Skip to main content

Management of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer in Older Women

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Management of Gynecological Cancers in Older Women

Abstract

Data on the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer in the elderly has relied mostly on selected pilot studies. The largest study, ICON4 analyzes the elderly subset and does suggest that patients over 65 benefit from treatment with carboplatin + paclitaxel when the disease is categorized as platinum-sensitive as compared to single agents or other combinations. When the disease is platinum-resistant, preliminary results of the AURELIA study indicate that bevacizumab adds to the effect of chemotherapy, and this may also be applicable to the elderly. Nevertheless, there are a number of considerations relating to co-morbid conditions, adherence to treatment, and drug interactions that may pose a challenge in any one elderly individual undergoing chemotherapy treatments. Detection of early recurrences may be important, but this has not been studied specifically in an elderly population.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Baker SD, Grochow LB. Pharmacology of cancer chemotherapy in the older person. Clin Geriatr Med. 1997;13:169.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Balkrishnan R. Predictors of medication adherence in the elderly. Clin Ther. 1998;20: 764–71.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawhney R, Sehl M, Naeim A. Physiologic aspects of aging: impact on cancer management and decision making, part I. Cancer J. 2005;11:449.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schrijvers D, Highley M, De Bruyn E, et al. Role of red blood cells in pharmacokinetics of chemotherapeutic agents. Anticancer Drugs. 1999;10:147.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sehl M, Sawhney R, Naeim A. Physiologic aspects of aging: impact on cancer management and decision making, part II. Cancer J. 2005;11:461.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Launay-Vacher V, Chatelut E, Lichtman SM, et al. Renal insufficiency in elderly cancer patients: International Society of Geriatric Oncology clinical practice recommendations. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:1314.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright JG, Boddy AV, Highley M, et al. Estimation of glomerular filtration rate in cancer patients. Br J Cancer. 2001;84:452–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vestal RE. Aging and pharmacology. Cancer. 1997;80:1302.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Tam-McDevitt J. Polypharmacy, aging, and cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2008; 22:1052.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chan JK, Urban R, Cheung MK, et al. Ovarian cancer in younger vs older women: a population-based analysis. Br J Cancer. 2006;95:1314–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Winter 3rd WE, Maxwell GL, Tian C, et al. Prognostic factors for stage III epithelial ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:3621–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pectasides D, Fountzilas G, Aravantinos G, et al. Epithelial ovarian carcinoma in younger vs older women: is age an independent prognostic factor? The Hellenic Oncology Cooperative Group experience. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2007;17:1003–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Maas HA, Kruitwagen RF, Lemmens VE, et al. The influence of age and co-morbidity on treatment and prognosis of ovarian cancer: a population-based study. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;97:104–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Petignant P, Fioretta G, Verkooijen HM, et al. Poorer survival of elderly patients with ovarian cancer: a population-based study. Surg Oncol. 2004;13:181–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sundarajan V, Hershman D, Grann VR, et al. Variations in the use of chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer: a population-based study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20:173–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Efstathiou E, Dimopoulos MA, Bozas G, et al. Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer in the elderly: chemotherapy tolerance and outcome. Anticancer Res. 2007;27:611–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Hershman D, Jacobson JS, McBride R, et al. Efectiveness of platinum-based chemotherapy among elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;94:540–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freyer G, Tinker AV, Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup. Clinical trials and treatment of the elderly diagnosed with ovarian cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(4):776–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Thigpen T, Brady MF, Omura GA, et al. Age as a prognostic factor in ovarian carcinoma. The Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Cancer. 1993;71:606–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Ben-Ami I, Vaknin Z, Schneider D, et al. Perioperative morbidity and mortality of gynecological oncologic surgery in elderly women. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2006;16:452–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Wright JD, Herzog TJ, Powell MA. Morbidity of cytoreductive surgery in the elderly. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;190(5):1398–400.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Fotopoulou C, Savvatis K, Steinhagen-Thiessen E, et al. Primary radical surgery in elderly patients with epithelial ovarian cancer: analysis of surgical outcome and long-term survival. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2010;20:34–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Cloven NG, Manetta A, Berman ML, et al. Management of ovarian cancer in patients older than 80 years of age. Gynecol Oncol. 1999;73:137–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Marchetti DL, Lele SB, Priore RL, et al. Treatment of advanced ovarian carcinoma in the elderly. Gynecol Oncol. 1993;49:86–91.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Diaz-Montes TP, Zahurak ML, Giuntoli RL, et al. Surgical care of elderly women with ovarian cancer: a population-based perspective. Gynecol Oncol. 2005;99:352–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Al-Refaie WB, Parsons HM, Henderson WG, et al. Major cancer surgery in the elderly: results from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Ann Surg. 2010;251(2):311–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alphs HH, Zahurak ML, Bristow RE, et al. Predictors of surgical outcome and survival among elderly women diagnosed with ovarian and primary peritoneal cancer. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;103:1048–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Audisio RA, Pope D, Ramesh HS, et al. Shall we operate? Preoperative assessment in elderly cancer patients (PACE) can help. A SIOG surgical task force prospective study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;65:156–63.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. McLean KA, Shah CA, Thompson SA, et al. Ovarian cancer in the elderly: outcomes with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary cytoreduction. Gynecol Oncol. 2010;18:43–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Vergote I, Tropé CG, Amant F, et al. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(10):943–53.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Talarico L, Chen G, Pazdur R. Enrollment of elderly patients in clinical trials for cancer drug registration: a 7-year experience by the US Food and Drug Administration. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:4626–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wright JD, Doan T, McBride R, et al. Variability in chemotherapy delivery for elderly women with advanced stage ovarian cancer and its impact on survival. Br J Cancer. 2008;98:1197–203.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Hilpert F, du Bois A, Greimel ER, et al. Feasibility, toxicity and quality of life of first-line chemotherapy with platinum/paclitaxel in elderly patients aged  >  or  =  70 years with advanced ovarian cancer: a study by the AGO OVAR Germany. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:282–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Eisenhauer EL, Tew WP, Levine DA, et al. Response and outcomes in elderly patients with stages III-IV ovarian cancer receiving platinum-taxane chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2007;106:381–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Trédan O, Geay JF, Touzet S, et al. Carboplatin/cyclophosphamyde or carboplatin/paclitaxel in elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer? Analysis of two consecutive trials from the Group d’Investigateurs Nationaux pour I’Etude des Cancers Ovariens. Ann Oncol. 2007;18:256–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pignata S, Breda E, Scambia G, et al. A phase II study of weekly carboplatin and paclitaxel as first-line treatment of elderly patients with advanced ovarian cancer. A Multicentre Italian Trial in Ovarian cancer (MITO-5) study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2008;66:229–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Fader AN, von Gruenigen V, Gibbons H, et al. Improved tolerance of primary chemotherapy with reduced-dose carboplatin and paclitaxel in elderly ovarian cancer patients. Gynecol Oncol. 2008;109:33–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Kurtz JE, Kaminsky MC, Floquet A, et al. Ovarian cancer in elderly patients: carboplatin and pegylated liposomal doxorubicin versus carboplatin and paclitaxel in late relapse: a Gynecologic Cancer Intergroup (GCIG) CALYPSO sub-study. Ann Oncol. 2011;22(11):2417–23. Epub 2011 Mar 14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Pignata S, Ferrandina G, Scarfone G, et al. Poor outcome of elderly patients with platinum-sensitive recurrent ovarian cancer: results from the SOCRATES retrospective study. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 2009;71:233–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Parmar MK, Lederman JA, Colombo N, et al. Paclitaxel plus platinum-based chemotherapy versus conventional platinum-based chemotherapy in women with relapsed ovarian cancer: the ICON4/AGO-OVAR-2.2 trial. Lancet. 2003;361:2099–106.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Perren TJ, Swart AM, Pfisterer J, et al. A phase 3 trial of bevacizumab in ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med. 2011;365:2484–96.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Muggia F. Bevacizumab: role in first-line ovarian cáncer. Drugs 2012;72(2):931–6

    Google Scholar 

  43. Cassidy J, Saltz LB, Giantonio BJ, et al. Effect of bevacizumab in older patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: pooled analysis of four randomized studies. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2010;136:737–43.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Laskin J, Crinò L, Felip E, et al. Safety and efficacy of first-line Bevacizumab plus chemotherapy in elderly patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer: safety of avastin in lung trial (MO19390). J Thorac Oncol. 2012;7:203–11.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Price TJ, Zannino D, Wilson K, et al. Bevacizumab is equally effective and no more toxic in elderly patients with advanced colorectal cancer: a subgroup analysis from the AGITG MAX trial: an international randomised controlled trial of Capecitabine, Bevacizumab and Mitomycin C. Ann Oncol. 2012;23(6):1531–6. Epub 2011 Oct 29.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Reifenstein EC. The treatment of advanced endometrial cancer with hydroxyprogesterone caproate. Gynecol Oncol. 1974;2:377–414.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Piver MS, Barlow JJ, Lurain JR, Blumenson LE. Medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo Provera) vs. hydroxyprogesterone caproate (Delalutin) in women with metastatic endometrial adenocarcinoma. Cancer. 1980;45:268.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Thigpen JT, Brady MF, Alvarez RD, et al. Oral medroxyprogesterone acetate in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a dose–response study by the Gynecologic Oncology Group. J Clin Oncol. 1999;17:1736.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Markman M. Hormonal therapy of endometrial cancer. Eur J Cancer. 2005;41:673.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Thigpen T, Brady MF, Homesley HD, et al. Tamoxifen in the treatment of advanced or recurrent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group Study. J Clin Oncol. 2001;19:364.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Whitney CW, Brunetto VL, Zaino RJ, et al. Phase II study of medroxyprogesterone acetate plus tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma: Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:4–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Fiorica JV, Brunetto VL, Hanjani P, et al. Phase II trial of alternating courses of megestrol acetate and tamoxifen in advanced endometrial carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol. 2004;92:10–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ma BB, Oza A, Eisanhauer E, et al. The activity of letrozole in patients with advanced or recurrent endometrial cáncer and correlation with biological markers: a study of the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2004;14:650.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Rose PG, Brunetto VL, VanLe L, et al. A phase II trial of anastrozole in advanced recurrent or persistent endometrial carcinoma: a Gynecologic Oncology Group study. Gynecol Oncol. 2000;78:212–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Chouliara Z, Kearny N, Stott D, et al. Perceptions of older people with cancer information, decision making and treatment: a systematic review of selected literature. Ann Oncol. 2004;15:1596–602.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Franco Muggia M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix (From C. Aghajanian for Gynecologic Oncology Group, January 2012)

Reprinted with permission from GOG Statistical Center, Elm & Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY 14263-0001.

Appendix (From C. Aghajanian for Gynecologic Oncology Group, January 2012)

Carboplatin Dose Calculation Instructions

The Cockcroft-Gault formula will be used in GOG trials.

Conversion of IDMS creatinine levels to “non-IDMS” values will not be permitted.

A carboplatin calculation tool is available on the GOG website (Web Menu, Tools).

Dosing of Carboplatin

The carboplatin dose will be calculated to reach a target area under the curve (AUC) according to the Calvert formula using an estimated glomerular filtration rate (GFR) from the Cockcroft-Gault formula.

The initial dose of carboplatin must be calculated using GFR. In the absence of renal toxicity greater than or equal to CTCAE grade 2 (serum creatinine >1.5 × ULN) or toxicity requiring dose modification, the dose of carboplatin will not need to be recalculated for subsequent cycles but will be subject to dose modification for toxicity as noted in the protocol.

At the time of dose modification, if the patients age has changed (the patient has had a birthday), the site can use the current age.

In patients with an abnormally low serum creatinine (less than 0.7 mg/dl), the creatinine clearance should be estimated using a minimum value of 0.7 mg/dl.

For trials where patients enter and are treated within less than or equal to 12 weeks of surgery: If a more appropriate (higher) baseline creatinine value is available from the preoperative period (within 4 weeks of surgery date), that value may also be used for the initial estimation of GFR.

Calvert formula:

$$\text{Carboplatin}\text{dose}\left(\text{mg}\right)=\text{Target}\text{AUC}\times(\text{GFR}+25)$$

Note: The GFR used in the Calvert formula should not exceed 125 ml/min.

$$Maximum\text{{0.17em}}\text{carboplatin}\text{{0.17em}}\text{dose}\text{{0.17em}}\left(\text{mg}\right)=\text{Target}\text{{0.17em}}\text{AUC}\text{{0.17em}}\left(\text{mg}\text{}/\text{}\text{ml}\times \mathrm{min}\right)\times 150\text{{0.17em}}\text{ml}\text{}/\text{}\mathrm{min}.$$

The maximum allowed doses of carboplatin are:

  • AUC 6  =  900 mg

  • AUC 5  =  750 mg

  • AUC 4  =  600 mg

For the purposes of this protocol, the GFR is considered to be equivalent to the estimated creatinine clearance. The estimated creatinine clearance (ml/min) is calculated by the method of Cockcroft-Gault using the following formula:

$$ \text{Creatinine} \text{clearance}\left(\text{ml}\text{}/\text{}\mathrm{min}\right)=\frac{\left[140-\text{Age} \left(\text{years}\right)\right]\times \text{Weight} \left(\text{kg}\right)\times 0.85}{72\times \text{serum} \text{creatinine} \left(\text{mg}\text{}/\text{}\text{dl}\right)}$$

Notes:

Weight in kilograms (kg):

Body mass index (BMI) should be calculated for each patient. A BMI calculator is available at the following link: http://www.nhlbisupport.com/bmi/

Actual weight should be used for estimation of GFR for patients with BMI of less than 25.

Adjusted weight should be used for estimation of GFR for patients with BMI of greater than or equal to 25.

Adjusted weight calculation:

$$\text{Ideal}\text{{0.17em}}\text{weight}\left(\text{kg}\right)=\left(\left(\left(\text{Height} \left(\text{cm}\right)/2.54\right)-60\right)\text{{0.17em}}\times 2.3\right)\text{{0.17em}}+45.5 $$
$$ \text{Adjusted}\text{{0.17em}}\text{weight}\text{{0.17em}}\left(\text{kg}\right)=\left(\left(\text{Actual}\text{{0.17em}}\text{weight}-\text{{0.17em}}\text{Ideal}\text{{0.17em}}\text{weight}\right)\times 0.40\right)+\text{Ideal}\text{\{0.17em}\text{weight}$$

The Cockcroft-Gault formula above is specifically for women (it includes the 0.85 factor).

At the time of a dose modification for toxicity:

If the creatinine at the time of a dose modification is lower than the creatinine used to calculate the previous dose, use the previous (higher) creatinine; if the creatinine at the time of a dose modification is higher than the creatinine used to calculate the previous dose, use the current (higher) creatinine. This will ensure that the patient is actually receiving a dose reduction.

Moreover, the AURELIA study results presented at the May 2012 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) meeting reported delays in disease progression when bevacizumab was added to either paclitaxel, pegylated liposomal doxorubicin or topotecan versus either of the agents by themselves –thus encouraging use of combined treatments.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Romero, N., Muggia, F. (2013). Management of Recurrent Ovarian Cancer in Older Women. In: Lichtman, S., Audisio, R. (eds) Management of Gynecological Cancers in Older Women. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4605-6_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4605-6_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-2215-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4605-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics