Skip to main content

The H-Reflex and F-Response

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2533 Accesses

Abstract

Common electrophysiological recording modalities applied in the surgical setting include somatosensory evoked potentials (SSEPs), motor evoked potentials (TcMEPs), and electromyography (EMG). Central function is traditionally monitored with SSEPs and TcMEPs. Spinal nerve and nerve root function can be more easily assessed with EMG. While generally accepted to provide complete spinal cord protection, SSEPs are specific for the dorsal white matter tracts and the vascular territory of the posterior spinal arteries. The TcMEP is specific for monitoring descending white matter pathways of the lateral and anterior columns, but is also distinct in being the only routinely applied modality to monitor the integrity of the spinal gray matter. While useful in detecting gross changes in motor function as a result of spinal cord injury, TcMEPs do not monitor more complex spinal circuits including multisegmental, interneuronal, and propriospinal circuitry responsible for the control of voluntary movement. Furthermore, TcMEP monitoring has some contraindications and typically causes considerable patient movement and the risk of bite injury. Two other modalities, the Hoffmann reflex (H-reflex) and the F-response, have been proposed as valuable adjuncts to SSEPs and TcMEPs for monitoring spinal cord integrity during neurosurgical spine procedures [1].

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Leppanen RE, Abnm D, American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. Intraoperative monitoring of segmental spinal nerve root function with free-run and electrically-triggered electromyography and spinal cord function with reflexes and F-responses. A position statement by the American Society of Neurophysiological Monitoring. J Clin Monit Comput. 2005;19:437–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Piper H. Die Aktionsstrome menschlicher Muskeln. Die Metodiek der Untersuchung am Seitengalvanometer und die Prinzipien der Stromkurvenanalyse.Typen unterschiede der Willkur kontraktion. Zeitung Biol Tech Methode 1912;3:3–52.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hoffman P. Uber die Beziehungen der Sehnenreflexe zur willkürlichen Bewegung and zum Tonus. Z Biol. 1918;68:351–70.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Magladery JW, McDougal Jr DB. Electrophysiological studies of nerve and reflex activity in normal man. I. Identification of certain reflexes in the electromyogram and the conduction velocity of peripheral nerve fibers. Bull Johns Hopkins Hosp. 1950;86(5):265–90.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Schieppati M. The Hoffmann reflex: a means of assessing spinal reflex excitability and its descending control in man. Prog Neurobiol. 1987;28:345–76.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Misiaszek JE. The H-reflex as a tool in neurophysiology: its limitations and uses in understanding nervous system function. Muscle Nerve. 2003;28:144–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Palmieri RM, Ingersoll CD, Hoffman MA. The Hoffmann reflex: methodologic considerations and applications for use in sports medicine and athletic training research. J Athl Train. 2004;39:268–77.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Leppanen RE. Monitoring spinal nerve function with H-reflexes. J Clin Neurophysiol. 2012;29:126–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fisher MA. F-waves – physiology and clinical uses. ScientificWorldJournal. 2007;7:144–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Popovic DB. Neural prostheses for movement restoration. In: Moore J, Zouridakis G, editors. Biomedical technology and devices handbook. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2004. p. 21–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leis AA, Zhou HH, Mehta M, Harkey 3rd HL, Paske WC. Behavior of the H-reflex in humans following mechanical perturbation or injury to rostral spinal cord. Muscle Nerve. 1996;19:1373–82.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Rossi L, Bianchi AM, Merzagora A, Gaggiani A, Cerutti S, Bracchi F. Single trial somatosensory evoked potential extraction with ARX filtering for a combined spinal cord intraoperative neuromonitoring technique. Biomed Eng Online. 2007;6:2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Merzagora AC, Bracchi F, Cerutti S, Rossi L, Gaggiani A, Bianchi AM. Evaluation and application of a RBF neural network for online single-sweep extraction of SEPs during scoliosis surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2007;54:1300–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou HH, Mehta M, Leis AA. Spinal cord motoneuron excitability during isoflurane and nitrous oxide anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1997;86:302–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Rehberg B, Grunewald M, Baars J, Fuegener K, Urban BW, Kox WJ. Monitoring of immobility to noxious stimulation during sevoflurane anesthesia using the spinal H-reflex. Anesthesiology. 2004;100:44–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baars JH, Dangel C, Herold KF, Hadzidiakos DA, Rehberg B. Suppression of the human spinal H-reflex by propofol: a quantitative analysis. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006;50:193–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Baars JH, von Dincklage F, Reiche J, Rehberg B. Propofol increases presynaptic inhibition of Ia afferents in the intact human spinal cord. Anesthesiology. 2006;104:798–804.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Baars JH, Benzke M, von Dincklage F, Reiche J, Schlattmann P, Rehberg B. Presynaptic and postsynaptic effects of the anesthetics sevoflurane and nitrous oxide in the human spinal cord. Anesthesiology. 2007;107:553–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hugon M. Methodology of the Hoffmann reflex in man. In: Desmedt JE, editor. New developments in electromyography and clinical neurophysiology, vol. 3. Basel: Karger; 1973. p. 277–93.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hultborn H, Illert M, Nielsen J, Paul A, Ballegaard M, Wiese H. On the mechanism of the post-activation depression of the H-reflex in human subjects. Exp Brain Res. 1996;108:450–62.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Jasper R, Daube MD, Devin I, Rubin MD. Clinical neurophysiology. New York: Oxford University Press; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bosnjak R, Makovec M. Neurophysiological monitoring of S1 root function during microsurgical posterior discectomy using H-reflex and spinal nerve root potentials. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010;35:423–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Leppanen RE. Intraoperative applications of the H-reflex and F-response: a tutorial. J Clin Monit Comput. 2006;20:267–304.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Scott Francis Davis Ph.D., CNIM .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bamford, J.A., Davis, S.F. (2014). The H-Reflex and F-Response. In: Kaye, A., Davis, S. (eds) Principles of Neurophysiological Assessment, Mapping, and Monitoring. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8942-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-8942-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-8941-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-8942-9

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics