Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Cousins but Not Twins: Instructional Design and Human Performance Technology in the Workplace

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology

Abstract

Instructional design (ID) and human performance technology (HPT) stem from a common origin in systems thinking and behavioral psychology, but today the two fields employ different research bases, system foci, and methods. To contrast these fields, this chapter presents an idealized and abstracted discussion that examines the theoretical origins of the two fields, briefly describes their similarities, and focuses on their differences in terms of analytical frameworks and methods. We conclude that contemporary practice in most contexts combines elements of ID and HPT, particularly when working in cross-functional teams seeking to improve organizational performance. Practitioners of ID are likely to encounter HPT in their work, and they may be called upon to serve as part of a cross-functional team using HPT as a common conceptual framework.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Addison, R., Haig, C., & Kearny, L. (2009). Performance architecture: The art and science of improving organizations. San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aguinis, H., & Kraiger, K. (2009). Benefits of training and development for individuals and teams, organizations, and society. Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 451–474. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.60.110707.163505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, V., & Johnson, L. (1997). Systems thinking basics: From concepts to causal loops. Waltham, MA: Pegasus Communications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTD. (2008). The ASTD WLP competency model. American Society for Training and Development. Alexandria, VA. Retrieved from http://www.astd.org/content/research/competency/AreasofExpertise.htm.

  • ASTD. (n.d.). Mission and vision. Retrieved June 3, 2013 from http://www.org/ASTD/aboutus/missionAndVision/.

  • *Baek, E.-O., Cagiltay, K., Boling, E., & Frick, T. (2007). User-centered design and development. In J. Michael Spector, M. David Merrill, Jeroen van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 660–668). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beich, E. (Ed.). (2008). ASTD handbook for workplace learning ­professionals. Washington, DC: American Society for Training & Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Boling, E., & Smith, K. M. (2007). Artifacts as tools in the design process. In J. Michael Spector, M. David Merrill, Jeroen van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 685–690). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Brethower, D. M. (2006). Systemic issues. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.). Handbook of human performance technology (3rd ed., pp. 111–137). San Francisco: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinkerhoff, R. O. (2006). Using evaluation to measure and improve the effectiveness of human performance technology initiatives. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential (3rd ed., pp. 287–311). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Broad, M. L., & Newstrom, J. W. (1992). Transfer of training: Action-packed strategies to ensure high payoff from training investments. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2008). Design thinking. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 84–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, R. (2003). Updating the behavior engineering model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 8–14. doi:10.1002/pfi.4930420504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chevalier, R. (2006). Leadership in performance consulting. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential (3rd ed., pp. 964–985). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • d.school. (2010). Bootcamp bootleg. Palo Alto, CA: Institute of Design at Stanford. Available at http://dschool.typepad.com/files/bootcampbootleg2010.pdf.

  • Dean, P. J. (1997). Thomas F. Gilbert, Ph.D: Engineering performance improvement with or without training. In P. J. Dean, & D. E. Ripley (Eds.), Performance improvement series: Vol. 1. Performance improvement pathfinders: Models for organizational learning systems (pp. 45–64). Silver Spring, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Definition and Terminology Committee of AECT. (2007). Definition. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (2nd ed., pp. 1–14). Oxford, England: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2009). The systematic design of instruction (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertmer, P. A., Stepich, D. A., York, C. S., Stickman, A., Wu, X., Zurek, S., et al. (2008). How instructional design experts use knowledge and experience to solve ill-structured problems. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 21(1), 17–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Gagne, R. M. (1985). The conditions of learning and theory of instruction (4th ed.). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gagne, R. M., Wager, W. W., Golas, K., & Keller, J. M. (2005). Principles of instructional design (5th ed.). Belmont, CA: Thomson/Wadsworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Gilbert, T. F. (1996a). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance (Tribute ed.). Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, T. F. (1996b). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harless, J. H. (1973). An analysis of front-end analysis. Improving Human Performance: A Research Quarterly, 4, 229–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson, C. S. (1990). A process model for performance technology. Performance and Instruction, 29(3), 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISPI. (2002a). Code of ethics. Retrieved September 29, 2010, from http://www.ispi.org/uploadedFiles/ISPI_Site/About_ISPI/About/Code-of-Ethics.pdf.

  • ISPI. (2002b). ISPI’s performance technology standards (p. 35). Silver Spring, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Jonassen, D. H. (2004). Learning to solve problems. San Francisco: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Kaufman, R. (1983). A holistic planning model: A system approach for improving organizational effectiveness and impact. Performance and Instruction, 22(8), 3–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D., & Kirkpatrick, J. (2006). Evaluating training programs: The four levels (3rd ed.). San Francisco: Barrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langdon, D. (2000). Aligning performance: Improving people, systems, and organizations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawson, B. (2006). How designers think: The design process demystified (4th ed.). Oxford, UK: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1988). Making instruction work, or, skillbloomers. Belmont, CA: Lake.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction (3rd ed.). Atlanta, GA: Center for Effective Performance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mager, R. F., & Pipe, P. (1970). Analyzing performance problems: Or you really oughta wanna. Belmont, CA: Fearon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marker, A. (2007). Synchronized analysis model: Linking Gilbert’s behavior engineering model with environmental analysis models. Performance Improvement, 46(1), 26–32. doi:10.1002/pfi.036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, J. (1991). Rapid application development. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, D. H. (2008). Thinking in systems: A primer. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Merrill, M. D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenda, M. (2003). In search of elusive ADDIE model. Performance Improvement, 42(5), 34–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Molenda, M. (2010). Origins and evolution of instructional systems design. In K. H. Silber & W. R. Foshay (Eds.), Handbook of improving workplace performance (Vol. 1: Instructional design and training delivery, pp. 53–92). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Molenda, M., & Pershing, J. A. (2007). Improving performance. In A. Januszewski & M. Molenda (Eds.), Educational technology: A definition with commentary (2nd ed., pp. 49–80). Oxford, England: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison, G. R., Ross, S. R., & Kemp, J. E. (2007). Designing effective instruction (5th ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook of improving performance in the workplace, vol. 3: Measurement and evaluation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Myerson, J. (2001). IDEO: Masters of innovation. London, UK: Laurence King.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Pershing, J. A. (2006). Human performance technology fundamentals. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential (3rd ed., pp. 5–34). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, J. J., & Phillips, P. P. (2002). Eleven reasons why training and development fails … and what you can do about it. Training, 39(9), 79–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C. (1990). Training for impact: How to link training to business needs and measure the results. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, D. G., & Robinson, J. C. (2006). Making the transition from a learning to a performance function. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential (3rd ed., pp. 903–923). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J. (1990). Performance technology: Working the system. Training, 27(2), 42–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, M. J., Coscarelli, W. C., & Hutchison, C. S. (1999). The origins and evolution of the field. In H. D. Stolovitch & E. J. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology: Improving individual and organizational performance worldwide (2nd ed., pp. 24–46). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, S. M., Morrison, G. R., Hannafin, R. D., Young, M., Akker, J. V. D., Kuiper, W., et al. (2007). Research designs. In J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. V. Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 715–761). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossett, A. (1987). Training needs assessment. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowland, G. (1993). Designing and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(1), 79–91. doi:10.1007/BF02297094.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummler, G. A. (1972). Human performance problems and their solutions. Human Resource Management, 11(4), 2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummler, G. A. (2006). The anatomy of performance. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential (3rd ed., pp. 986–1007). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rummler, G. A. (2007). The past is prologue: An eye witness account of HPT. Performance Improvement, 46(10), 5–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rummler, G. A., & Brache, A. P. (1990). Improving performance: How to manage the white space on the organization chart. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Silber, K. H. (2010). A principle-based model of instructional design. In K. H. Silber & W. R. Foshay (Eds.), Handbook of improving workplace performance (Vol. 1: Instructional design and training delivery, pp. 23–52). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. C., & Koszalka, T. A. (2007). Competencies for the new-age instructional designer. In J. Michael Spector, M. David Merrill, Jeroen van Merriënboer, & M. P. Driscoll (Eds.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 570–575). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (2005). Instructional design (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • *Van Tiem, D. M., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2004). Fundamentals of performance technology: A guide to improving people, processes, and performance (2nd ed.). Silver Spring, MD: International Society for Performance Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villachica, S. W., & Stepich, D. A. (2010). Surviving troubled times: Five best practices for training professionals. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 23(2), 93–115. doi:10.1002/piq.20083.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villachica, S. W., & Stone, D. L. (1998). Rapid application development for performance technology: Five strategies to deliver better interventions in less time. In P. J. Dean & D. E. Ripley (Eds.), Performance improvement interventions: Performance technologies in the workplace (pp. 343–399). Washington, DC: International Society for Performance Improvement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villachica, S. W., & Stone, D. L. (1999). Performance support systems. In H. D. Stolovitch & E. J. Keeps (Eds.), Handbook of human performance technology: Improving individual and organizational performance worldwide (2nd ed., pp. 442–463). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villachica, S. W., & Stone, D. L. (2010). Cognitive task analysis. In K. H. Silber, & W. R. Foshay (Eds.), Handbook of improving ­workplace performance (Vol. 1: Instructional design and training delivery, pp. 227–258). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Villachica, S. W., Stone, D. L., & Endicott, J. E. (2006). Performance support systems. In J. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Improving individual and organizational performance worldwide (3rd ed., pp. 539–566). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass/Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watkins, R., Leigh, D., Foshay, W. R., & Kaufman, R. (1998). Kirkpatrick plus: Evaluation and continuous improvement with a community focus. Education Technology Research and Development, 5(3), 390–393.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winiecki, D. J. (2006). Systems, measures, and workers: Producing and obscuring the system and making systemic performance improvement difficult. In J. A. Pershing (Ed.), Handbook of human performance technology: Principles, practices, and potential (3rd ed., pp. 1224–1250). San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Foshay Group and Walden University, 9614 Hillview Drive, Dallas, TX, 75231, USA

    Wellesley R. Foshay

  2. Boise State University, 1910 University Drive, Boise, ID, 83725, USA

    Steven W. Villachica & Donald A. Stepich

Authors
  1. Wellesley R. Foshay
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steven W. Villachica
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Donald A. Stepich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wellesley R. Foshay .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. , Department of Learning Technologies, C, University of North Texas, North Elm 3940, Denton, 76207-7102, Texas, USA

    J. Michael Spector

  2. W. Sunset Blvd. 1812, St. George, 84770, Utah, USA

    M. David Merrill

  3. , Centr. Instructiepsychol.&-technologie, K.U. Leuven, Andreas Vesaliusstraat 2, Leuven, 3000, Belgium

    Jan Elen

  4. Research Drive, Iacocca A109 111, Bethlehem, 18015, Pennsylvania, USA

    M. J. Bishop

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media New York

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Foshay, W.R., Villachica, S.W., Stepich, D.A. (2014). Cousins but Not Twins: Instructional Design and Human Performance Technology in the Workplace. In: Spector, J., Merrill, M., Elen, J., Bishop, M. (eds) Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation