Skip to main content

Critical Thinking and Intellectual Style

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Adaptive Decision Making and Intellectual Styles

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Psychology ((BRIEFSPSYCHOL,volume 13))

Abstract

The aim of this second chapter is to present a review of literature on critical thinking and on intellectual styles in order to point out the potential intersections between critical thinking and intellect. These pages are directed toward an integration of intellectual ability, learning style, personality and achievement motivation as predictors of the decision-making process. We point out the main factors affecting decision processes in the current complex scenario recalling some concepts illustrated in “Decision Making in the Social Sciences”. Far from the normative approach, we present insights on the adaptive nature of the decision-making process in our complex society: people adapt according the age, the experience, the contexts, and the role we play.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This type of decision making is seen in economic Game Theory, whereby strategies are implemented by players who seek to maximize their own profits in a monetary game of heads/tails.

  2. 2.

    It should be noted that despite the plethora of literature examining emotional intelligence, Schalk (2012) has indicated the need to distinguish between emotional intelligence and emotional competence, suggesting that the former refers to accuracy in recognizing and understanding others’ emotions, while the latter refers more to the effectiveness in using emotional information.

References

  • Ali, N., Bantz, D., & Siktberg, L. (2005). Validation of critical thinking skills in online responses. Journal of Nursing Education, 44(2), 90–94.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, S., Giese, J., & Boush, D. (2010). Feeling, thinking, and differential decision making under risk. Advances in Consumer Research, 37, 465–466.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arend, B. (2007). Course assessment practices and student learning strategies in online courses. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 11(4), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berzins, M., & Sofo, F. (2008). Developing critical thinking skills in first year Australian university students. Journal of Learning, 15(1), 261–272.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, C., & Foster, C. (2011). Thinking styles: Maximizing online supported learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 44(2), 121–139. doi:10.2190/EC.44.2.a.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borlandoe, J. (2005). An examination of thinking styles of community college women administrators in three mid-Atlantic states. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Wilmington College, Delaware.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes, J., & Torney-Purta, J. (1995). Naive theories and decision making as part of higher order thinking in social studies. Theory and Research in Social Education, 23(3), 260–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., Chang, J., & Chen, Y. (2001). A study of thinking styles and their relevant variables of Junior High School principals in Taiwan. Paper presented at the international education research conference of AARE, Fremantle, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, Y., Chen, 1. & Yu, P. (2002). Tracks: The dynamics and emergence of innovating, design making and expressing organizations. Unpublished paper, Taiwan University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corcoran, K., Epstude, K., Damisch, L., & Mussweiler, T. (2011). Fast similarities: Efficiency advantages of similarity-focused comparisons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37(5), 1280–1286. doi:10.1037/a0023922.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • de Acedo Lizarraga, M., de Acedo Baquedano, M., Oliver, M., & Closas, A. (2009). Development and validation of a decision making questionnaire. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 37(3), 357–373. doi:10.1080/03069880902956959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easen, P., & Wilcockson, J. (1996). Institution and rational decision making in professional thinking: A false dichotomy? Journal of Advanced Nursing, 24(4), 667–673. doi:10.1111/1365-2648.ep8543214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Etzioni, A. (1988). The moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follman, J., Lavely, C., & Berger, N. (1997). Inventory of instruments of critical thinking. Informal Logic, 18(2&3), 261–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garvey, J., & Buckley, P. (2011). Using technology to encourage critical thinking and optimal decision making in risk management education. Risk Management & Insurance Review, 14(2), 299–309. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6296.2011.01200.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grigorenko, E., & Sternberg, R. (1997). Styles of thinking, abilities and academic performance. Exceptional Children, 63, 296–312.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, K., & Vance, C. (2009). Examining managerial thinking style, EQ and organizational commitment. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(3), 344–366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groves, K., Vance, C., & Paik, Y. (2008). Linking linear/nonlinear thinking style balance and managerial ethical decision making. Journal of Business Ethics, 80(2), 305–325. doi:10.1007/s10551-007-9422-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haller, C., & Courvoisier, D. (2010). Personality and thinking style in different creative domains. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity and the Arts, 4(3), 149–160. doi:10.1037/a0017084.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, D. (1997). Students need “reality checks”. Education Digest, 63, 24–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham, J., & van den Bos, K. (2010). On unconscious morality: the effects of unconscious thinking on moral decision making. Social Cognition, 28(1), 74–83. doi:10.1521/soco.2010.28.1.74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hassan, K., & Madhum, G. (2007). Validating the Watson Glaser critical thinking appraisal. Higher Education, 54(3), 361–383. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9002-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsdingen, A., van den Bosch, K., van Gog, T., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010). The effects of critical thinking instruction on training complex decision making. Human Factors, 52(4), 537–545. doi:10.1177/0018720810377069.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kember, D., & Leung, D. (2000). Development of a questionnaire to measure the level of reflective thinking. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 25(4), 381–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, D. (2008). Game theory and neural basis of social decision making. Nature Neuroscience, 11(4), 404–409. doi:10.1038/nn2065.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy, A., & Janeke, H. (2009). The relationship between thinking styles and emotional intelligence: An exploratory study. South African Journal of Psychology, 39(3), 357–375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, W., & Burrell, D. (2009). Decision making skills that encompass a critical thinking orientation for law enforcement professionals. International Journal of Police Science & Management, 11(2), 141–149. doi:10.1350/ijps.2009.11.2.118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resulaj, A., Kiani, R., Wolpert, D. M., & Shadlen, M. (2009). Changes of mind in decision making. Nature, 461, 263–266. doi:10.1038/nature08275.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schalk, T. (2012). The role of emotional competence on the effectiveness of natural resource management committees. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Canberra: University of Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Semerci, Ç. (2007). Developing a reflective thinking tendency scale for teachers and student teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 7(3), 1369–1376.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, F. (2002). Thinking style inventory (TSI) manual. Canberra: University of Canberra.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, F. (2005). Thinking styles of modern Chinese leaders: independence and exploration in an historically conditional China. Australian Journal of Adult Learning, 45(3), 304–330.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, F., & Berzins, M. (2009). Asking questions: The difference between undergraduate and postgraduate student preferences. Journal of the World Universities Forum, 2(1), 199–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sofo, F., Berzins, M., & Colapinto, C. (2008). Thinking styles of Australian, Chinese and Italian university students. International Journal of Diversity in Organizations, Communities and Nations, 8(2), 221–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sternberg, R. (1997). Thinking styles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Streetman, D., McCreadie, S., McGregory, M., & Ellis, J. (2006). Evaluation of clinical research knowledge and interest among pharmacy residents: Survey design and validation. American Journal of Health-System Pharmacy, 63(23), 2372–2377. doi:10.2146/ajhp060099.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tallman, I., & Gray, L. (1990). Choices, decisions and problem-solving. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1), 405–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang, J. (2003). Are Asian thinking styles different? Acculturation and thinking styles in a Chinese Canadian population. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, George Fox University, Oregon, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vance, C., Groves, K., Paik, Y., & Kindler, H. (2007). Understanding and measuring linear/nonlinear thinking style for enhanced management education and professional practice. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6(2), 167–185. doi:10.5465/AMLE.2007.25223457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volpentesta, A., Ammirato, S., & Sofo, F. (2012). Collaborative design learning and thinking style awareness. International Journal of Engineering Education, 28(4), 948–958.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B., Stains, M., Escriu-Sune, M., Medaglia, E., Rostamnjad, L., Chinn, C., et al. (2011). A novel instrument for assessing students’ critical thinking abilities. Journal of College Science Teaching, 40(5), 102–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, C., & Zhang, L. (2011). Thinking styles and conceptions of creativity among university students. Educational Psychology, 31(3), 361–375. doi:10.1080/01443410.2011.557044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Francesco Sofo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sofo, F., Colapinto, C., Sofo, M., Ammirato, S. (2013). Critical Thinking and Intellectual Style. In: Adaptive Decision Making and Intellectual Styles. SpringerBriefs in Psychology, vol 13. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-6708-3_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics