Abstract
If you follow the advice I have given in previous chapters, the chances are good that the results of your multiple imputation and analysis will be good. However, unforeseen things happen. Also, if you happen to be helping another person with these analyses, the material in this chapter will give some strategies for working through the problems.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
But do recall that convergence is a function of the parameter values, and is not a direct function of the function value. Still, it is more common with “normal” EM convergence that the function value makes very small (monotonic) changes just prior to convergence.
- 2.
I also performed the same analysis with SPSS 19. Strategies and code for performing these analyses in SAS and SPSS are provided on our website, http://methodology.psu.edu.
- 3.
In SPSS, I found the principal components analysis to be as described above. However, I was somewhat less able to make use of the regression analysis to point further to the variable that should be removed, because SPSS does not have the option of including variables in the order presented. Thus, posatt1 was omitted from the analysis based on the F-to-enter criterion. On the other hand, the variable that was removed automatically (posatt1) did show that the problem was probably in that set of variables.
References
Collins, L. M., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C. M. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330–351.
Graham, J. W. (2003). Adding missing-data relevant variables to FIML-based structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 80–100.
Graham, J. W., Hofer, S. M., & Piccinin, A. M. (1994). Analysis with missing data in drug prevention research. In L. M. Collins and L. Seitz (eds.), Advances in data analysis for prevention intervention research. National Institute on Drug Abuse Research Monograph Series #142, pp. 13–63, Washington DC: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
Hansen, W. B., & Graham, J. W. (1991). Preventing alcohol, marijuana, and cigarette use among adolescents: Peer pressure resistance training versus establishing conservative norms. Preventive Medicine, 20, 414–430.
Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2010). Mplus User’s Guide. (6th ed.). Los Angeles: Author.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer Science+Business Media New York
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Graham, J.W. (2012). Practical Issues Relating to Analysis with Missing Data: Avoiding and Troubleshooting Problems. In: Missing Data. Statistics for Social and Behavioral Sciences. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4018-5_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4018-5_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New York, NY
Print ISBN: 978-1-4614-4017-8
Online ISBN: 978-1-4614-4018-5
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)