Skip to main content

Abstract

Injuries of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis comprise approximately 1–18% of all ankle sprains and are involved in 10% of all ankle fractures.1 A low reported incidence may be due to poor sensitivity in identifying subtle widening of the syndesmosis on radiograph, as these injuries are often unnoticed in the absence of frank diastasis. Though they represent a low percentage of ankle injuries, syndesmotic injury is the single most predictive factor for long-term disability and chronic ankle pain regardless of grade.2 In athletes, syndesmosis injuries significantly increase the time to return to activity compared to lateral ankle sprains and can be a source of significant disability3

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Jensen SL, Andresen BK, Mencke S, et al. Epidemiology of ankle fractures. A prospective population-based study of 212 cases in Aalborg, Denmark. Acta Orthop Scand. 1998;69(1):48–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gerber JP, Williams GN, Scoville CR, et al. Persistent disability associated with ankle sprains: a prospective examination of an athletic population. Foot Ankle Int. 1998;19(10):653–60.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hopkinson WJ, St Pierre P, Ryan JB, et al. Syndesmosis sprains of the ankle. Foot Ankle. 1990;10(6):325–30.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Xenos JS, Hopkinson WJ, Mulligan ME, et al. The tibiofibular syndesmosis. Evaluation of the ligamentous structures, methods of fixation, and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995;77(6):847–56.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ogilvie-Harris DJ, Reed SC, Hedman TP. Disruption of the ankle syndesmosis: biomechanical study of the ligamentous restraints. Arthroscopy. 1994;10(5):558–60.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Close JR. Some applications of the functional anatomy of the ankle joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1956;38-A(4):761–81.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Peter RE, Harrington RM, Henley MB, et al. Biomechanical effects of internal fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmotic joint: comparison of two fixation techniques. J Orthop Trauma. 1994;8(3):215–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Boytim MJ, Fischer DA, Neumann L. Syndesmotic ankle sprains. Am J Sports Med. 1991;19(3):294–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Stuart MJ, Smith A. Injuries in Junior A ice hockey. A three-year prospective study. Am J Sports Med. 1995;23(4):458–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Beumer A, van Hemert WL, Swierstra BA, et al. A biomechanical evaluation of clinical stress tests for syndesmotic ankle instability. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(4):358–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kiter E, Bozkurt M. The crossed-leg test for examination of ankle syndesmosis injuries. Foot Ankle Int. 2005;26(2):187–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Williams GN, Jones MH, Amendola A. Syndesmotic ankle sprains in athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2007;35(7):1197–207.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Nussbaum ED, Hosea TM, Sieler SD, et al. Prospective evaluation of syndesmotic ankle sprains without diastasis. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29(1):31–5.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Nielson JH, Gardner MJ, Peterson MG, et al. Radiographic measurements do not predict syndesmotic injury in ankle fractures: an MRI study. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;436:216–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ebraheim NA, Lu J, Yang H, et al. Radiographic and CT evaluation of tibiofibular syndesmotic diastasis: a cadaver study. Foot Ankle Int. 1997;18(11):693–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Oae K, Takao M, Naito K, et al. Injury of the tibiofibular syndesmosis: value of MR imaging for diagnosis. Radiology. 2003;227(1):155–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jenkinson RJ, Sanders DW, Macleod MD, et al. Intraoperative diagnosis of syndesmosis injuries in external rotation ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(9):604–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Brosky T, Nyland J, Nitz A, et al. The ankle ligaments: consideration of syndesmotic injury and implications for rehabilitation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1995;21(4):197–205.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoiness P, Stromsoe K. Tricortical versus quadricortical syndesmosis fixation in ankle fractures: a prospective, ­randomized study comparing two methods of syndesmosis fixation. J Orthop Trauma. 2004;18(6):331–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Ho JY, Ren Y, Kelikian A, et al. Mid-diaphyseal fibular ­fractures with syndesmotic disruption: should we plate the fibula? Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(6):587–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Forsythe K, Freedman KB, Stover MD, et al. Comparison of a novel fiberwire-button construct versus metallic screw fixation in a syndesmotic injury model. Foot Ankle Int. 2008;29(1):49–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Cottom JM, Hyer CF, Philbin TM, et al. Transosseous fixation of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis: comparison of an interosseous suture and endobutton to traditional screw fixation in 50 cases. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2009;48(6):620–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Thornes B, Shannon F, Guiney AM, et al. Suture-button syndesmosis fixation: accelerated rehabilitation and improved outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;431:207–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Miller AN, Paul O, Boraiah S, et al. Functional outcomes after syndesmotic screw fixation and removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(1):12–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Manjoo A, Sanders DW, Tieszer C, et al. Functional and radiographic results of patients with syndesmotic screw fixation: implications for screw removal. J Orthop Trauma. 2010;24(1):2–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bell DP, Wong MK. Syndesmotic screw fixation in Weber C ankle injuries – should the screw be removed before weight bearing? Injury. 2006;37(9):891–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Moore JA Jr, Shank JR, Morgan SJ, et al. Syndesmosis ­fixation: a comparison of three and four cortices of screw fixation without hardware removal. Foot Ankle Int. 2006;27(8):567–72.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Weening B, Bhandari M. Predictors of functional outcome following transsyndesmotic screw fixation of ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(2):102–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Chissell HR, Jones J. The influence of a diastasis screw on the outcome of Weber type-C ankle fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995;77(3):435–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Klitzman R, Zhao H, Zhang LQ, et al. Suture-button versus screw fixation of the syndesmosis: a biomechanical analysis. Foot Ankle Int. 2010;31(1):69–75.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Grass R, Rammelt S, Biewener A, et al. Peroneus longus ligamentoplasty for chronic instability of the distal tibiofibular syndesmosis. Foot Ankle Int. 2003;24(5):392–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Edwards GS Jr, DeLee JC. Ankle diastasis without fracture. Foot Ankle. 1984;4(6):305–12.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Endean T, King W, Martin R. Syndesmotic rupture without ankle fracture: a report of two cases in professional football players. J Am Podiatr Med Assoc. 2003;93(4):336–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kennedy JG, Soffe KE, Dalla Vedova P, et al. Evaluation of the syndesmotic screw in low Weber C ankle fractures. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14(5):359–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Brown KW, Morrison WB, Schweitzer ME, et al. MRI findings associated with distal tibiofibular syndesmosis injury. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;182(1):131–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stoffe K, Wysocki D, Baddour E, et al. Comparison of two Intraoperative assessment methods for injuries to the ankle syndesmosis: a cadaveric study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91:2646–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to George Tye Liu D.P.M. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag London

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Liu, G.T., Allen, M.A. (2013). Syndesmosis Injuries. In: Saxena, A. (eds) Sports Medicine and Arthroscopic Surgery of the Foot and Ankle. Springer, London. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4106-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4471-4106-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, London

  • Print ISBN: 978-1-4471-4105-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-1-4471-4106-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics