Skip to main content

Advances in Anterior Ankle and Subtalar Arthroscopy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 2062 Accesses

Abstract

Much advancement has been made in ankle arthroscopy. In 1931, Burman concluded the ankle joint was not appropriate for arthroscopy due to its small size.1,2 However, Takagi, in 1982, described a routine method to examine the ankle through arthroscopy.3 Over the years, smaller scopes have been developed that are suitable for the ankle, which has advanced the practice immensely.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Lundeen G. Historical perspectives of ankle arthroscopy. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1987;26:3–7.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Guhl JF. History and development of foot and ankle arthroscopy. 2nd ed. Thorofare: Slack Inc; 1993. p.1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Takagi K. Arthroscopy of small joints. New York: Igaku-Shoin; 1982. p.3.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lundeen RO. Manual of ankle and foot arthroscopy. New York: Churchill Livingstone; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drez D, Guhl J, Gollehon DL. Ankle arthroscopy: technique and indications. Foot Ankle. 1981;2:138–42.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parisien SJ, Shereff MJ. The role of arthroscopy in the diagnosis and treatment of disorders of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1981;2:144–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stienstra JJ. Intra-articular soft tissue masses of the ankle. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994;11:371–83.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Stone JW, Guhl JF. Meniscoid lesions of the ankle. Clin Sports Med. 1991;10:661–76.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bassett Fh, Gates HS, Billys JB, et al. Talar impingement by the anteroinferior tibiofibular ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1990;72:55–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Martin DF, Curl WW, Baker CL. Arthroscopic treatment of chronic synovitis of the ankle. Arthroscopy. 1989;5:110–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Lundeen RO. Ankle arthroscopy in the adolescent patient. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1990;29:510–5.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundeen RO. Arthroscopic anatomy of the anterior aspect of the ankle. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 1985;75:367–71.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Ray RG, Gusman DN, Christensen JC. Anatomical variation of the tibial plafond; the ­anteromedial tibial notch. J Foot Ankle Surg. 1994;33:419–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Berndt Al, Harty M. Transchondral fractures (osteochondritis dessicans) of the talus. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1959;41:988.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hamilton W. Differential diagnosis. In: Guhl J, editor. Ankle arthroscopy: pathology and surgical techniques. 2nd ed. Thorofare: Slack Inc; 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ferkel RD, Sgaglione NA, Del Pizzo W, et al. Arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus: technique and results. Orthop Trans. 1990;14:172–3.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Meyer JM, Hoffmeyer P, Xavier X. High resolution computed tomography in the chronically painful ankle sprain. Foot Ankle. 1988;8:291–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Liu Sh, Nuccion Sl, Finerman G. Diagnosis of anterolateral ankle impingement. Am J Sports Med. 1997;25:389–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Deginder WL. Osteochondritis dessicans of the talus. Radiology. 1955;65:590.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Dipaola JD, Nelson DW, Colville MR. Characterizing osteochondral lesions by magnetic ­resonance imaging. Arthroscopy. 1991;7:101–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Palladino S. Distraction systems for ankle arthroscopy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994;11:499-511.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Cameron S. Technical note: noninvasive distraction for ankle arthroscopy. Arthroscopy. 1997;13:366–69.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lamy CJ, Stienstra JJ. Complications in ankle arthroscopy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994;11:523–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen YC. Arthroscopy of the ankle joint. Arthroscopy. 1976;1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Grady J, Hughes D. Arthroscopic management of talar dome lesions using a transmalleolar approach. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2006;96(3):260–3.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Barber FA, Click J, Britt BT. Complications of ankle arthroscopy. Foot Ankle. 1990;10:263–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Lamy C, Stienstra JJ. Complications of ankle arthroscopy. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994;11:523–39.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Martin DF, Baker C, Curl WW, et al. Operative ankle arthroscopy, long term follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 1989;17:16-23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Armstrong RW, Bolding F, Joseph R. Septic arthritis following arthroscopy: clinical ­syndromes and analysis of risk factors. Arthroscopy. 1992;8:213–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Rodeo SA, Forster RA, Weiland AJ. Current concept review: neurologic complications due to arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:917–26.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Corso S, Zimmer T. Technique and clinical evaluation of arhtroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Arthrosc J Arthroscopic Relat Surg. 1995;11(5):585–90.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Liberman I, Fitsialos D. Arthroscopically assisted arhtrodesis for ­osteoarthrotic ankles. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1993;75:1167–74.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Myerson MS, Quill G. Ankle arthrodesis – a comparison of an arthroscopic and an open method of treatment. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1991;268:84.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Turan I, Wredmark T, Fellander-Tsai L. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995;320:110–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Glick J, Morgan C, Myerson M, et al. Ankle arthrodesis using an arthroscopic method: long-term follow-up of 34 cases. Arthrosc J Arthroscopic Relat Surg. 1996;12(4):428–34.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Kats J, van Kampen A, de Waal-Malafijt M. Improvement in technique for arthroscopic ankle fusion: results in 15 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2003;11:46–9.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Gougoulias NE, Agathangelidis FG, Parsons SW. Arthroscopic ankle arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(6):695-706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Tasto JP. Subtalar Arthroscopy. Operative Arthroscopy. 3rd ed. New York: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2002:944–52.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Lundeen RO. Arthroscopic fusion of the ankle and subtalar joint. Clin Podiatr Med Surg. 1994;11(3):395-406.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Scranton PE. omparison of isolated subtalar arthrodesis with autogenous bone graft versus outpatient arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis using injectable bone morphogenic protein-enhanced graft. Foot Ankle Int. 1999;20(3):162–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Van Dijk CN, Scholten PE, Krips R. A 2-portal endoscopic approach for diagnosis and treatment of posterior ankle pathology. Arthroscopy. 2000;16:871–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Carro LP, Golano P, Vega J. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis: the posterior approach in the prone position. Arthrosc J Arthroscopic Relat Surg. 2007;23(4):445. e1–4.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Amendola A, Lee KB, Saltzman CL, Suh JS. Technique and early experience with posterior arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28:298-302.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Glanzmann MC, Sanhueza-Hernandez R. Arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis for symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hindfoot: a prospective study of 41 cases. Foot Ankle Int. 2007;28(1):2-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Beimers L, Leeuw P, van Dijk N. A 3-portal approach for arthroscopic subtalar arthrodesis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2009;17:830–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amol Saxena D.P.M. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Grady, J.F., Saxena, A., Smith, A.M., Boumendjel, Y. (2013). Advances in Anterior Ankle and Subtalar Arthroscopy. In: Saxena, A. (eds) Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4106-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4106-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4105-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4106-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics