Skip to main content

Metamorphic Structure Representation: Designing and Evaluating Anatomies of Metamorphic Manipulators

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Advances in Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots I

Abstract

In this work the metamorphic structure representation (MSR) is proposed for the systematic development and evaluation of structures of metamorphic serial manipulators. The basic elements of MSR are presented, in terms of module and connection type. The conceptual design of metamorphic structures using MSR is presented. The criteria for evaluating emerging structures are introduced in terms of simplicity and solvability of inverse kinematics. Finally, a case study of two different structures is presented along with their subsequent evaluation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Paredis C, Brown B, Khosla P (1996) A rapidly deployable manipulator system, In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Robotics and Automation, pp 1434–1439

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen I-M (2001) Rapid response manufacturing through a rapidly reconfigurable robotic workcell. ROBOT CIM-INT MANUF 17:199–213

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen I-M, Yang G, Yeo S-H (2006) Automatic modeling for modular reconfigurable robotic systems, theory and practice, industrial-robotics-theory-modelling-control. ARS/plV, Germany, ISBN 3-86611-285-8, p 964

    Google Scholar 

  4. Charalampos D Valsamos CD, Moulianitis V, Aspragathos N (2011) Index based optimal anatomy of a metamorphic manipulator for a given task, Accepted for publication to ROBOT CIM-INT MANUF

    Google Scholar 

  5. Valsamos H, Moulianitis V, Aspragathos N, Rapid evaluation of reconfigurable robots anatomies using computational intelligence, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC 6277 LNAI (PART 2), pp 341–350

    Google Scholar 

  6. Valsamos H, Aspragathos NA (2009) Determination of anatomy and configuration of a reconfigurable manipulator for the optimal manipulability, IEEE/ASME ReMAR’09 Conference, pp 497–504

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang T Dai JS Fang YF, Zeng Q (2011) String matrix based geometrical and topological representation of mechanisms, the 13th world congress in mechanism and machine science, Guanajuato, 19–25 June2011 No.A23_493

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chen I-M, Gao Y (1998) Inverse kinematics for modular robots. In: Proceeding Of the 1998 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Leuven, Belgium

    Google Scholar 

  9. Aghili F, Parsa K, (2007) Configuration control and recalibration of a new reconfigurable robot. 2007 IEEE Conference on Robotics and Automation, Roma 10–14 April 2007, pp 4047–4083

    Google Scholar 

  10. Gao Y (2000) Decomposible closed-form inverse kinematics for reconfigurable robots using product of exponential formula. Master Thesis, School of Mechanical and Production Engineering Nanyang Technological University, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charalampos Valsamos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Appendix A

Appendix A

Modules types for structuring metamorphic robots

Pseudo joint

• 1 D.O.F. passive connector

• Twist can be set by the user Two options, as shown or opposite direction)

• Reference configuration θp = 0o set by designer

• Range of displacement for configuration shown [−900, + 900] (adjusted according to reference configuration set by the designer)

• 2 Connecting Surfaces (as shown)

• Not scalable, Connective surfaces set to match all types of other modules

Active Joint

• 1 D.O.F. rotating active joint

• Self contained active module

• Twist and displacement as shown

• Scalable in three different sizes

• 6 Connecting surfaces (as shown)

Rigid Connector

• Passive connector

• Provides length for a metamorphic structure

• For connection encoding the direction of the length is used (as shown)

• 6 connective surfaces (as shown)

• Also scalable to required length

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag London

About this paper

Cite this paper

Valsamos, C., Moulianitis, V.C., Aspragathos, N. (2012). Metamorphic Structure Representation: Designing and Evaluating Anatomies of Metamorphic Manipulators. In: Dai, J., Zoppi, M., Kong, X. (eds) Advances in Reconfigurable Mechanisms and Robots I. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4141-9_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4141-9_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4140-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4141-9

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics