Skip to main content

Abstract

In this chapter an informal treatment of the basic ideas of what, in our view, abstraction should is reported. In particular, the notion of abstraction is linked to that of information hiding, and the nature of the abstraction as an intensional property of system descriptions is suggested. Moreover, grounding abstraction on a configuration space (containing all the possible descriptions of a system, given a set of sensors) allows a clear distinction to be made among the cognate notions of abstraction, approximation and reformulation. Finally, the relationships between abstraction and generalization are discussed in depth.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 159.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As it will be discussed in the next chapter, the system \(\mathcal{S }\) needs not to be a physical one, and “measuring” is to be taken in a wide sense, as discussed also by Floridi [175].

  2. 2.

    See Sect. 2.2.

  3. 3.

    The true way and order for drawing all parts and members of the human body”.

  4. 4.

    See Sect. 2.1.

  5. 5.

    See Sect. 2.3.

  6. 6.

    See the pioneering work by Michalski [367].

  7. 7.

    See Sect. 2.3.

  8. 8.

    See Sect. 2.6.

  9. 9.

    \({ COV }(\varphi )\) is the set of models of \(\varphi \) in \(\mathcal{A }\).

  10. 10.

    For instance, aggregation is only meaningful for abstraction, whereas omitting details pertains to both abstraction and generalisation.

  11. 11.

    See Sect. 2.6.

  12. 12.

    See Sect. 2.6.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lorenza Saitta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Saitta, L., Zucker, JD. (2013). Boundaries of Abstraction. In: Abstraction in Artificial Intelligence and Complex Systems. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7052-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7052-6_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-7051-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-7052-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics