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9011-1_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-9010-4
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-9011-1
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)